출사(出仕) 전까지 석북(石北)의 삶과 시의 면모

申章燮(Shin Jang-Seop) 중앙어문학회 2009 語文論集 Vol.41 No.-

This Study was it considered about aspect of a poetic, and suspicious with a trajectory of life before going into government service Seokbuk Sin-gwangsu. He rose to a person who has only passed the first examination for office to the 39 years old that a middle age became, but was not able to go out to the relation that was a family of the NamIn which fell to a government official. You got from choice of I-jeongbo (李鼎輔) and ritual food got from a stick cold Yongung to 50 years old (1761)Eumgwan (蔭官) so that you were so, and sets removed abuse of party strife while enforcing TangpyeongChaek. Therefore, you have watched the poor life to poets of misfortune like fates until former days. Seokbuk did not have fundamentally a closed of thoughts by variety of consciousness world, but he was a Confucian scholar. As you are so, you look to what, specially, you look up a lot of temples in order to soothe indignation by restrictions of rising in the world originated from in own status or households, and associated with the monks in his 20-30 seasons. Also, he had a lot of the times that he left home, and often looked up the Jeolla-do provinces with one's wife's home and Seoul in order to solve basic poverty of a family from an early age. The center sent the life in the strange lands where life of conquest south return north and conquest north return south continued. The ardenting having exposed to affection about an itinerary of life away from home and a traveler's lonely feelings and families in of his the poetic. Sorrow to lose a wife met to especially middle aged age approached for pain most shocking in his life. Though death from disease, but do so that you discard chastity of the compassion that was not able to run a patriarch out doing you are poor by own inabilities poverty self-reproach not being things by chronic illness and a death of a wife feels at a funeral oration. As, besides, his the family was too poor, his three brothers all were not able to gather. As you were so, there could not but be a lot of contents you were gloomy, and to recite dark actuality that families should live separately because of the poverty in his poetic. In this way hardship and trouble to experience by a breakdown regarding both persons that got from during Joseon's postscript intellectuals were sorrow itself of a ruin illustrious official, and it was one in exposing to a hardship and a trouble and experiencing because of the home's poor and the economic conditions to be difficult, too contemporary social aspect.

신뢰실행환경 프로그램 작성을 위한 민감 정보 처리 분석

신장섭 ( Jang-seop Shin ),박재성 ( In-young Bang ),방인영 ( Jae-sung Park ),안선우 ( Sun-woo Ahn ),백윤흥 ( Yun-heung Paek ) 한국정보처리학회 2017 한국정보처리학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.24 No.2

최근 ARM, Intel 등의 주요 CPU 제조사에서는 운영체제 등 상위 레벨 소프트웨어에 대한 공격으로부터 어플리케이션의 보안상 민감한 부분을 보호하려는 목적으로 신뢰실행환경(Trusted Execution Environment, TEE)이라는 격리된 실행 환경을 자사의 칩에 제공하고 있다. TEE를 활용하기 위해서는 일반 실행 환경에서 수행될 코드와 TEE에서 수행될 코드를 각각 작성하여야 한다. 본 논문에서는 TEE 프로그램 개발의 편의를 위해, 기존에 작성된 C 프로그램을 분석하여 보안상 민감한 정보를 처리하는 부분을 분석하는 도구를 제시한다. 개발자가 기존 C 프로그램에서 보안상 민감한 정보가 유입되는 부분을 표시하면 본 도구는 민감한 정보가 처리되는 함수 목록을 분석하고, 개발자는 이를 바탕으로 일반 실행 환경과 TEE에서 수행될 코드를 작성할 수 있다.

