정부청사 보안조직의 문제점 및 개선방안 - 정부청사특별사법경찰대 창설을 중심으로 -

박창규 사단법인 한국안전문화학회 2023 안전문화연구 Vol.- No.21

In addition to the ongoing threat of provocations, such as North Korea's resumption of ballistic missile tests, and the chaotic international situation caused by the prolonged Russian invasion of Ukraine, anxiety in the field of domestic security is also rising. Even in these chaotic times, government offices are always exposed to various security incidents, so it is necessary to pay more attention to security. The government buildings of the Republic of Korea consist of 'A'-class facilities (Seoul, Gwacheon, Daejeon, Sejong), where most of the administrative and central administrative agencies are located, and other government and local government buildings. The importance of government building security is increasing due to additional construction plans for government and local government offices, but the security organization is insufficient in comparison. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the current situation of the government building security organization, draw implications, and suggest improvement plans so that an organization capable of improving security level and efficient security work can be formed. As for the method of the study, in order to identify the problems of the government building security organization, previous research and literature data on the security organization of other organizations similar to the government building were analyzed, and the problems and improvement of the security organization were targeted at the security officials among the government building protection personnel. An in-depth interview was conducted on the room. As a result of the study, the problems of the government building security organization were found to be non-unification of command authority, composition of protection personnel, lack of specialized security departments, and legal authority of public officials in defense positions. Clear division of duties and organizational organization, expansion of departments specializing in security for each building, review of application of legal authority such as the Act on performance of Duties by Police Officials in Security Official, and establishment of a Special Judicial Police Unit at government buildings were suggested. In particular, this study proposed the creation of a new security organization tentatively named 'Government Buildings Special Judicial Police Unit' as an improvement plan that can complement all 7 problems, and organized into organizations such as members and organization chart, duties and scope of the organization A portion of the content was also suggested. Therefore, it is expected that the utilization of the results of this study will greatly contribute to the improvement of the security level by improving the security organization of government buildings.

