국가산림문화자산의 분류체계와 지정기준에 관한 연구 – 명승 및 천연기념물과의 비교를 중점으로 -

한선영,정푸름 전북대학교 부설 휴양및경관계획연구소 2024 휴양및경관연구 (J East Asian Landscape Studies) Vol.18 No.2

세계화, 지방화 시대가 본격화되면서 다양성의 가치가 더욱 중요해지고 있으며, 경쟁단위를 지자체 중심체제로 전환하는 추세가 뚜렷해지고 있다. 이러한 추세 속에서 최근 가장 주목받는 지역문화자원은 '명승'과 '국가산림문화자산'이다. 산림청은 2014년부터 산림 생태·경관·문화적으로 보존 가치가 높고 역사성이 큰 유·무형의 자산을 국가산림문화자산으로 지정하고 있다. 2022년 11월까지 지정된 국가산림문화자산은 전국적으로 총 80건이며, 이중 전라북도가 18건에 달하는 반면 충청북도는 하나도 지정되지 않았다. 이는 지자체의 관심의 차이에서 기인되는 것으로서 각 지자체는 향후 경쟁적으로 도내 자원을 국가산림자산으로 등재하기 위한 후보지 발굴과 등재노력이 한층 강화될 것으로 보인다. 본 연구는 국가산림문화자산의 정의와 지정기준 검토를 통해 산림자산의 지정기준 및 분류체계 개선, 유산 개념의 세분화, 자산의 지평 확장 방안을 제시하고자 시도되었다. 본 연구의 주제는 산림청이 지정·운영되는 2022년 11월 30일 기준으로 지정된 산림유산 총 80건과 지정에 따른 분류체계에 대한 검토이다. 특히 본 연구에서는 국가유산청이 지정하는 ‘명승’과 ‘천연기념물’의 기준 및 분류체계과 비교·검토하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, ‘산림문화자산의 정의’에 대한 검토 결과 국가산림문화자산 중 산림과 관련된 생태적 가치는 ‘천연기념물’의 과학적·학술적 가치와 상충되며, 산림문화자산의 경관적 가치는 ‘명승’의 경관적 가치와 상충되는 등 산림문화자산과 유사 문화유산 간 가치기준의 혼재가 다수 발견된다. 이는 문화유산 간 반복적인 재지정 및 해제를 초래하며, 추후 혼란을 막기 위해 명확한 기준을 제시해야 한다. 둘째, ‘국가산림문화자산의 지정기준’ 검토결과 문화유산 중 ‘명승’과 ‘천연기념물’ 그리고 일부 ‘사적’과도 유사한 분류속성을 공유하고 있다. 특히 중분류의 ‘숲’에 해당하는 소분류 ‘마을숲’은 ‘명승’이나 ‘천연기념물’의 세부분류기준 중 하나인 ‘생활문화 등과 관련되어 가치가 큰 인공 수림지’와 일부 중복되고 있다. ‘자연물’의 옛길, 바위샘, 계곡, 폭포, 동굴, 화석지 등 역시 거의 동등한 기준으로 분류되고 있다. 또한 ‘사적 및 근대유산’은 명칭 그대로 ‘사적’ 분야와, 정원은 ‘명승’ 분야와, 그리고 동식물의 ‘화석’은 ‘천연기념물’ 지질분야와 밀착되어 있음을 확인하였다. 셋째, ‘국가산림문화자산 분류기준’을 검토한 결과 개념상의 변별력 부족으로 인한 차별성 부족과 모호성, 유사 분류군 간 성격의 불균질성, 조합형의 구체적인 정의 부재로 인한 혼란 등을 지적하였다. 또한 유사 문화유산과 비교할 때 개념의 충돌, 개념의 소극적 적용 등 문화유산 간 연계 부족을 보였다. 이는 국가적 차원에서 전반적인 문화유산의 가이드라인을 제시해 각 기관에서 용어 및 개념이 오용되거나 혼용되지 않도록 해야할 필요가 있다. 또한 조합형 중 ‘기록물+금석각류를 제외하면 금속류는 한 건도 지정되지 않고 석각류 일색임을 볼 때 향후 지정 추이를 살펴보며 명칭을 수정하거나 성격에 따라 분리를 고려할 필요가 있다. 다섯째, 국가산림문화자산의 분포는 전라북도가 18건(22.5%), 전라남도 17건(21.3%), 강원도 14건(17.5%), 경상북도 11건(13.8%), 경상남도 7건(8.8%), 경기도 4건(5.00%), 서울특별시와 부 ... As globalization and localization trends have intensified, the value of diversity has become increasingly important, and the trend of shifting the unit of competition to a local government-centered system is becoming more pronounced. In this context, the cultural resources that have recently attracted the most attention are 'Scenic Sites' and 'National Forest Cultural Assets.' Since 2014, the Korea Forest Service has been designating tangible and intangible assets with high ecological, landscape, and cultural preservation value and historical significance as National Forest Cultural Assets. As of November 2022, a total of 80 National Forest Cultural Assets have been designated nationwide, with 18 in Jeollabuk-do and none in Chungcheongbuk-do. This reflects the difference in interest among local governments, and it is expected that local governments will intensify their efforts to discover and register local resources as National Forest Assets in the future. This study attempts to suggest improvements in the designation criteria and classification system of forest assets, the refinement of the concept of heritage, and the expansion of the scope of assets through a review of the definition and designation criteria of National Forest Cultural Assets. The study examines a total of 80 forest heritage sites designated as of November 30, 2022, and the classification system. In particular, the study compared and reviewed the criteria and classification systems of 'Scenic Sites' and 'Natural Monuments' designated by the Cultural Heritage Administration. The results of this study are as follows. First, the ecological value of forest-related National Forest Cultural Assets conflicts with the scientific and academic value of 'Natural Monuments,' and the landscape value of forest cultural assets conflicts with the landscape value of 'Scenic Sites,' revealing a mix of value criteria among similar cultural heritage. This can lead to repetitive re-designation and revocation of cultural heritage, and clear criteria should be presented to prevent future confusion. Second, the designation criteria for National Forest Cultural Assets share similar classification attributes with 'Scenic Sites,' 'Natural Monuments,' and some 'Historic Sites.' Third, the classification criteria for National Forest Cultural Assets lack conceptual distinctiveness, resulting in a lack of differentiation and ambiguity, heterogeneity in the characteristics of similar classification groups, and a lack of specific definitions for composite types. Fourth, there is a lack of linkage between cultural heritage, with conflicts in concepts and passive application of concepts when compared to similar cultural heritage. Fifth, the distribution of National Forest Cultural Assets shows a strong regional bias, with Jeollabuk-do having the most (18 cases, 22.5%) and Chungcheongbuk-do having none. This suggests that local governments lack interest and a sense of the need to designate forest cultural assets, and additional research on promotion and utilization strategies is needed to activate the National Forest Cultural Asset system.

