중국법상 行政審判機關의 終局裁決權과 그에 대한 評價

정이근(Jeong Yi-Keun) 부산대학교 법학연구소 2005 법학연구 Vol.46 No.1

This thesis focus on the power of final decision of the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration in Chinese legal system. In current Chinese legal system, the Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China, the Administrative Review Law of the People's Republic of China, the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Entry and Exit of Chinese Citizens, and the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Entry and Exit of Foreigners, confirms the power of final decision of the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration As a general rule, with regard to specific administrative action of administrative organ, the administrative counterpart can choose between administrative litigation and administrative review. But, in otherwise, as regards administrative fine or administrative detention of public security organization in the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Entry and Exit, and as regards specific administrative action of Department of State Council, People's Government at the provincial level, People's Government of autonomous region or People's Government of municipality directly under the Central Government, for administrative remedy, if the administrative counterpart choose administrative review, the decision of the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration becomes final award, and the administrative counterpart can not bring a suit against defendant(the administrative organ) any more. In particularly, the article 30 of the Administrative Review Law of the People's Republic of China exclude judicial review of People's Court, in case of definition or adjustment of administrative boundary, decision of land requisition by State Council, People's Government at the provincial level, People's Government of autonomous region or People's Government of municipality directly under the Central Government, and in case of verifying decision of the administrative organ which regard to the ownership or right to the use of mineral resources, watercourse, forest, chain of mountains, grassland, wasteland, sand area, maritime space by People's Government at the provincial level, People's Government of autonomous region or People's Government of municipality directly under the Central Government. Confirming the power of final decision of the administrative organ which conducted the reconsideration means that the administrative organ has a power which is conclude judicial review by People's Court. Lastly, in China, these system will threaten sufficient remedy of administrative counterpart, and it would be violate the principle of rule of law.

중국 행정소송상 의무이행소송에 관한 검토

정이근(Jeong Yi-Keun) 한국비교공법학회 2010 공법학연구 Vol.11 No.1

중국 행정소송법에서는 각 사건의 구체적 상황에 따라 법원이 유지판결, 취소판결, 부분 취소판결, 새로운 행정행위를 하도록 하는 판결 및 이행판결을 하도록 규정하고 있다. 행정소송법이 구체적으로 소송의 종류를 구분하여 규정하고 있지 않지만, 판결의 종류를 규정함으로써 실질적으로 의무이행소송제도를 운용하고 있다. 의무이행소송은 급부소송에 속하고, 의무이행소송은 소송목적의 급부성과 소송목적물의 소극성을 가진다. 의무이행소송은 행정법 영역에서 광범위하게 적용 가능한 소송의 한 형식이다. 의무이행소송을 제기하기 위해서는, (1)행정상대방이 행정기관에 대하여 특정한 신청을 할 것, (2)청구는 행정기관에 대하여 특정한 행정행위를 요구할 것, (3)행정기관의 거부 또는 부작위로 인하여 권리침해 또는 그 침해가능성이 있을 것, (4)행정기관이 정당한 이유 없이 구체적 행정행위를 하지 않을 것, (5)법정 기간 내 소송을 제기할 것, (6)의무이행소송을 통한 구제가 가능할 것 등의 요건을 만족해야 한다. 인민법원은 의무이행소송이 제기되면 청구권의 존재 여부에 대하여 심사하고, 또한 사건의 성숙성에 대한 판단을 한다. 의무이행소송의 판결은 구체적 판결설에 따라 행정기관이 이행할 구체적인 내용을 포함하여 판결한다. 이행판결과 새로운 행정행위를 명하는 판결은 개념상 구분된다. 새로운 행정행위를 명하는 판결은 원 행정행위의 취소를 전제로 한다. 의무이행판결에서 법원은 의무이행의 기간을 설정해야 한다. 이때 판결서상 기간의 설정은 법정 기간을 적용하는 경우 또는 합리적 기간을 적용하는 경우가 있다. In Chinese Administrative Procedure Law, in according to concrete condition, the People's Court can give decision upon judgement maintaining a specific administrative acts, rescind a judgement, partial rescind a judgement, judgement for new performance order, and judgement of specific performance. Although Chinese Administrative Procedure Law not provides the form of lawsuit in directly, but it concludes the form of judgement, so we can understand that Chinese Administrative Procedure Law apply the system of lawsuit for performance of obligation. Lawsuit for performance of obligation belong to action of performance, and it has the nature of prestation and negative feature in purpose of action. So, in administrative law realm, we can apply it widely. If administrative counterpart institute lawsuit for performance of obligation, the lawsuit must satisfy following requisites: (1)the existence of application of administrative counterpart; (2)the application must conclude a specified performance for administrative agency; (3)the existence of injury or it's possibility in refusal or nonfeasance of administrative agency; (4)without resonable reason, administrative agency have no action; (5)the lawsuit must satisfy the term condition; (6)the lawsuit for performance of obligation must be useful in that case. If lawsuit for performance of obligation was instituted by administrative counterpart, the People's Court will review the existence of application right and the ripeness of the case. According to the theory of specific judgement, the judgement for lawsuit for performance of obligation must concludes specified contents of performance for administrative agency. The judgement for performance of obligation distinguish from the judgement for new performance order in conception. The judgement for new performance order wants a condition that reverse of original administrative action. In the judgement for performance of obligation, the People's Court must fix the period of performance of obligation. At that time, the People's Court will apply an legal limits of time or a resonable period in written judgement.