해방 이후 조선총독부청사의 변천과 그 의미

정희선 한국민족운동사학회 2018 한국민족운동사연구 Vol.0 No.94

After liberation, most colonial architectures have changed and remained in public space. They have been used continuously for practical reason. Retention of colonial architectures does not mean mere continuance of space but symbolism as well. Japanese Government-General Building, built in 1926, was critical architecture that represented colonial power of Japanese imperialism era. Even after the liberation of Korea, it had been used for 50 years as United States Army Military Government in Korea(USAMGIK), Central Government Complex and National Museum of Korea. So far, studies of Japanese Government-General Building were concentrated on certain period– completion and removal. But it is necessary to study changes of colonial architectures after liberation of Korea. This research examines changing processes of the building throughout its existence by focusing on its usage as main government building after liberation. Through this, the study is to find out in what logic that made modern architecture representing colonial power was used and removed. After Korean independence, though the Japanese Government-General Building was symbol of colonial power, it was kept in use as main office building of government for economical efficiency. It was used as USAMGIK right after liberation, and became the Capitol building after government formation. Its economic feasibility had fell because of damages due to Korean War, still it was more financially better to repair than built new one. After 1980s, as economy grew, ‘Recovery of Ethnicity’ came to the fore and the Japanese Government-General Building was changed to National Museum of Korea. Jeon Doohwan regime, which had lack of political legitimacy, carried out this plan to gain public popularity. Kim Yeongsam government made policy of deconstruction of building as part of ‘Historical Rectification’. Processes change and removal was all for ‘Recovery of National identity’. However, social interest was just focus on visible action and discussion about historical meaning of the architecture was not viewed. Most of modern architectures, existing nowadays, are now facing maintenance or abolition on decision of center or local governments. To maintain modern buildings, it is necessary to avoid from unconditional logic, and make standard to look modern culture heritage in overall and long-term perspective. Korean modern architectures were kept in use after liberation for practical reason and individual of them changed in various ways. Therefore, it is difficult to apply one certain standard on decision on maintenance of them. Each of them were used in different ways depends on situation after liberation, there is need to look at historicity of the building throughout its entire existing period. 해방 이후 식민지 건축물은 대부분 현실적인 이유로 도시공간에 존속하였다. 식민지 건축물의 존속은 단지 물리적 공간의 연속에 그치는 것이 아니라 건물이 가진 상징성 또한 연속되는 것이었다. 1926년 준공된 조선총독부청사는 일제의 식민권력을 상징하는 핵심적인 건축물이었다. 조선총독부청사는 해방 이후에도 군정청, 중앙청, 국립중앙박물관으로 50여 년간 활용되었다. 그동안 조선총독부청사를 다룬 연구는 주로 건물의 준공과 철거라는 특정 시기에 집중하였다. 본 연구에서는 식민지 건축물의 변천을 해방 전후에 걸쳐 유기적으로 살펴볼 필요가 있다고 보고, 해방 이후 조선총독부청사의 활용에 주목하였다. 이를 통해 식민권력을 상징하는 근대건축물이 해방 이후 어떠한 논리를 통해 활용되고 철거되었는지 살펴보고자 하였다. 해방 이후 조선총독부청사는 경제적 효율성이라는 현실적 이유에서 계속 활용되었다. 조선총독부청사는 해방 직후 미 군정청으로 활용되었고, 정부 수립 이후 중앙청이 되었다. 한국전쟁으로 건물이 훼손되면서 조선총독부청사의 경제성이 떨어졌지만, 여전히 대체할 건물을 신축하는 것보다 조선총독부청사를 복구하는 것이 경제적 이점을 가졌다. 1980년대 이후 경제성장과 함께 ‘민족성 회복’의 문제가 사회 전면에 대두되면서 조선총독부청사는 국립중앙박물관으로 개편되었다. 권력획득 과정의 정당성이 취약했던 전두환 정권은 대중적 지지를 유도하기 위해 중앙청을 국립중앙박물관으로 개편하였다. 김영삼 정부는 역사바로세우기 사업의 일환으로 조선총독부청사 철거를 정책적으로 추진하였다. 조선총독부청사의 개편과 철거 과정은 모두 ‘민족성 회복’을 목적으로 하였다. 그러나 그 과정에서 건물의 역사적 의미에 대한 논의보다 가시적인 행위에 사회적 관심이 집중되었다. 현재 대부분의 근대건축물은 중앙 혹은 지방정부의 정책적 판단으로 건물의 존폐가 갈리고 있다. 근대건축물의 보존을 위해서 무조건적인 보존이나 철거 논리에서 벗어나 근대문화유산을 종합적이고 장기적인 관점에서 바라볼 수 있는 기준을 정립해야한다. 한국의 근대건축물은 해방 이후 현실적 필요에 따라 계속 활용되면서 개별 건축물이 다양하게 변용되었다. 따라서 근대건축물은 보존과 철거 결정에 일괄적인 기준을 적용하기 어렵다. 각각의 근대건축물이 상황에 따라 해방 전후 다양하게 활용되었기 때문에, 건물의 특정 시기에 국한하지 않고 전체 존속 시기를 아울러 해당 건물의 역사성을 살펴보아야한다.

