알콜과 식이지방량이 흰쥐의 간 지질조성과 간조직형태에 미치는 영향

정경희(Kyung-Hee Chung),조성희(Sung-Hee Cho),신응남(Eung-Nam Sin),최경호(Kyung-Ho Choi),최영선(Young-Sun Choi) 韓國營養學會 1988 Journal of Nutrition and Health Vol.21 No.3

제왕절개술 환자를 위한 Critical Pathway 개발

정경희(Chung, Kyung Hee),장금성(Jang, Keum Seong) 한국간호교육학회 1998 한국간호교육학회지 Vol.4 No.1

재미한인의 사회경제적 성장 - 그 연구를 위한 이론적 고찰

정경희(Kyung-Hee Chung),이인표(Inpyo Lee) 한국아메리카학회 2004 美國學論集 Vol.36 No.3

  For the last forty years Korean-Americans achieved an outstanding socioeconomic development. This paper is an attempt to find theoretical perspectives which can explain the development more properly.<BR>  One major approach which analyses Korean immigrants" socioeconomic adjustments to the host society is middleman minority theory. In spite of much criticism against the theory it is still helpful to understand Korean immigrants" concentration in small business and their involvement in racial conflicts with minority customers.<BR>  Another useful approach for an analysis of Korean immigrants is the ethnic enclave hypothesis. Several researchers argued that the term ethnic enclave should not be used because of the difficulty of definition and measurement, They overlook the original insights of the hypothesis. The ethnic enclave economies enhance opportunities of ethnic groups within. Also the structuring and impact of ethnic enclaves constitute a core part of the study of the incorporation of immigrant groups.<BR>  The middleman minority theory and the ethnic enclave hypothesis, recast to theorise the invisible networks of object/persons expanding across space will be the basis for the research of Korean-American society.

역사교육을 둘러싼 한국과 미국의 이념논쟁 비교

정경희(Kyung-Hee Chung) 한국아메리카학회 2008 美國學論集 Vol.40 No.3

The controversy over the Natinal History Standards in America during 1994-5 and the controversy over Korean modern history textbooks in Korea since 2004 assume a very similar aspect in spite of almost a decade's time difference. This study aims to analyze and compare in derail the history education debates in the two countries. First of all, both in America and in Korea the controversy was stimulated by the media, not by the academics Soon, the controversy extended to the legislative body of each country, and sparked intense poltical debates over history education. In January 1995 the United States Senate passed a resolution condemning the National Standards for History as un-American, and the authors of the standards were forced to revise them. In 2004 Korea National Assembly, too moch swayed by the party interests, did not do anything but further polarized the bitter dispute when a conservative Congressman insisted that the narrative of the Korean modern history textbook is overly anti-American and Pro-North Korean Textbook Forum, a group of intellectuals held symposia and published several books including korean Modern History an Alternative Textbook as a counter to the existing Korean modern history textbooks, which were deemed to be left-leaning by the group. However, it was not until the new conservative administration was launched in early 2008 that the revision of korean modern history textbooks saw any progress. Conservatives led by Lynne Cheney criticized the Standards for describing American past "too grim and gloomy" In Korea its modern history textbooks were blamed for narrating Korea's history of recent sixty from negative perspective, while writing that of North Korea as positively as possible. In both countries it was the main issue of the debates that the national history, especially the stories of nation building and the founding fathers were depicted too negatively in the Standards and history textbooks. It is also similar that during the debates both sides condemned that the other sides are politicizing history. Peoples involved in the Standards controversy and Korean modern history textbooks controversy charged that the opposing sides are politically motivated. As a result, the history education became the arena for the ideological controversy. Thus, ironically teachers and students who are directly involved in the issue of teaching and learning were excluded from the debates in both countries. It is noteworthy that the long ideological controversy in both Korea and in America was pressed by the extreme difference of historical recognition between the traditionalists and the revisionists.

경희 동서약학연구소 업적 초록집 ( 1984 ~ 1993 ) - 제 9 권 경희동서약학연구소보 ( 1992 ) / 원보 : Berberinephenolbetaine 유도체 합성

황순호(Soon Ho Hwang),김신규(Sin Kyu Kim),정경희(Kyung Hee Chung),김재현(Jae Hyun Kim) 경희대학교 동서약학연구소 1994 경희동서약학연구소보 Vol.11 No.-

N/A

경희 동서약학연구소 업적 초록집 ( 1984 ~ 1993 ) - 제 9 권 경희동서약학연구소보 ( 1992 ) / 원보 : 8.14-Cycloberberine 유도체 합성연구

김신규(Sin Kyu Kim),손세일(Se Il Sohn),정경희(Kyung Hee Chung),황순호(Soo Ho Hwang),김재현(Jae Hyun Kim) 경희대학교 동서약학연구소 1994 경희동서약학연구소보 Vol.11 No.-

