RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        감염성 안질환의 원인균 및 항생제 감수성에 대한 10년간의 고찰

        최현태,이동욱,안민,조남천,유인천,Hyun Tae Choi,Dong-Wook Lee,Min Ahn,Nam Chun Cho,In Cheon You 대한안과학회 2012 대한안과학회지 Vol.53 No.7

        Purpose: To investigate the ocular regional incidence, causative species and antibiotic susceptibility in patients with infectious ocular disease whose causative organism was isolated. Methods: A total of 519 eyes in 519 patients with infectious ocular disease, who were diagnosed by smears and cultures from January 2000 to December 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The mean age of the 519 patients was 54.0 years, and 66.1% of the patients were male. The most common systemic disease was diabetes mellitus. The most common previous ocular disease was keratoconjunctivitis. Specimens were most frequently swabbed from the cornea, where 81.2% were bacteria isolates and 18.8% fungi isolates. The most prevalent causative organism was Staphylococcus epidermidis, and the most prevalent fungus was Fusarium species. Vancomycin, ceftazidime, and fourth-generation fluoroquinolone maintained high antibiotic susceptibility. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis were increasing near the end of the reference period, and endophthalmitis was more common in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus. Conclusions: Identifying the causative organism in infectious ocular disease by smears and cultures is essential. More effective treatment of infectious ocular disease would be possible by analyzing the frequent organism, clinical manifestations, and antibiotic susceptibility. More caution is necessary due to the increase in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2012;53(7):934-940

      • KCI등재

        자율주행자동차 운행 중의 사고발생과 손해배상책임

        최현태(Choi, Hyun-Tae) 한양법학회 2018 漢陽法學 Vol.29 No.1

        The Autonomous Vehicles, also known as driverless cars, have recently emerged as an important issue of the public debate over the vehicle business market. In spite of the high public interest, legal issues, such as liability, and consequently damages, by the autonomous vehicles are broadly hailed. To date, there has been minimal research in the Korean law field regrading autonomous transportation technology. In respect of that the autonomous vehicle would cause vigorous debates for new liability framework for injuries totally against the existing liability framework, this study establishes the contours of argument for the new liability framework associated with the new technology. To begin with, this paper would like to examine whether court to decide grants liability for any accident on autonomous car to the car’s owner or operator under traditional tort law principles. However, this article addresses that, under the current liability frame, the injured party would be difficult to directly bear some responsibility of a negligence for accident to the owner or operator because the responsibility under the frame may ultimately turn on degree of control of the driver over the car. Next, this paper decides whether the party can raise product liability lawsuit to car manufacturers, software designers, and component makers based on the existing product liability principles. Finally, this paper proposes congress an alternative liability framework over the next ten years or so years as society transitions to widely popularize the autonomous vehicle.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        소비자계약상 정보제공의무에 대한 일고찰

        최현태(Choi, Hyun-Tae) 한양법학회 2013 漢陽法學 Vol.24 No.4

        This article is concerned with reviewing theories and regulations about the duty of furnishing information on the Consumer Contract Law. The duty of furnishing information is required due to the structural inequality, especially serious discrepancy in information, in contract relationship. My approach in this paper is based on that the clarifies the concept of Consumer Contract Protection, and after reviewing various concept and scope regarding to regulations about the duty of furnishing information under the concept of Consumer Contract protection. The Consumer Protection Act in Korea has been revised to enact and supplement the Consumer Fundamental Act which has been effective from March 27, 2007. However, in spite of the revision of the consumer law, the law has a lot of problems that are being criticized. In particular, the obligation to provide information is the most important issue. So, this article will investigate various theories regarding the obligation to disclose information. And then, this study considerations how Consumer Contract Law is responding to the information gap between consumers and businesses on the grounds of regulations under the special law and civil code. there is lack of legal responses to minimize the information gap between consumer and businesses under consumer contract. So we are called to equal-model this duty. The duty to disclose information is one of the typical examples of the legal responses to minimize the information gap. In consequence, in this study I focus only on the issue of the duty of furnishing information on the Consumer Contract Law. This article will provide favorable implications to ‘the theoretical analysis and de lege ferenda‘ as it has effectively arranged and analyzed the obligation to provide information. In the future, we will study more about this problem is proposed that it should.