Status of Exotic Plants in the Home Gardens of the Museom Village in Youngju City, Gyeongsangbuk-do Province, Korea - Comparison between Designated Versus Non designated Cultural Assets -

성정원,김기송,박성혁,박진선,노재현,김용식,오현경,이원호,손희주,박진욱,안계복 한국전통조경학회 2014 한국전통조경학회지 Vol.12 No.-

The objective of this study was to provide basic data necessary for the management of exotic plants in folk villages through comparative analysis of the planting state of houses designated as cultural assets and houses non-designated as cultural assets in Museom Village, Youngju City, which was designated as National Cultural Heritage and the results was summarized as follows: 1. In Museom Village, 191 taxa of exotic plants were recorded among 472 taxa of endemic plants. Thus, the ratio of exotic plant recorded as 40.5%. 2. For the exotic plants inside the houses, 79 taxa of ornamental exotic plants, 8 taxa of landscape exotic plants, 54 taxa of cultivated exotic plants, and 50 taxa of naturalized exotic plants were recorded, suggesting the Naturalization Rate(NR) of 10.6%. The life-from showed that annual plants with 82 taxa(47.7%) comprised the highest proportion. 3. The exotic flora were compared between the houses designated as Cultural Assets and houses non-designated as Cultural Assets. The results showed that there were 90 taxa(51.7%) of exotic plants in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets and 171 taxa(52.3%) in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets, suggesting that the number of exotic plants in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets was 1.9 times more than those in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets. That is considered attributable to the high rate of residence in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets and preference towards ornamental plants. Meanwhile, 26 taxa(14.9%) were recorded in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets and 41 taxa(24.3%) were recorded in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets, which suggest that the naturalized plants are more likely to be occured in the house gardenss not-designated as Cultural Assets. 4. The number of plant taxa in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets showed a difference of 4% between interior space and exterior space which is significantly lower than the difference of 53% showed by the number of plant taxa in the house gardens not designated as Cultural Assets. This result is considered to reflect the horticultural hobby and viewpoint of garden owners towards gardens, given the planting space, growth conditions, and unrestrictive conditions in gardens based on the extent of closed state of both types of houses. The objective of this study was to provide basic data necessary for the management of exotic plants in folk villages through comparative analysis of the planting state of houses designated as cultural assets and houses non-designated as cultural assets in Museom Village, Youngju City, which was designated as National Cultural Heritage and the results was summarized as follows: 1. In Museom Village, 191 taxa of exotic plants were recorded among 472 taxa of endemic plants. Thus, the ratio of exotic plant recorded as 40.5%. 2. For the exotic plants inside the houses, 79 taxa of ornamental exotic plants, 8 taxa of landscape exotic plants, 54 taxa of cultivated exotic plants, and 50 taxa of naturalized exotic plants were recorded, suggesting the Naturalization Rate(NR) of 10.6%. The life-from showed that annual plants with 82 taxa(47.7%) comprised the highest proportion. 3. The exotic flora were compared between the houses designated as Cultural Assets and houses non-designated as Cultural Assets. The results showed that there were 90 taxa(51.7%) of exotic plants in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets and 171 taxa(52.3%) in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets, suggesting that the number of exotic plants in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets was 1.9 times more than those in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets. That is considered attributable to the high rate of residence in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets and preference towards ornamental plants. Meanwhile, 26 taxa(14.9%) were recorded in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets and 41 taxa(24.3%) were recorded in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets, which suggest that the naturalized plants are more likely to be occured in the house gardenss not-designated as Cultural Assets. 4. The number of plant taxa in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets showed a difference of 4% between interior space and exterior space which is significantly lower than the difference of 53% showed by the number of plant taxa in the house gardens not designated as Cultural Assets. This result is considered to reflect the horticultural hobby and viewpoint of garden owners towards gardens, given the planting space, growth conditions, and unrestrictive conditions in gardens based on the extent of closed state of both types of houses.