중국 최고인민법원의 사법해석제도 검토

정이근(Jeong Yi-Keun) 한국비교공법학회 2010 공법학연구 Vol.11 No.3

본 논문은 중국 최고인민법원의 사법해석권 행사와 관련되는 사법해석제도를 검토하여 그 제도적 특징이나 문제점을 구체적으로 파악하고자 한다. 중국의 최고인민법원은 최고 재판기관으로서 구체적 사건의 판결을 전제로 법률의 해석을 위한 사법해석권한을 행사하고 있다. 그러나 최고인민법원의 사법해석권 행사는 현대적 법치주의의 관점에서 보면 많은 여전히 문제점을 안고 있는 것도 사실이다. 즉, 최고인민법원이 내리는 사법해석이 입법기관의 기능을 담당하는 형국이 되기도 하고, 최고인민검찰원 또는 기타 중앙 행정부서와 공동으로 내려지는 경우도 많아 독립된 사법기관에 의한 법 해석이 이루어지 못하는 경우가 있으며, 경우에 따라서는 법관의 독립이라는 원칙을 훼손하고 있다. 그러나 현실적으로 최고인민법원의 사법해석은 재판에서 중요한 기준이 되고 있다. 최고인민법원의 법률에 대한 사법해석은 유사사건에 있어서 중요한 법원으로서 역할을 하고 있고, 하급법원의 판결에서 해석상 논란에 될 수 있는 규정에 대하여 국가적으로 개관적 통일성을 유지한다는 점에서는 중요한 의의가 있다고 할 것이다. 결론적으로, 본문의 내용과 같이 중국 최고인민법원의 현행 사법해석제도는 여러 가지 장점과 단점을 모두 내포하고 있다. 향후 중국 법제 현대화의 진전과 함께 입법기관의 입법기능의 강화와 제도적 발전을 기대한다. This thesis focus on the system of judicial interpretation which it about exercise the power of judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court of China, and we could comprehense some features and matters of this system. As the highest court in China, the Supreme People's Court exercise the power of judicial interpretation for judge in the specific suit case. But, in the modern constitutionalism views, it is true that the exercise of the power of judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court causes or implies various matters. For example, in some times, judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court act as a substitute for legislative function, and in many case, the Supreme People's Court exercise the power of judicial interpretation with the Supreme People's Procuratorate or other administrative authorities, so it is to say that not real independent judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court, moreover it defames the principle of judicial independence of judicial office. No matter how, actually, judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court is one of the most important criteria in judge. Judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court play an important role as a key source of law in the same kind of case, especially in low level court's trial, and it guarantee a unity of law interpretation in China. In conclusion, modern judicial interpretation system of the Supreme People's Court of China includes various merits and faults. Hereafter, we hope that more evolution of the judicial interpretation system, and recovery the function of legislative organ in China.