      • KCI등재

        상가건물임대차상 권리금계약의 통제

        최현태(Choi, Hyun-Tae) 한양법학회 2012 漢陽法學 Vol.23 No.4

        The problem of foregift is not just an issue in the area of civil law but also in the area of public law. Foregift is received based on an unofficial contract. However, owing to the ambiguous relationship between the rights, the disputes about the collection and compensation of the foregift would become a social issue. In this article, I summarized the existing legal system and the arguments as to what the Foregift is. In most of the cases, The problem of foregift is formed on the basis of three interested parties (which are a leaseholder, a previous tenant and a new tenant). First of all, as the Supreme Court has defined the concept and types of foregift. The most important point of this problem is willing to accept the claim for restoration. It is generally believed that foregift cannot be returned at the due of contract. In this matter, the Supreme Court has determined as follows; Foregift was not returned without special reasons in due, either. But I think that the decision is a little misguided view. Meanwhile, in order to change the administration which do not compensate the foregift of the commercial lease, it is necessary to regulate a shop tenancy and its combinated goodwill as the valuation methods should be regulated in the Act. In order to guarantee the stability and transferability of the shop tenancy, it is required to control the commercial lease landlord’s restrictions on the transfer under good causes through the amendment of the Commercial Buildings Lease Protection Act. In any case, this article is focused on legal feature of the foregift, and protection way for the economic weak. And then, I insisted that foregift should be compensated to obtain fair compensation through the amendment of the Commercial Buildings Lease Protection Act.

      • KCI등재

        집합건물 구분소유권자와 단체적 구속

        최현태(Choi, Hyun-Tae) 한국재산법학회 2011 재산법연구 Vol.28 No.1

        In case defines conceptually, the multi-owned building or condominium is the whole collection of individual home units along with the land upon which they sit. And the divided ownership refers to a relationship by which two or more individuals exercise an exclusive control over a specific part of one building. Article 1 of Multi-owned Building Act prescribes, ""In the event that a separated part of one building can be used as an independent article, it may be an object of ownership according to the provisions of this Act"". Multi-owned buildings are many questions have been result in to whether administration of such properties are governed under the Ownership and Management of Multi-owned Building Act. The Multi-owned Building Act about right and duty of the individual dividing owner about fact and their collective life is providing all facts. Of course, the Act is providing even about use and benefit and disposition of the Multi-owned building. But to these provisions are exist the few thing criticism. There is a problem three provisions to of the namely next. ⅰ) When applying 1 of Art. 24 of Multi-owned Building Act meaning and criterion of this provision ⅱ) With the effectiveness of a rule and the criteria for judgment ⅲ) The right protection of individual dividing owner which opposes in reconstruction resolution. To be short, these are the thing about infringement and limit of the right of ownership of the individual in compliance with restriction by an association. In conclusion, this study presented the Legal Problems of Multi-owned Building under the Act in Korea. I look forward to discussing further of this point at issue. And this study will become reference in future research. 주거환경의 계속되는 변화로 새롭고 다양한 내용의 권리관계가 형성되고 있다. 특히 그 중에서도 여러 사람이 공동으로 하나의 건물을 사용ㆍ수익하고 나아가 건물의 일부분을 전유하는 구분소유관계가 일반화되었다. 이런 사회적 현상에 따라 하나의 건물에 대한 구분소유관계를 규율하기 위해 집합건물법이 제정되었다. 집합건물법은 각각의 구분소유자의 권리의무에 관한 사항은 물론이고 구분소유권자간의 공동생활에 관한 제반사항들을 정하고 있다. 즉 구분소유의 대상이 되는 건물을 사용, 수익하는 것에 대한 부분을 정하고 있을 뿐만 아니라 구분소유자가 각각 소유권을 가지는 것으로 보는 전유부분에 대한 권리의무에 대해서도 정하고 있다. 하지만 이들 규정에서는 몇 가지 논란이 될 만한 점들이 나타난다. 그 중에서도 단체적 구속에 따른 私소유권의 침해 및 그 한계와 관련하여 의문을 불러일으키는 몇 가지 규정들의 해석이 중요한 의미를 가진다. 그래서 본 논문에서는 어떤 구분소유자의 소유권행사가 공동생활의 영위하고 있는 목적인 공공의 이익에 반하는 경우나 혹은 그 반대로 다수 구분소유자의 구분소유권에 대한 결정이 소수 구분소유자의 이익을 제한하는 경우에 있어 나타날 수 있는 문제점 세 가지를 중심으로 검토해보았다. 구체적으로, 첫째 집합건물법 제5조 제1항의 의미와 당해 규정을 적용시 논란이 될 수 있는 판단기준에 관한 사항, 둘째 집합건물에 단체의 합의에 의한 규약이 마련되어 있지만 구체적 사안에서 규약의 유효성이 문제될 경우 그 적용상의 한계, 셋째 재건축 결의와 관련해 나타나고 있는 개별 구분소유권자의 권리와 단체적 구속 사이의 이해관계의 합리적 조절에 관한 것에 대해 살펴보았다. 집합건물법이 규율하고 있는 것은 시민의 주거권 및 주거환경과 관련하고 있는 만큼 현실의 새로운 현상들에 대해 지속적인 연구의 시도가 이루어지길 기대한다.