영주 무섬마을 주택 내 외래식물현황 -문화재지정 및 비지정 가옥의 비교를 중심으로-

( Jung Won Sung ),( Gi Song Kim ),( Sung Hyuk Park ),( Jin Sun Park ),( Jae Hyun Rho ),( Yong Shik Kim ),( Hyun Kyung Oh ),( Won Ho Lee ),( Hee Joo Son ),( Jin Wook Park ),( Gye Bog Ahn ) 한국전통조경학회(구 한국정원학회) 2014 Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landsca Vol.12 No.-

본 연구는 국가지정문화재 민속마을로 지정된 영주 무섬마을을 대상으로 문화재 지정 가옥 및 비지정 가옥 정원 내 식재상태의 비교 분석을 통해 민속마을 외래식물 관리에 필요한 기초자료를 제공할 목적으로 시도되었으며, 주요결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 무섬마을은 전체 472분류군의 소산식물 중 191분류군의 외래식물을 확인함에 따라 외래식물율(Ratio of exotic plant)은 40.5%이다. 3) 2. 가옥 내 관상외래식물은 79분류군, 풍치외래식물 8분류군, 경작외래식물 54분류군 및 귀화외래식물 50분류군으로 귀화율(歸化率, Naturalization Rate: NR)은 10.6%이며, 생활형은 일년생식물이 82분류군(47.7%)으로 월등히 높았다. 3. 문화재지정 가옥과 비지정 가옥 정원의 외래식물을 비교한 결과, 지정 가옥의 총 외래식물은 90분류군(51.7%)인 반면, 비지정 가옥은 총 171분류군(52.3%)으로 비지정 가옥이 지정 가옥에 비해 1.9배의 외래식물을 기록하였다. 이는 비지정 가옥의 높은 상주율과 관상식물 선호도에 기인된 결과로 판단한다. 한편 문화재 지정 가옥은 26분류군(14.9%), 비지정 가옥은 41분류군(24.3%)으로 비지정 가옥의 귀화식물 발생율이 역시 높았다. 4. 문화재 지정가옥은 내?외부 공간 식물상의 격차가 4% 수준으로, 비지정 가옥의 53% 수준에 비해 현저히 낮았는데, 이는 양자 간 가옥형태의 폐쇄성 정도에 따른 정원 내 식재공간면적과 생육조건 그리고 제약을 받지 않는 조건에서 소유주의 정원관과 원예취미가 반영된 결과로 판단한다. The objective of this study was to provide basic data necessary for the management of exotic plants in folk villages through comparative analysis of the planting state of houses designated as cultural assets and houses non-designated as cultural assets in Museom Village, Youngju City, which was designated as National Cultural Heritage and the results was summarized as follows: 1. In Museom Village, 191 taxa of exotic plants were recorded among 472 taxa of endemic plants. Thus, the ratio of exotic plant recorded as 40.5%. 2. For the exotic plants inside the houses, 79 taxa of ornamental exotic plants, 8 taxa of landscape exotic plants, 54 taxa of cultivated exotic plants, and 50 taxa of naturalized exotic plants were recorded, suggesting the Naturalization Rate(NR) of 10.6%. The life-from showed that annual plants with 82 taxa(47.7%) comprised the highest proportion. 3. The exotic flora were compared between the houses designated as Cultural Assets and houses non-designated as Cultural Assets. The results showed that there were 90 taxa(51.7%) of exotic plants in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets and 171 taxa(52.3%) in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets, suggesting that the number of exotic plants in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets was 1.9 times more than those in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets. That is considered attributable to the high rate of residence in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets and preference towards ornamental plants. Meanwhile, 26 taxa(14.9%) were recorded in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets and 41 taxa(24.3%) were recorded in the house gardens non-designated as Cultural Assets, which suggest that the naturalized plants are more likely to be occured in the house gardenss not-designated as Cultural Assets. 4. The number of plant taxa in the house gardens designated as Cultural Assets showed a difference of 4% between interior space and exterior space which is significantly lower than the difference of 53% showed by the number of plant taxa in the house gardens not designated as Cultural Assets. This result is considered to reflect the horticultural hobby and viewpoint of garden owners towards gardens, given the planting space, growth conditions, and unrestrictive conditions in gardens based on the extent of closed state of both types of houses.

