기술사업화 능력과 기술경영 성과의 관계에 대한 변혁적 리더십의 조절효과에 관한 연구

이태헌 리더십학회 2016 리더십연구 Vol.8 No.1

This study is an empirical study on technology commercialization and technology management performance, which are attracting attention mainly in industry. Especially, we tried to verify the moderating effect of transformational leadership on the relationship between technology commercialization ability and technical management performance and relationship. This study has identified the CEO’s manufacturing capacity, production capacity, and marketing competence that affect the performance of technology management. In addition, we investigated how the performance of technology management varies according to the strength of transformational leadership which is most important in technology commercialization. The results of the analysis are summarized as follows. First, in verifying the effect of technical commercialization capabilities on technical management performance, it was found that all technical commercialization abilities have a significant (+) effect on firm performance. It is believed that the technology commercialization capabilities contribute to the enhancement of corporate performance through successful technology commercialization. Second, The intellectual stimulation about the relationship between the technical commercialization ability and the technical management performance showed a positive effect (+), but the charisma had little effect. It is found that the core talents that are most required for technology-intensive SMEs that promote technology commercialization from the practical side are leaders who encourage creative intuition and logical solution. Therefore, SMEs that have leadership that stimulates intellectual stimulation and promote technology commercialization will not only reach the goal of technology commercialization, but also improve technology management performance, which will further enhance future competitiveness. 본 연구는 최근 들어 산업계를 중심으로 주목을 받고 있는 기술사업화와 기술경영 성과에 관한 실증연구이다. 특히 기술사업화 능력과 기술경영 성과의 관계와 그 관계에 있어서의 변혁적 리더십의 조절 효과를 검증하고자 하였다. 협의의 기술사업화 과정을 전제로 기술집약형 중소기업 최고 경영자의 제조역량 및 생산역량, 마케팅 역량이 기술경영 성과에 미치는 영향을 규명한 것이다. 또한, 기술사업화 추진 시 가장 중요시되는 최고 경영자의 리더십을 변혁적 리더십에다 초점을 두고 리더십 강도에 따라서 기술경영의 성과가 어떻게 달라지는 지를 조사하였다. 그리고 상관관계, 계층적 회귀분석 방법을 이용하여 분석하여 다음과 같은 결론을 도출하였다. 첫째, 기술사업화 능력들이 기술경영 성과에 미치는 영향 검증에서는 모든 기술사업화 세부능력들이 기업 성과에 유의한 양(+)의 영향을 미치는 것을 알 수 있었다. 이를 통하여 기술사업화 능력들은 성공적인 기술사업화를 통해 기업 성과 제고에 상당 부분 기여하는 것으로 판단된다. 둘째, 기술사업화 능력과 기술경영 성과의 관계에 대한 변혁적 리더십은 두 개의 하위 변수인 카리스마와 지적자극 중에서 지적자극은 대체로 조절 효과가 있는 양(+)의 효과로 나타났으나 카리스마는 거의 효과가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 실무적 측면에서 기술사업화를 추진하는 기술집약형 중소기업에 가장 요구되는 핵심 인재상은 창의적 직관과 논리적 해결을 독려하는 리더형인 것으로 밝혀진 것이다. 따라서 지적 자극을 촉발하는 리더십을 갖추고 기술사업화를 추진하는 중소기업은 기술사업화 목표 도달뿐만 아니라 기술 경영 성과까지 향상되어 미래 경쟁력이 더욱 높아질 것이다. 키워드: 기술사업화 능력, 변혁적 리더십, 기술경영 성과

기술가치 평가를 위한 기술사업화 기간 및 비용 추정체계 개발

전승표(Seoung-Pyo Jun),최대헌(Daeheon Choi),박현우(Hyun-Woo Park),서봉군(Bong-Goon Seo),박도형(Do-Hyung Park) 한국지능정보시스템학회 2017 지능정보연구 Vol.23 No.2

