http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
기업의 혁신지향적 문화와 의존성이 산학협력 및 산학협력몰입에 미치는 영향
황경연(Kyung-Yun Hwang),안기돈(Gi-Don An) 한국무역연구원 2021 무역연구 Vol.17 No.1
Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of a firm’s innovation-oriented culture and dependence on firm performance through Industry-University cooperation commitment. Design/Methodology/Approach Based on the literature on interorganizational relationships and organizational culture;the relationship between a firm’s dependence;innovation-oriented culture;Industry-University cooperation;Industry-University cooperation commitment and performance was established as 7 hypotheses;and a conceptual research model was created. The data required for the research model were collected through a survey of Daedeok Innopolis firms. Data from 107 firms under the Industry-University cooperation were used to test the research model;and partial least square was used for data analysis. Findings It was found that the dependence of a firm has a positive effect on Industry-University cooperation and Industry-University cooperation commitment. Moreover;the innovation-oriented culture of firms has a positive effect on Industry-University cooperation and Industry-University cooperation commitment. In addition;it was confirmed that Industry-University cooperation significantly affects the Industry-University cooperation commitment. Furthermore;Industry-University cooperation and Industry-University cooperation commitment significantly affect firm performance. Research Implications This study contributed academically in that it empirically revealed the structural relationship between a firm’s dependence;innovation-oriented culture;Industry-University cooperation;cooperation commitment and performance. In addition;these research results provide meaningful implications for promoting industry-university cooperation.
동북아 역내 협력의 상대성: 상상력의 구상과 인지적 실제
정항석 고려대학교 평화와 민주주의연구소 2015 평화연구 Vol.22 No.1
The aim of this paper are to discuss the problems and prospects of regional cooperation in Northeast Asia and to address this apparent contradiction and prolonged issues among major countries-Korea, China and Japan with five mechanisms suggested by Martin A. Nowak as a positive venue converging to support the regional cooperation. In reality, however, it is too complicated to simply be cooperative within the region: the cooperative process is still slow since the parties are lack of trust for their foreign policies and for their historical reasons while the regional major countries have recognized the importance of regional economic integration and strengthening cooperation. Presumably the pattern of slow-level cooperation in the region is at odds with a view that has aired in the views of traditional perspective: people are based on narrowly self-interest as the ‘Prisoner’s Dilemma’ does not just mean ‘working together’ of any sort. Then, the regional major parties are hanging about outside on the road of ‘relativity of cooperation’ at the trap of ‘rational fools’ or Morgenthau’s ‘extra-attention.’ This is just a trap that, as this argue, should be reconsidered. It implies it has been ignored, in much instances, the opposite appears to be true. In practice, there exists a ongoing muddle which can be caused of in debates between Nowak’s mechanisms when it is required of ‘altruism’ and ‘reciprocity’ to cover the critical questions. ‘Altruism’ and ‘reciprocity’ are the main evolutionary mechanisms underlying cooperation to let it go to evolution. In this vein, Northeast Asian countries face to changes in the recognition of cooperation among them. Here, they are asking to detour the conundrum of ‘still slow and regional cooperation’. In conclusion, Nowak’s view shows that it is highly possible that the regional parties may be revamped to positive cooperation for building the sound regional community, which should play a decisive role for the economic and social development in the Northeast Asia. 오늘날 동아시아, 특히 동북아 역내 국가들은 협력의 필요성에는 공감하고 있지만 인지적 차원에서 그 개진의 정도는 더디다. 근원적으로 ‘왜 국가간 협력이 어려운 것인가’ 하는 의문에 대하여 전통주의 시각은 합리성을 설명의 중심에 두고, 국제사회의 주요 행위자들을 이기적인 존재로 간주함으로써 국가간 협력이 용이하지 않다는 사고가 지배적이었다. 역내 협력의 부진은 ‘의사적(疑似的) 협력을 포함하는 ‘여분의 모색(extra-attention)’, 센(Sen)의 ‘합리적 바보(rational fools)’ 그리고 상대이익의 배제를 의미하는 ‘협력의 상대성’과 닿아있다. 즉, 역내 국가들은 인식의 변화를 요구받고 있다. 이런 면에서 인류는 협력을 통해 문명을 이루어왔고, 그것이 공진화와 공생의 요인이 된다는 ‘협력의 진화(evolution of cooperation)’는 주목될 가치가 있다. 노왁(M. Nowak)은 협력이 진화할 수 있는 5가지 규칙(Five Rules)을 제시하였다. 이 규칙들에 따르면 협력과 배신이 가져올 수 있는 다양한 결과가 산출되었다. 집약하자면, 모든 생명체가 이기적이지는 않고, 상호부조(相互扶助)적 협력을 통해 번성의 진화과정을 반복하며, 인간의 관계 역시 이기적인 것으로만 투영되지 않는 협력의 결사체라는 것이다. ‘협력진화론’은 ‘상대의 오류에 대하여 관대함과 용서’를 포함한다는 측면에서 이타성(altruistic)을 기저에 두고 있다. 이 같은 지적에도 불구하고 노왁의 ‘협력의 진화론’은 행위자들이 향유하는 가치는 협력에서 비롯되며, 호혜적 상호성에 기초한 협력은 미래의 갈등을 제어하고 궁극적으로 생산적 협력을 도출한다는 측면에서 그 의의가 있다. 또한 협력의 조건과 그 결과의 공유에 대한 기초적 지식과 지혜를 반추하게 한다는 면에서 동북아 역내 협력을 위한 진전의 가능성을 시사해 준다.
정구상,이재선,김태성 한국산업경영시스템학회 2014 한국산업경영시스템학회 학술대회 Vol.2014 No.춘계
This study analyze the effects of cooperative activities between SME's(Small and Medium Company's). To research the empirical analysis, we divide type of cooperation into four dimensions such as technical cooperation, human resource cooperation, sales cooperation and finance cooperation. We examine the role of cooperation philosophy as precedence factor. In addition, this study analyze the relationship between cooperation philosophy, cooperation activities and performance. The finding of this study can be summarized as follows, First, the result of path analysis between cooperation philosophy and cooperation activities is that cooperation philosophy have significant effect on technical cooperation, human resource cooperation, sales cooperation and finance cooperation. Second, the result of relationship between cooperation activities and performance, technical cooperation, human resource cooperation, sales cooperation have significant effects on cooperation performance. In particular, the effect of haman resource cooperation is relatively high because cooperation through personnel exchanges is effective in the short-term performance. In addition, the implications of this study are presented as follows, First, this study analyze the empirical test by using PSBP Model in terms of partnership. Until now, many researcher analyze the relationship between big and small company, but we try to verify the relationship between small business company. So, we can present a beneficial implications to explain importance of cooperation activities between SME's. Second, there is the problem of technical information disclosure issue when SME's business unit have a partnership. To overcome this problem, we use cooperation philosophy and it can be escape the negative views.
