http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
조직사회자본, 직장생활의 질, 조직시민행동 간 구조적영향관계 분석:재직기간에 따른 다중집단분석을 중심으로
고명철 한국정책과학학회 2024 한국정책과학학회보 Vol.28 No.1
본 연구는 조직구성원들의 직무태도를 중심으로 조직사회자본(Organizational Social Capital; OSC)의 효과성에 대한 일반화에 많은 관심을 기울여 선행연구를 확장해, 조직사회자본의 효과성이 재직기간에 따라 어떻게 달라지는지를 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 조직사회자본의 하위변수인 구조적, 관계적, 인지적 OSC를 예측변수, 직장생활의 질(Quality of Work Life; QWL)을 매개변수, 그리고 조직시민행동(Organizational Citizenship Behavior; OCB)의 하위 구성요인인 개인지향-조직시민행동(OCB directed of Individual; OCBI)과 조직지향-조직시민행동(OCB directed of Organization; OCBO)를 종속변수로 설정한 구조모형을 제시하고, 다중집단분석(multi-group analysis; MGA)을 통해 재직기간에 따라 이들 변인 간 구조적 영향관계가 어떤 차이가 보이는지를 살펴보았다. 분석결과, OSC의 모든 하위 구성요소가 OCBO의 형성에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 반면, 구조적 OSC와 관계적 OSC는 OCBI에 유의미한 영향관계를 형성하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 QWL은 관계적 OSC와 OCBO 간 관계를 완전 매개하는 반면, 인지적 OSC와 OCBO 간 관계는 부분 매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 다중집단분석 결과, 단기 재직자보다 장기 재직자 집단에서 인지적 OSC가 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향이 더 큰 것으로 나타났다. 이는 재직기간에 따른 조직사회자본의 효과성 차이를 제시하는 것으로, 분석결과를 토대로 직구성원들의 조직시민행동 함양을 위한 정책적 시사점을 제시하였다. The purpose of this study was to examine how the structural relationships between organizational social capital, Quality of Work Life, and organizational citizenship behavior differ by organizational tenure. Using a multi-group path model analysis, the hypothesized model was individually tested by organizational tenure, and relationships between the variables were compared. Data obtained from public employees in South Korea provided moderating effects of organizational tenure on the structural relationships. In particular, cognitive OSC had a greater impact on both organizational citizenship behavior directed of individual (OCBI) and organizational citizenship behavior directed of organization (OCBO) in the group with long organizational tenure, rather than a group with short tenure. Based on findings, policy implications to enhance organizational citizenship behavior were presented.
고명철 한민족문화학회 2002 한민족문화연구 Vol.10 No.-
As to the character of the school of foreign literature which did vigorous activities in the circle of criticism in the 1930s, I have examined a review 「foreign literature and duty and future of the school of foreign literature in Chosun period」by Lee Heon-gu. In this review he surveyed the aspects of foreign literature which had been accepted from the beginning of modern literature and revealed the purpose and meaning why the school of foreign literature was organized. He also clearly discussed identity of the school of foreign literature related to its duty and future through a content of explanatory character about criticism of Kaff. His review aims to introduce a climate of foreign literature accepted disorderly by examining systematically. Needless to say he, as a foreign literary writer, has a will of enlightenment intent on dedication to a progress of korean literature by correcting foreign literature which had been wrongly acknowledged until the appearance of the school of foreign literature. As I raised a problem, the self-introspection and self-awareness of the school of foreign literature which is the subject of enlightenment should keep pace in order to have genuineness of a will of enlightenment. It means not only the character of foreign literature which was learned and achieved under a suzerain state of colony, but also the clear self-awareness as an intelligent who spent his adolescence in the intelligent society of colony. However he did not discuss deeply about these aspects. In fact a question raised by me is the same with that of Kaff about the school of foreign literature. Lee Heon-gu just mentioned this at the level of professing outwardly. It resulted in not understanding the essence of power and ideology with literary magazine and newspaper as a modern literary system. The school of foreign literature had created and circulated its symbolic capital through literary magazine such as 『Poetry Literature』 and 『Monthly Literature』 and newspaper such as 『DongaIlbo』, 『ChosunIlbo』 and 『JengangIlbo』. 「The school of foreign literature」 of Lee Heon-gu revealed a problem which did not easily overlook as Kaff criticized along with important things about organization and activity of the school of foreign literature. In the aspect of a derivative problem while discussing seriously correlation with korean literature and foreign literature, his review is regarded as an important criticism in the circle of criticism of Korea.