우주발사체용 복합재 산화제탱크 구조 강건성 검증을 위한 정하중 시험

김현기,김성찬 항공우주시스템공학회 2021 항공우주시스템공학회지 Vol.15 No.5

This study presented the results of the static load tests conducted to verify the structural robustness of the composite oxidant tank for a space launch vehicle. First, we introduced the test equipment used in the static load test of the composite oxidant tank, and then described the test requirements that the composite oxidant tank must satisfy. In addition, we presented a test set-up diagram consisting of the static load test fixture, hydraulic pressure, control equipment, and data acquisition equipment, and the load profile of the static load test of the composite oxidant tank consisting of shear, equivalent compression, bending, and combination tests. As a result of load control, we verified the reliability of this test by showing the errors between the input load and the feedback load in each channel according to the increase of the test load, and the feedback error between the channel A and channel B of load cell in each load actuator. As a result of the static load test, the load of the actuator was properly controlled within the allowable error range in each test, and we found that the test specimen did not cause damage or buckling that causes significant structural defects in the required load. 본 연구에서는 우주발사체용 복합재 산화제탱크의 구조 강건성을 검증하기 위해 수행된 정하중시험 결과를 제시하였다. 먼저, 복합재 산화제탱크 정하중시험에 사용된 시험장비를 소개하고, 복합재 산화제탱크가 만족해야 하는 시험 요구도를 설명하였다. 그리고, 정하중 시험치구, 유압, 제어장비, 데이터획득장비로 구성되는 시험셋업 구성도를 제시하였고, 전단, 등가압축, 굽힘, 조합시험으로 구성된 복합재 산화제탱크 정하중 시험의 하중 프로파일을 제시하였다. 하중 제어의 결과로 시험하중 증가에 따른 각 하중부과기에서 입력하중과 출력하중 사이의 오차와 각 로드셀 A와 b 채널사이의 오차를 제시하여 본 시험의 신뢰성을 확인하였다. 정하중 시험 결과로, 각 시험에서 하중부과기의 하중은 허용 오차 범위 내에서 적절히 잘 제어되었으며, 시험시편도 요구 하중 내에서 파손이나 심각한 구조적 결함을 유발하는 좌굴은 발생하지 않는 것으로 확인되었다.

Evaluating the Accuracy of Load Application for Static Structural Testing of Aerospace Flight Vehicles

심재열 한국항공우주학회 2020 International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sc Vol.21 No.1

This study introduces a method to evaluate the accuracy of load application in static structural tests of aerospace flight vehicles which use lots of actuators. Test data were collected for this study from typical test conditions of four independent structural tests performed within two decades in this laboratory. The tests included three full-scale aircraft tests and a launch vehicle sub-component test. The accuracy of load application was evaluated by calculating the root mean square deviation (RMSD) of errors normalized by DLL (design limit load). The RMSD range of the normalized error for the three full-scale aircraft tests was 0.27–0.89% and was much larger than the 0.04% obtained for the launch vehicle sub-component test. After analyzing the errors in all 91 loading channels used for the four tests, it was determined that tight adjustment of the load limit valve (LLV), and using actuators with a small load ratio, introduced large errors in load application. Even after excluding undesirable data related to the tight adjustment of the LLV and the use of actuators with less than 3% load ratio, the accuracy of load application for the three full-scale tests was still lower than the results for the sub-component test. The factors which induced the large errors in the full-scale tests were determined to be the large displacement of wing or canard and the use of actuators with small load ratio. RMSDs recalculated after excluding the undesirable data were in the range of 0.26–0.41% for the full-scale tests. The maximum value, 0.41%, can be used as tolerance to confirm the accuracy of load application for the next full-scale tests.

양방향 재하시험을 이용한 말뚝의 하중-변위곡선 추정방법

권오성,권오균,김명모,최용규 한국지반공학회 2006 한국지반공학회논문집 Vol.22 No.4

For the last decade, the bi-directional testing method has been advantageous over the conventional pile load testing method in many aspects. However, because the bi-directional test uses a loading mechanism entirely different from that of the conventional pile load testing method, many investigators and practicing engineers have been concerned that the bi-directional test would give inaccurate results, especially about the pile head settlement behavior. Therefore, a bi-directional load test and the conventional top-down load test were executed on 1.5 m diameter cast-in-situ concrete piles at the same time and site. Strain gauges were placed on the piles. The two tests gave similar load transfer curves at various depth of piles. However, the top-down equivalent curve constructed from the bi-directional load test results predicted the pile head settlement under the pile design load to be about one half of that predicted by the conventional top-down load test. To improve the prediction accuracy of the top-down equivalent curve, a simple method that accounts for the pile compression is proposed. It was also shown that the strain gauge measurement data from the bi-directional load test could reproduce almost the same top-down curve.

