http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
코로나19 상황에서 재난분야 교수자를 대상으로 한 비대면 교육의 개선에 관한 조사연구
박진찬,백민호,Park, Jin Chan,Beck, Min Ho 한국재난정보학회 2021 한국재난정보학회 논문집 Vol.17 No.3
Purpose: Normal education operation was difficult in the national disaster situation of Coronavirus Infection-19. Non-face-to-face education can be an alternative to face to face education, but it is not easy to provide the same level of education. In this study, the professor of disaster management field will identify problems that can occur in the overall operation and progress of non-face-to-face education and seek ways to improve non-face-to-face education. Method: Non-face-to-face real-time education was largely categorized into pre-class, in-class, post-class, and evaluation, and case studies were conducted through the professor's case studies. Result&Conclusion: The results of the survey are as follows: First, pre-class, it was worth considering providing a non-face-to-face educational place for professors, and the need for prior education on non-face-to-face educational equipment and systems was required. In addition, it seems necessary to make sure that education is operated smoothly by giving enough notice on classes and to make efforts to develop non-face-to-face education programs for practical class. Second, communication between professor and learner, and among learners can be an important factor in non-face-to-face mid classes. To this end, it is necessary to actively utilize debate-type classes to lead learners to participate in education and enhance the educational effect through constant interaction. Third, non-face-to-face post classes, policies on the protection of privacy due to video records should be prepared to protect the privacy of professors in advance, and copyright infringement on educational materials should also be considered. In addition, it is necessary to devise various methods for fair and objective evaluation. According to the results of the interview, in the contents, which are components of non-face-to-face education, non-face-to-face education requires detailed plans on the number of students, contents, and curriculum suitable for non-face-to-face education from the design of the education. In the system, it is necessary to give the professor enough time to fully learn and familiarize with the function of the program through pre-education on the program before the professor gives non-face-to-face classes, and to operate the helpdesk, which can thoroughly check the pre-examination before non-face-to-face education and quickly resolve the problem in case of a problem.
박진찬(Park, Jin-Chan),신호준(Sin, Ho-Jun),구원회(Gu, Won-Hoe),백민호(Baek, Min-Ho) 한국화재소방학회 2013 한국화재소방학회 학술대회 논문집 Vol.2013 No.추계
본 연구에서는 국내에 거주하고 있는 외국인의 재난 및 응급시 안전서비스에 대한 의식조사를 실시하여 재난안전서비스 개선방안을 검토하였다.
새로운 진단기준(ADA)에 따른 임신성 당뇨병의 빈도 및 특징
박진찬,박석원,이미화,박진경,주선녀,정훈,박홍훈,김세현,홍은경,김유리,조용욱,이상종 대한당뇨병학회 2002 임상당뇨병 Vol.3 No.1
연구배경 : 최근에 미국당뇨병학회(ADA)에서 임신성 당뇨병의 진단기준으로 Carpenter와 Coustan 등의 기준을 채택하였다. 본 연구는 우리나라 산모를 대상으로 진단 기준의 변화에 따른 유병률의 변화와 임상적 특징을 고찰해 보고 자 하였다. 방법 : 1998년 10월부터 1999년 12월까지 포천중문의과대학 부속 분당차병원에 내원한 임신24~28주의 산모 2,682명 모두에서 50 g 경구당부하검사를 시행하였고, 양성을 보인 451명에서 100 g 경구당부하검사를 시행하였다. 최종적으로 정상내당능으로 확인된 산모를 A군, NDDG 기준에 의해 임신성 당뇨병으로 진단된 산모를 B군, ADA 기준을 적용함으로써 추가로 임신성 당뇨병으로 진단된 산모를 C군으로 하여 세 군 간의 임상적·생화학적 특징, 주산기 합병증 등을 비교하였다. 결과 : 1) NDDG 진단기준에 의한 임신성 당뇨병의 유병률은 2.1%였으며 ADA 진단기준을 적용하면 3.4%로 1.6배의 증가를 보였다. 2) C군의 임신전 체중, 신체질량지수(BMI), 임신횟수, 출산횟수, 공복시 혈당은 B군과 차이가 없었으나, 정상내당능을 보인 A군과는 유의한 차이를 보였다. 3) 신생아의 평균체중, 거대아, 과체중 출생아, 저체중 출생아, 미숙아 및 제왕절개술의 빈도, 1분 및 5분 APGAR 점수에 있어서는 세 군간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론 : 임신성 당뇨병의 유병률은 NDDG 기준에 의하면 2.1%였으며, ADA 기준을 적용하면 3.4%로 1.6배의 증가를 보였다. ADA 진단기준을 적용함으로 인하여 추가로 임신성 당뇨병으로 진단된 군의 임상적·생화학적 특징이 정상 내당능을 보인 군과는 유의한 차이를 보였으며, 기존의 NDDG 진단기준에 의하여 임신성 당뇨병으로 분류된 군과는 차이가 없었다. Background: Recently, American Diabetes Association(ADA) accepted the Carpenterand Coustan's criteria for the diagnosis of GDM. This report will examine the change of the prevalence and clinical characteristics of GDM in Korean pregnant women according to either NDDG or ADA criteria. Method: 2,682 pregnant women were universally screened for GDM 451 positively screened women were taken 100gm OGTT and classified into three groups. The group A was women with NGT, group B was women with GDM by NDDG criteria and group C was women with GDM additionally diagnosed by ADA criteria. We examined the prevalence and compared the clinical and biochemical characteristics of the three groups. Results: 10 The prevalence of GDM was increased from 2.1% to 3.4% according to the change of the diagnostic criteria. 2) The pregestational weight, BMI, gravida, partiy, fasting plasma glucose level in group C were not different from group B, but significantly different from group A. 3) The rates of macrosornia large or small for gestational age, prematurity, 1 and 5 minute APGAR scores and cesarean section rates were not different among three groups.