한국어 피동문의 수용성에 대한 연구

김기유(Ki-Yu Kim),엄홍준(Hong-Joon Um) 현대문법학회 2018 현대문법연구 Vol.99 No.-

A Study on the Acceptability of the Korean Passive Constructions. Studies in Modern Grammar 99, 117-141. This paper examines the difference of degree of acceptability for suffix passive constructions and -eojida passive constructions, and the double-passive constructions in which both are combined. Afterwards, claim that the doublepassive constructions should be regarded as a well-formed passive constructions like the other two passive constructions. For this, we compare the acceptability of the acceptability of the double-passive constructions, suffix passive constructions and the -eojida passive constructions using descriptive statistics and one-way repeated measures ANOVA. As a result, the acceptability of the suffix sentence is highest, followed by the double-passive constructions and the -eojida passive constructions. Although double-passive constructions is treated as a non-grammatical sentence in school grammar, some items have the highest acceptability of double-passive constructions, as can be seen from the descriptive statistics. In addition, it is higher than the acceptability of the -eojida passive constructions in all questions. Taking these results into consideration, a double-passive constructions can be regarded as a qualified passive sentence, just like the other two passive constructions. In consequently, double-passive constructions can be interpreted as a combination of passive and other meanings (potential, unintentional, etc.).

Object-to-Subject Raising in English and Semantic Properties of the Constructions

Keeseok Cho 담화·인지언어학회 2023 담화와 인지 Vol.30 No.1

Object-to-subject raising constructions are special constructions not only in English but also in other languages such as Spanish, Dutch, and German. Object-to-subject raising constructions are constructions of great academic interests both in theoretical and educational aspects. Numerous previous studies have discussed the object-to-subject raising and yet have not come up with the distinctive properties of the constructions that allow objects to raise to subject positions in comparison with other constructions that do not allow objects to raise to subject positions. The aim of this study is to investigate object-to-subject raising in English and find out the semantic properties that the constructions of the object-to-subject raising have. On the basis of the results of empirical survey with native and nonnative speakers of English, this study puts forth a conclusion that predicates of affecting constructions, predicates of polar opposite constructions, and predicates of necessity constructions allow object-to-subject raising in adjective-toinfinitive constructions. The results of this study will make a contribution not only to theoretical developments but also to educational application.

딥러닝 기반 이중모드 OFDM-IM 검파기 설계

김정현(Jung-Hyun Kim),박호성(HoSung Park) 대한전자공학회 2020 대한전자공학회 학술대회 Vol.2020 No.11

영어와 한국어의 비정형 명사절 대조분석

조기현 ( Joh Gi-hyun ) 한국현대영어영문학회 2017 현대영어영문학 Vol.61 No.4

This paper aims to present a contrastive analysis of non-finite nominal constructions in English and Korean. The nominalization of non-finite constructions in English and Korean is realized by ‘-um’, ‘-ki’, ‘to + V’, and ‘V + ing,’ respectively. The analysis focused on 1) the co-occurrence relations between verbs of matrix sentences and non-finite nominal complements in embedded sentences when a matrix clause is merged with a non-finite complement clause and 2) the types of subjecthood of non-finite nominal constructions in the two languages. The result reveals that each nominalized construction has responsiveness to a certain extent between Korean and English, and that ‘-ki’ constructions in Korean respond to infinitive constructions in English and ‘-um’ constructions respond to gerund constructions. However, in some cases, we may find that they lose the responsiveness. There appears to be several types of subjecthood in non-finite constructions in English and Korean; PRO, accusative, ‘for’+accusative in infinitive constructions, PRO, accusative, or genitive in gerund constructions, PRO, accusative, dative in ‘-ki’ constructions, and PRO, accusative, genitive in ‘-um’ constructions. From this result, we can suggest that only ‘-um’ construction and gerund construction can have genitive case as subjecthood, which means these two constructions responds to each other. (Kunsan National University)

Constructions Sharing Similar Restrictions with MSCs in Korean and the Processing Approach to Island Effects

Jeong Me Yoon 한국생성문법학회 2015 생성문법연구 Vol.25 No.2

One salient property of multiple subject constructions (MSCs) in Korean is that they need to satisfy various restrictions the nature of which is mainly interpretive. Interestingly, the restrictions identified for MSCs are not confined to them but restrictions similar to them are observed with various other constructions in Korean such as subject-to-object raising constructions, double relative constructions and some topic constructions. A natural question arising from this is why these diverse constructions share similar restrictions with MSCs. In this paper I claim that this is because they all share a common characteristic with MSCs, not because their derivation involves MSCs, as is commonly proposed to be the case. To be specific, my claim is that this common characteristic is the fact that all the constructions in question involve an island configuration and that the reason such constructions are subject to various restrictions is because they incur heavy processing loads.