Technology commercialization creates effective economic value by linking the companys R & D processes and outputs to the market. This technology commercialization is important in that a company can retain and maintain a sustained competitive advantage. In order for a specific technology to be commercialized, it goes through the stage of technical planning, technology research and development, and commercialization. This process involves a lot of time and money. Therefore, the duration and cost of technology commercialization are important decision information for determining the market entry strategy. In addition, it is more important information for a technology investor to rationally evaluate the technology value. In this way, it is very important to scientifically estimate the duration and cost of the technology commercialization. However, research on technology commercialization is insufficient and related methodology are lacking. In this study, we propose an evaluation model that can estimate the duration and cost of R & D technology commercialization for small and medium-sized enterprises. To accomplish this, this study collected the public data of the National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS) and the survey data provided by the Small and Medium Business Administration. Also this study will develop the estimation model of commercialization duration and cost of R&D performance on using these data based on the market approach, one of the technology valuation methods. Specifically, this study defined the process of commercialization as consisting of development planning, development progress, and commercialization. We collected the data from the NTIS database and the survey of SMEs technical statistics of the Small and Medium Business Administration. We derived the key variables such as stage-wise R&D costs and duration, the factors of the technology itself, the factors of the technology development, and the environmental factors. At first, given data, we estimates the costs and duration in each technology readiness level (basic research, applied research, development research, prototype production, commercialization), for each industry classification. Then, we developed and verified the research model of each industry classification. The results of this study can be summarized as follows. Firstly, it is reflected in the technology valuation model and can be used to estimate the objective economic value of technology. The duration and the cost from the technology development stage to the commercialization stage is a critical factor that has a great influence on the amount of money to discount the future sales from the technology. The results of this study can contribute to more reliable technology valuation because it estimates the commercialization duration and cost scientifically based on past data. Secondly, we have verified models of various fields such as statistical model and data mining model. The statistical model helps us to find the important factors to estimate the duration and cost of technology Commercialization, and the data mining model gives us the rules or algorithms to be applied to an advanced technology valuation system. Finally, this study reaffirms the importance of commercialization costs and durations, which has not been actively studied in previous studies. The results confirm the significant factors to affect the commercialization costs and duration, furthermore the factors are different depending on industry classification. Practically, the results of this study can be reflected in the technology valuation system, which can be provided by national research institutes and R & D staff to provide sophisticated technology valuation. The relevant logic or algorithm of the research result can be implemented independently so that it can be directly reflected in the system, so researchers can use it practically immediately. In conclusion, the results

A Study on Technology Entrepreneurship Policy Focused on Innovative Growth

Jeong-Keun Yun,Jae-Chul Kwon,Sun-Hee Choi 한국유통과학회 2019 The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business( Vol.10 No.2

Purpose - Research on the ability of domestic public institutions to conduct business is being conducted. Research on government support policy for public technology projects, emphasizes technology creation. Public agencies are encouraging evolutionary barriers at the stage of realistic business. This paper presents the policy possibilities by presenting policies and strategies based on corporate public policy. Research design, data, and methodology – In this study, we surveyed the actual state of public technology commercialization based on the data on state of technology commercialization of public institutions. We collected and analyzed the literature data to enhance the competitiveness of technology commercialization by identifying success cases of public technology commercialization. In Korea, there are not many research papers that provide policy alternatives for technical commercialization of public research institutes. Therefore, in this paper, we review various government policies and check the status of technology commercialization to increase its value. Results – As a result of this study, it is suggested that various policy development is necessary for the commercialization of public technology, because it is important to increase the value of technology users, suppliers, investors and customers through various network activation. In particular, it is necessary to establish differentiated Korean public technology commercialization model for the proliferation of public technology commercialization by presenting methodical model of technical commercialization. Conclusions - Through this study, it is important to raise the competitiveness of domestic public technology commercialization, to create economic value, and to improve the performance of technology commercialization. Therefore, it is necessary to contribute to the creation of research achievement, research method of excellent technology, and method of commercializing technology, and to create achievement of technical commercialization in the future. In addition, from the viewpoint of commercialization of technology, strategies for creating value through utilization of public technology should be prepared, and a plan for mutual prosperity among domestic companies should be prepared. Policy alternatives of various public technology commercialization to build national competitiveness have been developed, and various examples of performance for the performance of public technology commercialization should be derived.