산학협력 네트워크 형성 과정의 단계별 성공 요인에 대한 실행 개선 요구 분석 연구
안재영,이병욱 한국직업교육학회 2017 職業 敎育 硏究 Vol.36 No.1
The purposes of this study are 1) to analyse the importance and performance of the success factors in steps of Formation process Of Cooperation NetWork(FoCNW) of educational institutions and businesses, and 2) to draw the success factors that need improvement. To achieve these purposes a survey research was conducted with a group of 1,098 (professors, teachers and workers in charge of cooperation at universities, technical colleges, vocational high schools and businesses which are equipped with a cooperation system), and 339 questionnaires were analyzed. The major results of the study are as follows. Firstly, while cooperation workers showed high recognition on the importance of success factors in steps of FoCNW, their performance of those factors was relatively low. Secondly, both the recognition of importance and performance of success factors in steps of FoCNW was higher in educational institutions than in businesses. Thirdly, the success factors in need of improvements from both educational institutions and businesses are ‘collecting outer information and consulting’ and ‘publicizing cooperation competency’, ‘setting cooperative activities (programs) and contents of agreements’, ‘managing cooperation quality formally’, ‘drawing plans for sustainable cooperation improvement’ and ‘diffusing cooperation network’. The success factors in need of improvements from educational institutions are ‘perceiving necessity of and forming consensus on cooperation’ and ‘deciding and supporting the worker in charge of cooperation’, and ‘participating and sharing of organization members’. The success factors in need of improvements from businesses are ‘deciding goals and performance strategies’, ‘developing mutual understanding and checking possibility of cooperation with potential partners’, and ‘evaluating cooperation activities and their outcomes and providing feedback’ and ‘adjusting contents of agreements and deciding whether to maintain cooperation’. Therefore, efforts from each partner to improve those factors and support from related organizations are necessary. 이 연구의 목적은 산학협력 네트워크 형성 과정의 단계별 성공 요인의 중요도와 실행 정도를 분석하여 실행 개선이 요구되는 성공 요인의 우선순위를 도출함으로써 교육기관과 산업체가 산학협력 네트워크를 효과적으로 형성하는데 필요한 기초자료를 제공하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 대학·고교와 산업체의 산학협력 담당자 1,098명을 대상으로 설문 조사를 실시하여 339부(30.9%)의 설문지를 분석하였다. 이 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 산학협력 담당자들은 산학협력 네트워크 형성 과정의 단계별 성공 요인을 중요하게 인식하고 있는데 반해 성공 요인의 실행 정도는 상대적으로 낮은 편이다. 둘째, 교육기관이 산업체보다 대체로 성공 요인을 중요하게 인식하고 있으며 교육기관이 산업체보다 대체로 성공 요인을 잘 실행하고 있는 편이다. 셋째, 교육기관과 산업체 모두에 실행 개선이 요구되는 성공 요인은 인식 및 준비 단계의 ‘외부 정보 수집 및 자문’과 ‘산학협력 역량 홍보’, 구축 단계의 ‘협력 활동(프로그램) 및 협약 내용 설정’, 운영 및 조정 단계의 ‘공식적인 산학협력 질 관리’, 강화 및 확산 단계의 ‘지속가능한 산학협력 개선 방안 도출’과 ‘산학협력 네트워크 확산’이다. 교육기관에 실행 개선이 요구되는 성공 요인은 인식 및 준비 단계의 ‘산학협력 필요성 인식 및 공감대 형성’과 ‘산학협력 담당자 선정 및 지원’, 구축 단계의 ‘조직 구성원의 참여 및 공유’이다. 산업체에 실행 개선이 요구되는 성공 요인은 인식 및 준비 단계의 ‘목표 및 실행 전략 설정’, 동기화 단계의 ‘잠재적 협력 주체와의 상호 이해 및 협력 가능성 검토’, 운영 및 조정 단계의 ‘산학협력 활동·성과 평가 및 피드백’과 ‘협약 내용 조정 및 협력 유지 여부 결정’이다. 따라서 이들 요인에 대한 주체별 개선의 노력과 유관기관의 지원이 요구된다.
( Dae Won Ohn ),( Mason Richey ) 한국국방연구원 2014 The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis Vol.26 No.1
Northeast Asia`s regional cooperation is abysmal. Although China, South Korea, and Japan have generally compartmentalized bilateral trade relations in order to ensure continuing prosperity of their respective economies, regionally institutionalized cooperation remains weak, even in this domain. Trilateral political and security cooperation among these states is virtually nonexistent. China`s disinclination (as an emerging regional hegemon) toward regional cooperation and Japan`s failure to settle its historical problems are regarded as the key reasons for the lack of such a development. Yet despite this fraught situation the prospects for regional cooperation among the three main Northeast Asian powers have seen glimmers of hope. This paper argues that security is surprisingly one of the areas where scholars and practitioners envision a foundation for increased opportunities for regional cooperation. The most noteworthy case is the ongoing coordination among China, Japan, and South Korea (along with some others) to fight piracy in the Gulf of Aden area. Beyond the result of reducing piracy on commercial shipping, the counter-piracy effort has fostered cultural exchange among the region`s different navies and coastguards, offering opportunities for growing the spectrum of maritime security expertise beyond what each country would be able to do alone. This paper looks at the implications of this combined effort for other potential areas of cooperation among the Northeast Asian states.
