http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 김성천 (검색결과 757 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
-
-
-
사회복지현장에 기반한 가족중심사례관리 실천 모색 : 현장사례분석 중심으로
김성천,박지영 한국사례관리학회 2012 사례관리연구 Vol.3 No.1
본 연구는 가족중심의 사례관리’가 이론적으로 어떤 것인가에 대한 정체 규명을 고민하고, 우리나라에서 실천되고 있는 ‘가족중심의 사례관리’의 진단을 통해 그 함의와 발전방안을 탐 색적으로 모색하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이에 외국의 주요 가족관계 사례관리 모델과 우리나 라에서 적용되는 여섯 개의 사회복지기관 사례를 질적 분석하여 도출된 가족중심사례관리에 대한 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 가족중심 사례관리의 초점단위는 가족구성원 개인뿐 아니라 집단적 성격을 지닌 한 단위로서 ‘전체로서의 가족’이 주 대상이 되며, 둘째, 가족의 특성에 초점을 맞추면서 강점 관점으로 접근한다. 셋째, 가족의 기능과 체계, 가족환경에 대한 사정과 개입의 준거틀은 생태체계적 접근에 기반한다. 넷째, 가족중심사례관리자는 가족의 체계와 기 능을 변화시킬 수 있는 가족치료 및 상담, 가족옹호와 임파워먼트에 대한 이해가 필요하며, 가족역동성에 대한 지식 및 훈련이 필요하다. 마지막 다섯째, 젠더관점에서 양성 평등적이고 문화적 다양성을 고려하는 문화민감성에 기반 한 사례관리 실천이 지향되도록 한다.
-
형법상 인과관계의 객관적 귀속 이론과 대법원의 판단기준
김성천,배제우 中央大學校 法學硏究所 2012 法學論文集 Vol.36 No.2
A certain relation between activity and result, that is to say, the issue of causation in Criminal Law is vitally important. Whether or not the result only occurred as a consequence of some requirements for an activity being met reverts to the person who did it has been the issue of causation in Criminal Law, which is being discussed thus far. Article 17 in Criminal Law stipulates that "if any activity is not linked to the occurrence of risks that become the element of crime, such an activity is not punished owing to its result." The theory of causation is a controversy over "the linkage to the occurrence of risks becoming the element of crime" which is set forth as a criterion for linking the activity with result, Article 17, especially over the definition of the meaning of the "linkage." However, that the issue of causation in Criminal Law which has important implications is attempted to be settled with only the said Article -the definition of the appropriate scope of the criminal attribution or reversion that the Criminal Law targets- is very difficult. In addition, as Article 17 is pretty much an abstract concept, the suggestion of the specific content and measurement for it should be left with judicial theories and precedents. From prior to the legislation of Criminal Law, the Korean precedents has seen the issue of causation in Criminal Law settled in terms of the theory of the Substantial Relationship of causation, in which the "Substantiality" is the criterion of judgment. In most case, the majority of their expressions in writing as well has been made without the process of the specified reasoning. They have been recorded as "there is a substantial relationship or there isn't." From the perspective view of the daily life experiences, as the judgment of "It is substantial" is overly abstract, the several contradictory conclusions could be possibly brought in. Rather, the convenience that any conclusion could be reached tend to overly prefer the "substantiality" and the precedents judge the causation based on it. Along with it, on the one hand, some precedents show the conclusion that the issue of causation has been likely to be settled with an objective attribution Theory with an exception of some vital normative judgment, given that it could not be settled only by considering its pure factual aspects. This is about whether the result occurred is to be reversed to what its doer created and is deemed a thing that the Korean courts are sufficiently in agony over what is more reasonable in the course of a judgment seeking a justice. Finally, in summary, with regard to the activity that becomes a cause for its result after identifying the existence of causation about the relationship of cause and result, the approach of the objective attribution theory that reviews the issue of the criminal attribution as a criterion for norm, separately of the relationship of the causation in natural science could be a more persuasive specified reasoning method than the simple expressions, such as "There is a substantial relationship of causation or there isn't" without the special detailed reasoning process or judgmental process as an overall atmosphere for a judicial precedent, in deducing the reasonable conclusion.
-
-
-
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