연구논문(硏究論文) : 지식재산 사업화 관련 법제도 체계에 대한 분석

손승우 ( Seung Woo Son ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2012 법학논총 Vol.36 No.2

As one of the Five IP Offices(IP5), Korea has maintained world-class level in a creation and protection of Intellectual Property. However, when it comes to create value by taking advantage of the created IP, it falls short of expectations. For these reasons, the recent policy of the government`s research and development, and technology and intellectual property is concentrated on commercialization. Support commercialization of intellectual property policies of the government, which is run mostly on the legal foundation, such as Technology Transfer and Commercialization Promotion Act, The Framework Act on Intellectual Property, Invention Promotion Act, Industrial Technology Innovation Promotion Act, Framework Act on Science and Technology, Regulations on Management of national Research and Development Projects, etc. These laws include a variety of programs and institutions for the commercialization. For example, specialized technology commercialization company, technology evaluation, technology holding company, finance, technology trust, technology start-ups specializing in company, asset-backed securitization, gratuitous donation, etc. The commercialization policy has been implemented by various government agencies such as the commercialization of research and development by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, industrial property commercialization by the Patent and Trademark Office, and the commercialization of the technology industry by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy, and the commercialization of the technology-related venture company by the Small & Medium Business Administration. Therefore, IP(including technology) commercialization in relevant laws can be overlapped, and the organic connection may not be enough. For instance, the Framework Act on Science and Technology does barely address facilitating commercialization of intellectual property from the research and development stage. This paper provides the basic comprehensive review of the relationship of the laws and institutions related to intellectual property rights commercialization. It examines inefficiency caused by redundant regulations of commercialization, and non-legislative space as well. It also suggested the necessity for a further study on comprehensive analysis on the legal system for the commercialization of intellectual property.