민속문화재는 누구의 것인가? -지정제도에서 등록제도로의 이행에 대해-

린쳉웨이[林承緯] 실천민속학회 2022 실천민속학연구 Vol.39 No.-

Intangible cultural heritage has gradually captured the attention of the public in the 21 century, as it becomes more integrated with the purposes and inspirations for tourism, economic development, and culture. It has even become a demonstration of national strength as various countries actively promote international cultural resources. Promoted by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the “Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage” has expanded the protection of global culture from “exclusive world heritage” of the past to intangible cultural assets.Furthermore, following the global trend of preservation, various countries have begun to value the protection of both tangible and intangible cultural elements. When Taiwan amended the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act in 2005, the most significant revision was the enactment of substantive formal protection measures for intangible cultural heritage and the creation of two preservation categories in the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act, namely folk customs and relevant cultural artifacts, as well as traditional arts. Based on Taiwan’s Cultural Heritage Preservation Act, the protection of folk customs between 2006 to 2016 was implemented using the method of “designation” for national-level protection, and “registration” for local-level protection. The law was again revised in 2016, changing the listing method of national-level folk cultural assets from designation to registration. The goal was to reduce excessive interference by national laws and regulations such as the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act. A review is perhaps necessary for such a transformation in the concept of folk cultural asset preservation, and whether it has had a direct impact in the preservation of folk culture in recent years. Taipei City, which has undergone the most comprehensive urbanization, will serve as an example in this article, focusing on the local status of folk culture asset preservation as a way to understand the current status of such efforts. In particular, the ongoing “Shezi Island Bombing of the Earth God” folk cultural asset registration will be closely examined. In the early years, construction restrictions were imposed on Shezi Island due to the low-lying terrain. This limitation has hindered urbanization of the region, but also preserved its rich local traditions, including the “Bombing the Earth God” custom during the Lantern Festival in the beginning of the year. Recently, the implementation of urban renewal programs have gradually rebuilt traditional settlements on Shezi Island. In response, local residents wish to register the “Bombing of Earth God” ritual as a cultural asset, perhaps as a way of slowing down excessive urbanization efforts. However, the revision of the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act, changing the listing method from designation to registration has also had an effect on local regulations regarding cultural preservations, which has also made it more difficult for Shezi Island residents to protect their homeland through the preservation of folk cultural assets. The social impact of such transformation in preservation policies reveal another type of close relationship between the preservation of folk cultural assets and the development of social communities.

