http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
연구논문 : 관광개발의 경향과 사례분석을 통한 친환경적 계획방안 연구
주용준 ( Yong Joon Joo ),사공희 ( Gong Hee Sa ) 한국환경영향평가학회 2011 환경영향평가 Vol.20 No.2
Interests in tourism and leisure have increased with the quality of life in Korea. The government takes the lead in development of tourism for balanced development between regions and local governments use development of tourism as a means for vitalization of local economy. The sustainable and eco-friendly development plan is required for the tourism development, because it needs effective use of limited natural resources and consideration of environmental capacity in the region. This study analyzed the trend of tourism development during nine years, and problems with respect to planning and environment aspects on the basis of four examples which follow recent development trend. We suggest improvement plan that 1) establishment of consistency and systematics of tourism development, 2) enforcement of setting up regional tourism development plan, 3) comprehensive and systematic plan establishment in consideration of private sector, 4) reasonable adjustment and environmental management for development project of approval organization, 5) removal of duplicate regulations for development project. Application of the improvement plan while setting up tourism plan could contribute to vitalization of local economy, and environmental preservation and management.
주용준(Yong Joon Joo),황희연(Hee Yeon Hwang) 한국도시지리학회 1999 한국도시지리학회지 Vol.2 No.1
The purpose of this study is to build sustainable land use indicators that are able to propose concrete aims and evaluate their result. The other purpose is to examine the weighted value system as a tool for assessing the sustainability and evaluating efficiency and environmental stability of land use in the five cities. The results of this study can be summarized as follows First, indicators for evaluating sustainable land use of cities are slightly different from conventional indicators. First of all, the evaluative indicators focus on discovering a solution to problems, while the but conventional indicators it itself. Also sustainable indicators are closely connected with each other without having to fix one side of the pertinent category. second, generally weights show that principles and indicators on nature conservation and environmentally frendliness are higher than others but, do not show a wide gap. Third, to evaluate the value of sustainable land use on the basis of indicators, in the sight of objective indicators(pressure and state indicators) the value of five cities is ranked as follows 1) Jeonju(0.0071) 2) Changweng(0.0045) 3) Cheongju(-0.0020) 4) Anyang(-0.0057) 5) Ansan(-0.0063) and in the sight of subjective indicators(respond indicators) is 1) Changweng(0.0682) 2) Cheongju(0.0623) 3) Jeonju(0.0598) 4) Ansan(0.0594) 5) Anyang(0.0573).
邊秉卨(Byun Byung-Seol),朱龍俊(Joo Yong-Joon) 대한국토·도시계획학회 2000 國土計劃 Vol.35 No.1
This study is to evaluate how much the land use planning and management of new town, meet the purpose of the construction and sustainable principles. To do this. the study sets basic principles of new town land use. determines evaluation factors. develops evaluation index on the factors. and evaluates sustainability of land use in Pundang, Ilsan, Pyungchon, Sanbon, and Jungdong among new towns Seoul Metropolitan suburban areas. In the index setting is presented the principles of sustainable land use based on the image of a sustainable new town, guideline of sustainable land use. and principles of urban development. Basic system to set the index is done by choosing and classifying by using the subject of index related to land use among sustainable index indicated inside and outside of the nation, using DSR (Driving force. State. Response) structure. In the evaluation is sustainable land use evaluated by setting the weight. The results showed Ilsan recorded the highest value of sustainability of 0.0541. Next. Pundang showed 0.0378, Jungdong -0.01777, Sanbon -0.0327. Pyungchon -0.0415 in order. These results can be used as a guideline to set basic direction of land use policy. or as data for guideline for town development and management.
