http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이영록 한국법철학회 2006 법철학연구 Vol.9 No.2
Punishment as Moral Urge Young-Lok Lee In this article, I try to show that when punishment is understood as moral urge, it is best justified. Punishment as moral urge conveys the message to the wrongdoer that his act was wrong, and urges him to consider its wrongness seriously, hoping that he will repent morally. It implies that the moral urge theory presupposes moral autonomy of human being. The theory shares in the merits with retribution theory in that respect. Moreover, it naturally demands that punishment itself should be inflicted in accordance with morality. It enables the theory to resolve the difficulties undergone in criminal practices better than other punishment theories including theories of both retribution and prevention. Critics might say that the theory can not explain the rationale of the capital punishment, for the reason that it makes the repentance of the criminal meaningless. But expanding the object of moral urge to victims and people, the theory can be compatible with capital punishment in principle, regardless of whether or not the capital punishment is desirable practically.
Increased Intraocular Pressure after Extensive Conjunctival Removal: A Case Report
이영록,나정화,김재용,성경림 대한안과학회 2013 Korean Journal of Ophthalmology Vol.27 No.2
A 50-year-old woman, who had undergone extensive removal of conjunctiva on the right eye for cosmetic purposes at a local clinic 8 months prior to presentation, was referred for uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation (up to 38 mmHg) despite maximal medical treatment. The superior and inferior conjunctival and episcleral vessels were severely engorged and the nasal and temporal bulbar conjunctival areas were covered with an avascular epithelium. Gonioscopic examination revealed an open angle with Schlemm’s canal filled with blood to 360 degrees in the right eye. Brain and orbital magnetic resonance imaging and angiography results were normal. With the maximum tolerable anti-glaucoma medications, the IOP gradually decreased to 25 mmHg over 4 months of treatment. Extensive removal of conjunctiva and Tenon’s capsule, leaving bare sclera, may lead to an elevation of the episcleral venous pressure because intrascleral and episcleral veins may no longer drain properly due to a lack of connection to Tenon’s capsule and the conjunctival vasculature. This rare case suggests one possible mechanism of secondary glaucoma following ocular surgery.
이영록,전치혁 한국경영과학회 2008 한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2008 No.5
Spectral clustering is one of the most recent unsupervised learning methods in data partitioning problems. Although spectral clustering algorithms commonly show better experimental results than those of other clustering methods, there are some practical issues in using the methods. This article concentrates on two critical issues in a large-scale problem; computing time and data storage requirements. Traditional spectral clustering algorithms are impractical in large-scale problems because of the eigenvalue decomposition. We propose a new algorithm which is introducing supervised learning techniques to spectral clustering to handle largescale data partitioning problems efficiently. Our method predicts eigenvector elements using the Gaussian process regression method with a smallsize spectral decomposition. With experiments on several large-scale data sets, we show our algorithm leads a remarkable computational cost reduction and nearly identical results comparing to the traditional spectral clustering.
이영록,전치혁 대한산업공학회 2008 대한산업공학회 춘계학술대회논문집 Vol.2008 No.5
Spectral clustering is one of the most recent unsupervised learning methods in data partitioning problems. Although spectral clustering algorithms commonly show better experimental results than those of other clustering methods, there are some practical issues in using the methods. This article concentrates on two critical issues in a large-scale problem; computing time and data storage requirements. Traditional spectral clustering algorithms are impractical in large-scale problems because of the eigenvalue decomposition. We propose a new algorithm which is introducing supervised learning techniques to spectral clustering to handle largescale data partitioning problems efficiently. Our method predicts eigenvector elements using the Gaussian process regression method with a smallsize spectral decomposition. With experiments on several large-scale data sets, we show our algorithm leads a remarkable computational cost reduction and nearly identical results comparing to the traditional spectral clustering.
이영록 한국법철학회 2013 법철학연구 Vol.16 No.2
I tried in this article to reconstruct the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas from the viewpoint of law. Its aim was to give a foundation of Other-centered legal philosophy. It was, I claimed, that a legal system could not be the closed one in itself, rather it should be ceaselessly constructed and criticized from the infinite responsibility for the transcending Other. Moreover, I could get some suggestions on the legal philosophy which Levinasian philosophy could give. They were summarized as follows. Firstly, law has the meaningfulness in the most original sense, and opens the human dimension free from our urgent needs. Secondly, law should be always rethought because it contains injustice from the start. In that respect, both traditions in legal philosophy, namely natural law theory and legal positivism, have serious defects. Thirdly, legality does not solve all the ethical problems. Fourthly, a legal system should be open to the moments which can deconstruct itself such as right of resistance or civil disobedience. Lastly, a legal system should be constructed and interpreted on the basis of responsibility for others rather than my rights. 이 논문의 목적은 레비나스의 철학을 법의 관점에서 재구성하는 것이다. 이를 통해 타자 중심의 타자법철학의 가능성을 모색해 보고자 하였다. 그 토대는 법체계는 그 자체로 자족적인 완결된 체계일 수 없고, 초월적인 타자에 대한 무한책임으로부터 끊임없이 동력을 공급받고 그로부터 비판받아야 한다는 사실이었다. 나아가 이 글에서는 레비나스의 법철학이 오늘날의 법철학에 함의하는 바도 몇 가지로 제시해 보고자 하였다. 첫째는 가장 근원적인 차원에서 법의 의미 있음을 말할 수 있다는 사실이다. 법은 우리의 욕구와 그 절박성, 그리고 그 즉시성의 폭력으로부터 자유롭게 된 인간적 실존의 차원을 열어준다. 둘째는 법은 그 시초부터 부정의를 내포하고 있다는 점에서 끊임없이 재검토되어야 한다는 점이다. 이 점에서 자연법론이나 법실증주의는 모두 법을 이해하는 데 근본적인 결함을 가지고 있다. 셋째는 합법성은 윤리의 모든 문제를 해소하지 않는다는 점이다. 넷째는 나아가 법체계는 그 자신 안에 자신을 해체할 수도 있는 길을 열어두어야 할 필요가 있다는 사실이다. 여기서 전통적인 저항권이나 시민불복종, 양심범 등의 개념을 새롭게 이해할 가능성이 열린다. 마지막으로 법의 내용은 나의 권리보다는 타인에 대한 책임이라는 관점에서 재해석되고 구축되어야 한다.