중국 내 대한민국임시정부 사적지의 현황과 과제

오대록 한국근현대사학회 2020 한국 근현대사 연구 Vol.93 No.-

The Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea, based in China, had engaged in the independence movement from the time when it was established in the French concessions in Shanghai, China to the moment when the liberation of Korea came to pass when it was located in Chongqing. The trajectory left the Provisional Government a wide variety of its traces and footprints in Shanghai, Hangzhou, Jianggang, and Chongquing in China. Since an investigation was launched to find out the historical sites of the independence movement, the Independence Hall has found out 81 sites related to the Provisional Government. Of these sites, ten historical sites were investigated which are related to the Provisional Government precincts. This number includes the category of unspecified historical sites in roughly identified locations by inference. Of these sites, the location and the timing of use of the Provisional Government building located in Hangzhou needs reviewing. The building the Provisional Government used in May, 1932 was investigated to be located in the old Qunying Hotel. However, referring to various materials including the map of Hangzhou reveals the fact that the old Qunying Hotel was not used as the building of the Provisional Government. The building in use at the time was inferred to be located around number 205 and number 264 in what is now Yeonan-ro. The second building the Provisional Government used was located in number 23 of Hobyeon Village. The time when it settled in Hobyeon Village was traced to be in May 1932. However, reviewing a wide variety of literature seems to indicate that the timing of using Hobyeon Village building falls on after January 1934. The Memorial Museums related to the Provisional Government were established in China. There are five of them, among which the building in Shanghai, Hanzhou and Chongqing were built in the place of the old Provisional Government and the rest two (Zhenjiang, Liuzhou) were located in the sites reflecting the claims of the Chinese government. Apart from the Provisional Government buildings and the Memorial Halls, 67 sites in total related to the Provisional Government were investigated. Classified by the categories of the region and prefecture, there are 19 sites in Shanghai region, 5 sites in Zhejiangsheng (Jiaheng, Hangzhou, Haiyan), 8 sites Jiangsusheng (Jingangwkdtk, Nanjing), 2 sites in Hunansheng (Changsha), 6 sites in Guangdongsheng, 4 sites in Guangxi Zhuangzu Autonomous Zone, and 3 sites in City of Chongqing (Chongqing, Qijiang). Classified by type, 23 buildings, 1 cemetery, and 43 vacant places were confirmed. The issues at hand and the ways to utilize them related to the historical sites can be summed up as follows: first, intensive investigations into the corresponding areas with a long-term planning should be done and, simultaneously, related literature and the maps and cadastral maps should be collected. Based on these works, the locations of the historical sites need to be clearly confirmed by comparison and inference; if the site identification is impossible, it is necessary to widen the estimated sites. Second, the issues of damages and loss of the historical sites should be addressed. The historical sites that remain in the original state or in a similar state are vulnerable to distortions on the grounds of dilapidation or development, and loss or destruction. There is an urgent need to cooperate closely with the Chinese government to preserve the historical sites on a permanent basis. There might be a need to conduct 3D survey project as a preparation for the worst scenario. Third, exhibitions which emphasize contents and regional characteristics need to be arranged. An investigation into the exhibitions taking place in the Memorial Halls of the Provisional Government reveals problems such as the fallacies in historical facts and the overlapping of exhibition contents. The contents of activities Keywords: the Provident Government of the Repu... 大韓民國臨時政府는 1919년 중국 上海 프랑스 조계에서 수립된 이래 1945년重慶에서 해방을 맞이할 때까지 중국에 근거지를 마련하여 독립운동을 전개하였다. 이러한 이유로 임시정부는 중국 상해를 비롯하여 항주·기강·중경지역 등에 다수의흔적과 자취를 남겼다. 국외에 소재한 독립운동 사적지 조사가 시작된 이래 현재까지독립기념관이 파악하고 있는 임시정부 관련 사적지는 81개소이다. 이 중 임시정부청사와 관련된 사적지는 10개소로 조사되었다. 이는 대략적인 위치를 비정한 사적지까지 범주에 포함 시킨 숫자이다. 이 중 杭州지역에 마련된 임시정부 청사의 위치와 사용 시점에 대해서는 재검토가필요하다. 임시정부가 1932년 5월 사용했던 청사는 인화로에 위치한 옛 群英飯店 건물로 조사되었다. 하지만 1928년 발간된 항주시 지도 등 여러 자료들을 통해볼 때 옛 군영반점 건물이 청사로 사용되지 않았음을 확인했다. 당시 사용되었던청사는 현재 연안로 205호와 264호 일대로 추정할 수 있다. 임시정부가 두 번째로 사용했던 청사는 호변촌 23호였다. 호변촌에 자리 잡은 시점은 1932년5월로 알려져 있었다. 하지만 여러 문헌자료를 검토해본 결과 임시정부가 호변촌청사를 사용한 시점은 1934년 1월 이후였던 것으로 보인다. 중국 내에는 임시정부와 관련된 기념관이 건립되었다. 모두 5개소로 이 중 상해와항주·중경지역은 옛 청사 건물에 조성되었고, 나머지 2개소(鎭江·柳州)는 중국 정부의 주장이 반영된 위치에 세워졌다. 청사와 기념관을 제외한 임시정부 관련 사적지는 모두 67개소가 조사되었다. 이를 지역별·省 단위로 분류해 보면 상해지역에 19개소, 浙江省(嘉興·항주·海鹽) 5개소, 江蘇省(진강·南京) 8개소, 湖南省(장사) 2개소, 廣東省(광주) 6개소, 廣西壯 族自治區(유주) 4개소, 중경시(중경·綦江) 23개소 등으로 대별할 수 있다. 유형별로분류해 보면 건물 23개소·묘역 1개소·터 43개소로 확인되었다. 임시정부 사적지와 관련한 당면 문제와 향후 활용방안을 몇 가지로 정리해보면다음과 같다. 첫째, 사적지 위치 비정에 대한 유연성과 지속적인 조사 및 관련자료를수집해야 한다. 장기적인 계획하에 해당 지역에 대한 집중 조사가 필요하고, 문헌자료와 함께 해당 도시(지역)의 지도 및 지적도를 수집하는 작업이 병행되어야 한다. 이를 기반으로 사적지 위치를 명확하게 비정하고, 지점 확인이 불가한 경우에는추정지를 넓게 비정할 필요성이 있다. 둘째, 사적지 훼손과 멸실에 대비해야 한다. 현재 원형 및 원형에 가까운 형태로남아있는 사적지들은 향후 노후·개발 등의 이유로 변형되거나 훼손·멸실 될 가능성이 크다. 중국 정부와 긴밀하게 협조하여 사적지를 영구 보존을 위한 방안 마련이시급하다. 만일의 경우를 대비하여 3D실측 사업을 검토해 볼 필요성도 있다. 셋째, 내용과 지역적 특성이 강조된 전시가 필요하다. 중국에 건립된 임시정부 기념관의전시를 살펴보면 역사적 사실 오류 및 전시 내용 중복 등 여러 가지 문제점을 가지고있다. 거시적인 안목을 가지고 각 지역에서 전개된 임시정부의 활동과 특성을 부각시킬 수 있는 내용을 전시에 반영해야 할 것이다. 마지막으로 중국 정부와 긴밀한 협조가 필요하다. 현재 임시정부 사적지는 중국에 위치해 있다. 임시정부 관련 기념관도 중국 정부의 승인하에 개관되었고, 관리 주체도 정부가 맡고 있는 상황이다. 기념관 건립...