N/A

제왕절개술 환자에 대한 Critical Pathway 적용효과

정경희(Kyung Hee Chung),주정란(Jeong Lan Joo),정휴성(Hyeu Sung Chung) 한국간호행정학회 2000 간호행정학회지 Vol.6 No.2

미국 역사표준서 논쟁 연구

丁慶姬(Chung Kyung-Hee) 역사교육연구회 2004 역사교육 Vol.89 No.-

This paper tries to expose the ideological conflict that underlay the development of the National History Standards by analyzing the intellectual and political contexts in which the controversy surrounding the creation of the Standards. Backed by national political leaders in the Bush Administration and funded by NEH, the National History Standards Project was launched in 1991. To seek consensus on the teaching of history, the professors and the teachers involved in the project debated some fundamental issues such as the issue of multiculturalism and the primacy of the Western Civilization in the world history. Eventually the National History Standards they proposed were a compromise on the issues of the inclusion of minority contributions in the U. S. history and the place of western civilization in the teaching of world history. Yet before the Standards were released in October 1994, Lynne Cheney, the former director of NEH, denounced the Standards as the product of an academic establishment that rebels in politicized history. She charged the authors of the Standards with political correctness, excessive multiculturalism, and neglecting America"s many heroes and triumphs. For the next eighteen months, the controversy over America"s past raged in the national press, over the airwaves, and in the Congress. With the help of conservative media, and the new Republican majority in the Congress, the conservatives led by Cheney portrayed the writers of the Standards as a band of left-leaning professors with the aim of perverting the minds of America"s youth. To refute this allegation, the NCHS did their best, including to stress that the Standards had emerged through an admirable process of open debate. However, their response was too late and too weak to reverse the damage done by Cheney"s domination of the debate early on. In this analysis both sides which were involved in the Standards controversy were found to have politicized the debate, and as a result, they did a real disservice to the nation. The conservatives claimed that the authors of the Standards politicized history through the Standards. The NCHS made a response that the conservatives had an intention to make the Standards debate a political issue, questioning the timing of Cheney"s attack which was launched just two weeks before the election of November 1994. Regardless of political inclination, both sides believed that the other side is acting according to the political motivation only. Now the battle over the Standards in the ongoing culture wars is over. Neither side achieved victory. The conservatives did not succeed in implementing their reform agenda, and the liberal content of the Standards was repudiated by Congress. The Standards controversy demonstrated that school reform is too important to be made a hostage to the culture wars.