정책연구 : 창업보육 중소기업의 기술사업화에 관한 실증 연구

전인오 ( In Oh Jeon ) 한국중소기업학회 2010 中小企業硏究 Vol.32 No.4

본 연구는 창업보육 프로그램을 통해 지원을 받고 있는 중소기업들이 "보유하고 있는 아이디어를 기술개발을 통해 사업화하는 과정에서" 필요한 제반 능력들을 어느 정도 확보하고 있는 지 파악하고, 또 CEO 및 기업 특성에 따라 이러한 기업 능력에 차이가 나타나고 있는 지 실증적으로 분석한 것이다. 아울러 이러한 창업보육 중소기업들이 기술사업화를 추진함에 있어서 부딪히는 제반 애로점들을 파악하여, 이를 효율적으로 지원할 수 있는 지원방안을 모색하는 데도 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 창업보육센터에 입주했거나 입주 예정인 기업들에 대해 정부가 추진하고 있는 "창업보육기술개발사업"을 통해 지원을 받은 중소기업들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였고, 최종적으로 89개의 유효한 설문을 회수하였다. 창업보육 중소기업들의 기술사업화에 대한 실증분석을 통해 얻은 결과들은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 창업보육 중소기업들의 기술혁신 및 사업화 능력을 분석한 결과, 전반적으로 연구개발 능력과 기술축적 능력이 기술혁신능력, 제품화 능력, 생산화 능력, 마케팅능력에 비해 높은 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 이들 기업에 대한 효과적인 지원을 위해서는 취약한 능력을 보강하는데 더 노력이 집중 되어야 하며, 구체적으로는 마케팅 능력, 생산화 능력, 제품화 능력 등의 구축에 더 정책 지원의 비중이 주어져야 한다. 둘째, 창업보육 중소기업의 CEO의 연령과 학력에 따른 기업능력의 정도를 검증한 결과, CEO의 연령이 40세 이상인 기업에서 사업화 관련 역량에서 조금 더 높았고, CEO의 학력별 기업능력의 차이 분석에서는 CEO의 학력이 대학원 이상으로 높은 기업에서 연구개발 및 생산화 능력이 우월하고 CEO의 학력이 대졸이하 인 기업에서는 기술축적, 기술개발, 제품화 및 마케팅에서 우월한 능력을 보였으나 통계적으로는 유의하지 않았다. 셋째, 창업보육 중소기업의 사업 경과연수에 따른 기업능력의 정도를 검증한 결과, 사업경력에 따라 통계 적으로 유의한 기업능력의 차이는 보이지 않았다. 다만 3년 이내 업력을 가진 기업에서 기술축적과 개발능력이 우수하고, 다른 능력에서는 3년 이상 경력 기업이 우수한 경향을 보였다. 넷째, 창업보육 중소기업이 기술개발 및 사업화를 하는데 기업자신의 보유능력과 비교하여 애로점이 많은 분야로는"자금조달 관리업무" "마케팅 업무", "조직구성 및 운영업무"의 순으로 나타나고 있다. 이러한 영역에서는 창업보육 중소기업들이 자신의 보유하고 있는 능력으로는 해결이 불가능하다고 응답하고 있다. 다섯째, 사업화를 수행하는 과정에서 필요로 하는 업무영역별 능력을 ① 기술개발 및 관리, ② 기술기획 및 전략기획, ③ R&D 프로젝트 관리, ④ 핵심기술 분석, ⑤ 사업계획 수립, ⑥ 자금조달능력, ⑦ 마케팅 능력, ⑧ 조직운영능력의 8개 분야로 구분하고 그 각각의 세부업무 수행능력에 대하여 `중요도의 인식`을 분석한 결과 〈기술개발 및 관리〉 분야가 모든 단위 변수에서 가장 중요하게 인식되고 있었다. 아울러 〈기술/ 전략 기획〉 분야의 "경영/기술전략 수립"과 〈자금조달능력〉 분야의 "재무 및 투자계획", <R&D 프로젝트 관리〉 분야의 "R&D 기획", 그리고 사업계획 수립이나 핵심기술 분석도 중요하게 나타났다. 반면에 기술사업화를 추진하는 직접적인 변수로 기업의 마케팅과 조직운영 변수는 중요도를 낮게 인식하고 있었다. 여섯째, 사업화 과정에서 자체 해결이 어려운 이슈가 무엇인지 분석하였는데, "투자 유치"가 가장 어렵다 고 답했고, 다음으로 "기술 사업화", "경영/기술 전략 수립", "리스크 관리"인 것으로 나타났다. 아울려 "시장 조사", "마케팅 전략/계획"도 어려운 업무로 나타났고, 상대적으로 기술기획이나 지적재산권 관리 등은 해결의 난이도가 높지 않다고 인식하고 있었다. 따라서 창업보육 중소기업의 사업화 애로점을 해소하려면 경영 및 사업화 능력 확충을 위한 교육과 정보 제공, 협력을 통한 연계 주선 및 지원체계의 강화 등이 지속적으로 추진되어야 하며, 기업들의 자구 노력과 제반 정책 지원을 통한 창업보육 중소기업들의 능력 강화는 기술사업화 활성화로 이어질 것이다. Business incubator (BI) is recognized as an efficient mechanism to promote new venture crea-tion, technology commercialization and job creation. To become successful, tenant firms of BIs should have attractive business opportunities and required capabilities. This study focuses on the small and medium en-terprises (SMEs) supported by the government`s business incubation project, and deals with technology de-velopment and commercialization processes of incubated SMEs those own ideas for new technology and product development. The purpose of this study is to analyze SMEs` capabilities and difficulties in technol-ogy commercialization and to propose government policies to effectively promote SMEs` commercialization. Based on previous literatures, this study developed a research framework. Data were collected from 89 SMEs, located or to be located in business incubators and financially supported by the government for the commercialization of new technologies. The questionnaire used in this study contains several items such as i) general company information (industry, location. CEO`s age and education, and years of business oper-ation), ii) SME`s technology development capabilities (R&D capability, technology accumulation capability, and technology innovation system), ill) SME`s technology commercialization capabilities (product commercialization capability, process/production capability, and marketing capability), iv) difficult business processes or areas faced during the technology commercialization process (company formation procedure, technology de-velopment and management, business planning, fund raising and finance, technology marketing, and organ-ization management), and v) recognized importance of each business activity or capability in technology commercialization. Empirical results obtained from statistical analyses were summarized as follows. First, SMEs showed high-er technology development capability than technology commercialization capability. Especially, R&D and technology accumulation capabilities were very high compared to product commercialization, process technol-ogy production, and marketing