1930~1931년 대전기성회의 충남도청 유치운동

김나아 한국근현대사학회 2012 한국 근현대사 연구 Vol.61 No.-

The relocation of the Chungnam Provincial Government Building was the opportunity for Daejeon to get socio-economical gains, let alone to jump up to an administrative center. On November 8, 1930, the Daejeon Supporting Association was organized to systematically and effectively attract the Chungnam Provincial Government Building. The Japanese had great weight in the organization of association members of the Daejeon Supporting Association, and most of them were involved in commerce and industry, on the basis of whose capital, they launched a drive to attract the Chungnam Provincial Government Office. In addition, even the Koreans, who were consistent with the Japanese in their interests, were in activity as a member of the Daejeon Supporting Association. The Daejeon Supporting Association executed petitionary activities for attracting the Chungnam Provincial Government Office against the Japanese Government-General of Korea and political arena in Japan. The Japanese Government-General of Korea decided on the relocation of the provincial government to Daejeon in January, 1931. It’s because Daejeon was the place which was able to heighten the efficiency in operating the local administration by virtue of its traffic convenience. In spite of the decision on the relocation of the Chungnam Provincial Government Office, there still remained a problem of securing the budget for relocation costs of the Provincial Government Office. At that time, the ruling party of Japan sought for a retrenchment policy in an effort to break through economic depression, and to check the ever-rising military influence. In order to check the governor-general Saito, who was an influential person, and the chief of state affairs-Godama, the House of Representative slashed the budget for the relocation of the provincial government building. With the deletion of the budget for the provincial government building, the Daejeon Supporting Association promised the raising of contributions to construction costs of the provincial government office to the Japanese Government-General of Korea, and tried to aggressively solve the difficult situation through the meeting with political figures in Japan. As a result, the budget for the provincial government office came to revive at the House of Peers. The Daejeon Supporting Association conciliated the men of influence by sending its members because it was important to secure the support of a local community. When the issue of budget for relocation of the provincial government building as the Daejeon Supporting Association managed to secure the regional sentiment, each district of Chungnam got to send a telegram of supporting the relocation of the Chungnam Provincial Government Building to Daejeon to the political arena in Japan. Like this, the activity by the Daejeon Supporting Association played an ultimate role in relocating the Chungnam Provincial Building to Daejeon.