환경영향평가 변경협의 및 재협의 제도 고찰 - 국내외 제도 운용현황을 중심으로 -
김진오 ( Jin-oh Kim ),주용준 ( Yong-joon Joo ) 한국환경영향평가학회 2021 환경영향평가 Vol.30 No.5
환경영향평가 협의는 개발사업에 대한 주변의 입지 및 토지이용 현황, 사업유형 등을 고려한 현황조사와 영향예측 및 평가를 바탕으로 다양한 이해관계자가 참여하고 결과를 공유하는 최종적 의사결정 단계라고 볼 수 있다. 그러나, 사업계획에 대한 잦은 변경협의와 환경영향평가 협의 이후 이어지는 변경협의 등으로 인해 다양한 이해관계자들이 공유하고 장시간에 걸쳐 인적·물적 자원을 투입한 환경영향평가 과정 및 결과가 훼손되는 등 문제를 초래하고 있다. 변경협의 및 재협의는 기존에 협의가 완료된 개발사업에 대해 토지이용의 변화나 공사 지연, 주변환경의 변화 등 다양한 원인으로 인해 발생하는 계획의 중요한 변경이 이루어질 때 요구되는 프로세스이다. 이러한 변경협의 및 재협의는 주변 여건 변화에 따른 탄력적 대응과 지역주민과의 갈등 조정 측면에서 중요한 과정으로 평가되고 있다. 본 연구는 변경협의 및 재협의에 대한 요건과 국내 운영현황에 대한 고찰, 그리고 해외사례 분석을 통해 국내 변경협의 및 재협의에 대한 개선방안을 제안하고자 한다. 따라서 국내 법규분석을 바탕으로 변경협의 및 재협의 제도의 도입과 변천, 발전과정을 고찰하였으며 미국과 유럽연합(EU), 스코틀랜드, 일본을 중심으로 변경협의 및 재협의 관련 제도와 지침 등의 운영 현황을 파악하여 우리나라와의 차이점 및 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 연구는 이같은 연구결과를 바탕으로 변경협의 및 재협의 제도의 개선을 위한 개선사항을 제시하였으며 이는 환경영향평가가 다양한 자연 및 사회환경적, 경제적 변화로 요구되는 변경협의 및 재협의를 효과적으로 운영하는데 기여할 수 있기를 기대한다. EIA consultation is a final decision-making process that enables a variety of stakeholders to participate in and to share important information about the expected environmental impacts caused by development projects. However, this process is often undermined through re-consultation processes by significant changes in the proposed plans. EIA re-consultation is a necessary process when an approved plan needs to be changed for a variety of important reasons including the changes of land use, delay of construction, and surrounding environments. EIA re-consultation is also important to resolve conflicts among stakeholders and to respond flexibly to unexpected changes in surrounding environment. This study aims to analyze the operation status and the problems of current institutional systems of EIA re-consultation, and to draw implications by reviewing institutional systems of other countries such as U.S. EU, Scotland, and Japan. On the basis of the previous analysis, we propose recommendations to improve the existing EIA re-consultation process. We expect this study helps understand operation status and problems of EIA re-consultation, and provides meaningful implications to improve the existing institutional systems and practice of re-consultation.
邊秉卨(Byun Byung-Seol),朱龍俊(Joo Yong-Joon) 대한국토·도시계획학회 2000 國土計劃 Vol.35 No.4
The purpose of this study is to improve the efficiency, equity, and transparency of the projects which support residents by setting up the proper indicators. The research methodology is as follows. First, the evaluation model is set up, which is the basis of 5 principles for evaluation. Second, 5 evaluation sectors are set up, which is the planning sector, process sector, implement sector, management sector, and outcome sector. Each evaluation sector includes evaluation scope and indicators. Here, the evaluation sectors and indicators are weighed upon the expert survey. The results of survey represent that the planning sector and management sector show the high weight value. Viewing the weight of individual indicators, the degree of satisfaction, the rate of facility utilization. the degree of reasonable composition of committee showed the very high value. Based on these weight value. this study assigned the proper points at each indicator. The total value of the highest satisfaction level is 1000 points. These points of each indicator will be useful for program evaluation.
유헌석 ( Heon Seok Yoo ),주용준 ( Yong Joon Joo ),정성훈 ( Seong Hoon Jeong ) 한국환경영향평가학회 2002 환경영향평가 Vol.11 No.4
Procedures to establish well-balanced development and effectiveness of environmental impat assessment need include various stakeholder`s participation in writing and reviewing document of environmantal impact assessment, collecting public opinion, and post monitoring. Accordingly, to encourage effective and efficient collection of resident`s opinion analyze present conditions and problems and suggest institutional and politic alternative proposals of it. This study resulted in following conclusions. In institutional aspects,①Proposal for drafting document of environmental impact assessment ② Composition of committee for collection and regulating stakeholder`s opinion ③ Width of civil participation scale. In politic aspects, ① Use of local community ② Guide of local information from local society and environmental impact assessment ④Strength of dutied and dutied and duties of local govement.