경정맥공 신경초종

김태선,정신,강삼석,이정길,김재휴,김수한,이제혁,김태선,정신 대한신경외과학회 1998 Journal of Korean neurosurgical society Vol.27 No.4

外煥先物의 헤징模型에 關한 實證的 分析

金泰先,崔範洙 동국대학교 대학원 1992 大學院硏究論集-東國大學校 大學院 Vol.22 No.-

The Foreign Exchange Fluctution was magnified by starting of the floating exchange rates in Bretton Woods System. So foreign exchange futures is needed to hedge the foreign exchange risk. Thus Demand on Hedging has increased. Open Economic System of Korea demand this hedging method. Therefore this study examines the hedging effects of the portfolio hedging model, the risk-return hedging model in the foreign exchange futures markets. In addition to, this study will provide hedger with a lecture. The results of this dissertation can be summerized as follows: First, it is clear that every currency and hedge period showed autocorrelation seeing the result of OLS analysis, thus estimated value was over estimated. In case of price level, the positive autocorrelation was proved in every currency and hedge period and in case of price change and price change ratio, the positive autocorrelation was proved 2.4 weeks. Second, Cochrane-Orcutt Iterative Method improved autocorrelation in every currency, hedge period and price level. what is more. The HE using price change ratios is better than that using price change. Third, the more hedge period was long, the more hedge ratio and hedging effectiveness was effcient in OLS and Cochrane-Orcutt Iterative Method. Fourth, it was tested that, in the risk-return hedging model, Deutch mark was the most stable Foreign Exchange Future. It caused that correlation of Deutch mark was the highest of all. As noted above, the portpolio hedging and the risk-return hedging model in the ex-ante viewpoint hedging model was that the more hedge period was long. the more hedge ratio and hedging effectiveness was higher in the Foreign Exchange Future. Moreover, the more correlation was higher, the more hedging effectiveness was bigger.

일반연제 발표 : 체외수정 및 배아의 자궁내이식에 의하여 임신된 4례에 관한 연구

김태선,이상찬,윤만수,최욱환,김원회 대한산부인과학회 1987 대한산부인과학회 학술대회 Vol.59 No.-

불임의 내과적 치료

김태선 中央醫學社 1989 中央醫學 Vol.54 No.5

외상성 뇌수종의 임상적 고찰 : A Retrospective Review

김태선,김재휴,김수한,강삼석,이제혁,우정현 대한신경외과학회 1992 Journal of Korean neurosurgical society Vol.21 No.10

Posttraumatic hydrocephalus is a treatable complication of head injury. A total 4,359 cases of moderate and severe head injury were admitted to the Chonnam university hospital within recent 10 years. Forth patients(0.91%) developed symptomatic posttraumatic hydrocephalus within the same period. The mean interval between trauma and onset of symptom suggesting hydrocephalus was 62.8 days, 9∼10 weeks in the most common incidence. The main symptom indicating hydrocephalus were dementia, sign of raised intracranial pressure, failure to improve in order. At the onset of hydrocephalus, 37 patients(92.5%) had lucency of the periventricular white matter on CT scan, 36 patients were treated by ventriculoperitoneal or lumboperitoneal shunt. There was marked improvement in 13 patients(36.1%) and slight improvement in 14 patients(38.9%).

미국법상 금지명령 제도 - 불법행위법 개정안에 대한 시사점을 중심으로 -

김태선 한국민사법학회 2012 民事法學 Vol.61 No.-

In recent months, the Civil Law Reformation Committee of the Ministry of Justice drafted the amendment of the Tort Law in Korea. The draft includes a remedy of injunction against torts and its requirements and is stated in the following: The right to prevention exists in so far as compensation would not be an adequate remedy and it is reasonable for the person who would be liable for the causation of the damage to prevent it from occurring. This article, supporting the broad offering injunctive relief to remedy tort, studies the Injunction in American Tort Law and tries to seek its implication for Korea. To be entitled to permanent injunctive relief in American Tort Law, a plaintiff must establish that a future harm is irreparable and that the hardship brought to the defendant by compliance is not disproportionate to the benefit to the plaintiff after compliance. The requirement that harm be irreparable has been softening in many cases, stated in terms of "the relative adequacy of injunction." The relative hardship likely to result to the defendant if an injunction is granted and to the plaintiff if it is denied is one of the factors to be considered in determining the appropriateness of injunction against tort. Restatement (second) of torts points out that by hypothesis, the defendant is the wrongdoer. Care must be taken that the needs of the deserving plaintiff are not too easily overbalanced by the hardship that an injunction would bring upon the defendant. Examining the foregoing statement, the article suggests the following: The inadequacy of damages requirement in the recent draft should not be posed in absolute terms but in comparative terms for ascertaining the relative adequacy of injunction against the damages. It should not be the law that an injunction be refused unless other remedies are inadequate in the sense of being wholly unserviceable or worthless. Injunction should bring more ordinary relief to remedy tort in Korea.