일제강점기 도청사ㆍ부청사 건립의 배경과 성격

김명선(Kim Myung-Sun),박정대(Park Jung-Dae) 대한건축학회 2008 대한건축학회논문집 Vol.24 No.2

During the period of colonial Choson, there were a total of 13 To (道) government office buildings, and as few as 12 and as many as 22 Pu (府) government buildings. In the beginning of that period, To and Pu government buildings were mainly housed in pre-existing facilities that had initially been constructed as Togwanchalbu (道觀察府) or the Japanese Lisachung (日本理事廳), as well as other types of facilities. Eight out of the nine newly established Pu's in the 1930's continued to make use of pre-existing buildings. It was towards the latter half of the 1920's that To and Pu offices began to be newly constructed. In the case of To offices, even earlier cases of new construction existed. The main reasons that spurred these particularly early new constructions were the relocation of a To office building to a different city; the relocation of the To government building within the same city; or the loss of a facility due to fire. Additionally, for both To's and Pu's, there were a few instances where older, pre-existing buildings were enlarged or remodeled for continued use. The five main reasons to invest in new construction were, 1) the relocation of a To government building or the new designation of a Pu; 2) the deterioration of a facility or subsequent lack of space due to an increase in activities and employees; 3) the loss of a building due to a fire; 4) the subsequent off-center location of a Pu due to the relocation or growth of the town's administration district; or 5) the desire to provide a building that fittingly reflects the prestige and dignity that a To or Pu was believed to possess. Among these five reasons, the second demonstrated the most need for the new construction of To and Pu government buildings. Many To and Pu officers simultaneously requested that the Choson Government-General grant them permits for new construction, but insufficient funds prevented their demands from easily being met. For this reason, some To and Pu officers would apply for a building permit while also donating funds or land for the construction, which would have been secured as contributions from the townspeople. In this manner, the people of some To‘s and Pu's ended up partially carrying the burden of building construction costs. In the end, new construction for To and Pu government buildings came to realization only after their need reached urgent status, which shows how little the Choson Government-General was active in the construction of To and Pu office facilities. However, records show that the construction of new To offices of Pyongbuk (平北), Kyongnam (慶南), and Choongnam (忠南) were executed at the same time that the operation of these buildings were transferred to key points along the railroad connecting Pusan (釜山) and Manchuria. Also, the construction of Hambuk (咸北) To's office building occurred at the time of its relocation to the military city of Nanam (羅南). Both of these cases demonstrates that the Choson Government-General implemented the construction of To office buildings not in response to local needs, but for the overall interest of imperialist Japan.