글로컬화 관점에서의 라이선스 패션잡지의 상호텍스트성 분석

정경희(Chung, Kyung Hee),이미숙(Lee, Mi Suk) 한국디자인문화학회 2016 한국디자인문화학회지 Vol.22 No.3

패션잡지는 글로벌한 패션 트렌드를 주도해 가는 역할을 담당함과 동시에, 각국의 독특한 패션 문화적 특성을 담아내 왔다. 이에 본 연구의 목적은 글로컬화의 관점에서 국내 · 외의 패션잡지의 콘텐츠 및 텍스트 분석을 통해 문화적인 관점에서 동일한 사례를 바라보는 각 나라의 라이선스 패션잡지의 특징과 글로벌, 로컬 문화요소 간의 상호작용이 궁극적으로 잡지콘텐츠에 어떻게 나타나고 있는지를 살펴보는데 있다. 그리고 이러한 분석을 통해, 패션과 패션잡지 산업의 국제화 관련 전략 수립에 필요한 기초 자료와 관련학문의 연구토대를 제공하고자 한다. 연구 방법으로 먼저, 선행연구 고찰을 통해 글로컬 미디어로서 라이선스 패션잡지에 대해 살펴본 다음, 실증적 연구로써 2015년에 발간된 한 · 미 라이선스 패션잡지 「VOGUE」의 목차에 나타난 패션기사의 헤드라인에 대한 내용분석과 상호텍스트성 분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 라이선스 패션잡지의 기사를 분석한 결과 「VOGUE KOREA」의 경우, Beauty & Health, Item, Style 관련 기사가 70% 이상을 차지하고 있는 반면, 「VOGUE US」는 Style, Beauty & Health, People, Item, Brand 기사가 유사한 빈도를 보이면서 많이 나타났다. 그리고 과월호에 따른 콘텐츠에 있어서도 미국은 매 과월호에서 변화 있게 콘텐츠가 구성되고 있었다. 둘째, 라이선스 패션잡지 기사의 헤드라인에 나타난 어휘를 분석한 결과, Style 관련기사에서 한국은 패션 소재를 나타내는 어휘와 패션이미지를 표현하는 어휘가 많이 활용되었고 이와 관련된 어휘로 구체적인 패션 아이템 어휘들이 헤드라인에 직접적으로 사용된 반면, 미국은 계절과 관련된 어휘와 패션 아이템, 패션 소재와 관련된 어휘가 패션기사의 헤드라인에 많이 활용되었고, 이와 관련된 패션 문화적으로 의미가 있었던 대중작품의 명칭이나 배역의 이름 등이 직접 사용되는 경우도 많은 것으로 나타났다. Item 관련 헤드라인에서는 드레스 어휘가 슬립, 보헤미안 등의 어휘와 함께 공통적으로 활용되었지만 그 외의 어휘에서는 한국의 경우, 구체적인 패션 아이템 어휘가 활용된 반면, 미국은 스타일을 설명하는 패션 이미지 어휘가 위주로 사용되었다. 그리고 Beauty & Health 관련 기사에서는 뷰티와 메이크업, 향수 등의 어휘가 공통적으로 많이 나타났고, 그 외의 어휘에서는 한국의 경우, 피부, 네일, 미국은 헤어, 피트니스, 립 어휘가 많이 나타나 차이가 있음을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구를 통해 얻은 결론으로는 라이선스 패션잡지는 차별화된 콘텐츠로 잡지를 구성하고 있으며, 기사의 헤드라인에 있어서도 한국은 스타일이나 아이템의 구체적인 특징을 표현하는 어휘를 사용하는 반면, 미국은 스타일이나 아이템의 명칭뿐만 아니라 영화 · 드라마 등 대중문화와 관련된 어휘가 사용되는 차이를 보이는 것으로 나타났다. Overseas licensing fashion magazines have been responsible for the important role of leading global fashion trends while at the same time expressing a characteristic closeness to the culture and lifestyle of each country. The purpose of this study is to analyze the contents and texts of fashion magazines at home and abroad in the aspect of glocalization and examine the characteristics of how license fashion magazines in each country view the same case from a cultural point of view and how interaction between global and local cultural elements appears in magazine contents. This analysis will provide basic information necessary to establish the internationalization strategies of the fashion and fashion magazine industry and the foundation to study related disciplines. The study methodology was the review of previous studies to examine a licensed fashion magazine as the glocal media and the empirical study to analyze the substance and intertextuality of fashion news headlines in the contents of 「VOGUE」, a licensed fashion magazine published in 2015 in Korea and the USA. The results of the study were as follows. First, the news of the licensed fashion magazine were collected. In 「VOGUE KOREA」, beauty & health, item, and style news accounted for more than 70%. On the other hand, 「VOGUE US」 showed similar frequency in style, beauty & health, people, item, and brand news. In the contents of past issues, 「VOGUE US」 differently organized contents in every issue. Second, the vocabulary of headline news in the licensed fashion magazine was analyzed. In style news, 「VOGUE KOREA」 frequently used fashion material and fashion image vocabulary. And in related vocabulary, specific fashion item vocabularies were directly used in the headlines. On the other hand, 「VOGUE US」 frequently applied season-related vocabulary and fashion item and material vocabulary to the fashion news headlines. In many cases, related names of popular works, or cast names which are meaningful in fashion and culture were directly used. In item-related headline news, dress, slip, and Bohemian were commonly used.「VOGUE KOREA」 frequently used fashion item vocabularies. But, in 「VOGUE US」, fashion image vocabularies were used to explain the style. In beauty & health news, beauty, make-up, perfume, fragrance, and scent were commonly used, while skin and nail were commonly used in Korea. Hair, fitness, and lip were frequently used in the USA, suggesting a great difference. In conclusion, licensed fashion magazines had distinctive contents. In Korea, vocabulary which expresses detailed characteristics of style or items was commonly used. On the other hand, in the USA, the name of style or items and popular culture-related vocabulary including movie or drama were frequently used.

미국 헌법의 제정과 연방공화국의 건국

丁慶姬(Chung Kyung-Hee) 역사학회 2008 역사학보 Vol.0 No.198

Why did the framers adopt the Constitution instead of the existing Articles of Confederation in 1787? Many historians and political scientists conclude that both the defects of the Articles of Confederation and the vices of the state politics during the 1780s led the framers to consider an alternative. Especially historian Gordon S. Wood insists that the latter was the principal reason because the framers such as James Madison were disenchanted with the abuse of power by the state legislatures. This essay, however, is an attempt to consider the making of the Constitution and the Union to be an experiment in international system of cooperation on a continent divided into 13 states. The Federalist papers indicate that the Federalists' determination to establish a united national government was resulted primarily from their concerns with the dangers from foreign force and secondarily from concerns with the dangers from war between the 13 states. By 1787 the Federalists discerned that the failures of the Union created a full-blown crisis of the American Revolution. They believed that the tendency of American politics was toward disunion, and that the anarchy of disunion would soon lead to tyranny and counterrevolution. The imminent collapse of the Union would multiply potential dangers by exposing each state to the rivalry of other American as well as European states. A strong Union was the only guarantee of American independence. In 1787 two extremes, before the Federalists, were a perfect separation and a perfect incorporation of the 13 states. The Federalists rejected both extremes, in favor of a "middle ground". They chose this "middle ground" because they believed that both the dissolution of the Union and the consolidation of the Union would be a betrayal of the Revolution. Both the anarchy and the empire were the threatening factors to the republic, what the founding fathers considered as the ideal type of nation system.