한국어 교육의 의존명사 복합구성 제시 형태 연구  ― 의존명사 ‘것’을 중심으로

손진희 중앙어문학회 2018 語文論集 Vol.76 No.-

The purpose of this study is to investigate how complex constructions of dependent nouns are presented in Korean language and grammar textbooks. Additionally, this study examines the presentation methods used for complex constructions of dependent nouns through comparison of examples from the Sejong corpus. Complex constructions of dependent nouns adopt the form of [[precedence elements +[dependent nouns] +following elements]] and are centered on dependent nouns. This study investigates how complex constructions of dependent nouns have been presented in Korean language textbooks, Korean grammar textbooks, and the Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK), focusing on “것 (Geot),” the most frequently used dependent noun in modern Korean. The results demonstrated that although the constructions had the same meaning, their presentation format could differ in each textbook. For example, there was a case in which the allomorphs of complex constructions were listed as headwords; however, complex constructions were not registered as headwords in the Standard Korean Language Dictionary. Additionally, a format was observed that was presented in five different textbooks. Examining the forms of complex constructions of dependent nouns presented in the Sejong corpus, this study determined that the precedence elements of the dependent noun “것 (Geot)” were verb, adjective, and the adnominal suffix “-이다.” There was no difference among the existing Korean language textbooks, etc. However, ‘-(으)ㄴ 것이다’, which occurred most frequently in the Sejong corpus, was not presented clearly. Additionally, “아니다 (no),” “없다 (nothing),” “중 (between),” “때문에 (because),” etc. as following elements of the dependent noun “것 (Geot)” were presented as frequent examples in the Sejong corpus. However, these elements were hardly seen in Korean language textbooks, etc. In conclusion, this research examined the differences in the presentation of complex constructions of dependent nouns in Korean language education, focusing on the dependent noun “것 (Geot)” and examples from Korean language textbooks, Korean grammar textbooks, and the Sejong corpus. 본 연구는 의존명사 복합구성이 한국어 교재와 한국어 문법서에 어떻게 제 시되고 있는지 살펴보고, 세종 말뭉치의 용례와 비교하여 의존명사 복합구성 의 제시 방안을 살펴보는 데 목적이 있다. ‘의존명사 복합구성’은 의존명사를 중심으로 [[선행 요소+[의존명사]+후행 요소]]의 형식을 취하는 것을 말한다. 현대 국어 사용 빈도가 가장 높은 ‘것’을 중심으로 의존명사 복합구성이 한국어 교재, 한국어 문법서, 한국어능력시험(TOPIK)에서 어떻게 제시되어 있는지 살펴보았다. 그 결과 같은 의미를 가진 복합구성이라도 교재마다 제시 형태가 다르며, 복합구성의 이형태로 보이는 것도 각각 표제어로 올린 경우도 있었다. 『표준국어대사전』에는 복합구성이 표 제어로 등재되어 있지 않았다. 5종의 교재에서 한 번씩만 제시된 형태도 있었 으며, 의미 설명에도 차이가 있었다. 의존명사 ‘것’을 중심으로 한 복합구성이 세종 말뭉치에 나타난 형태를 살펴보 면 의존명사 ‘것’의 선행요소로는 동사, 형용사, ‘-이다’의 관형사형 어미로 나 타나 기존 한국어 교재 등과 차이가 없었다. 그러나 세종 말뭉치 용례에서 가장 많이 나타난 ‘-(으)ㄴ 것이다’는 명확하게 제시하고 있지 않았다. 또한 의존명 사 ‘것’의 후행요소로 ‘아니다’, ‘없다’, ‘중’, ‘때문에’ 등도 말뭉치에서는 빈번한 용례로 제시되는데, 한국어 교재 등에서는 찾아보기 힘들었다. 본 연구로 의존 명사 ‘것’을 중심으로 한 복합구성이 한국어 교재, 한국어 문법서와 세종 말뭉 치 용례에서 어떠한 차이점이 나타나는지 알 수 있었다.