현장시험과 Class-A 및 C1 type 수치해석을 통한 강관매입말뚝의 거동에 대한 연구

김성희(Sung-Hee Kim),정경자(Gyoung-Ja Jung),정상섬(Sang-Seom Jeong),전영진(Young-Jin Jeon),김정섭(Jeong-Sub Kim),이철주(Cheol-Ju Lee) 한국지반환경공학회 2017 한국지반환경공학회논문집 Vol.18 No.7

본 연구에서는 강관매입말뚝의 하중-침하 및 전단응력 전이 특성을 분석하기 위하여 시험시공 및 수치해석을 수행하였다. 동재하시험 및 정재하시험을 수행한 결과 EOID 및 Restrike 시험을 통해 평가된 말뚝의 설계지지력은 정재하시험에서 평가된 설계지지력에 비해 각각 약 56~105% 및 65~121%의 범위를 보였으며, 말뚝재하시험 이전에 수행된 Class-A type 수치해석의 경우 38~142%의 범위를 보였다. 또한 Restrike 시험에서 평가된 설계지지력은 EOID 시험의 설계지지력에 비해 12~60% 증가된 것으로 평가되었다. EOID에서는 선단지지력이 크게 측정되는 데 비해, Restrike 시험에서는 주면마찰력이 크게 측정되었는데 Restrike 시험의 타격에너지가 충분하지 않은 경우 말뚝의 선단지지력이 과소평가될 가능성이 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구의 분석에 의하면 동재하시험을 통해 말뚝의 지지력을 합리적으로 평가하기 위해서는 주면지지력은 Restrike 시험 결과를, 선단지지력은 EOID 시험결과를 적용하는 것이 합리적인 것을 알 수 있었다. 정재하시험 실측값과 수치해석으로부터 예측된 하중-침하 관계는 탄성범위까지는 어느 정도 유사하지만 항복이 발생한 이후의 거동은 크게 벗어났다. 즉 실측값은 항복 이후 경화현상이 거의 없이 마치 탄성-완전소성(elastic-perfectly plastic) 재료와 유사하게 파괴에 도달되는 반면에, 수치해석에서는 변형경화(strain hardening)과정을 거치면서 파괴에 점진적으로 도달되는 경향을 보였다. 말뚝의 하중-침하 특성은 지반의 강성에 영향을 받으며, 축력분포는 지반의 전단강도상수에 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. In this study, a series of full-scale field tests on prebored and precast steel pipe piles and the corresponding numerical analysis have been conducted in order to study the characteristics of pile load-settlement relations and shear stress transfer at the pile-soil interface. Dynamic pile load tests (EOID and restrike) have been performed on the piles and the estimated design pile loads from EOID and restrike tests were analysed. Class-A type numerical analyses conducted prior to the pile loading tests were 56~105%, 65~121% and 38~142% respectively of those obtained from static load tests. In addition, design loads estimated from the restrike tests indicate increases of 12~60% compared to those estimated in the EOID tests. The EOID tests show large end bearing capacity while the restrike tests demonstrate increased skin friction. When impact energy is insufficient during the restrike tests, the end bearing capacity may be underestimated. It has been found that total pile capacity would be reasonably estimated if skin friction from the restrike tests and end bearing capacity from the EOID are combined. The load-settlement relation measured from the static pile load tests and estimated from the numerical modelling is in general agreement until yielding occurs, after which results from the numerical analyses substantially deviated away from those obtained from the static load tests. The measured pile behaviour from the static load tests shows somewhat similar behaviour of perfectly-elastic plastic materials after yielding with a small increase in the pile load, while the numerical analyses demonstrates a gradual increase in the pile load associated with strain hardening approaching ultimate pile load. It has been discussed that the load-settlement relation mainly depends upon the stiffness of the ground, whilst the shear transfer mechanism depends on shear strength parameters.