영사악부(詠史樂府)에 투영된 륜리의식(倫理意識)의 표현 양상

신장섭 ( Shin Jang-seop ) 한국어문교육연구회 2003 어문연구 Vol.31 No.4

This paper aims to investigate the attitude and behavior of Kim Hoojik, Seong Choong, Mul Gaeja, Eul Phasoo, Gil Jae and six dead loyal subjects, in the viewpoint of the confucian ethics-loyal remonstrance, unchangeable loyalty to one King, becoming a government official and retiring from the position. First, Lee Ik, Im Changtaek and Nam Keukgwan treating Kim Hoojik and Seong Choong show that a subject must not hesitate to give a direct advice to a King and must work for a great cause but they do not give attention to human conflict and agony behind the great cause. Next, Lee Ik and Kim Soomin treating Gil Jae and six dead loyal subjects accept the behavior of Gil Jae who retired from a public office according to the confucian cause that a subject must give his loyalty to only one King. Last, Lee Ik, Nam Keukgwan and Kim Soomin treating Eul Phasoo and Mul Gaeja show that when a confucian learned man becomes a government official, he has to help a King right and guide people into the right way, but when he retires from a public duty, he has to train himself for good deeds.

「사금갑(射琴匣)」 설화의 영사악부(詠史樂府) 전승과 그 의미

신장섭 ( Shin Jang-seop ) 한국어문교육연구회 2008 어문연구 Vol.36 No.2

This study is to research the transmission and meaning of the narrative of SaGeumGap which was showed on YoungSa-Yuefu. The materials of its narrative were used in SamGukYuSa by five writers, JeomPhilJae, SeongHo, HyuOng, MyungEun, NakHaSaeng. Pil-ho Jeom used relatively short eight pharases in his poem titled “Dalho”. In its poem, he repeated the tittle so often that he surpassed the poetic mood. And then he focused on less description of historical facts but on more writer's lyrical empathy. Using the writer's empathy he showed the crow's godlikeness which saved unified Sila from the a part of corruption. Otherwise SeongHo tried to show poetic variety and presented events and happenings in detailed. He insisted that not a crow but a ghost helped his dynasty, Shila. He didn't express his opinion clearly about Chun(Heaven) and Shin(God). He excluded, if possible, mythical materials but he mentioned Gwi(God) a lot in his writings. His writing of the narrative, SaGeumGap was cleary distinguished from other writings which supported the dynasty with the power of new religion, Buddhism and the opposition's antagonism. He described the antagonism between them. HyuOng wrote his work on the basic of a narrative but he used more poetic sentiment and less description of historical facts. The creative intention of YoungSaAkBu focused on not historical description but lyrical ego-importances. He criticized over-Buddha worship and found out the cause of the fall of the country on it. MyungEun used ordinary terms and transmitted the fact without flowery languages. In the narrative, SaGeumGap, he didn't show a historical contents but just narrative factor so his writing didn't keep literature transformation in comparison with other works but he criticized that the shamanism like OhGiYil was showed to support the power of royal. NakHaSaeng used the poetic terms like GeumBi, GeumBak and long and short phrases. He expanded the danger coming to a royal family and raised up the level of poetical tension. But in his writing god-likeness was not able to find out. He also had a negative view about god. He only had critical consciousness about Buddhism but it was not strong like HyuOng and MyungEun.

「관서악부(關西樂府)」를 통해 본 석북(石北)의 역사인식 고찰

신장섭 ( Shin Jang-seop ) 한국어문교육연구회 2006 어문연구 Vol.34 No.3

In this thesis I have tried to examine an aspect of his historical recognition through a parts of the Seokbuk`s Gwanseoyuhefu 108 poetry which treated the person who is historical of the origin, from the begn-ning Joseon to Japanese invasion of Imjinwaeran. Seokbuk was adhering basically to a culture consciousness of respect me heightening of Myeong reject to Cheong, while being opposed to thought and consciousness tread in china culture. He is to have considered absolutely value an al-legiance about the person who is faithful to a admonition through the last times a place of historical interest and a Confucianism ideology while being having the ethnic consciousness that regarded our race, our history as important. Worked hard through cherish the memory of a de- ceased and recollection about them while being so in order to present conformity on desirable man. Also, let you influence the audience through tenderness and sincere of poetic`s spirits and criticized social contradiction or political gains and losses, and were the persons who endeavored in order established nor- mative consciousness, and to catch just society evil practices. These points are revealed well on the Gwanseoyuhefu a book on strategy that Gwanseoyuhefu were proud an evasive answer like a purity immutable law of Buddha. Thus, Seokbuk was showing own historical view to fus-ing properly narrative element, at Chinese poetry when a lyric achieved the mainstream in literary. This work of Seokbuk can confirm ins partially succeeding to a tra-dition of Yeongsayuhefu, at having expressed a growth process of the ethnic self and pride, doing to a material history, remains, persons etc. However, above all, this work` is putting praise and censure conscious- ness which a good villain acts have exposed at a expire history and persons point at direction to admonish and reprimand future generation. And characteristics of Yeongsayuhefu are having at that kind of points.