공익과 사익의 이익형량과 선택 : 폐기물관리법 규정과 발치한 치아를 소재로

정이근(Jeong Yi-Keun) 부산대학교 법학연구소 2011 법학연구 Vol.52 No.3

본 논문은 발치한 치아를 소재로 하여 폐기물관리법 관련 규정의 의미 및 발치한 치아의 물건성과 재산성에 대하여 검토하고, 공익과 사익의 충돌과 이익선택의 문제 및 이와 관련한 합리적인 해결 방안을 제시해 보고자 한다. 공익과 사익이 충돌하는 구체적인 상황에서는 유효한 기준을 적용하여 각 이익을 형량하고, 그에 따른 선택을 결정 할 수밖에 없는 것이며, 결국 공법상 비례의 원칙을 적용한 이익형량을 전제로 할 수밖에 없다. 본 논문에서 제시한 사례와 같이, 발치한 치아가 사소한 물건으로 보얼 수 있지만 국민의 현실 생활과 밀접한 사안임을 감안하면 이에 대한 학술적 검토는 매우 중요한 의미를 갖는 것으로 판단한다. 즉, 폐기물관리라는 국가목적(공익)의 실현과 이에 대응되는 개인의 이익 사이의 충돌과 선택의 문제를 고민하게 한다. 논문에서는, 치과의원에서 발치한 치아의 처리에 관한 한, 환자의 의견을 사전에 물어 폐기물로 처리되도록 하거나 본인이 수령을 원하는 경우 적절한 소독조치를 통하여 개인에게 불출할 수 있도록 입법에서 명확히 규정할 필요가 있다는 것을 주장한다. 이러한 선택적 처리는 국민의 기본적 권리 확대를 위한 측면에서도 바람직할 것이라 생각되며, 발치한 치아에 대한 일률적인 폐기처리에서 오는 자원의 낭비나 환경오염 유발을 방지할 수 있고, 개인의 신체를 이탈한 물건에 대한 사적 소유권 보장과 정신적 만족도를 제고 시킬 수 있다고 생각된다. This thesis’s important material is a extracted tooth and provisions of the Wastes Disposal Law. In this thesis, author review the meaning of the law provisions, the nature of a thing and the nature of property, and review balancing the interests between public interests and private interests, and it’s selection, afterward author suggests a resonable solution about related problems. In a specific situation when arise collisions between public interests and private interests, it needs a effective standard for resolve problems and use that standard, balance two interests, and must select more resonable interests, at last, we may choose the principle of proportionality in public law for the purpose of balancing interests. In addition to above point, as suggested case in this thesis, even though a extracted tooth seems like a mere thing, but if we consider that it is very close to citizen’s day life, this thesis itself has some value in review. In specific case that this thesis suggested in introduction, we are trouble that we must select which one between public interests for national disposal wastes and private interests for- the private rights. In thesis author persist that, about disposal method for the extracted tooth in dental clinic, prior to disposal the tooth for waste, dental clinic must ask to patient that he want his own tooth or not, in that case, if the patient want his extracted tooth, dental clinic perform proper disinfect and issue it for patient, so in this thesis author persist that it need a legislative measures for protect private rights. Through these selective disposal for extracted tooth, we can more magnitude citizen’s fundamental rights, and can avoid waste of resource or control environmental pollution, moreover through the remodel institution, we can more build up private ownership and mental contentment for a seceded thing from one’s body.