Semantic relations and multiple case constructions: an experimental approach

( Yong Hun Lee ) 경희대학교 언어연구소 2014 언어연구 Vol.31 No.2

Multiple Nominative Constructions (MNCs) and Multiple Accusative Constructions (MACs) have been some of the hottest and interesting topics in Korean syntax. Though there have been lots of previous studies on these constructions, most of them have provided theoretical accounts. Recently, Lee (2013) took an experimental approach and examined native speakers`` grammaticality judgment of these constructions. This paper took the same approach to these constructions, but the experiment was performed with 100 native speakers. Ryu (2013) tried to unify MNCs and MACs into Multiple Case Constructions (MCCs) and to classify them into 16 types based on the semantic relations. This paper adopted his data sets and the experiment was performed based on these 16 semantic relations. The experiment was designed following Johnson (2008); and the native speakers’ grammaticality judgments were measured with two scales, numerical estimates and line drawing, though the latter was adopted in the actual analyses. Through the experiment, the following facts were observed again: (i) The grammaticality of the MCCs does not constitute a homogeneous group, (ii) The grammaticality of the MCCs varies depending on which semantic relations hold between two NPs, (iii) MNCs had more grammaticality judgments than MACs if both constructions occurred in the similar contexts, and (iv) the sentences in some MAC types had much lower grammaticality than those in the others, as Ryu (2013) mentioned. (Chungnam National University)

Syntactic Structures of -Ko Coordinate Constructions

Eun-Ji Lee 한국생성문법학회 2010 생성문법연구 Vol.20 No.2

In this paper I investigate the phrase structures of the -ko coordinate constructions in Korean. To do it, I first examine two kinds of the -ko constructions, -koC and -koS constructions. I present the observed facts that when the nonfinal conjunct is overtly tense-marked or the final conjunct has its own independent, specified subject, the two conjuncts yield the parallel reading, constituting a -koC construction, and when any overt tense marker is absent in the nonfinal conjunct, conjuncts yield the nonparallel reading, forming a -koS construction. However, even when the nonfinal conjunct is not overtly tense-marked, conjuncts can yield the parallel reading if there is a parallelism in semantic relation between them. I show that the two -ko constructions are different syntactically as well as semantically. Based on those syntactic differences, I suggest phrase structures for the two -ko constructions. Among the three main structures for the coordinate construction presented in the literature, the flat multiple branching structure, the spec-complement structure, and the adjunction structure, I argue for the hypothesis that the second is the structure for the -koC construction, while the third is the structure for the -koS construction.

On the Syntax and Semantics of Korean Classifier Constructions

김광섭 한국생성문법학회 2010 생성문법연구 Vol.20 No.2

There are two types of Korean classifier construction: postnominal classifier constructions and prenominal classifier constructions, and the postnominal classifier constructions are in turn divided into the split constructions and the non-split constructions. This paper is concerned with the syntax and semantics of those Korean classifier constructions. After observing that there are semantic differences between the prenominal and postnominal classifier constructions, I argue that the differences follow from the fact that the prenominal classifiers are NP modifiers, whereas the postnominal classifiers are nomimal predicates taking the common nouns as their Content arguments. Furthermore, I claim that the Content argument can make an appositive relation with the Reference argument, which gives rise to two variants of postnominal classifier construction--the split construction and the non-split construction.

A Reanalysis of Double Object Constructions and Dative Constructions in English: A Construction Grammar Approach

Lee, Ki Taek 한국외국어대학교 영미연구소 2014 영미연구 Vol.31 No.-

The purpose of this paper is to argue that there are prototype effects in each construction. Linguistic constraints and principles are obeyed in extensions of each construction and these in turn will affect the prototypical meanings of the constructions. I have revised and adapted some of their models to offer my own interpretation of how we use and understand prototypical and peripheral constructions. It has also been argued that the central sense of DOC is associated with a highly specific semantic structure: successful transfer between a volitional agent and a willing recipient. DOC and DC may have several systematic metaphors that license extensions from their basic senses. In DOC, the underlying meaning is 'change of possession,' whereas in DC, it is 'change of location.' Either one of these structures may fit the particular semantic requirements of a given verb, but one structure will be strongly preferred. There is also a particular format of lexical representation that allows reference to events, as semantic properties cannot be stated properly except by reference to events. In addition to setting up particular semantic conditions, DOC and DC also allow for different information structures. Information structure appears to be one of the decisive factors governing the behavior of verbs, such as give, that essentially have the same meaning in DC and in DOC. We have seen cases in which information structure appears to override semantic restrictions. It has also been argued that although the meanings of different constructions are motivated by the meanings of their parts, the meaning of a construction as a whole cannot be directly imputed from the meanings of its component parts. Grammar provides the constructions and lexicon provides the meaningful elements plugged into these constructions. Finally, I analyzed dative alternation with respect to its polysemy and its partial productivity. This study concentrated on particular semantic constraints, the prototype effect, and metaphorical extensions of the construction based on the degree of match between the features of constructions and those of verbs.