중요무형문화재 예능분야의 원형과 전승 문제에 대한 반성적 검토

한양명(Han Yang-Myung) 한국민속학회 2006 韓國民俗學 Vol.44 No.1

이 연구는 중요무형문화재로 지정된 민속 가운데 특히 예능분야에 속하는 것들을 대상으로 '원형'과 전승에 관한 문제를 반성적으로 검토하고 대안을 제시하기 위해 이루어졌으며, 크게 네 장으로 구성된다. 첫 번째 장에서는 논란이 되고 있는 원형의 개념 문제를 문화재보호법의 맥락 속에서 검토해 보았다. 검토의 결과 문화재보호법에서 말하는 원형은 '지정 당시의 형태'를 말하는 것으로서 문화재로서 갖추어야 할 요건은 역사성, 전통성, 지역을 바탕으로 한 전승성 등임을 파악할 수 있었다. 두 번째 장에서는 앞의 논의를 바탕으로 과연 예능분야에서 지정된 무형문화재가위의 요건을 갖추고 있는가를 검토하였다. 검토 결과, 상당수의 문화재가 전통을 선별하여 창출되었고, 단일 전통에 바탕을 둔 것조차도 복원 및 지정과정에서 변형되었음을 확인할 수 있었다. 세 번째 장에서는 지정 이후의 변화과정을 살펴보았다. 몇 몇 사례를 검토한 결과, 문화재보호법에 명시된 '원형 보존의 원칙'은 ‘지키려고 해도 벗어나려고 해도 결국은 지킬 수 없는’ 무리한 요구임을 확인할 수 있었다. 네 번째 장에서는 이와 같은 논의를 바탕으로 대안을 제시하였다. 그 내용은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 원형 개념을 명확히 해서 혼란을 피해야 한다. 둘째, 문화재지정의 제 과정을 합리화, 체계화하고, 여기에 관여하는 전문가집단을 엄격하게 선별, 관리해야 한다. 셋째, 지정 이후의 전승에서 원래의 형태를 유지하는 구심적 전승과 시대의 변화에 조응하는 원심적 전승을 함께 인정해야 한다. 넷째, 이미 지정된 문화재에 대한 텍스트비판을 수행하여 그릇된 것을 바로잡고, 창조된 텍스트는 그 자체로 가치를 인정해야 한다. This study consists of 4 chapters, examines reflectively the matters upon 'original form' and tradition in relation with some art assets among folk designated as important intangible cultural assets, and prepare an alternative. In chapter 1, I investigated the concept of original form in the context of the preservation law of cultural asset. As a result of it, The original form in the preservation law of cultural asset, means the original form of cultural asset when it was designated at the first time and could be designated as a cultural asset when it gets its historical depth, tradition, convention and so forth. In chapter 2, I examined how cultural assets in folk art satisfy really the above mentioned conditions. As a result of it, I verified that a considerable number of cultural assets were recreated through the selection of traditional form, and were transformed in the process of restoring or designating them although they were based on tradition originally. In chapter 3, I looked into the process that they have been changed after their designation. I ascertained that some cultural assets, if any case, cannot observe the cardinal principle of preservation of original form described clearly in the preservation law of cultural asset In chapter 4, I presented some alternatives on the base of the above discuss. they are as follows. a. we have to clarify the concept of original form to avoid confusion. b. we have to systemize and rationalize all the process of designating cultural assets, and to select and superintend the expert group related here. c. we have to admit both centripetal tradition which gives its emphasis on the original form and centrifugal tradition which complies with the changesof the times. d. we have to practice the text criticism of the designated cultural assets, to correct a wrong and to accept the created cultural asset as its cultural value itself.

경기도 향토민요 관련 무형문화재의 전승현황과 과제

장희선 ( Jang Hee-sun ) 한국공연문화학회(구 한국고전희곡학회) 2017 공연문화연구 Vol.0 No.35

본 논의는 경기도 지역 향토민요 무형문화재의 지정 및 지정 후 재현, 전승 현황을 고찰하고, 전승의 과제와 개선방안을 제시한 글이다. 1998년 지정 후 2016년까지, 경기도 향토민요 관련 무형문화재로 최대 13종 지정이후 9종으로 감소하여, 문화재 관리, 운영의 문제가 예상된다. 우선 북서부 지역 위주의 분포와 농요, 의례요 등 유사한 민요의 지정현황은 발굴·복원과정에서 일정부분 상호 전이되거나 정형화 경향과, 일부의 원형 훼손 가능성, 지정·전승 과정상의 한계 등을 의미한다. 그리고, 문화재 종목의 `(세시)놀이`와 `민속음악`의 유형분류와 민요구성의 관계가 모호하여, 재검토가 요구된다. 민요와 놀이·의례의 연계성 등은 원형에 대한 인식과 관련된다. 지정문화재의 명칭과 종목 번호도 올바른 문화재 지정 여부에 대한 지표가 될 수 있다. 보존회의 전수교육은 정기적인 회원 강습과 일반인 대상교육으로 구분가능하고, 원형전승과 현대적 계승의 이원화된 공연양상을 띤다. 의례(일) 과정과 연계된 다양한 유형의 소리 발굴 및 지나친 양식화에 따른 원형훼손에 유의할 필요가 있다. 전승의 과제와 개선방안으로, 첫째, 문화유산의 가치와 보존에 대한 인식 재고, 둘째, 문화재 지정과 해제 과정의 지표화, 셋째, 문화재의 기록화와 기록물 보존의 체계화, 넷째, 지역사회와의 연계, 다섯째, 전문인력 구성과 지원관리의 체계적 정립 등을 주요 논점으로써, 제안하였다. In this article, I suggest issues and tasks in transmission of Gyeonggi Province folk songs after thorough study of designation of Gyeonggi Province folk songs as intangible cultural asset, reproduction and transmission. Intangible cultural assets are classified into seasonal playing and songs. Originally, category or extension of folk songs is above mere songs and it also embraces personal lives as well as village communities. Intangible assets of folk songs are folk art, group events and non-stage events at the same time based on tradition, history, uniqueness, characters of field value. Gyeonggi Province has 9 intangible assets now because of the revocation of several assets (All Gyeonggi Province, Hwasung, Gwacheon) within five years after initial designation of 13 assets in 1998. They are mostly distributed in the north Gyeonggi region where is close to the DMZ and delay in development seems to have enabled the preservation. Most of the intangible cultural assets are farming songs and weeding which show characteristics of Gyeonggi Province. Most of the designees are who performed excavation, recovery, excluding a few cases without designees on designation, and almost all the designee passed away. Number of cases have been revoked because transmission was not completed or some cases were transmitted to groups rather than specific designees. Subscription concert, the biggest and most representative event, is performed once a year with all of the 9 intangible cultural assets in the original complete forms of the designation. Intangible cultural assets are classified into seasonal playing and songs. In general, current performance of the intangible cultural assets and folk songs are same as the originally designated forms and are not in varied forms other than folk songs like songs for rice-planting and weeding. Funeral songs are transmitted in Yangju and Yangpyeong. In terms of the operation, preservation societies having training centers have been performing more constant activities for preservation including lecture, performance and transmission. Members are quite aged and the societies are suffering from lack of support fund for reproduction and transmission. Problems in reproduction and tasks for the transmission I would like to suggest are like followings. First, preservation and value of the cultural assets. Second, new understanding of designation and revocation of the intangible cultural assets. Third, record of performance and sound source. Fourth, liaison with local communities. Fifth, organization of professional resources and establishment of systematic support and management.