2018년 중국 헌법의 주요 개정내용과 평가

정이근(Jeong, Yi Keun) 부산대학교 법학연구소 2018 법학연구 Vol.59 No.4

논문은 우선 1982년 전면 개정된 헌법을 위주로 2004년까지 이루어진 핵심 개정사항을 간략히 살펴보고, 특히 2018년 헌법 개정의 주요내용과 그에 대한 평가를 시도하고자 한다. 중국 헌법 개정의 주요내용을 이해하고 평가를 시도함으로써 사회주의 국가인 중국이 추구하는 대 내 · 외적 가치 지향점을 가늠할 수 있을 것이라 생각한다. 헌법 개정의 주요내용은 11개 항목으로 요약할 수 있다. 즉, 과학발전관의 명시와 시진핑 신시대 중국 특색 사회주의사상의 정치 및 사회생활 중의 주도적 지위 확립; 중국특색 사회주의 사업의 추진과 두 번의 100년을 위해 분투할 목표에 대한 내용의 조정; 의법치국과 헌법시행을 위한 조치의 개선; 혁명 및 건설․발전과정에 대한 내용의 보완; 애국통일전선과 민족관계에 관한 내용의 개선; 평화적 외교에 관한 내용; 중국공산당의 전면적인 영도에 관한 내용을 견지하고 강화하며; 사회주의 핵심 가치관에 관한 내용 추가; 국가주석 연임에 관한 규정을 폐지하고; 구(區)를 설치한 시(市)가 지방성법규를 제정할 수 있는 규정을 추가하고; 감찰위원회에 관한 규정을 추가한 것이다. 2018년 중국의 헌법 개정은 한마디로 중국공산당의 집권능력 강화로 이해된다. 새로운 모순의 해결을 위하여 중국공산당의 영도력 강화가 필수적이라는 인식에서 나아가 당의 집권능력 강화를 위하여 신시대 중국 특색 사회주의사상을 제시하였고, 국가감찰위원회를 통하여 부패척결을 지속함으로써 당과 국가의 감독체계를 강화하려는 의지의 표현이 헌법 개정으로 나타난 것으로 볼 수 있다. 헌법기관으로서 독립적 위헌심사기관의 설치가 국가감찰위원회에 비하여 더 시급한 것이 아니었던가 하는 생각도 든다. 또한 헌법 개정의 과정에서 인민의 민주적 의지(의사)가 충분히 반영되지 못한 점, 헌법 개정절차의 개선에 무심했던 점도 아쉽다. 앞으로 중국 국민의 국가에 대한 새롭고 다양한 요구의 증가는 물론, 과거와 달리, 국민의 사회적 역량이 새로운 형태로 발전하고 확장될 것임을 예상할 수 있다. 국가적 상황에서 여전히 법의 계급성 내지 수단적 성질을 부인할 수 없지만, ‘국민과 함께 하는 사회주의 법치국가’의 실현을 위하여, 국가적 차원의 지속적인 제도개선 노력이 필요할 것이다. This paper, firstly, from the sweeping revision of Chinese Constitution in 1982 to amended in 2004, takes a brief look at the key amendments, especially focus on the main contents and evaluation of amended Chinese Constitution in 2018. Through its comprehension and evaluation, we can measure that the direction of values at home and abroad that China, a socialist country, persue. The contents of the constitutional amendment are 11 items. That is, scientific thinking on development; confirmed that Xi jin-ping"s new era China-specific socialist thought takes a leading position in political and social life; adjusted the overall situation of the Chinese socialist project and the goals of struggling for two hundred years; has improved rule of law and constitutional enforcement measures; the contents of the process of revolution and development are supplemented; improvements have been made to the contents of patriotic unitary front and national relations; faithfully followed the subject of peaceful diplomacy; China`s Communist Party has strengthened its overall leadership; added the contents of the core values of socialism; abolished regulation on the president"s restriction of consecutive terms; added the regulation on city which established district able to enact local regulations; added the regulations of the State Supervision Committee. China’s amendment of constitution in 2018, in briefly, means that the Communist Party of China has strengthened its power. To resolve new contradiction, from the perception that strengthening the leadership of the Communist Party of China is essential, furthermore, to strengthen the Party’s power present new era China-specific socialist thought, by continuing to fight corruption through the State Supervision Committee, the will to tighten the oversight of the Party and the State has emerged in the amendment of constitution. Meanwhile, compared to the establishment of the State Supervision Committee, I think that the establishment of an independent constitutional review agency is more urgent. In the course of amendment of constitution, still the people`s democratic opinions are not sufficiently reflected. It is regrettable that the present amendment of constitution did not take into account the constitutional amendment procedure for democratic justice of the Constitution. New and diverse needs of the people will increase in the future, unlike the past, the social power of the people will be developed and expanded in new forms. There is still no denying the classiness or means of the law in the present national situation, to establish a “socialist rule of law with people”, continuing efforts are needed to improve the system at the national level.