사적단체의 차별행위의 위법성 -대판2011.1.27, 2009다19864(공2011상,396)을 계기로

김태선 전남대학교 법학연구소 2011 법학논총 Vol.31 No.2

In the Supreme Court Case involving a exclusion of women enjoyment of equal privileges in an private association, the Supreme Court held that the private association’s discriminatory practice may be treated as an illegal assault on human dignity, a tortious invasion violating the civil code. In determining whether a private association may discriminate illegally in denying women the full membership, it held that the followings should be considerations: ① whether the private association is considered “public or private”, ② whether there are objective grounds to justify different treatments by the private association, ③ whether the discriminatory practice have serious adverse effects on the plaintiffs. This article,while appreciating the judgement’s significance as establishing the rule as to an private association’s discriminatory practice, tries to revise the rule more organized. In the last analysis, this article suggests the following as the criteria for judgement:① the importance of principle of the Constitution in interpretation of the civil code ② balancing the conflict interests-equal rights and freedom of association, ③ the reason of justifying the discrimination ④ the nature and the mission of the association. 대상판결은 평등권 침해는 별개의 법률 없이도 민법 제750조의 인격적 이익 침해의 한 형태로 논해질 수 있고, 사적 단체의 성별에 따른 차별처우가 일반적으로 금지 된다고 할 수는 없지만, 차별처우가 사회공동체의 건전한 상식과 법감정에 비추어 볼 때 도저히 용인될 수 있는 한계를 벗어난 경우에는 위법한 것으로 평가할 수 있다고 보았다. 그리고 그 위법성은 ① 사적 단체의 성격이나 목적, ② 차별처우의 필요성, ③ 차별처우에 의한 법익 침해의 양상 및 정도 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 판단한다고 하였다. 다양한 인격적 이익 가운데 평등권은 비교적 최근에 주장된 권리이고, 이에 관한 판례나 기존 연구가 축적되어 있지 않아 명확한 위법성 기준을 찾기 어려운 가운데, 대상판결은 최초로 사적 단체의 차별적 처우의 위법성 판단 기준을 명시 하였다는 점에서 의미가 있다. 필자는 대상판결의 취지에 대체로 찬성하되 이를 보다 체계적으로 구성하여, 사적 단체의 차별적 처우의 위법성 판단기준으로 ① 헌법적 질서와의 조화 ② 충돌하는 법익간의 형량 ③ 합리적 이유의 유무 ④ 단체의 본질과 목적에 반하는 차별처우의 금지라는 고려 요소를 제안한다.

非對稱情報下의 賃金交涉과 罷業에 관한 動態的 分析

김태선 동국대학교 대학원 1996 大學院硏究論集-東國大學校 大學院 Vol.26 No.-

Strikes seem to be Pareto-inefficient outcome of bargaining between a union and a firm. However in thesituation in which the firm has more information than the union concerning the state of nature, the union can use the possibility of strikes as a way of gaining information. Than strikes can be the outcome of rational behavior by both parts. This paper explains dynamically the strike duration which is inversely related to firm's profit level and the aggrement with wage rate which is positively related to strike duration under asymmetric information.

국부 컬러 정보를 이용한 내용기반 영상 검색

김태선,최덕규,박차훈 경운대학교 산업기술연구소 2002 産業技術硏究論文誌 Vol.5 No.1(A)

In general, color histogram method are widely used for the content based image retrieval. However, because of the absence of spatial information, it is difficult to discriminate images of the similar histogram. Thus this paper, we propose content based image retrieval method using local color information. Proposed method stores edge neighbor color histograms for edge pixel as index information, which combines spatial information with color information in images efficiently. The experimental results show that the proposed method can give better recall and precision performance than other methods using color histograms or color coherence vector(CCV).