정부-공중관계와 공동체 의식을 통한 보훈 정책 평가와 실천

김학신,최명일,김대욱 한국PR학회 2021 PR연구 Vol.25 No.4

Purpose This study aims to analyze how the Government-Public Relationship is related to the Korean government’s veterans affairs policies, which commemorate the dedication of veterans and urge citizens to practice prosocial activism with the veterans affairs. In order to approach the primary purpose, this study employs the establishing government-public relations through strategic use of government PR(Ledingham, 2001; Choi Ji-hyeon, Cho Sam-seop, 2016) and community-building theory (Kruckeberg & Starch, 1988)' as a theoretical research frame. Methods and Results As a result of conducting a survey on adults aged 20 to 59 nationwide (N=1,000), the impact of the government-public relationship on the positive evaluation of government’s veterans affairs policies and the favorable behavioral intention with the veterans affairs policies was mediated by the sense of community. In other words, the positive relationship between the government and the public based on a positive perception of the government's policy capability and communication capacity lead to the enhancement of sense of ccommunity, which in turn influence on the positive policy evaluation and participation in practicing veterans affairs. Conclusion It can be seen that the public's experiential perception towards the government's policy management ability, morality, and communication ability function as a major factor in the process of community-building. Moreover, by demonstrating the fact that a sense of community mediates ‘government-public relations’ and ‘citizen’s positive evaluation and participation toward government’s veteran’s affairs policy’, fostering a sense of community as a strategic concept for effective government PR can be suggested. Thus, the importance of the sense of community can be reconfirmed as a PR strategy that can induce active intervention in the policy from the public beyond understanding and agreeing with the policy. 목적본 연구는 정부PR의 전략적 활용을 통한 정부-공중관계 형성(Ledingham,2001; 최지현·조삼섭, 2017)과 공동체 형성 이론(Kruckeberg & Starch, 1988)을 이론적 논의의 주요개념으로, 정부-공중관계가 보훈 정책 긍정평가와 보훈 문화 확산이라는 정부 보훈 정책의 사회적 가치실현에 어떻게 연결되는지를 분석하였다. 구체적으로는 ‘공동체 의식’이 ‘정부-공중관계’와 ‘시민들의 국가보훈 인식과 평가’, ‘실천 의지’를 어떻게 매개하는지를 살펴보았다. 방법 및 결과전국 만20세부터 59세 성인을 대상(N=1,000)으로 설문 조사를 시행한 결과, 긍정적인 보훈 정책 평가와 보훈실천에 대한 정부-공중관계의 영향이 시민들이 인식하는 공동체 의식에 매개된다는 사실이 나타났다. 즉, 정부의정책 능력과 소통역량에 대한 긍정적 인식을 바탕으로 한 정부와 시민의 우호적 관계는 공동체 의식 강화를통해 사회통합과 공동체 구축을 목적으로 하는 정부 정책에 대한 긍정적 인식과 시민의 직접적인 참여 의지로연결될 수 있다. 결론정부의 정책운영 능력과 도덕성, 커뮤니케이션 능력에 대한 공중의 적극적 인식과 신뢰감을 바탕으로 한 정부-공중관계가 공동체 의식의 선행요인으로 작용한다는 사실을 알 수 있다. 또한, 공동체 의식이 정부-공중관계와보훈정책에 대한 긍정 평가와 보훈실천 의지를 매개한다는 사실을 입증함으로써, 정책 이해는 물론, 대중의 적극적인 정책 개입을 유도할 수 있는 PR 전략으로 공동체 의식의 중요성을 확인할 수 있다.

지역거점 공공청사의 공간구성에 관한 연구 - 해외 사례를 중심으로 -

박항섭,이관석 한국문화공간건축학회 2017 한국문화공간건축학회논문집 Vol.- No.60

As the information society has emerged, the public has enjoyed more active social participation, culture, and leisure and become interested in the use and management of public spaces and programs through which they can communicate. However, the government building has not flexibly coped with such demands and has been only used when necessary with its standardized spatial composition and programs. In this study, we investigate the government buildings as regional hubs where information exchange and communication occur as well as public goods representing a region and conducting its administrative work where local residents can have pride. We aim to use the study results as the basic data for the spatial composition of the local government building. The architectural expression of the regional hub can be realized through organic relations of spatial, visual, continuous, approach, empirical, organic, behavioral and perceptual expression. The excellent examples of the foreign government buildings as regional hubs classify programs as follows: publicity, local, and symbol programs. The spatial composition is divided into mutual exchange space, public support space, educational information space, and activity space. Layout the government buildings are classified as follows based on entrance to the government buildings and public communication space: courtyard type, integrated type, separate type, and contact type. Plans are classified as follows based on the bottom shape and function of the lower layer: distributed type, central type, and eccentric type. Façades are classified as follows based on the relations with the surrounding and material properties and composition: pattern types and regional-adaptation types. Sections are classified as follows based on spatial composition type: atrium type, aisle type, square type, and hybrid type. The government offices as regional hubs should be open space that reflects the cultural and historical characteristics of regions. They should promote voluntary citizen participation through differentiated space and programs and change from non-daily places to daily places.