Consideration on Design Loads Needed for Assessing Integrity of Fuel Assemblies Under Normal Conditions of Transport

Woo-seok Choi,JaeHoon Lim,Jongmin Lim,Gil-Eon Jeong 한국방사성폐기물학회 2022 한국방사성폐기물학회 학술논문요약집 Vol.20 No.1

This paper intends to present considerations on the question of what is the “load standard” or “design load” for integrity evaluation under normal transportation conditions and what type of design load is good for users. This suggests a direction for subsequent research on producing design loads that transport business companies can utilize without difficulty. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the integrity of spent nuclear fuel during normal transportation. A representative study recently conducted is the Multi-modal Transportation Test (MMTT) conducted using a commercial spent nuclear fuel cask by US DOE in 2017. In Korea, additional transport tests were planned to acquire sufficient test data under the conditions of road and sea transport considering the Korean situation. As a result, road transport tests were carried out in 2020 and sea transport tests were carried out in 2021. In the road transport test, a driving test that simulates various road conditions and a test that cycled a 4.5 km road eight times were performed. In most cases, the maximum acceleration of less than 1 g occurred, and the maximum strain was less than 48 με. For the sea transport test, the magnitude of both the maximum acceleration and the maximum strain were lower than those in the road transport test. We concluded tentatively that the integrity of spent fuel under normal conditions of transport was satisfactory with a large margin. However, when the storage business is realized and the transport of spent fuel becomes visible, the storage and transport business companies will have to prove the maintenance of the integrity of the spent fuel under normal transport conditions at the request of the regulatory agency. The transport business companies can transport the spent nuclear fuel by using different types of transport casks and different types of trucks and ships from those used in the tests mentioned above. However, it is absurd to have to prove the integrity of spent nuclear fuel by performing expensive tests again. Therefore, in this study, the design load that can be used by transport business companies is to be presented. The design load to be presented should satisfy the following requirements. The design load should be applicable including some differences in the transport cask or transport system, or different design loads should be presented according to the differences. The location where this design load is applied is to be specified (e.g. fuel rod, basket, internal structure). Requirements according to the operating speed of the transport system should be presented together. The type of design load is to be presented (e.g. PSD, SRS, FDS etc.). Other types of standards may be presented. For example, a speed limit for a vehicle carrying spent nuclear fuel may be suggested, or a speed limit for a vehicle passing through a speed bump may be suggested. In order to present such a reliable design load, a multi-axis vibration excitation shaker table test will be carried out. Though this shaker table test, the behavior of the nuclear fuel assembly is closely evaluated by applying the data obtained from the road and sea transport tests previously performed as an input load. In addition, FDS (Fatigue Damage Spectrum) will be produced and applied to experimentally evaluate the durability of fuel assemblies under normal transport conditions.

암반소켓된 소구경 현장타설말뚝의 정재하시험과 양방향재하시험 분석법 비교연구

송명준(Myungjun Song),송영훈(Younghun Song),정민형(Minhyung Jung),박영호(Youngho Park),박재현(Jaehyun Park),이주형(Juhyung Lee),정문경(Moonkyung Chung) 한국지반환경공학회 2013 한국지반환경공학회논문집 Vol.14 No.9

이 논문에서는 정재하시험과 양방향재하시험의 하중-침하거동을 비교하기 위하여 인접한 위치에서 직경 480mm인 암반에 소켓된 현장타설말뚝을 시공하고 각각 정재하시험과 양방향재하시험을 실시하였다. 양방향재하시험 해석법 중 기존의 탄성압축량을 고려하지 않은 등가하중곡선법은 정재하시험 결과와 비교할 경우 침하량을 과소평가하는 것으로 나타났기 때문에, 정확한 하중-침하 곡선 산정을 위해서는 반드시 탄성압축량을 고려해야 한다. 또한 기 제안된 여러 탄성압축량을 고려한 등가하중곡선법들을 정재하시험 결과와 비교검토한 결과, 충분한 적용성을 가지는 것으로 판단되었다. 또한 정재하시험과 양방향재하시험의 지지력을 비교한 결과, 양방향재하시험은 말뚝재료의 극한강도를 반영하지 못하고 지반의 극한지지력만을 평가하므로 반드시 재료강도에 대한 검토를 실시하여야 한다. In this study, each top-down load test and bi-directional load test has been performed on the 480mm diameter of two rock socketed drilled shafts, which are located next to each other, and the results have been compared. The result shows that the settlement from the equivalent load-settlement curve of bi-directional load test is smaller than one from top-down load test, because elastic is not considered in equivalent load-settlement curve of bi-directional load test. Therefore elastic shortening should be considered to obtain appropriate equivalent load-settlement curve. Three existing methods used to obtain equivalent load-settlement curve with consideration of elastic shortening has been compared with the result of top-down load test. The result shows that those existing methods are sufficiently applicable to the design. In addition, result of comparison between top-down load test and bi-directional load test shows that bi-directional load test was found to overestimate bearing capacity because it does not consider pile body failure.