capabilities. Therefore government support to strengthen technology commerci-alization capabilities should be highlighted. Second, companies with an older CEO (40 years old and more) showed higher technology accumulation capability compared to those with a younger CEO. Firms` commercialization capabilities were not sig-nificantly different depending on the CEO`s education level. Third, years of business operation of incubated SMEs did not affect firms` technology development and commercialization capabilities, although younger firms showed slightly higher capabilities in technology de-velopment compared to older firms. Fourth, SMEs pointed "fund raising and finance" as the most difficult business area and bottleneck in tech-nology commercialization. "Technology marketing" and "organization management" were also very lacking areas in the process of commercialization. SMEs replied that these three areas are main bottlenecks and can-not be overcome without strong support from outside (including the government). Fifth, technology commercialization requires the integrated efforts of several business activities such as in-novation, business and technology planning, marketing, financing and organization management. In this study, commercialization-related activities or capabilities were classified into eight categories, such as i) technology development and management, ii) strategic technology planning, iii) R&D project management, iv) core tech-nology development, v) preparing a business plan, vi) financing, vii) marketing, and viii) organization management. The survey result shows that SMEs recognize "technology development and management" (such as corporate technology planning, technology commercialization, and core technology management) as the most important capability for successful commercialization. Furthermore, financial requirement analysis and investment planning, strategy formulation, R&D project planning, and business planning were also appeared as important activities and capabilities for commercialization. Based on the empirical study and findings, this study suggests following policy recommendations. First of all, financing was the key obstacle in technology commercialization. Therefore, securing several funding sources should be the priority policy measure. In addition to the government`s financial supports, the private sec-tor should take more active roles in early stage financing for SMEs through angels and venture capital investments. Government should make efforts for deregulation in the financial sector Second, the lack of planning and marketing capabilities can be ascribed to poor manpower. Government should support manpower training and recruiting through various training programs and subsidies for new hires. Long-term human resource development (HRD) planning should reflect the changing job market and emerging demands for new talents. Third, the roles of BIs should be strengthened from rent businesses (providing spaces) to integrated service providers. BIs should serve as technology commercialization platforms and make active networks with outside specialists. Especially, BI managers should have pivotal roles in technology commercialization and new ven-ture growth and more incentives should be given to the specialists or businessmen with real business experi-ences to become BI managers. Fourth, this study showed that lacks in management capabilities (rather than technology capabilities) were more critical bottleneck in commercialization. Therefore executive management programs for small business CEOs should be promoted. In addition, undergraduate engineering students should have more chances to study management as recommended courses. Finally, integrated and flexible support mechanism should be devised to actively promote technology com-mercialization, from start-up and business planning to financing and marketing. Cooperation among several policy-implementing agencies is also needed. This study analyzes limited samples of SMEs and the finding cannot be necessarily generalized into different situations. With the environmental change from catch-up imitators to front runners, however, innovative SM& in Korea really need planning and management capabilities for the prosperous future, and this study signals the importance of management knowledge, skills, and capabilities of small business CEOs.