우리나라 정부 PR의 상징성에 관한 연구

문철수 ( Chul Soo Moon ) 한국PR학회 2002 PR연구 Vol.6 No.1

PR(Public Relations) in Government is communicational activity in order to improve relationship with the people by attracting the people`s interest and belief in the nation and national organizations. However, PR in Korean Government has been regarded as a one-sided promoting activity of government policy. PR in Government could not attract the people`s interest under the military government continued for 32years because it had been made unilaterally in order to advertise the government. Especially, Korean Government has made PR in Government by suggesting symbolic policy rather than by delivering real help to the people. This symbolic PR policy contains two purposes : persuading people in order to hold positive mind about legitimacy of the government and making them follow government policy. For example, `Government of People`, preceded by `Civilian Government`, which achieved a real change in the Government party and the Opposition party also focuses on suggesting symbolic policy including the `Second Nation-Building`, and the symbolic PR is still regarded as an effective method for Korean. In the analysis of the past Korean Government`s PR, it is summed that the PR executives has put special stress on the image improvement of the highest man of power using ambiguous symbolic expressions. Therefore, PR executives who have got the principle of administration supermacy during past time, should recognize the recent social circumstances by themselves and make an effort to support desirable government and people. After then, they could recover the faith which has fallen down.

CPTED 관점에서 본 공공청사의 현황 및 개선방안 연구

김서우(Seou Kim) 한국셉테드학회 2022 한국셉테드학회지 Vol.13 No.2

본 연구에서는 국가 및 지방정부의 공적인 업무를 수행하는 공공청사가 침입 등의 범죄예방 측면에서 안전한지, 또 빈번한 집회 및 시위로 인한 피해를 최소화할 수 있도록 계획되고 있는지를 확인하고 개선방안 도출하고자 하였다. 연구성과로서 첫째, 정부청사의 경우 2016년 12월에 「정부청사관리 규정 및 시행규칙」에 ‘청사의 출입 관리’ 및 ‘방호 진단’을 신설하였으나 지방 정부청사의 경우 아직 제도적으로 반영되지 못한 상태이다. 또한 여기에 반영된 내용은 「건축법」에 따른 아파트 등에 적용되는 범죄예방 건축기준에 한참 미치지 못하는 수준임을 확인할 수 있었다. 둘째, 공공청사를 대상으로 한 집회 및 시위가 증가하고 있고, 소음 등으로 인해 공공청사에서 업무수행에 어려움을 겪고 있는 것으로 설문조사 결과 분석되었다. 셋째, 공공청사가 범죄로부터 안전하기 위해서는 공공청사에도 「건축법」에 따른 범죄예방 설계 기준이 적용되어야 하며, 시위로 인한 업무의 피해를 최소화하기 위해서는 차음 성능이 강화된 창호 설치 등의 조치가 필요하다. The purpose of this study is to investigate government office buildings and the environmental factors that contribute to crime preventative designs of those buildings. It has been found that: first, in the case of central government buildings, “access management of government buildings” and “protection diagnosis” were newly established in the 「government building management regulations and enforcement regulations」 in December, 2016. However, this change has yet to be established in local government buildings. In addition, it was confirmed that the contents of regulations reflected here were far below par compared to the crime prevention building standards applied to personal apartments under the 「Building Act」. Second, as rallies and protests that take place near government office buildings increase every year, surveys confirm that exposure to noise has a negative impact on work performance. Finally, it is crucial that crime preventative designs should be strictly controlled by regulation (ex. building codes), so that civil servants are protected from crimes. It is necessary to improve sound insulation performance of windows to minimize the noise generated by protests to not hinder the work performance of civil servants. These findings help understand the current environmental conditions of government office buildings associated with crime prevention facilities. There is room for improvement in the principles and process to make the government office building better, safer and more pleasant for both citizens and officials.