대구경 현장타설말뚝의 대용량 양방향 말뚝재하시험 분석 및 극한지지력 추정을 위한 수치해석 연구

남문석(Nam, Moonsuk),김상일(Kim, Sangil),홍석우(Hong, Seokwoo),황성춘(Hwang, Seongchun),최용규(Choi, Yongkyu) 한국지반환경공학회 2011 한국지반환경공학회논문집 Vol.12 No.10

초고층 건축물 기초의 고용량 하중 지지능력을 확인할 수 있는 가장 현실적인 방안인 고유압방식의 고용량 양방향 말뚝재하시험을 2개 현장에서 실시하였다. 고유압 복동식 양방향 말뚝재하시험은 정재하시험 시 재하용량 한계와 현장조건의 제약을 극복할 수 있는 가장 현실적인 방안으로 볼 수 있었으며 고용량이 필요한 시험말뚝에 대한 재하시험에 매우 유용한 시험방법으로 판단되었다. 2개의 사례에서 계산된 설계하중 충족비는 각각 3.3, 2.1이었으므로 사례(P-2)에서 1방향 재하하중을 다소 작게 재하하였더라면 말뚝기초의 안정성을 실증적으로 확인하지 못하였을 것으로 판단되었다. 초고용량의 양방향 말뚝재하시험에서 설정한 최대하중까지 재하하더라도 말뚝 및 지반의 극한상태를 확인하는 것은 쉽지 않았으므로 대구경 현장타설말뚝의 극한지지력을 추정하기 위하여 2개의 고용량 대구경 현장타설말뚝에 대한 수치해석을 실시하였다. The high capacity bi-directional pile load test is an optimum pile load test method for high-rised buildings. Especially, a high pressure and double-acting bi-directional pile load testing, a special type of the high capacity bi-directional pile load test, is the most practical way to overcome limitations of loading capacities and constraints of field conditions, which was judged to be a very useful test method for requiring high loading capacities. Total of 2 high capacity bi-directional pile load tests(P-1 and P-2) were conducted in high-rised building sites in Korea. Based on the field load test results, the sufficiency ratio of loading capacities to design loads for P-1 and P-2 were 3.3 and 2.1, respectively. For P-2, the load test could not verify the design load if 1-directional loads applied slightly smaller than the actual applied load. Also, high capacity bi-directional pile load tests were difficult to determine an ultimate state of ground or piles, although the loads were applied until their maximum loads. Hence, finite element analyses were conducted to determine their ultimate states by calibrating and extrapolate with test results.

양방향말뚝재하시험의 재하용량 기준에 관한 연구

최용규(Choi Yongkyu) 대한토목학회 2008 대한토목학회논문집 C Vol.28 No.6

대형말뚝기초의 양방향 재하시험에서 재하용량 기준이 정확하게 규정되어 있지 않다. 그래서 양방향말뚝재하시험을 수행함에 있어 많은 혼란이 발생하고 있으며 재하용량에서 최대 2배까지의 차이가 나타나고 있다. 본 연구에서는 양방향 말뚝재하 시험 기준들을 고찰하였으며, 국내에서 수행된 양방향 말뚝재하시험 사례들에 기초하여 최대등가시험하중, 재하하중 증가비, 재하용량 증가비 및 설계하중 충족비를 분석하였다. 양방향 말뚝재하시험 기준은 1방향 재하용량으로 정의되어야 하며, 1방향 재하용량은 설계하중의 2배 이상 이어야 한다는 것을 알 수 있었다. In the bi-directional pile load test (BD PLT) for pile load tests of Mega pile foundations, loading capacity standard is not specified exactly. Therefore there are so many confusions in performing the BD PLT and variations up to maximum 2 times in loading capacity are come out. In this study, standards of bi-directional pile load test (BD PLT) were considered. Based on cases of the bi-directional pile load test performed in domestic areas, maximum equivalent test load, test load increasing ratio, loading capacity increasing ratio and sufficiency ratio of design load were analyzed. It could be known that the loading capacity standard of bi-directional pile load test must be defined as 1-directional loading capacity and also must be established as more than 2 times of design load.