A Study on the Facilitators & Performance of Cooperative Activation between SMEs
Goosang Jung,Tae-Sung Kim,Jae-Sun Lee 한국산업경영시스템학회 2014 한국산업경영시스템학회 학술대회 Vol.2014 No.춘계
This study analyze the effects of cooperative activities between SME’s(Small and Medium Company’s). To research the empirical analysis, we divide type of cooperation into four dimensions such as technical cooperation, human resource cooperation, sales cooperation and finance cooperation. We examine the role of cooperation philosophy as precedence factor. In addition, this study analyze the relationship between cooperation philosophy, cooperation activities and performance. The finding of this study can be summarized as follows, First, the result of path analysis between cooperation philosophy and cooperation activities is that cooperation philosophy have significant effect on technical cooperation, human resource cooperation, sales cooperation and finance cooperation. Second, the result of relationship between cooperation activities and performance, technical cooperation, human resource cooperation, sales cooperation have significant effects on cooperation performance. In particular, the effect of haman resource cooperation is relatively high because cooperation through personnel exchanges is effective in the short-term performance. In addition, the implications of this study are presented as follows, First, this study analyze the empirical test by using PSBP Model in terms of partnership. Until now, many researcher analyze the relationship between big and small company, but we try to verify the relationship between small business company. So, we can present a beneficial implications to explain importance of cooperation activities between SME’s. Second, there is the problem of technical information disclosure issue when SME’s business unit have a partnership. To overcome this problem, we use cooperation philosophy and it can be escape the negative views.
산연협력에서의 협력적 행동 및 만족에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구
황경연,성을현 한국생산성학회 2021 생산성연구 Vol.35 No.2
The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors that affect satisfaction in Industry-Public Research Institute (IPR) cooperation. This study selects IPR's dependence, IPR's trust, IPR's cooperation commitment and IPR's cooperative behavior as factors influencing IPR's cooperation satisfaction based on resource dependence theory, interpersonal relationship theory and interorganizational relationship theory. The structural relationship between these constructs was established with nine hypotheses. A total of 277 data for hypothesis testing were collected from Daedeok Innopolis through a survey. The survey subjects were the managers of firms, which are technology receivers, and university professors and researchers at public research institutes, which are a group of technology providers. In the empirical analysis results, it was found that IPR's dependence has a positive effect on IPR's trust, IPR's cooperation commitment and IPR's cooperative behavior. And IPR's trust has a positive effect on IPR's cooperation commitment, IPR's cooperative behavior and IPR's cooperation satisfaction. In addition, IPR's cooperation commitment has a positive effect on IPR's cooperative behavior and IPR's cooperation satisfaction, and IPR's cooperative behavior has a positive effect on IPR's cooperation satisfaction. Additionally, in the technology receiver group, the effect of IPR's cooperation commitment on IPR's cooperation satisfaction was not significant, but all other structural relationships were found to be significant. On the other hand, in the technology providers group, IPR's trust was found to have a significant effect on IPR's cooperation commitment, IPR's cooperative behavior and IPR's cooperation satisfaction, and the rest of the structural relationships were found to be nonsignificant. As a result, the factors affecting the IPR's cooperation satisfaction of the businessmen group and the researcher group were found to be different.