박물관 문화상품 디자인 프레임워크에 관한 연구: 중국 박물관을 중심으로

왕정(Wang Zheng),장완석(Wansok Jang),반영환(Younghwan Pan) 대한인간공학회 2020 大韓人間工學會誌 Vol.39 No.4

Objective: The purpose of study is to structure the design framework that helps design the cultural goods of the museum. It also verifies the usefulness of the framework through practical design application. Background: The cultural functions of modern museums extend to social functions such as popular science, education and entertainment in collections and exhibitions, giving visitors the opportunity to explore the meaning of collections in both historical and modern contexts. The museum"s experience changed from "object-centered" to "visitor experience". We need to study the design of cultural products considering the user"s perception. Method: In this paper, we trace the theoretical origin of the relevant cultural experience concept and use a semi-structured approach to historical reality. Through expert interviews, interview framework was created and theoretical framework of culture experience design method was constructed based on interview material. We collected data through field visits. Results: The framework is a structure that considers cultural factors to traditional design considerations. Cultural considerations take into account historical and popular culture. This is because culture is an issue of interpretation, and current pop culture is affected. It also considers the categories of products to be considered. The strategic aspect takes into account the target users of the product and the direction of the museum. Based on this information, design direction is established based on cultural assets and users" schemas for the categories considered, and product positions. Cultural assets can be unraveled into design attributes with stories, metaphors and images, and images are composed of shapes, patterns, colors and materials. Conclusion: This paper organized a framework to help design cultural products by systematically categorizing the concepts related to cultural experience and analyzing and interpreting the results of expert interviews. Application: This framework can be useful for designing cultural products in museums. When data is accumulated, guidelines for designing cultural products can be drawn.