헬리컬 파일의 지지력 산정을 위한 양방향 재하시험의 적용성 평가

이동섭(Dongseop Lee),나경욱(Kyunguk Na),이원제(Wonje Lee),김형남(Hyung-nam Kim),최항석(Hangseok Choi) 한국지반신소재학회 2014 한국지반신소재학회 논문집 Vol.13 No.4

헬리컬 파일(helical pile)은 회전 관입기로 시공이 가능하므로 비교적 소형의 장비로 말뚝 시공이 가능한 장점이 있어, 최근 다양한 현장에서 그 사용이 증가하고 있다. 그러나 헬리컬 파일의 지지력을 평가하기 위한 현장 정재하시험은 시험하중만큼의 사하중, 반력 말뚝, 반력 앵커 등이 필요하다는 단점이 있다. 본 연구에서는 헬리컬 파일에 상대적으로 재하장치가 간단하고 시험이 간편한 양방향 재하시험을 적용하였으며, 양방향 재하시험 결과와 정재하시험 결과를 비교하였다. 양방향 재하시험은 헬리컬 파일의 중공형 중심축(shaft)에 중심축의 직경과 일치하고 중심축 내부 공간으로 유압재하용 호스가 나올 수 있도록 특수하게 제작된 유압식 셀(cell)을 나선형 원판(helix plate)사이에 삽입한 후, 유압 셀(cell)에 가압하여 지지력을 측정하는 방식으로 수행되었다. 양방향 재하시험은 유압식 셀을 최하단 나선형 원판 상부에 삽입한 경우와 최상단 나선형 원판 상부에 삽입한 두 가지 케이스로 시험을 진행하였으며, 각각의 방법이 선단지지력과 주면마찰력을 측정할 수 있도록 말뚝 두부의 변형을 제한하였다. 시험은 89mm, 114mm의 중심축에 450mm, 350mm, 200mm의 나선형 원판을 부착하여 제작한 헬리컬 파일로 수행되었으며, 시험 결과 정재하시험으로 산정한 지지력과 양방향 재하시험으로 산정한 지지력이 유사함을 확인하였다. The helical pile has become popular with some constructional advantages because relatively compact equipment is needed for installing helical piles. However, field loading tests for estimating the bearing capacity of helical piles have drawbacks that the required dead load should be as much as the operation load, and reaction piles or anchors are required. In this paper, the bi-directional load test without necessity of reaction piles and loading frames was applied to the helical pile, and the load-settlement curves of the helical piles were measured. The bi-directional load test was performed in two separate stages with the aid of a special hydraulic cylinder whose diameter is equal to that of the pile shaft. In the first stage, the hydraulic cylinder is assembled immediately above the bottom helix plate, and the end bearing capacity of the helical pile is measured. In the second stage, the hydraulic cylinder is assembled above the top helix plate, and the skin friction of the helical pile is measured. The pile loading-test program was carried out for the two different helical piles with the shaft diameter of 89 mm and 114 mm, respectively. However, the configuration of helix plates is identical with three helix plates of 450-, 350-, 200- mm diameter. Results of the bi-directional load test were verified by the conventional static pile loading test. As a result, the bearing capacity estimated by the bi-directional load test is in good agreement with the result of the conventional pile loading test.

현장재하시험을 통한 강관 매입말뚝의 지지력 안전율 제안

박종전,정상섬,박정식 한국지반공학회 2018 한국지반공학회논문집 Vol.34 No.5

In this study, the static and dynamic load tests were carried out to propose the safety factor of steel prebored and precast piles in weathered rocks. The axial load tests have been conducted on test piles with nominal diameters of 0.508 and 0.457 m. The piles were subject to static loading tests (14 times) and dynamic loading tests (EOID 14times, Restrike 14times). The dynamic loading tests were first executed after the casting of test piles (① initial EOID test). ②In the succeding 28 days from completion of construction, static load tests were performed and ③final restrike tests were carried out after 15 days from the static test. As a result, the bearing capacity based on Davisson method was 15% higher than that of the restrike tests. The bearing capacity of the static load tests were larger than that of the dynamic tests. By comparing the safety factor through various loading tests, the safety factor of dynamic loading tests were suggested to be lowered to 1.75 from the conventional 2.0.