http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 이인재 (검색결과 717 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
-
이인재 안동대학교 농업개발원 2001 最高農業經營者課程 論文集 Vol.5 No.-
파쇄목 퇴비 처리구가 활착율은 대조구에 비해 떨어졌으나, 엽장은 다소 길었고 엽색은 진하였다. 과일은 당도와 크기, 상품율 등 품질은 처리구가 양호하였다. 소득 및 수량은 처리구가 대조구에비하여 각각 23%, 8% 많았다. 퇴비 처리구에서 역병이 약간 적게 발생되었으나 기타 병해충은 비슷하게 발생하는 경향을 나타내었다. 토양분석 결과 처리구에서 유기물, 인산, 치환성 염기 등의 함량이 증가하였으며, 대조구에서는 인산의 함량만 증가하였고 기타 항목은 낮아졌다.
-
이인재 한국피부과학연구원 2012 대한피부미용학회지 Vol.10 No.3
The two main aims of this paper are as follows. One is to be understood what are three research behaviors which researchers can be encountering while proposing, fulfilling and reporting of research. The other is to be examined what is the research integrity, what is the relationship to the research ethics in relation to ethical research practice. Research integrity is defined it as that all researchers should obey in doing desirable research activities. It is not to be confused with research ethics. These two terms share some commonality, yet the main difference lies in substance. Research ethics usually pertains to issues related to the decisions about, or treatment practice of, humans in research. But research integrity deals with the question of truth and honesty in science, as well as complying with commonly accepted research practices beholden to the research community. The Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) represents the ideal standard institutions and individuals endeavor to meet and is conducting research in ways that fulfill the professional responsibilities of researchers.
-
-
이인재,최영휴,정원지 韓國工作機械學會 2000 한국생산제조학회지 Vol.9 No.4
This paper presents an indirect compensation of thermal errors during machining, in which thermal error is modelled as a linear regression of temperatures measured at 4 specified positions. In this regression model, weighting coefficients of the measured temperatures were estimated by using the least square method. The grinding test with compensation, after 4-hour warming-up operation before the test, showed that the maximum machining error of the work pieces was reduced to 12㎛ while it measured by 28㎛ without compensation. Furthermore the standard deviation of machining errors was also reduced from 8㎛ to 2㎛.
-
이인재 한국피부과학연구원 2013 대한피부미용학회지 Vol.11 No.1
There are so many researchers who don’t understand what is redundant publication and recognize it as one of serious research ethics violation. Researchers try to do redundant publication deliberately or unintentionally to increase the number of their research papers. The aims of this paper are to present what researchers must know and put it into practice to prevent redundant publication. To the end, this paper is focused on examination of the meaning, types and judgment criteria of redundant publication. Journals that view their purpose as including the reporting of original work generally insist that papers be submitted to them solely, not having been published before or not under consideration by any other journal. Violating this requirement by reporting substantially the same work more than once, without attribution of original sources, has been variously called redundant (duplicate, repetitive) publication. The redundant publication includes three types such as copying, salami-slicing, imalas publication. The definition of redundant publication raises the issue of how to recognize when 2 (or more) written reports are substantially the same. An all-inclusive, legalistic definition is probably not possible, although certain aspects or characteristics are usually evident on careful examination. At least 1 of the authors must be common to all reports. The subject or study populations are often the same or similar, the methodology is typically identical or nearly so, and the results and their interpretation generally vary little, if an all. The papers may differ in form but not in substance. To avoid the deliberate or undeliberate attempt for redundant publication, researchers should use proper amount of quotations, which means their work should not be filled with quotations. If one uses too many quotations or does not give credit in accordance with the accepted fair practices of the relevant research community in their creative work written on the basis of their own or another’s work, this constitutes redundant publication.
-
-
이인재,윤영돈,류숙희,정경은,이경희 한국윤리교육학회 2012 한국윤리교육학회 학술대회 Vol.2012 No.2
본 연구는 2011년도에 개발된 J. Rest의 4 구성요소에 관한 개념 규정 및 제4 요소인 도덕 품성화 능력을 측정하기 위한 검사를 개정하는 것이었다. 따라서 선행연구를 보완하여 도덕 품성화의 구 성 요소를 개인품성과 관계품성의 두 항목으로 재설정하고, 검사의 신뢰성과 타당성을 높이기 위 해 제시된 스토리와 문항을 수정하였다. 각 문항에 대해 5점 척도로 응답할 수 있도록 하였다. 서 울소재 중학생 총 409명을 대상으로 검사를 실시하였다. 개발된 검사의 신뢰도계수(문항 내적 일 치도인 크론바흐 알파)는 .90로 안정적이었다. 타당도와 관련해서 요인분석 결과 도덕품성화 능력 검사는 스토리별로 두 항목으로 한 문항을 제외하고 모든 문항이 예정된 구인으로 묶였다. 그러나 상관분석의 결과는 각 요인이 .90이상의 높은 상관을 보여 2011년 연구에 비해 개선되지 못했다. 그러나 개정된 검사는 2011년 검사에 비해 신뢰도와 타당도에서 더 안정된 검사로서, 이후 관련연 구를 위해 활용될 수 있을 것이다.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
