감마선 조사가 무(Raphanus sativus L.) 의 종자발아율 및 생육 초기 표현형에 미치는 영향

홍소연(So Yeon Hong),이온유(O New Lee),조영득(Yeong Deuk Jo),권효정(Hyo Joung Kwon),한미경(Mi Kyung Han),권만정(Man Jeong Kwon),이선미(Seon Mi Lee),박한용(Han Yong Park) 한국원예학회 2017 한국원예학회 학술발표요지 Vol.2017 No.5

의료행위와 환자의 자율성

홍소연 ( So Yeon Hong ) 한국윤리교육학회 2003 윤리교육연구 Vol.0 No.4

이 논문은 생명의료윤리학에서 주요한 자율성 개념을 비판하고자 한다. 동시에 새로운 자율성 개념의 필요성에 대해 논의할 것이다. 논자는 자율성의 철학적 근원, 즉 Kant와 Mill의 자율성과 최근 생명의료윤리학에서 상당한 영향력을 행사하고 있는 Beauchamp와 Childress의 자율성에 대해 먼저 논의할 것이다. 자율성은 의료행위에서 상당한 가치를 가지고 있음에도 불구하고, 이들의 자율성 개념은 의료행위에서 나타나는 문제점을 해결할 수 없다는 한계점을 가지고 있다. 논자는 이러한 자율성 개념의 한계점을 극복하기 위해서 손상과 질병을 경험하는 사람들의 자율성 경험에 대한 논의가 반드시 전제되어야 한다고 본다. 보다 포괄적인 자율성 개념을 정립하기 위해서는 손상이나 질병에 대한 경험적 연구가 반드시 필요하기 때문이다. 손상과 질병을 경험하는 사람들의 자아와 자아통제에 대한 논의는 이들의 자아가 ``상황``과 매우 밀접히 연관되어 있음을 나타낼 것이다. 이는 곧 Beauchamp와 Childress를 비롯한 자유주의 자율성 개념이 의료행위에 적용되기에 부적합함을 의미한다. 이들의 자율성 개념은 합리성과 독립에 지나치게 치중하는 매우 협소한 개념이기 때문이다. 따라서 논자는 주요한 자율성 개념이 가지고 있는 한계점을 극복하고 포괄적인 자율성 이해를 위해 손상과 질병이 자율성에 미치는 영향에 대해 논의할 것이다. 손상과 질병은 우리 삶의 일부분이고, 이로 인한 의존은 자율성과 반드시 대립되는 개념이 아니라, 상호 보완적이고 병행할 수 있는 개념이기 때문이다. I criticize the dominant conception of autonomy in biomedical ethics. And I discuss the need for a vision of patient autonomy. First, I analyze the conception of autonomy put forth by Kant and Mill, and Tom Beauchamp, James Childress. Theirs` conception is based on liberal rationalism that dominates biomedical ethics and health care. Though their conception has influential value, I show significant limitations in theirs` concept. That is, because theirs` conception is emphasized on ``independence`` and ``rationality,`` the scope of autonomy is significantly narrow. I argue that it is not appropriate to appeal to theirs` conception toward assessing which patients we ought to respect as autonomous. So, this conception is not practical relevance in medical practice. For the purpose of overcoming this limitations, I explore the experience of autonomy for people with chronic impairment and illness. I think that any acceptable conception of autonomy will account for relational features of self and self-governance. Therefore, for autonomy`s having the practical relevance in biomedical ethics, comprehensive conception is needed. That is, impairment and illness is one aspect in our life and dependence on different peoples is also indispensible in our life. I don`t deny Beauchamp and Childress`s autonomy. Rather, the comprehensive autonomy has to retain the value of Beauchamp and Childress`s conception of autonomy and to avoid their major problem. Also, this alternative autonomy is better suitable to the practical activities of medicine.