김희진 한국창의정책학회 2024 한국창의정책학회 정책연구 Vol.9 No.-
지방의회와 국회 모두 각각 지역주민과 전체 국민을 대표하는 기관으로서, 서로 다른 역할과 책임을 가지고 있지만, 지방자치 및 국가의 발전이라는 궁극적인 목표는 동일하다. 이 두 기관이 상호 협력하여 의견을 나누고 지속적으로 소통한다면 민주주의 및 실질적 법치국가 실현과 지방분권 및 지방자치 실현에 나아가 국가발전에 기여할 수 있다. 한편, 중앙지방협력회의에서 논의되는 안건의 대부분은 법개정 사항의안건이 많고, 법개정 사항은 국회의 입법영역이어서 중앙지방협력회의에서 결정한 내용을 실제로 이행하기까지는 어려움이 크다. 이에 따라 중앙지방협력회에서 실제 이행까지 이어지는 안건은 법개정 사항이 아닌대통령령 개정으로도 해결 가능한 안건이 대부분이다. 이것은 중앙지방협력회의가 중앙과 지방이라고 하지만 법과 정책을 집행하는 행정기관위주의 협력회의로서, 민주적 법치국가의 근간인 입법기관의 참여가 제한되어 나타나는 문제이다. 따라서 지방의회와 국회가 협력하여, 민주적 의사소통을 보장하고 국가의 정책 결함이나 입법의 미비를 보완하며 집행의 실효성을 확보하는것이 중요하다. 이에 협력방안을 제안하면 다음과 같다. 하나는 국회지방의회협력회의의 설치이고, 또 다른 하나는 지역대표형 상원의 설치이다. 지방의회와 국회간 협력의 가장 전형적인 형태는 지역대표형 상원일것이다. 그러나 현재 우리나라는 단원제를 채택하고 있고, 이러한 현재의 상황 하에서는 국회지방의회협력회의를 설치하여 상호간 협력하는 것이 적절할 것이다. 덧붙여 지방의회와 국회간의 협력은 단순히 협력의 방식, 협력제도에대한 마련 및 개선만의 문제가 아니라, 지방의회가 입법기능과 관련된능력을 함양하고 지방의회의 역량을 강화할 수 제반 여건이 마련될 때효과가 극대화 될 것이다. Both local councils and the National Assembly are institutions representing local residents and the entire nation, respectively, and have different roles and responsibilities, but their ultimate goal of local autonomy and national development is the same. If these two institutions cooperate with each other, share opinions, and communicate continuously, they can contribute to the realization of democracy and a substantive rule of law, decentralization, and local autonomy, and further contribute to national development. Meanwhile, most of the agenda items discussed at the Central-Local Cooperation Council are agenda items for law revisions, and since law revisions are within the legislative domain of the National Assembly, it is difficult to actually implement the content decided at the Central-Local Cooperation Council. Accordingly, most of the agenda items that lead to actual implementation at the Central-Local Cooperation Council are agenda items that can be resolved by revising presidential decrees rather than law revisions. This is a problem that arises because the Central-Local Cooperation Council is a cooperation council centered on administrative agencies that execute laws and policies, although it is a central and local government, and the participation of the legislative body, which is the foundation of a democratic rule of law, is limited. Therefore, it is important for local councils and the National Assembly to cooperate to ensure democratic communication, supplement national policy deficiencies and legislative insufficiencies, and secure the effectiveness of execution. Here are some suggestions for cooperation. One is the establishment of the National Assembly-Local Council Cooperation Council, and the other is the establishment of a regional representative senate. The most typical form of cooperation between local councils and the National Assembly would be a regional representative senate. However, our country currently adopts a unicameral system, and under the current situation, it would be appropriate to establish a National Assembly-Local Council Cooperation Council to cooperate with each other. In addition, cooperation between local councils and the National Assembly is not simply a matter of establishing and improving the method of cooperation and the cooperative system, but will be most effective when all conditions are prepared to foster the legislative function-related capabilities of local councils and strengthen the capacity of local councils.
