http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
TEAMS 비행위험성 진단체계 평가규준 개발에 관한 연구
서석교 한국소년정책학회 2011 少年保護硏究 Vol.16 No.-
This study has been conducted to draw up quantitative delinquency risk assesment standards of TEAMS(Total Education and Management System) delinquency risk assessment system, and to verify the validity. From Aug. 2008 to Jul. 2010, 8,823 cases out of 11,921 juvenile classification cases in all juvenile classification offices were selected to an object of study. The procedure of this study is as in the following. First, restructured assessment factors and reset weights of the factors through factorial analysis. Numbers of low factors increased from 18 to 27, rank-order of weights among assessment scores changed, and deviation among weights decreased. Second, developed standardized norms by calculating average and standard deviation of each groups to compare each factor scores. Third, established the level of delinquency risk by calculating average readmit rate of the juvenile classification office. Forth, verified validity of this assessment system. The convergent validity was good because corelation among 8 diagnosis area scores was statistically significant. The discrimination validity was also good because assessment scores of validity group(expected lower delinquency risk level) were statistically significantly lower than those of norm group(expected higher delinquency risk level). But prediction validity was not good because corelation between 8diagnosis area scores and remediation score was not statistically markedly significant. According to this study, must be reflect this study result on TEAMS to make use of the assessment system in real business,prepare institutional base to describe assessment scores to investigation report, develop relative education contents for hands-on workers to make the best use of this assessment system, and perform follow up study to strengthen reliability and validity of assessment system.
서석교,김홍근 한국심리학회 2004 한국심리학회지 일반 Vol.23 No.2
The present study investigated frontal-executive functions in 45 schizophrenic patients and 27 normal control subjects. All subjects were administered Executive Intelligence Test (EXIT), K-Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (K-WAIS) and Rey-Kim Memory Test (RKMT). The major findings were as follows. Firstly, the difference between the schizophrenia group and the control group was most pronounced in executive intelligence quotient (EIQ) compared with the difference in verbal comprehension index (VCI), perceptual organization index (POI), freedom-from-distractibility index (FDI), and memory quotient (MQ). Secondly, the 4 difference scores of the EXIT are relatively pure measures of executive functions. The schizophrenic group was significantly lower than the control group in each difference score. Thirdly, of the schizophrenic group, 25 showed a clinically defective performance (i.e., ≤79) in at least one of the three summary measures--EIQ, MQ, and full-scale intelligence quotient (FIQ). Of these 25, 24 (96%) showed a defective performance in EIQ. These results suggest that frontal-executive function is one of the most defective cognitive functions in schizophrenia. 본 연구는 45명의 정신분열병 환자와 27명의 정상인을 대상으로 전두엽-관리기능을 비교하였다. 측정 도구로는 EXIT(Executive Intelligence Test)를 사용하였으며, 비교를 위하여 지능검사(K-WAIS)와 기억검사(Rey-Kim 기억검사)도 함께 실시하였다. 주요 결과는 다음과 같았다. 첫째, 정신분열병군은 시공간지수, 주의력지수, 기억지수, 관리지능지수 각각에서 통제군 보다 유의미하게 낮았다. 그러나 양 집단의 차이는 관리지능지수에서 가장 현저하였다. 둘째, EXIT에서 산출되는 4개의 ‘차이 점수’(difference score)는 기존의 점수들에 비해 보다 순수한 관리기능지표로 해석할 수 있다. 이 4개의 차이 점수 각각에서 정신분열병군은 통제군에 비해 유의미하게 낮았다. 셋째, 정신분열병군에서 지능지수, 기억지수, 관리지능지수 중 어느 하나라도 경계선이하(즉 79이하)인 환자는 25명이었다. 이 중 24명(96%)이 관리지능지수에서 결손을 보였다. 그러므로 관리지능지수의 결손이 없는 상태에서 지능지수나 기억지수의 단독적 결손을 보이는 정신분열병 환자는 극히 드물었다. 이상의 결과는 정신분열병군이 다수의 인지 영역에서 결손이 있지만 그 중에서도 관리기능의 결손이 가장 심함을 제시한다.