감마선 조사선량에 따른 십자화과 작물의 발아율, 초기생장 및 생존률의 변화 비교

홍소연(So Yeon Hong),이온유(O New Lee),조영득(Young Deuk Jo),박한용(Han Yong Park) 한국원예학회 2017 한국원예학회 학술발표요지 Vol.2017 No.10

미성년자의 의사결정능력과 동의

홍소연 ( So Yoen Hong ) 한국의료윤리학회 2005 한국의료윤리학회지 Vol.8 No.2

In order to consent to medical treatment, patients must be capable of making voluntary decisions. Patients with decision-making competence must be able to understand the information their physician offers them, evaluate the potential benefits and risks of any treatment the physician proposes, and make their own decisions without the influence of others. Prior to asking for a patient`s consent, a physician must first decide whether or not the patient has the competence to make an adequate decision. If the patient is fit for making voluntary decisions, his/her decisions must be respected. If the patient is unfit for making such decisions, then family members or agents stipulated by the law will have the right to make decisions on behalf of the patient. However, it is not easy to determine whether a patient has the proper competence to give voluntary informed consent. This determination is difficult especially in the case of minors, the mentally ill, and senior citizens. Attitudes toward judging the competence of minors are vague. This is well revealed in legislation on the rights of minors to give voluntary informed consent. However, recent studies on the mental development of minors show that minors do in fact have decisionmaking competence similar to that of adults. These studies emphasize the importance of first checking the competence of minors to give voluntary informed consent and then getting their approval. Answers are sought on what would be most suitable means to obtain the consent of minors. First, patients must be given the proper information of the kind of treatment they will receive; minors should not be exempted from this process. However, minors have been legally regarded as persons without competence to give appropriate and voluntary informed consent, and it is usually the parents that have the right to make decisions on behalf of their children. Therefore, it has been common practice to obtain consent for treatment from parents. In order for this practice to be justifiable, minors must not have any competence to make decisions. In reality, however, legal regulations state that minors do have the competence to make decisions for themselves. This recognition is reflected in recent ethical guidelines for physicians. We need to examine how the law interprets the decision-making competence of children and how the decision-making competence of children has actually developed. Second, though it may be true that minors do not have as much decision-making competence as adults, we can see in the cognitive development of minors that the older they become, the more competence they have to make adequate decisions for themselves. Hence, excluding the opinion of minors cannot be justified. I believe that though the competence of minors to make decisions?may not be perfect, a suitable method should be used to gain consent from minors who are in the process of developing their own autonomy. In addition, I suggest that a cooperative model among minors, parents, and physicians should be followed in order to get the "assent"of minors. Third, while it is ideal to obtain the assent of minors through this cooperative model, in reality there are ethical limits to this model. Because there are no standards for evaluating the decisionmaking competence of minors, it is difficult to determine who can give assent and who can give consent. There is also no accurate answer to the question of when to give minors the right to refuse treatment. Nor are there devices to mediate when conflicts arise between the choices of minors and parents. These limitations must ultimately be overcome during the process of promoting this cooperative model. It is important to create guidelines to overcome these limitations.

도시근린공원 방범설계 (CPTED)의 효과성 검증

홍소연(Hong, So Yeon),권순호(Kwon, Soom Ho),박세희(Park, Se Hee),김은기(Kim, Eun Kee) 한국공안행정학회 2020 한국공안행정학회보 Vol.29 No.1