      • KCI등재

        피성년후견인의 신상 보호와 자기결정능력 존중

        최현태(CHOI, Hyun Tae) 인하대학교 법학연구소 2013 法學硏究 Vol.16 No.2

        새로운 무능력자 보호제도가 도입됨에 따라, 이와 관련한 논의가 활발해져 왔다. 개정 전행위무능력자제도가 행위무능력자들에 대한 미흡한 보호로 인해 비판을 많이 받아왔던 만큼, 새로운 제도에 대한 기대 또한 클 수밖에 없다. 본 논문에서는 무엇보다도 성년후견제도를 중심으로 해서, 이러한 기대에 부응하여 피성년후견인의 실질적 보호를 얼마만큼 이룰 수 있을 것인가에 대한 고찰의 답으로 성년후견제도가 가지고 있는 이념인 피성년후견인의 신상보호의 영역에서의 자기결정능력의 존중의 조화가 필요함을 강조하고자 한다. 개정 민법은 제947조에서 피성년후견인의 자기결정능력 존중 실현의 전제로 피성년후견인의 자기결정능력 여하의 판단에서부터 신중을 기해야 함을 규정하고 있는데 이것은 개정민법이 후견인이 후견사무를 수행함에 있어 피후견인의 의사를 존중해야 할 의무가 있음을 명시함으로써 피성년후견인의 자기결정능력 판단에 신중해야 함을 표시한 것일 뿐만 아니라, 잔존한 자기결정능력을 최대한 존중할 것임을 선언한 것이라 평가할 수 있다. 이 같은 관점에서라면 제947조의2 제1항 및 제3항에 따른 피성년후견인의 의료행위와 관련한 동의권 문제나 성년후견 선고를 받지 못했거나 성년후견 선고 심판 중인 경우에 있는 의사결정무능력자 등의 요보호성년자들에서 나타나는 의료행위의 동의권 대행에 대한 판단문제에서도 어느 정도 일관성 있는 답을 얻을 수 있음을 기대한다. 결국 성년후견제도의 도입을 하고자 했던 본래의 가치나 목적을 이루기 위해서는 인간의 존엄성 존중을 정점으로 하여, 요보호성년자에게 의사결정능력이 있는 경우에는 의사결정능력 존재 추정 원칙에 따라 자기결정권의 존중을 가장 우선하여야 하고, 의사결정능력이 일부 결여 시에는 잔존능력 존중을, 그리고 의사결정능력 결여시에는 본인의 최선의 이익을 고려하는 의사결정을 할 수 있도록 조화롭게 해석할 것이 요구된다. The amendment of the Korean Civil Code will take place as soon as July 1, 2013. One of the most important issues related to adult guardianship system is a part. Through more than 100 new provisions, the revised Civil Code fundamentally reformed the guardianship system to establish a system to meet the diverse and complex needs of those who need a guardian and ensure due process. About the effectiveness of this new system, we have great expectations. Note the words, around the world in developed countries, a guardianship system has been historically implemented a long time ago. The old Civil Code has received a lot of criticism that it does not provide legal consideration to protect the incompetent persons. Therefore, we needed to introduce systems to protect the aged persons whose judging capacity and physical ability are deteriorated and those who are mentally and physically disabled. So, in the new adult guardianship system requires rigorous evaluation system of mental capacity under the ideas of respect of self-determination and utilization of residual ability of the adult wards. As a result, Judgment of guardianship commencement requires careful procedures to ensure due process for an adult ward as it restricts his or her capacity and property management and thus influences significant effects on his or her interest. Therefore, when we make a decision about capacity of self-determination of an adult ward, the more careful and more stringent standards should be judged for welfare of an adult ward. Above all, the adult guardianship system has to include basic viewpoint such as harmony of respect of self-determination capacity and serious consideration of personal welfare.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