카프 전후 소설의 어휘 사용 양상

문한별(Moon Hanbyoul),김일환(Kim Ilhwan) 한국언어문학회 2009 한국언어문학 Vol.69 No.-

The methodology of literature and linguistics is obviously different because its original purpose of research cannot be same. That is, main concerns of literature focus on creating texts or criticizing literature works, but the main purpose of linguistics is related to analyse linguistic phenomenon. Sometimes, however some of the methodology of linguistics can be applied to literature research because linguistics and literature can be overlapped to concerned to language itself. In this paper we introduced to quantitative approach to analyze and to compare novel texts during before and after 1934, in which KAPF is dismissed. So far Korean novels in this period can be estimated that trends are changed from critical realism to non-critical realism generally. Because most of research related to this argument are based on researchers' intuition or social background, however actual, authentic usage of words can be ignored or underestimated. We will expect that to analyse Korean novels using quantitative approach can show interesting results which cannot be captured by introspective criticism.

근대소설의 귀향과 여로 모티프 비교 연구

문한별(Moon Hanbyoul) 한국언어문학회 2010 한국언어문학 Vol.75 No.-

Historical reality of the period under the Japanese colonial rule of Korea was imprinted in the mind of writers as something similar to primal experience. Such experience was used as motifs in their novels. In the reality of the colonial rule from the 1910s to late 1930s, characters in the novels shared and reproduced the experience by reflecting the period. Four novels with motifs based on the experience were studied to identify the characteristics of changes in the motifs, and their historical meanings in this paper: they were ｢Maeuljip｣(1917) by Ju Yo-han, ｢Mansejeon｣(1922) by Yeom Sang-seop, ｢Seulpeun Mosun｣ (1918) by Yang Geon-sik, and ｢Soseolga Gubossieui ilil｣(1938) by Park Tae-won. ｢Maeuljip｣ and ｢Mansejeon｣ showed a similarity in their stories. Protagonists in the novels were students studying in Japan. They became conscious of the reality and problems of his times when they came home. However, to resolve the problems, they had to leave their hometowns. ｢Seulpeun Mosun｣ and ｢Soseolga Gubossieui ilil｣ dealt with issues in the period of the Japanese colonial rule from different point of views by their protagonists. Both stories were very similar in terms of narrative structures and the situation which the protagonists were facing. However, their viewpoints showed a big difference. Such difference depended on whether characters were independent in setting and recognizing the relations between themselves and subjects. It was meaningful to analyze those novels as it not only confirmed something in common in their motifs but also extracted the realistic background of the motifs, furthermore what they represented in their times.

일제강점기 대중잡지 『삼천리』를 통해 본 검열의 흐름과 매체의 생존 전략

김정화 ( Kim Junghwa ),문한별 ( Moon Hanbyoul ) 한국어문학국제학술포럼 2021 Journal of Korean Culture Vol.52 No.-

『Joseon Chulpan Gyeongchal Wolbo』 was a classified censorship document of the Japanese Government General’s Book Department formulated every month from September 1928 to December 1938. This report documents the total number of publications printed every month, administrative disposition statistics, and record of administrative disposition due to censorship, among other information. This article seeks to unfold the discussion regarding changes in the publication policy under the Empire and the media’s response strategy by utilizing the “article point” that documents the details of administrative disposition following censorship. In particular, it seeks to illuminate why the longest-running popular magazine during the period of Japanese colonialism, 『Samcheonli』’s, changed its publication direction, and to uncover how the proJapanese theory and sentiment formed and disseminated. The article point of 『Samcheonli』 has been classified, on the basis of its yearly proportion, into the three periods: 1929-1931, 1932-1936, and 1937-1938. The classification was made to examine the detailed aspect of censorship and administrative disposition. From 1929 to 1931, when 20 out of 29 article points were concentrated, articles with a nationalistic and socialist overtone were subject to censorship. From 1932 to 1936, the number of administrative dispositions decreased significantly compared to the previous period, and literary work appeared in the article points instead of other general articles or articles with a strong editorial characteristic. From 1937 to 1938, when the number of administrative dispositions increased rapidly, those articles with content contrary to the Japanese-Chosun identity policy (Naesun-Ilchae policy), those with favorable statements about the perspective of the U.S, which was regarded an enemy country in relation to the war, and those that were determined to contain contexts relating to nationalism and antiwar became subject to administrative disposition. The fact that 『Samcheonli』 was organized as article point for 29 occasions forms the basis of the Japanese Government General’s determination that this magazine contained ideologically problematic issues. Based on this, the historical meaning and the media’s response strategy can be confirmed through the characteristics of articles published for each period. From the point of the dissolution of the Shinganhyoe (an antiJapanese colonialism group), 『Samcheonli』’s characteristic transformed drastically from being suggestive and political to mass appeal-oriented, and its direction turned to securing readership and being plainly proJapanese. Following the emasculation of its political and ideological tendency of the early days, Donghwan Kim’s original intention of pursuing a popular general magazine emerged naturally, and as a result, 『Samcheonli』 settled based on the conspicuous capitalistic “sensationalism” and survival-based “proJapanese tendency.”