기술사업화 능력과 기술경영 성과의 관계에 대한 변혁적 리더십의 조절효과에 관한 연구

이태헌(Lee Tae Heon 대한리더십학회 2017 리더십연구 Vol.8 No.1

본 연구는 최근 들어 산업계를 중심으로 주목을 받고 있는 기술사업화와 기술경영성과에 관한 실증연구이다. 특히 기술사업화 능력과 기술경영 성과의 관계와 그 관계에 있어서의 변혁적 리더십의 조절 효과를 검증하고자 하였다. 협의의 기술사업화 과정을 전제로 기술집약형 중소기업 최고 경영자의 제조역량 및 생산역량, 마케팅 역량이 기술경영 성과에 미치는 영향을 규명한 것이다. 또한, 기술사업화 추진 시 가장 중요시되는 최고 경영자의 리더십을 변혁적 리더십에다 초점을 두고 리더십 강도에 따라서 기술경영의 성과가 어떻게 달라지는 지를 조사하였다. 그리고 상관관계, 계층적 회귀분석 방법을 이용하여 분석하여 다음과 같은 결론을 도출하였다. 첫째, 기술사업화 능력들이 기술경영 성과에 미치는 영향 검증에서는 모든 기술사업화 세부능력들이 기업 성과에 유의한 양(+)의 영향을 미치는 것을 알 수 있었다. 이를 통하여 기술사업화 능력들은 성공적인 기술사업화를 통해 기업 성과 제고에 상당 부분 기여하는 것으로 판단된다. 둘째, 기술사업화 능력과 기술경영 성과의 관계에 대한 변혁적 리더십은 두 개의 하위 변수인 카리스마와 지적자극 중에서 지적자극은 대체로 조절 효과가 있는 양(+)의 효과로 나타났으나 카리스마는 거의 효과가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 실무적 측면에서 기술사업화를 추진하는 기술집약형 중소기업에 가장 요구되는 핵심 인재상은 창의적 직관과 논리적 해결을 독려하는 리더형인 것으로 밝혀진 것이다. 따라서 지적 자극을 촉발하는 리더십을 갖추고 기술사업화를 추진하는 중소기업은 기술사업화 목표 도달뿐만 아니라 기술 경영 성과까지 향상되어 미래 경쟁력이 더욱 높아질 것이다. This study is an empirical study on technology commercialization and technology management performance, which are attracting attention mainly in industry. Especially, we tried to verify the moderating effect of transformational leadership on the relationship between technology commercialization ability and technical management performance and relationship. This study has identified the CEO’s manufacturing capacity, production capacity, and marketing competence that affect the performance of technology management. In addition, we investigated how the performance of technology management varies according to the strength of transformational leadership which is most important in technology commercialization. The results of the analysis are summarized as follows. First, in verifying the effect of technical commercialization capabilities on technical management performance, it was found that all technical commercialization abilities have a significant (+) effect on firm performance. It is believed that the technology commercialization capabilities contribute to the enhancement of corporate performance through successful technology commercialization. Second, The intellectual stimulation about the relationship between the technical commercialization ability and the technical management performance showed a positive effect (+), but the charisma had little effect. It is found that the core talents that are most required for technology-intensive SMEs that promote technology commercialization from the practical side are leaders who encourage creative intuition and logical solution. Therefore, SMEs that have leadership that stimulates intellectual stimulation and promote technology commercialization will not only reach the goal of technology commercialization, but also improve technology management performance, which will further enhance future competitiveness.

상생형 현장실습교육을 통한 기업가정신과 창업가 역량 향상에 관한 연구: 새가게운동 사례

이유태,정대성,오윤석 한국벤처창업학회 2016 벤처창업연구 Vol.11 No.1

There is a growing interest in the technology transfer and commercialization both at home and abroad. Accordingly, this study looked at the concept of technology transfer and commercialization, identified the factors that should be taken into account in order to facilitate technology transfer and commercialization, and then performed a empirical analysis. As for the conventional technology transfer and commercialization, there was a tendency to limit its scope to the exploration, transfer and commercialization of technology itself. Here in this research, technology transfer and commercialization is defined the category to expand as various activities implemented in order to make sure that intellectual properties such as intangible technological developments, know-how, and knowledge are transferred between the relevant parties through a contract or negotiation, and the party to which the transfer is made can then further develop and exploit the technology into tangible products and other activities to obtain economic benefit out of that. In addition, the findings of the positive analysis of technology transfer and commercialization revealed that the focus of facilitating technology transfer has been on the technology itself, its management and securing efficiency of the systems and institutions involved in the technology transfer and commercialization. So there was lack of recognition as to the importance of financial support given to the phase of technology commercialization. This indicates that when it comes to the technology transfer and commercialization, quantitative performance has been the focus of interest such as patent application, registration, number of technology transfers, royalty, etc. So there was not enough understanding as to the issues of starting up a business, creating quality jobs through technology transfer and commercialization, which are directly related to the realization of the creative economy. In this regard, this research is expected to be used for the development for the future policies to boost technology transfer and commercialization as it suggests not only simply ensuring quantitative performance but also necessary to create the environment for the creation of the stable ecosystem for the parties involved in the technology transfer and commercialization and then to build circumstances in which creative economy can be realized. 본 연구에서는 상생형 현장체험 창업교육의 일환인 새가게운동이 대학생 창업의도와 현장체험 대상기업인 소상공인 경영개선에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 본 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 새가게운동 체험이 기업가정신, 창업태도, 창업의도를 향상시키는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 기업가정신은 창업태도에, 창업태도는 창업의도에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 소상공인들의 창업가 역량(경영역량)과 기업가정신이 향상되고 이들의 향상은 재무적, 비재무적 성과에 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 시사점은 새가게운동과 같은 새로운 상생형 체험 프로그램이 참여한 대학생과 업주에게 양방향적으로 긍적적인 영향을 주고 있는 것이다. 따라서 창업교육에 있어서 세대별로 단절되는 것보다는 새가게운동과 같이 청장년이 같이 노력해서 그 결과가 상생적인 양방형 현장체험학습의 강화가 필요하다고 볼 수 있다.