이사의 불법행위로 인한 상장폐지와 주주의 손해

김태선 민사판례연구회 2014 民事判例硏究 Vol.- No.36

Korean Commercial Act § 401 (1) stipulates that if a director has neglected to perform his/her duties intentionally or by gross negligence, he/she shall be jointly and severely liable for damages against a third party. It is debated whether a shareholder could bring direct action against a corporation's director for his/her wrongful acts, to redress "indirect damages" caused by it. Indirect damages imply damages to an ownership interest in the corporation when alleged damages are attributable to a prior injury to the corporation. The Supreme Court holds that a corporate shareholder cannot bring a direct action against a director under Korean Commercial Act § 401 (1) to recover for indirect damages in all cases at issue. This paper argues such a rule that "a corporate shareholder cannot bring direct action to recover from indirect damages" should not apply to some exceptional cases. The rationale supporting this rule is based on public policy: the protection of corporate creditors by putting the proceeds of the recovery back in the corporation. Therefore, this paper argues that a shareholder could bring directaction against a corporation's director for his/her wrongful acts to redress "indirect damages," if ordering an individual recovery for indirect damages will not materially prejudice the interests of creditors of the corporation. There are a few similarities between shareholders’ claims for indirect damages and claim encroachment of a third party. The Supreme Court has held that violations of public order, such as conspiracy, malice, fraud and malfeasance, are required if claim encroachment is to become a tort action. One of the rationales supporting this rule is limiting tort liability in a reasonable range. It would be a common concern in the case of indirect damages. Furthermore, the well-established general rule is that the shareholders of a corporation may bring a derivative action to redress an injury to the corporation. Therefore, this paper suggests that a shareholder could bring direct action against a corporation's director only if he/she has neglected to perform his/her duties through malice, fraud or malfeasance 상법 제401조 제1항은 “이사가 고의 또는 중대한 과실로 그 임무를 게을리한 때에는 그 이사는 제3자에 대하여 연대하여 손해를 배상할 책임이 있다”고 규정하고 있다. 주주가 위 조문을 근거로 "간접손해"를 배상받을 수 있는지가 문제되는데, 주주의 간접손해란 “이사의 임무해태에 의해 회사에 손해가 발생함으로써 주주가 입은 손해”라고 설명할 수 있다. 대상판결을 포함하여, 대법원은 주주의 간접손해가 문제된 사안에서 일관되게 주주의 간접손해의 배상을 상법 제401조에 기해 이사에게 직접 청구할 수 없다고 보고 있다. 이 논문은 “주주의 간접손해는 배상받을 수 없다”는 도그마로 무조건 주주의 청구를 배척할 것이 아니라 주주의 간접손해라 할지라도 예외적인 경우에는 이사를 상대로 직접 배상을 청구할 수 있도록 해야 한다고 주장한다. 주주의 간접손해를 제401조에서 제외해야 한다고 보는 가장 중요한 정책적 근거는 위와 같은 소송을 통한 배상을 회사에 귀속시킴으로써 회사채권자를 보호하고자 하는데 있다. 따라서 실질적으로 이와 같은 정책적 근거가 문제되지 않는 경우, 즉 회사채권자의 이해관계에 반하지 않을 경우 주주의 직접 청구를 허용할 수 있다고 생각한다. 한편 주주의 간접손해가 문제되는 사안은 제3자에 의한 채권침해 사안과 유사한 점이 있다고 생각되는데, 제3자에 의한 채권침해 사안에서 채무자와의 적극 공모나 해의에 기한 부정한 수단을 사용하였다는 등의 채권침해의 고의·과실 및 위법성이 인정되는 경우 제3자의 채권침해가 불법행위에 해당한다는 것이 판례의 태도이다. 이러한 태도에는 불법행위책임을 합리적인 범위 내에서 제한하고자 하는 정책적 고려가 작용하고 있다고도 볼 수 있다. 회사제도의 본질상 주주의 간접손해는 주주대표소송으로 회복하는 것이 원칙이라고 생각되는만큼, 주주의 간접손해 사안에서도 위와 같은 유책성 및 위법성이 있는 경우에 한하여 이사에 대해 직접 배상을 청구할 수 있도록 함이 타당할 것이다.