프랑스 문화,지역학 : 프랑스 문화정책에서 공공단체 간의 협력
배준구 ( Jun Gu Bae ) 한국프랑스문화학회 2010 프랑스문화연구 Vol.21 No.-
La France, en mettant en oeuvre la decentralisation a partir de 1982, a revise en permanance la loi sur la reorganisation des methodes de cooperation, la simplification des procedures et la cooperation financiere pour prevenir le dysfonctionnement et renforcer la cooperation. Dans la politique culturelle, la France utilise les differentes formes de cooperation entre les collectivities publiques, c``est a dire la cooperation ponctuelle, le cofinancement organise, la cogestion d``institution, les politiques contractuelles etc. Cet etude tente dans la politique culturelle, depuis la mise en oeuvre de la decentralisation en France, d``identifier l``etat de fonctionnement et les caracteristiques de la cooperation entre les collectivities publiques et de presenter les suggestions politiques. Particulierement, cet etude a analyse l``etat de fonctionnement des informations actuelles sur les reformes institutionnelles liees a la politique culturelle et de la cooperation entre les collectivities publiques en mettant au point principalement des conventions de developpement culturelle, le protocole de decentralisation culturelle, le contrat de plan, l``Etablissement Public de Cooperation Culturelle etc. Le resultat de l``etude de la cooperation entre les collectivities publiques dans la politique culturelle francaise nous donne les suggestions politiques suivantes. Premierement, les conventions ou les contrats de plan utilises principalement comme un moyen de la cooperation entre les collectivities publiques dans la politique culturelle evite le risque d``isolement de la decentralisation en liant la politique de decentralisation et les politiques contractuelles. En revanche, les conventions de developpement culturelle ou le contrat de plan, les personnes concernees en comptant trop sur eux, peuvent etre limites ou risquer de perdre l``autonomie dans le secteur des entreprises non-contrat. Par consequent, il est important de minimiser les risques et les problemes que tient le systeme de contrats et de mettre en valeur son utilite. Deuxiemement, depuis la decentralisation, la France en signant des accords des conventions de developpement culturelle, des contrats de plan Etat-region et du protocole de decentralisation culturelle ameliore des partenariats avec des organisations impliquees dans les affaires et contribue a la coherence et la stabilite de la politique culturelle. L``utilisation active de ce genre d``accords et de contrats de la France donne les suggestions politiques pour la promotion de la politique culturelle de notre pays. Troisiemement, l``installation du protocole de decentralisation culturelle et de l``Etablissement Public de Cooperation Culturelle renforce la deconcentration culturelle et contribue a assurer l``autonomie a travers de la cooperation des collectivites territoriales et de l``integration et la gestion des institutions culturelles. Quatriemement, la France dans de divers projets ou des Festivaux du secteur culturel utilise principalement les types des contrats pluriannuelle(3-7 ans) qui nous donne des implications.
통일을 위한 남북한 경제협력전략과 조직화 방안: 독일 통일로부터의 교훈
김익성 ( Ik-seung Kim ) 한국질서경제학회 2016 질서경제저널 Vol.19 No.2
Economic cooperation between South and North Korea must precede peaceful attitude change in North Korean, including denuclearization and improvement on the military and political confidence level between South and North Korea. Additionally, the relief from economic sanction to North Korea from international society, such as the U.S, EU, and UN, should also precede to activate the economic cooperation. Nevertheless, the economic cooperation between two nations needs to be separated from the logic of political diplomacy since it is the prerequisite to South-North reunification. The economic cooperation acts as the motivation for the North Korea to change and open as well as the channel to establish trust. Thus, the study examines the meaning and importance of economic cooperation between South and North Korea as an investment to the reunification in the future. The case of German unification is analyzed and applied to identify the meaning and importance of Korean economic cooperation as a stepping stone of reunification. One of the main lesson learned from the case of German reunification is the fact that economic cooperation and pre-investment improved the competitiveness of Germany after the reunification. In this study, the basic direction and various strategic options to successful execution of economic cooperation between South and North Korea are provided. Instead of considering the cooperation as simple labor utilization, proposed strategies for the economic cooperation take into account the high-cost reduction and economic feasibility in post-reunification period. The executional strategies that connect industries from basic consumption to higher-value added industry in stages are emphasized. The South-Korean economic cooperation committee, increase in South-North Korean economic funds, the research center for economic cooperation and establishment of international economic network for reunification are provided as policies and organizing options for the cooperation.