일제강점 말기 경무국 도서과의 활동 방향과 검열의 흐름

문한별 ( Moon¸ Han-byoul ) 우리어문학회 2022 우리어문연구 Vol.72 No.-

1926년 4월에 신설된 조선총독부 경무국 산하 도서과는 일제강점기의 중심을 거치며 가장 강력하지만 숨겨져 있는 사상 통제의 기관이었다. 1926년부터 식민지 조선의 언론과 출판, 영화와 음반에 이르기까지 사상과 관련한 모든 것들은 도서과의 검열을 통해서만 조선인들에게 전달될 수 있었고, 그 역할은 일제강점기 중반부터 전시기까지 변함없이 지속되었다. 하지만 이 같은 조선총독부 경무국 산하 도서과의 역할은 제국과 식민지 상황의 변화에 따라 크게 변화양상을 보이는데, 본고에서는 경무국의 기관지인 『경무휘보』에 수록된 ‘도서과 통신’을 통하여 그 업무의 변화와 방향성의 전환에 대해 살펴보았다. 지금까지 도서과에 대한 연구는 제도와 조직에 대한 것과 도서과가 생산한 검열 문건에 집중된 바 있다. 그러나 1937년 이후 도서과가 1943년 정보과로 통합되어 사라질 때까지 구체적으로 어떤 역할을 담당하였는지에 대한 연구는 부족하였다. 본고는 이 시기 도서과의 활동을 확인하기 위하여 『경무휘보』의 ‘도서과통신’을 번역하였고, 이를 분석하여 그 역할과 흐름의 변화에 대하여 확인하고자 하였다. 그 결과 기존의 검열과 행정처분을 담당하던 도서과의 역할은 언론과 출판을 검열을 통해 통제하는 것에서 더 나아가 사상 교육과 언론지도라는 목적으로 확대되었고, 편집과 서술 방향에 이르기까지 확대되고 있었음을 우선 확인할 수 있었다. 또한 일제강점기 중기부터 그 영향력이 증대되고 있었던 영화 매체에 대한 검열을 강화하였고, 중일전쟁 이후에는 검열과 통제를 넘어 선전 영화의 기획과 제작, 배급과 상영이라는 지점까지 나아가고 있음을 알 수 있었다. The book department affiliated to Joseon Government-General Police Bureau established in April 1926 was the most powerful but hidden institution of thought control throughout the Japanese colonial era. Since 1926, everything related to thought from the press and publication to movies and albums of colonial Joseon were only allowed to be delivered to Koreans through censorship by the book department, and the role remained unchanged from mid Japanese colonial era to the wartime period. However, the role of the book department under the police bureau of the Japanese Government-General of Korea shows significant changes according to changes in the empire and colonial situation, and this study investigated the changes of work and direction through the 'newsletter of book department' from 『Gyeongmuhwibo』, an organ of police bureau. Until now, researches on book department have focused on systems and organizations and the censorship documents produced by the book department. However, there were insufficient studies on the specific role of the book department until it was integrated into the information department in 1943. This study translated 'newsletter of book department' of 『Gyeongmuhwibo』 to identify the activities of the book department during this period, and intended to identify the changes in role and trend. As a result, it was identified that the role of the book department, which was in charge of censorship and administrative measure, expanded from controlling the media and publishing through censorship to the purpose of ideology education and media guidance, and it was expanding from editing to the direction of description. Also, it was identified that censorship of the movie media that has been gaining influence since the mid-Japanese colonial era was strengthened, and that it is advancing to the point of planning, production, distribution, and screening of propaganda films beyond censorship and control after the Sino-Japanese War.