학교폭력예방법 제17조 제1항의 해석·적용과 가해학생의 인권보호를 위한 구체적 방안 연구

정이근(Jeong, Yi keun) 부산대학교 법학연구소 2021 법학연구 Vol.62 No.3

본 연구는 교육부의 학교폭력예방법 제17조 제1항의 법률 문언에 대한 해석태도를 비판적으로 검토하고 가해학생의 인권보호 측면에서 구체적 대안을 제시함으로써 기존의 행정해석 태도를 변경시킬 수 있는 이론적 기초를 제공하고자 한다. 학교폭력예방법 제17조 제1항은 학교폭력 가해학생에 대한 조치를 규정하고 있다. 이 법 시행령 제19조는 법률이 정한 가해학생에 대한 조치별 적용기준을 정하고 있고, 더세부적인 기준은 교육부장관이 정하여 고시하도록 하고 있다. 교육부는 학교폭력예방법 제17조 제1항 규정을 실무에 적용함에 있어, 법 제17조 제1항의 조치는 징벌적 처분이 아니라 선도·교육적 조치이므로 수개의 조치를 병과 함으로써 그 효과를 높일 수 있다면 교육목적 달성을 위하여 법 제17조 제1항에서 바로 원칙적인 병과가 가능한 것으로 해석하고 있다. 논문의 사례를 통하여 확인할 수 있는 바, 교육부의 행정해석에 따라 그동안 학교폭력 사안의 처리 실무에서는 위법성 여부에 대한 별다른 의심 없이 법률이 정한 선도·교육적 조치가 남용되어 가해학생의 인권이 침해되어 왔다. 물론 최근 법률의 개정으로 교육지원청에 설치된 심의위원회가 가해학생에 대한 조치를 결정함으로써 바람직한 방향으로 제도개선이 되었다고 생각하지만, 실무상 적용에 관한 교육부의 행정해석이 변경되지 않는 한 가해학생에 대한 인권침해는 여전히 지속될 것이다. 교육부는 학교폭력예방법 제17조 제1항에 대한 기존의 해석태도를 변경하여, 가해학생에 대한 교육·선도 및 징계를 결정함에 있어, 위법 부당하게 가해학생의 인권이 침해되지 않도록 해야 한다. 교육부가 엄격히 해석하여 집행하더라도 아무런 위법 또는 부당한 문제가 생길 여지는 없으며, 오히려 학교폭력예방법의 입법취지에 부합하는 법집행을 함으로써 법령소관기관의 법적 책임을 다하는 것이다. 학교폭력예방법의 입법목적도 가해학생에 대한 조치(징계)가 아니라 피해학생이나 가해학생 모두를 건전한 사회구성원으로 선도·교육하는 것이다. 그러므로 가해학생에 대한 조치 역시 법률의 범위 내에서 선도·교육적 차원에서 이루어지도록 함으로써 그의 인권을 보호하는 것은 당연하다. 이와 더불어, 입법적 차원에서는 현행 학교폭력예방법 제17조 제1항 본문에서 표현하고 있는 괄호 속의 표현을 삭제함으로써 법률 문언의 명확성을 확보하고 해석 및 적용상 통일성을 유지토록 하여야 한다. This study focus on Ministry of Education’s interpretation attitude about the first clause of article 17 of School Violence Prevention Act, for protection of human rights of wrongdoer students propose specific alternative, therefore this study is to provide a theoretical basis that can change the existing attitude of administrative interpretation. The first clause of Article 17 of the School Violence Prevention Act stipulates measures to be taken against students who perpetrate school violence. Article 19 of the Enforcement Decree of this Act sets the application standards for each measure for the wrongdoer students set by the Act, and the Minister of Education determines and announces more detailed standards. When the Ministry of Education applies the provisions of the first clause of Article 17 of the School Violence Prevention Act in practice, the measures under the first clause of Article 17 of the Act are not punitive measures but lead and educational measures. In order to achieve the educational purpose, the first clause of Article 17 of the Act interprets it as possible in principle. As can be confirmed through the case of the thesis, according to the administrative interpretation of the Ministry of Education, the human rights of the wrongdoer students have been infringed by the abuse of leading and educational measures prescribed by the law without any doubt about the illegality in the handling of school violence cases. Of course, with the recent revision of the law, the Deliberation Committee installed in the Office of Education Support decided to take action against wrongdoer students, so I think the system is being improved in a desirable way. Unless the Ministry of Education"s administrative interpretation regarding practical application is changed, human rights violations against the wrongdoer students will continue. The Ministry of Education must change the existing interpretation of the first clause of Article 17 of the School Violence Prevention Act so that the human rights of the wrongdoer students are not violated illegally and unjustly in determining education, guidance, and disciplinary action against the wrongdoer. Even if the Ministry of Education strictly interprets and enforces the law, there is no room for any illegal or unreasonable problems. Rather, it fulfills its legal responsibility by enforcing the law in line with the legislative purpose of the School Violence Prevention Act. The legislative purpose of the School Violence Prevention Act is not to take measures (discipline) against the wrongdoer students, but to lead and educate both the victims and the wrongdoer students as healthy members of society. Therefore, it is natural to protect the human rights of the wrongdoer students by ensuring that measures are also taken within the scope of the law at the leading and educational level. In addition, at the legislative level, it is necessary to ensure clarity of legal text and maintain uniformity in interpretation and application by deleting the expressions in parentheses expressed in the main text of the first clause of Article 17 of the Current School Violence Prevention Act.