Research on the Growth Strategy of University Technology Holding Companies Based on Public Technology

윤정근 동아시아경상학회 2020 The East Asian Journal of Business Economics Vol.8 No.4

Purpose- In terms of promoting public technology commercialization, 10 years have passed since the university technology holding company was launched. University technology holding companies are supporting the growth of excellent technology and human resources through technology commercialization by revitalizing the technology possessed by universities and in connection with startups. However, since university technology holding companies experience many difficulties in the process of commercializing public technologies, policy alternatives from various perspectives must be prepared. This study aims to study the growth strategies of university technology holding companies to promote public technology commercialization by examining the current status and problems of university technology holding companies. Research design, data, and methodology– In this study, the current status of university technology holding companies was analyzed based on the actual condition survey data published by the Association of University Technology Holding Companies. As there is a lack of research on university technology holding companies, a policy alternative was suggested by examining problems based on literature research. In addition, government announcement materials were used to develop policy alternatives such as laws and regulations related to university technology holding companies and operational status. Results- University technology holding companies occupy a very important position in public technology commercialization. The growth of technology holding companies over the past decade has contributed to public technology commercialization in many aspects, but the performance of domestic technology commercialization is insufficient compared to investment in R&D, so the role of public technology holding companies needs to be strengthened. Therefore, in this study, alternatives were proposed to strengthen the competitiveness of technology holding companies and to provide policy support. Through the reinforcement of the technology holding subsidiary's self-sustainability, the plan to foster excellent talent, and the marketing expansion model of the support program, it is highly necessary to commercialize the performance-generating public technology based on the technology holding company. Conclusions- The purpose of this study is to create a growth engine for technology holding companies by discovering policy alternatives for university technology holding companies that have not been studied so far. Although alternatives to revitalize the existing technology commercialization have been suggested, research on the role and status of detailed technology holding companies has been lacking, and the discovery of technology holding companies' operating systems and future growth models is very insufficient compared to overseas cases. Therefore, in this study, various policy alternatives and support efforts are needed so that university technology holding companies can be self-sustaining and act as a growth engine for public technology commercialization.

우리나라 중소기업의 공공기술 사업화 영향요인에 관한 연구

박문수 ( Mun-su Park ),장순우 ( Daniel Soonwoo Chang ) 한국통상정보학회 2016 통상정보연구 Vol.18 No.3