법우 송재섭 승무의 시지정무형문화재 가치 연구

최석권,서용석,이동수 한국연기예술학회 2023 연기예술연구 Vol.32 No.4

본 연구는 지속가능한 문화유산의 보전과 계승 발전을 위해 대전광역시 시지정무형문화재인 승무의 다양한 가치 평가가 무엇보다도 절실해진 시점에서 법우 송재섭의 삶과 춤을 통해 승무의 무형문화재적 가치를 고찰하는데 목적이 있으며 더 나아가 한국 전통춤인 승무의 활성화를 위한 기초자료를 마련하는 데 의의가 있다. 법우 송재섭 승무의 무형문화재 지정은 대전광역시의 전통춤 역사에 새로운 변화를 가 져온 계기가 되었다. 대전광역시 입장에서도 국가중요무형문화재로 지정된 종목을 시지정무형문화재로 인정함에 있어서 지역환경적으로 지정 당시 대전시는 신도시였고 대전을 대표할만한 전통춤이 부재한 실정에서 시는 다양한 문화재 지정이 필요했던 요인이 작용했다. 이러한 부분은 대전광역시 문화재 지정 의 모범적인 행정사례가 될 수 있다고 생각한다. 본 연구를 바탕으로 몇 가지 제언을 하고자 한다. 첫째, 해당 연구가 기반이 되어 지속적으로 법우 송재섭의 전통춤에 대한 폭넓은 연구가 수행되는 것이 필요하 다. 둘째, 오늘날 전통의 전승은 구술로 이루어지는 것이 아니라 객관적인 기록과 자료를 통해 이루어지 때문에 법우 송재섭 승무의 춤세계에 대한 문화재적 가치 연구물의 축적이 필요해 보인다. 셋째, 시지정 무형문화재의 가치를 높이고 전승 환경을 확장시켜 시지정문화재의 다양한 활용으로 시민들에게 양질의 문화향유 기회를 확대시켜나가기 위한 노력이 수반되어야 한다는 점이다. 넷째, 문화유산의 전승과 계승 발전을 위해서는 많은 연구의 축적과 기록화가 무엇보다도 중요하며, 무형문화재가 체계적으로 관리 될 수 있도록 전문인력에 대한 지원이 필요하다. 마지막으로 무형문화재가 문화사업이 될 수 있도록 지역문 화브랜드로 개발하고 지역의 특화 상품으로 이미지를 상품에 삽입하여 지역을 알릴 수 있도록 관광의 활 성화 작업도 함께 추진함이 필요하다 The purpose of this study is to examine the value of Seungmu as an intangible cultural asset through the life and dance of Beopwoo Song Jae-seop at a time when various value assessments of Seungmu, a city-designated intangible cultural asset of Daejeon, have become more urgent for the preservation and development of sustainable cultural heritage. Furthermore, it is meaningful in providing basic data for the revitalization of Seungmu, a traditional Korean dance. The designation of Beopwoo Song Jae-seop Seungmu as an intangible cultural asset was an opportunity to bring about a new change in the history of traditional dance in Daejeon Metropolitan City. Based on this study, I would like to make several suggestions. First, it is necessary to continue to conduct extensive research on Beopwoo Song Jae-seop's traditional dance based on this research. Second, since the transmission of tradition today is not done orally, but through objective records and data, it seems necessary to accumulate research on the cultural value of Beopwoo Song Jae-seop's dance world. Third, efforts should be made to increase the value of city-designated intangible cultural assets, expand the environment for their transmission, and expand opportunities for citizens to enjoy quality culture through various uses of city-designated cultural assets. Fourth, for the transmission and development of cultural heritage, the accumulation and documentation of a lot of research is of utmost importance, and support for professional manpower is necessary so that intangible cultural assets can be managed systematically. Lastly, it is necessary to develop intangible cultural assets into local cultural brands so that they can become cultural businesses, and to revitalize tourism by inserting images into products as local specialized products to promote the region.

지역 브랜드화를 위한 공간계획방안

김지영(Kim, Chi Young) 한국디자인지식학회 2010 디자인지식저널 Vol.13 No.-

문화"를 인류학적 관점에서 보는 개념은 간단하게 말해 사람이 "살아가는 방식"(ways of life) 또는 "삶의 양식"(patterns of life) 이라 할 수 있다. 인간의 생존에 관련된 모든 활동을 다 포괄하므로 보편적이고 ‘가치중립적인 입장’이다. 즉 인류의 시작과 함께 문화가 시작되었고, 인류의 발전과 함께 문화 또한 발전하였다는 것이다. 보존 문화자산은 특정 사회나 집단이 역사적으로 보존할 가치가 있다고 판단되어 문화자산으로 지정하고, 이를 제도적이고 법제적으로 보호하는 것을 말한다. 그동안 우리나라에서는 우리의 문화에 대한 인식과 관리가 소홀했던 것이 사실이며, 뒤늦게 우리의 것에 대한 가치인식이 생기고, 이를 발굴하고 보존하려는 움직임이 서서히 일고 있다. 현재 각 지자체에서는 지역의 문화자산을 브랜드화 하는 작업이 한창이며, 이를 통해 지역을 홍보하고 방문객을 유치하려는 전략을 수립하고 있다. 본 연구대상지는 전남 광양시 진월면에 위치한 ‘윤동주 유고 보존 정병욱 가옥’으로 최근에 근대등록문화자산으로 인정된 곳이다. 연구목적은 연구대상지를 통하여 망덕포구지역을 활성화하고, 보존문화자산인 정병욱 가옥과 주변에 대한 의미있고 차별화된 공간계획을 형성하는 것이다. 연구의 의의는 지 방군소마을에 존재 하는 보존문화자산을 활용한 공간계 획 방안으로 대상지역을 브랜드화 하여 지역을 알리고 이를 통해 부가가치를 창출하는데 있다. From the anthropological point of view, it can simply be said that culture is "ways of life" or "patterns of life" As it contains every human activity, it is universal and value-neutral. Culture was born with humanity and has developed with humanity. "Preserved cultural assets" are designated as such because they are worth protecting and preserving systematically for their historical and cultural value for a particular community. Preserved cultural assets are designated a such because they are worth protecting and preserving systematically for their historical and cultural value for a particular community. It is not to be denied that we have been quite negligent in recognition aid preservation of our cultural heritage, however, even if its a bit late, attention is being drawn to our cultural heritage recently. Local authorities are trying to set strategies for promoting their regions md inducing people to visit their regions by taking advantage of their local cultural heritages. The object of this research is the "house of Jung Byung Wook where manuscripts of Yoon Dong Joo are preserved" which is a registered cultural heritage, located in Jinweul-Myen Gwangyang, Jeolanamdo. The purpose of this research is to promote Mangduk port area where Jung Byung Wook"s house is and to create meaningful cultural space design around the house aid its vicinity. The meaning of this research is that it can be used as a reference for promoting local villages aid towns by producing cultural space on the basis of local cultural heritages as local braid.