공용물에 관한 법제개선을 위한 비교법적 연구

오준근(Oh Jun Gen) 한국토지공법학회 2010 土地公法硏究 Vol.48 No.-

“공용물”은 “행정기관이 스스로 사용하기 위하여 특정한 물건”을 총칭하며, 행정기관의 행정업무 수행에 있어 필수적인 행정수단에 해당한다. 공용물은 행정법학상 매우 중요한 의미를 지닌다. 우리나라의 경우 공용물의 설치와 관리에 관한 법률적 근거는 마련되어 있지 아니하며, 대통령령인 「정부청사관리규정」이 법적 근거를 형성하고 있다. 본 연구는 현행 행정법체계의 문제점을 지적하고, 이를 다른 나라의 입법례를 통하여 비교·검토하며, 입법론적 대안을 제시함을 목적으로 기획되었다. 본 연구에서는 우리나라의 법제와 독일 및 일본의 법제를 비교·분석하였다. 독일의 공물법제는 공공용물 법제와 공용물 법제가 엄격하게 구분되어 있다. 독일의 공공용물의 경우 도로법, 수자원법등이 독자적인 행정법의 영역으로 발전되어 있으며, 각각의 실정법체계와 법이론체계가 확립되어 있다. 그 반면에 공용물법제는 독자적인 법체계를 갖추고 있는 것이 아니라 재정행정법 체계의 일부로 편입되어 관리되고 있다. 그 반면에 일본의 공용물법제의 특징은 국유재산법제와 분리하여 “공물”로서의 청사를 독립적으로 관리하는 법률을 제정하여 시행하고 있다는 점을 들 수 있다. 일본의 경우 청사와 관사의 관리와 관련하여 분야별로 나누어 「국가의 청사등의 사용조정에 관한 특별조치법」, 「국가공무원숙사법」, 「관공청 시설의 건설등에 관한 법률」 등이 제정·시행되고 있다. 이 논문에서는 위와 같은 분석결과를 기초로 하여 공용물에 관한 법제 개선방향을 설정하고 그 대안을 제시하고자 시도하였다. 공용물에 관한 법제개선을 하고자 할 경우 공용물 법제를 어떠한 체계에 편입시킬 것인가에 대한 선택이 필요하다. 독일과 일본의 사례에서 살펴본 바와 같이, 공용물은 국유재산의 관점에서 법제화하거나, “공물”로서의 “공용물”의 특성을 존중하고 “공물법”의 일부로서 “공용물”의 행정법적 체계의 특수성을 인정하여 법제화할 것인가에 대한 검토가 필요하다. 검토결과 우리나라의 경우 국유재산법 등의 체계에 비추어 볼 때, 따라서 “공용물”을 행정청의 고유한 사용에 제공하도록 하기 위하여 필요한 구체적인 법적 규율과는 상당한 거리가 있어서 공물행정법으로서의 공용물 법제정비를 대안으로 제시하였다. 특히 현행 정부조직법이 “국유재산”과 “공물”을 분리하여 그 관할 주체를 달리하고 있다는 점도 논거 중의 하나로 채용하였다. 결론적으로 “공용물”에 관한 법률은 “공용물”에 관한 행정목적을 달성하기 위한 “공물행정법”의 체계로 정비되어야 할 필요가 있다할 것이다. Public buildings are one of the most essential administrative resources of the public agencies. The regal foundation for the management of the public buildings in Korea is 「Government Buildings Management Regulation」. This Regulation is not an act of the National Assembly, but a presidential decree. This article is prepared to discuss the direction of the reform of Korean legal system on the management of the public buildings. The korean, japanese and german legal system on this matter are compared in this article. The laws on the administrative resources are divided in german legal system. The public goods as the street, water are regulated in the separate legal system as street law, water law etc. Legal theory of the street law and water law are highly developed as a part of the german administrative law. On the contrary the public buildings are managed as a part of the legal system of public property law. The legal system of the public buildings are developed as a separated part of the administrative law in Japan. There are 「Law on the Special Measures for the Regulation of the Use of the Governmental Buildings」, 「Law on the Housing of the Government Employees」 and 「Law on the Construction of the Governmental Buildings」. There are typical two alternatives for the reform of the korean legal system on the public buildings according to the results of the analysis of the korean, german and japanese legal system. One is the way of reform as a part of public property law and the other a part of the administrative law on public resources. Because the public building are one of the essential resources of the administrative agencies, there are many critical point for the management of these according to the 「The National Government Organization Act」, the special treatment of the public buildings is indispensible as an object of special administrative law. The Direction of the legislation is suggested according to this viewpoint in this article