본 연구는 우리나라에서 공공부문으로부터 기술이전을 받은 중소기업에 대한 사업화 성과와 이에 대한 영향에 관한 연구이다. 2014년 기술이전사업화조사분석자료집에 따르면 공공부문에서 기술이전을 받은 기술 중 약30%만이 활용되고 있고 나머지 70%는 미활용되거나 방치상태이다. 상대적으로 대학 및 출연연 등 공공기관의 기술사업화 지원 역량 또한 발전이 더딘 상황이다. 이에 따라 공공부문 기술사업화를 통해 중소기업의 발전을 추동하고, 혁신 성과를 확산하기 위해서는 지속적이고 체계적인 정책적인 지원이 필요한 상황이다. 본 논문에서는 공공부문 기술이전 이후 중소기업의 활용 및 사업화 등에 관한 전주기적 분석을 통해 사업화 성공과 실패 요인을 조사하였다. 최근 3년간 진행된 중소기업기술통계조사를 기반으로 하여 기술사업화 성공기업을 도출하고, 기술사업화의 활용형태에 따라 성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 분석을 하였다. 통계 분석 결과, 공공기술을 기반으로 한 사업화 성공 중소기업은 기술개발 성공건수 및 지식재산 등록건수가 많아질수록 사업화 성공률에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 불필요하게 많은 기술개발, 계획 단계에서 긴 리드 타임 등의 경우 사업화 실패가능성이 높다는 것을 확인했다. 이러한 분석결과는 최근 양적인 차원에서 지원되는 중소기업의 기술개발 시도가 모두 긍정적인 효과를 발휘하기 어렵다는 정책 함의를 도출 할 수 있다. 또한 이를 위해 효율성 및 성공 가능성이 높은 기술사업화에 대한 선택적 지원이 필요하다는 것을 정책 함의로 도출할 수 있다. This paper investigates the success and failure factors of technology commercialization for SMEs developing public sector technologies. The 2014 Korea Technology Transfer Commercialization Status Report states that only 30% of the technologies that are transferred are being used and the rest are neglected. The objective of this paper is to determine the relationship between quantitative variables and the success rate of technology commercialization of 1,222 SMEs in Korea by using three analyzes (cross tabulation, process and logistic) methodologies to increase the success of public technology commercialization. The outcome shows that the number of successful technology deployment cases and the number of IPR registration cases have a positive impact on the success rate of public technology commercialization. The statistical outcome also verifies that unnecessary technology development, more attempts and failures of technology development, and longer lead time in the planning phase have a negative impact on the success rate of the public technology development and commercialization. For policy implications, the government should be selective in supporting public technology commercialization and development for SMEs as not all technology attempts exert positive effects.

한국산업기술진흥원(KAIT)기술경영우수논문 공모전 수상작 : R&D투자가 경영성과에 미치는 영향; 기술사업화 능력의 매개효과를 중심으로

이성화 ( Sung Hwa Lee ),조근태 ( Kuen Tae Cho ) 기술경영경제학회 2012 Journal of Technology Innovation Vol.20 No.1

R&D연구소를 보유하고 있는 우리나라 민간기업 118개를 분석한 결과, R&D투자는 기술사업화성과, 매출액증가율 및 영업이익증가율 등 경영성과에 모두 긍정적인(+)영향을 미치는 것을 확인하였고, 기술사업화 능력이 R&D투자와 경영성과간의 관계에서 분석한 결과, 기술전략기획능력, 기술프로세스능력, 기술조직능력인 광의의 기술사업화 능력이 경영성과에 부분적으로 매개효과를 나타났으며, 제조능력과 마케팅능력인 협의의 기술사업화 능력은 경영성과에 모두 매개효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 R&D투자가 경영성과를 달성하는데 필요한 요인이지만, 기술사업화 능력도 경영성과에 매개작용을 하므로 기술사업화 능력을 강화하는 것이 필요함을 시사하고 있다. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect on R&D investment and technology commercialization capabilities on business performance of 118 Korean firms which has R&D center. In particular, this study tried to define technology commercialization and technology commercialization capabilities for the board and narrow perspective, and investigates the role of technology commercialization capabilities in linking R&D investment and business performance in terms of a financial performance as the growing rate of sales, the growing rate of operating income to sales and non-financial performance as the ratio of technology commercialization. The results of this study are as follows. First, the findings of the research indicated that there was a significant positive relationship between R&D investment and business performance as financial and non-financial. Second, the study found that board technology commercialization capability as technology strategic planning, technology process, and technology organization has the mediating effect to R&D investment on business performance as the ratio of technology commercialization. Third, the study found that narrow technology commercialization capability as manufacturing and marketing play a mediating role in terms of business performance as financial and non-financial.