http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
중국어 ‘上’의 허사 쓰임에 나타난 한국인 학습자의 습득 양상 연구
유해도(Liu, Haitao),왕난난(Nannan Wang) 언어과학회 2021 언어과학연구 Vol.- No.96
This paper has investigated Korean Learners’ acquisition of each semantic type of ‘Shang’ in the constructions of ‘noun + Shang’ and ‘verb/adjective + Shang’ by learner corpus. The research results suggest that: (1) There is no significant difference in Korean Learners’ total acquisition achievements of ‘Shang’ after nouns and ‘Shang’ after verbs or adjectives. (2) In the constructions of ‘noun + Shang’ and ‘verb/Adjective + Shang’, Korean learners’ acquisition achievements of each semantic type of ‘Shang’ are different, which are mainly affected by their Chinese proficiency, but the scope of influence is different. (3) The reasons for the differences in Korean Learners’ acquisition achievements of the function word ‘Shang’ are mostly shaped by target item complexity, mother tongue influence and input frequency.
유해도 ( Haitao Liu ),공현장 ( Hyunjang Kong ),김판구 ( Pankoo Kim ) 한국정보처리학회 2004 한국정보처리학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.11 No.2
Existing methodologies and practical ontology development experiences have explored a broad spectrum of knowledge management challenges. Each has its own characteristics and evaluates only a subset of specific domain. However, there is still no one “correct” way or methodology for developing ontologies. In this paper, we described a methodology for domain driven ontology development, covering the whole lifecycle from the formalization of domain to the evolution of ontologies.
유해도 ( Haitao Liu ),신주현 ( Ju-hyun Shin ),김판구 ( Pankoo Kim ) 한국정보처리학회 2005 한국정보처리학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.12 No.1
Ontology developing process has aroused a lot of controversy among knowledge engineers and knowledge users. The recent surges on ontology building methodologies and practical ontology applications have explored a broad spectrum of knowledge management challenges. On the one hand, the abundant methodology theories provide us with a set of useful heuristic rules, from which we get the overview of ontology building process. But on the other hand, every research groups would like to justify their theories by listing their specific characteristics and unique method when approaching the right way. However, there is still no one “correct” way or methodology for developing ontologies. In this case, the methods used to evaluate only a subset of specific domain do not make any sense to the commonsense users. As a result, a comprehensive understanding of domain ontology is urgent and necessary.