이 연구는 도시근린공원에서의 범죄예방환경설계 효과성 검증을 목적으로 실시되었다. 연구목적 달성을 위해 선행연구에서 활용된 범죄예방환경설계 평가항목을 활용하여 대상 공원 두 곳의 범죄예방환경설계 수준을 객관적으로 평가하였고, 설계 수준이 우수한 공원과 낮은 공원 방문객들을 대상으로 각각 범죄피해두려움을 측정하였다. 분석결과 설계 수준이 우수한 공원보다 설계 수준이 낮은 공원에서 방문객들의 범죄피해두려움이 더 높게 나타남을 확인 할 수 있었으며, 두 공원에서 느끼는 범죄피해두려움의 평균차이는 통계적으로 유의한 차이로 확인되었다. 따라서 도시근린공원에서의 범죄예방환경설계는 이용객들의 범죄피해 두려움을 낮추는 효과가 있다고 할 수 있다. 그러나 이 연구는 범죄피해두려움에 영향을 미치는 다른 요인들을 통제하지 못하였다는 점, 조사대상 공원의 범죄예방환경설계 수준에 대한 평가의 정교성이 다소 낮다는 점 등의 한계가 존재한다. 그럼에도 불구하고 ‘CPTED 인식’과 범죄피해두려움의 관계를 주로 검토하여 효과성을 검증하고자 한 기존 선행연구와는 달리 객관적 평가척도를 활용하여 설계수준 차이에 따른 범죄피해 두려움의 차이를 검증함으로써 CPTED의 효과성을 검증하였다는 점에서 의의가 있는 연구라 하겠다. This study was conducted to verify the effectiveness of crime prevention environment design in urban neighborhood parks. To achieve the objectives of the research, the crime prevention environmental design evaluation items used in the previous studies were objectively evaluated, and the crime prevention environment design levels of two target parks were objectively evaluated. Fear of crime was measured. As a result, visitors were found to have higher fears of crime victimization in parks with lower design level than those with better design level, and the average difference between crime fears felt between two parks was statistically significant. Therefore, the design of crime prevention environment in urban neighborhood parks can be said to reduce the fear of crime victims. However, this study has limitations such as the lack of control of other factors affecting the fear of crime, and the low level of elaboration of the assessment of crime prevention environment design of the park under investigation. Nevertheless, unlike previous studies that mainly examined the relationship between CPTED awareness and fear of crime, CPTED by verifying the difference of crime damage fear according to the design level by using objective evaluation scale. It is a meaningful study in that it verified the effectiveness of.

충분한 설명에 근거한 동의에서 환자의 의사결정능력 판단의 기준

홍소연 ( So Yoen Hong ) 한국의료윤리학회 2005 한국의료윤리학회지 Vol.8 No.1

In current medical area, it has become a common process that physicians obtain patients` clear consent after transfer of information on treatment to patients prior to start treatment, and there seems to be no problem in appearance. However, if the process to obtain patient consent is observed, it can easily be found that the process is merely a conventional process and, if the pattern obtaining the consents is more deeply reviewed, it can be found that requirements to be importantly treated in the process of obtaining consents are omitted. In the world of our medical society, the process that patients agree in treatment is hearing the information from physicians and signing on consent forms where such information is described in detail, at all. They believe that they have done their duties because patients read and signed and, therefore, requirements to be deeply considered in practice are not reviewed in the process to obtain consents. The author reviewed the requirements for patients` decision-making competence among the requirements for patient consent. Despite patients` decision-making competence is the precondition of consent, procedure or standard to measure competence is not yet established. If medical information is disclosed and signature on consent forms is asked with no confirmation whether patients have the competence to make decisions, such an action cannot be considered to fulfill the liability to respect for patient`s autonomy that is the original purpose. Therefore, the author intend to introduce what are used as the standards for assessment of patients` decision-making competence in the Western and intends to review what kind of limits such standards have in assessment of patients` decision-making competence by reviewing the characteristics of patient`s decision-making in practical medicine. While, one of the questions made by current medical area is that Western standards on decision-making are settled with exceedingly individual-centered decisionmaking, thus, there cannot be no limit in application in our medical area; this will also be reviewed together. Through the review of such limits, it will be reviewed how the physicians` standards on patients` decision-making competence should be settled, when physicians obtain patients` consent, for appropriate use in clinical practice and what requirements should be considered in assessment of patients` decision-making competence.