논산 개태사지의 국가문화재적 가치 및종합정비방안 수립에 관한 연구

서정영 한국조경학회 2019 韓國造景學會誌 Vol.47 No.2

This study aims to analyze the status of the Gaetaesa Temple Site in Nonsan and the value of national cultural heritage associated with it, to work towards gaining the acceptance criteria to become state-designated cultural property and to propose a plan for comprehensive maintenance, a plan for the promotion of the project and a plan for the management and operation. The Gaetaesa Temple Site in Nonsan has unprecedented advancements, and the condition of the remains are relatively good. It would be necessary to conduct digging/excavation surveys continuously in the future and ensure the dignity of the Gaetaesa Temple Site in Nonsan as a cultural asset. In addition, the Gaetaesa Temple Site has excellent historical and cultural values as treasure-class cultural heritage. Most temples had treasures taken out of them, so it is necessary to designate this site as a state-designated cultural property instead of a municipality-designated cultural heritage site, and to manage it systematically. Accordingly, this study investigated the history and historical facts about the Gaetaesa Temple Site in Nonsan through the analysis of literature, including old documents, old maps, related academic papers and books, and referred to the results of digging/excavation surveys, conducted up to six times since the first excavation survey conducted in 1986, in order to understand the status of the remains, ruins and the building sites excavated at the Gaetaesa Temple Site in Nonsan. In addition, this study analyzed the values of the Gaetaesa Temple Site in Nonsan, dividing them into the remains, relics and ruins, and set up the scope of the Gaetaesa Temple Site in Nonsan, the cultural property area (designated and protected areas) and the acceptance criteria for the construction work in the historical and cultural environment preservation area. This study proposed a plan for the comprehensive maintenance of the Gaetaesa Temple Site in Nonsan, a plan for the promotion of the project and a plan for the management and operation. It is necessary to carry out ongoing excavation investigations and to reflect the opinions of the residents for the purchase of land, to supplement the comprehensive maintenance plan, business promotion and management plans, and step-by-step business plans should be established in detail. 본 연구의 목적은 논산 개태사지의 현황과 국가문화재적 가치를 분석하고, 국가지정문화재 지정을 위한 명칭, 허용기준 등을 설정하여 이를 바탕으로 종합정비방안과 사업추진 및 관리운영계획을 제안하는 것이다. 논산 개태사지는 전례 없는 진전을 갖추고 있으며, 유구 자체의 잔존상황도 비교적 양호한 편으로 추후 시․발굴조사를 지속적으로 진행하여 논산 개태사지의 문화재로서의 품격을 격상시킬 필요가 있다. 또한, 개태사지는 보물급의 문화유산을 반출하고, 역사적․문화적 가치가 우수하기 때문에 도지정문화재가 아닌 국가지정문화재로 지정하여 체계적으로 관리할 필요가 있다. 이에 따라 본 연구는 고문헌, 고지도, 관련 학술논문 및 서적 등 문헌고찰을 통하여 논산 개태사지의 연혁, 역사적 사실 확인을 하였으며, 논산 개태사지 내에서 발굴된 유구 및 유적, 건물지 등 현황을 파악하기 위하여 1986년 1차 발굴조사 이후 6차까지 진행된 시․발굴조사결과를 참고하였다. 또한, 역사적, 유물적 유적 등으로 구분하여 논산 개태사지의 가치를 분석하여 논산 개태사지의 범위와 국가지정문화재(사적) 문화재구역(안)을 설정하였다. 이를 바탕으로 논산 개태사지 종합정비방안과 사업추진 및 관리운영 계획을 제안하였다. 추후 지속적인 시․발굴조사를 진행하고, 토지매입을 위한 주민의견 등을 반영하여 종합정비방안과 사업추진 및 관리운영 방안을 보완해야 하며, 본 연구에서 제안하는 사업은 특성상 사업비가 많이 소요되므로 향후 단계별․연차별 사업추진 계획이 세부적으로 수립되어야 할 것이라 판단된다.