‘포석정(鮑石亭)’ 관련 영사악부(詠史樂府)의 창작 의도와 시적 변모

신장섭 ( Shin Jang-seop ) 한국어문교육연구회 2017 어문연구 Vol.45 No.3

This article examines the creation and the poetic transformations of the works by comparing and analyzing the structure and characteristics of the literary works that illustruates Poseokjeong banquet, which was the cause of the death of King KyungAe and the destruction of Silla . Sung-ho denounced the purgatory banquet by using comparative metaphors and literary references, yet raised the seriousness of the situation through audiovisual effects. Yaksan emphasized that Silla was a country destined to collapse and that the prime ministers had to secure the boarders while meeting the rhymes using rhyming couplets and repetition. Wonkyo repeats the poetic word, “Siyidohoe”, to maintain its format as a long novel. He also stresses his poetic concepth by repeating the first and last paragraph of his piece. Wonkyo's work is differentiated with other works in that he seeks for the revival of Silla dynasty, unlike other pieces in which derogates the state of the dynasty. Damchon title his work Poseokjeong to highlight the purgatory state of banquet and conciously reveal that Silla was destined to collapse through using Akbusije “Yeon”. Myeongeun titles his work “Bunhwaga” and stressed the importance Akbu through the use of “Ga”. He focuses on the death of royal servants and uses the idiom “Oksuwhojeonghwa” clearly depreciating the dynasty. Shinjae describes the collapse of King KyungAe who is indulged in pleausre, thorugh the use of autovisual poetic words. His work also displays rhythmic sense through rhymes in each phrase. Shinjae expresses his impressions observing Poseokjeong through appropriate exclamations. His work attracts its readers by compactly using the terms and idioms so that the readers could feel the empathy.

영사악부류 창작 동인과 작가의 세계관 - 왕조 교체기 선비의 절의를 중심으로 -

신장섭(Jang Seop Shin) 연민학회 1994 연민학지 Vol.2 No.-

N/A

세시기속시(歲時紀俗詩)를 통한 조선 후기 세시풍속(歲時風俗)의 의미와 양상

신장섭 ( Jang Seop Shin ) 한국비교문학회 2008 비교문학 Vol.46 No.-

한중(韓中) 고전산문(古典散文)의 분류(分類)와 서사문학(敍事文學)의 확장(擴張)에 대한 일고찰(一考察)