WCAG2.0 기반의 특정 사용자 집단을 위한 웹 접근성 평가 모델 개발

김초이 ( Cho-yi Kim ),홍소연 ( So-yeon Hong ),김소라 ( So-ra Kim ),한혁수 ( Hyuk-soo Han ) 한국정보처리학회 2009 한국정보처리학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.16 No.2

웹이 대중화되면서, 사용자 계층도 어린이, 노인, 장애인 등으로 다양해졌다. 인지적, 신체적 특징에 상관없이 모든 사람에게 동등한 웹 기회를 제공하고 있는가를 나타내는 지표가 웹 접근성이다. 웹 사이트들이 특정 수준의 웹 접근성을 준수하도록 유도하기 위해 W3C(World Wide Web Consourtium)의 WAI(Web Accessiability Initiative)는 웹 콘텐츠 접근성 가이드라인 WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guideliens)를 개발하였다. 현재, WCAG2.0 까지 발표된 가이드라인은, 4 개의 원칙(Principle), 12 개의 지침(Guideline), 그리고 61 개의 성공기준(Success Criteria)으로 구성 되어 있다. 평가자들은 WCAG2.0 에서 제시하는 성공 기준에 맞춰, 웹 사이트가 웹 접근성을 어느 수준으로 준수하고 있는지 평가한다. 하지만, WCAG2.0을 기준으로 웹 사이트를 평가할 경우, 성공기준의 준수여부는 평가가 가능하지만, 특정 사용자 집단의 특성을 반영한, 우선순위가 포함되지 않아, 특정 사용자 집단을 위한 개선 사항을 도출하는데 어려움이 있다. 이에, 본 논문에서는 이러한 점을 고려하여 WCAG2.0 기반의, 특정 사용 집단을 위한 웹 접근성 평가 모델을 제안한다. 사용자 특성에 따라 성공지침들의 중요도가 달라 질 수 있으므로, AHP 기법을 활용하여 성공지침들의 상대적 중요도를 평가하고, 우선순위화 하였다. 평가 모델의 효용성을 입증하기 위해, 특정 사용집단으로 노인 집단을 선정하여, 웹 접근성 평가 모델을 개발하였다.

스마트 항만 작업 분배 시스템 개발

안현서 ( Hyeon-seo An ),홍소연 ( So-yeon Hong ),전지우 ( Ji-woo Jeon ),이선영 ( Seon-young Lee ),김인수 ( In-soo Kim ) 한국정보처리학회 2021 한국정보처리학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.28 No.2

현재 대한민국 운송업에서 두 번째로 큰 비율(19.2%)을 차지하고 있는 수상 운송업에서는 연간 많은 재해가 발생하고 있으며 그 손해는 4백억 원에 달한다. 본 연구는 수상 운송업에서의 재해율과 경제적 손실을 최소화하기 위해 신체 측정기기 및 항만 작업 분배시스템을 설계하였다. 신체 측정기기는 심박, 알코올, 적외선 온도 센서 등을 활용하여 작업자의 신체 정보를 측정한다. 이 결과를 아두이노로 전송한 뒤 사용자의 집중도와 피로도를 분석하여 적절한 작업 분배 서비스를 제공한다.

Towards Privacy-Preserving Korean Voice Phishing Detection: A Federated Learning Approach with RoBERTA

Milandu Keith Moussavou Bousso(무사부부수구밀란두키스),Chang Kyun Hong(홍창균),Soyeon Hong(홍소연),Dong-Joo Park(박동주) 한국정보과학회 2023 한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집 Vol.2023 No.6

사용성 테스트를 통한 `스터디 헬퍼` 어플리케이션의 사용성 개선

권수영(Kwon Suyoung),김지수(Jee-Soo Kim),이규현(Kyuhyeon Lee),홍소연(Soyeon Hong),연명흠(Myeong-Heum Yeoun) 한국디자인학회 2015 한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집 Vol.2015 No.10