중국의 입법절차와 민주화 소고(小考)

정이근 ( Yi Keun Jeong ) 청주대학교 법학과 2008 청주법학 Vol.30 No.1

우리나라 현행 노동입법의 과제

정이근 ( Yi Keun Jeong ) 청주대학교 법학과 2010 청주법학 Vol.32 No.2

This thesis focus on the evaluation of labour laws, especially through developing process of labour laws, and review related problems of current labour law system, and suggest some proposal for evolution of Korean labour laws in the situation that stand on the huge waves of the change of economical, free market trends and globalism. In the labour law aspect, through the monetary crisis of 1970`s, it confronted new changes of situation in the relationship between workers and owner, and notwithstanding project nationwide exerts for establish appropriate legislation system, but because the affection of new free market idealism, even though there exist some protection legislation for workers, recently the phenomenon of increased irregular workers threat worker`s legal status more than former days. And, salary or other treats for work, not only irregular workers but also foreign workers, can be adjust for the working station or working status of worker. But in the time that determine the condition of treat for work, it is necessary to consider the principle of equality in the Constitution and equal treat principle in the basic law for the standards of labour. Moreover in the adjust of interests between each related parties, legislative authorities and related state organs must adopt or consider the standards that protection of human being`s dignity and the right to pursuit happiness in the Constitution Art. 10. If we interpretate the labour rights into that rights, i. e. workers can require the State guarantee proper working time and working condition for worker, guarantee human being`s substantial life, in this situation, most important thing is establish the labour law system which realize the principles of labour protection in accordance with the Constitution.

중국의 영업허가제도와 법적 문제점

정이근 ( Yi Keun Jeong ) 영산대학교 법률연구소 2013 영산법률논총 Vol.10 No.1

The main purpose of this thesis is that review the changing process of legal system for Chinese business license, basic procedure of business license and related legal problems for the system. Through this thesis, firstly, we should confirm several related problems for business license system, and in the some aspect that investors must understand his business scope related legal system and get hold of related legal problems for remove legal obstacles, this thesis will serve some direction for legal review of business realm. In China, business license procedure consist of application stage, review stage and issuing stage, through these procedure applicant would obtain the license, but there exist several legal problems, i.e. discriminative treatment of issuing licence, regional self-centeredness in the procedure, ambiguous of reviewing criterion, and insufficient legal remedy system for applicants. Even though Chinese central government persevere in her efforts for improvement related legal system, but for achieve higher level improvement the business license system, especially in based on established legal resource, China should prepare that the fairness and transparent business license procedure, and effective and well directed remedy system for applicants. In addition, the investor also have to recognize wholly related legal problems for his business.

중국 행정소송상 증거규칙에 관한 소고(小考)

정이근 ( Yi Keun Jeong ) 영산대학교 법률연구소 2008 영산법률논총 Vol.5 No.1

In Chinese administrative litigation system, evidence rules are consists of three sorts of regulations which is the evidence related provisions in the Administrative Litigation Law of People``s Republic of China, the Rule of Interpretation of the Supreme People``s Court for the Administrative Litigation Law, and the Rule of Evidence of the Supreme People``s Court for evidence of the Administrative Litigation Law. These rules are very important law resource in Chinese administrative litigation evidence system. Especially, the Rule of Evidence of the Supreme People``s Court for evidence of the Administrative Litigation Law, it was enforced from Oct 1 in 2002, and its main contents consist of six parts which is distribution of the burden of proof and period limited, presentation of proof, acquisition and conservation of proof, cross examine and confirm of proof, review and determination of proof, and other related provisions. This thesis focus on the problem of proof presentation, the proof acquisition problem of administrative organization, the problem of proof presentation for the third parties, and the problem of probative force. Through this thesis, we know that the rule of evidence of P.R.China contains many problems. But, if we consider various conditions of China, enforcement of unified rule system has many meanings. In the future, through sound development, it will be more improved. Finally, through this study, I suggested that Korea administrative litigation system must have its own rule of evidence, because it will serve development of evidence theory.