신장섭 ( Jang Seop Shin ) 한국비교문학회 2007 비교문학 Vol.43 No.-

〈동국악부〉를 통한 원교(員嶠)와 신재(信齋)의 역사 인식 고찰

신장섭(Shin Jang-seop) 우리문학회 2007 우리文學硏究 Vol.0 No.22

〈동국악부(東國樂府)〉 30편은 이광사(李匡師)가 1758년 함경북도 부령(富寧)에 정배(定配)된 이후 7년 동안의 유배시절 지은 작품이며, 여기에 원교의 둘째 아들 영익이 화답한 것이다. 따라서 이 작품은 부자가 함께 동일제목으로 수창(酬唱)한 최초의 영사악부라고 할 수 있다. 이 작품은 단군 조선의 건국과 내력을 읊은 '태백단(太伯檀)'으로부터 고려에 충절을 지키느라 조선에 벼슬하지 않은 선비들의 절개를 높이 찬양한 '두문동(杜門洞)에 이르기까지 주로 우리나라 전래의 건국 신화와 설화 등을 소재로 해서 장단구(長短句)의 형식으로 읊은 것이다. 유배생활에서 오는 고단함과 외로움을 달래기 위해, 그리고 자질(子姪)에 대한 원교의 교육열이 계기가 되어 창작된 이 작품과, 여기에 화답한 신재의 작품에 대해 본고에서는 모화(慕華)와 탈중화(脫中華)의 맹아(萌芽), 비과학적 사료(史料)의 수용과 실증주의라는 면에서 분석하였다. 분석의 대상이 된 작품들은 '황하가'ㆍ'조촉사'ㆍ'영천기'ㆍ'성모사'이며, 이 작품들에는 부자간 역사인식의 차이가 깊숙하고도 분명하게 자리잡고 있다. 원교는 우리민족의 상고사에 대한 자주적인 역사의식의 일면을 보여주고 있으나 당과 신라의 관계를 군신간 종속적으로 보고 있으며, 박혁거세를 중국 제실(帝室)의 딸인 성모의 아들로 묘사하는 등 모화와 사대의식을 노골적으로 드러내고 있다. 아울러 고대 국가의 성립에 대해서도 합리적이고 비판적인 안목으로 사료(史料)를 고찰하지 않은 채설화적이고 비과학적인 사료들을 그대로 수용하는 한편, 사서에 없는 내용까지도 풍부한 상상력과 표현력을 동원하여 자신의 주관적 감회와 정서를 담아내었다. 신재 또한 화이관(華夷觀)이나 사대성을 완전히 극복하지 못한 한계를 보여주고 있다. 그라나 부친과는 달리 중국과 대등한 관계로까지 보고자 하는 자주적이고도 주체적인 역사인식이 미미하게 싹트고 있었다. 그러면서 그는 성호(星湖)처럼 역사적으로 분명하게 실증되거나 고증될 수 있는 자료만을 신뢰하고 있었기 때문에 고대역사에 있어서 과학적 엄밀성과 정확성을 강조하였다. 그렇기에 굴원이『천문』을 지을 때의 태도처럼, 그 또한 신화나 전설의 유래가 황이(荒異)하고 불경(不經)스러워 사람들로부터 의심을 받거나 기롱당할 만한 내용들에 대해서는 이를 반드시 편제(篇題)에 기록하는 의식을 보였다. 30 volumes of Dong Guk-Yuefu was worked by Lee, Kwang-sa when he was condemned to exile in Bu-ryeong, North-Hamgyeong province in 1758 The work was made there for 7 years by him and his second son, Yeon-ik's responses. So the work can be the first Yeong Sa-Yuefu made by the father and son under a title. It was composed of the stories from Tae-Baek-Dan(태백단) which recorded Dangun Chosun's foundation and its origin to Du-Mun-Dong(두문동) highly praising the scholars' integrity who had not obtained any posts in Chosun government to keep their royalty to Goryeo. The work recited a traditional foundation myth and tale of our country using the pattern of Long-Short phrase. Won-Kyo had created this work to relieve tireness and solitary in a place of exile and his educational interest in his son and nephew. His son, Sin-jae had made the work to respond his father's letters. In the study I have analyzed the work in the part of the worship of Chinese civilization and the base of exit-Chinism, the receptivity of non scientific-historical materials and positivism. I have picked up some pieces of the work, Hwanghwa-ga, Jochok-ga, Yeongcheon-ga and Seongmo-sa to analyze. There were their deep differences of historical cognition among the pieces. Won-Kyo had historical independent cognition about our ancient times but he viewed the subordinate relation between Shila and China. He openly expressed a worship of Chinese civilization and a trimming policy such as he regarded Pak-Hyeok-Geo-Se as the son of chinese emperor's niece. Also he didn't examine the historical materials about the foundation of ancient county with logical and critical view. He quoted narrative and non scientific-historical materials about the ancient country's foundation. He even used his imagination, emotion and sentiment to write them. Through Sin-jae fully didn’t overcome the worship of Chinese civilization and the trimming policy, he got a deep different view from his father. He had tried to treat the equal relation between China and Shila with a sense of dependence and sovereignty. He only trusted the historical materials which could be actual proofs and research. He also emphasized scientific exactitude and accuracy in ancient history. He recorded the materials with another titles which origins were not clear and strange so people could doubt and ridicule them. He also expressed them by poetry.