http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
한국적 ‘검찰사법’ 체제의 탄생 ―일본적 ‘검찰사법’의 유산과 해방 후 입법의 결과―
문준영 법과사회이론학회 2009 법과 사회 Vol.0 No.37
It is often said that Korean public prosecutors are very powerful but there is no effective check on their power. The basic structure of the Korean criminal justice system and the public prosecutors’ organization is modeled after the Continental criminal justice system. Korean criminal justice was popularly called “prosecutorial justice” as Japanese one. It means that the prosecutor’s role and influences in criminal justice is very dominant. The public prosecutor’s centralized and hierarchical organization, political partisanship, and subordination to the government are popularly criticized as the opposite to their nature and function as a objective office or quasi-judicial officer. How to control the danger of politically abusing the prosecutorial power by government has been one of big issue in the judicial and political reform discussion. This article explores the origin of the Korean “prosecutorial justice,” and examines how the legal- institutional basis of the problematic phenomenon was made. First, it begins by reviewing “prosecutorial justice” of Modern Japan and colonial Korea in order to find the legacies such as the institution of prosecutor-general, theory about the unity or indivisibility of prosecutor, and the legislative proposals for the future. Second, it examines After-Liberation legal reform aimed at the de-inquisitorialization of the criminal justice system; it then reviews four issues and its legal results: prosecutorial discretion, admissibility of written evidence prepared by prosecutor and police in trial, prosecutor’s monopoly to apply warrant to the court, and changes in pre-trial procedure after abolishing the instruction(pre-trial investigation exercised by judge of instruction). Third, it reviews the characteristics of prosecutor’s organization reflected within the Public Prosecutor’s Office Act of 1949.
문준영,임태은,박장훈,류지헌,이상영,김영규,오승모 한국공업화학회 2014 한국공업화학회 연구논문 초록집 Vol.2014 No.1
For advanced safe LIBs, room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) have attracted great attention due to unique characteristics such as non-volatility, great thermal stability and high conductivity. We demonstrate that thin and homogeneous surface film, which is electrochemically deposited on cathode, LiCoO<sub>2</sub>, by using RTIL-electrolyte with adopting the unsaturated part on the cation of 1-allyl-1-methylpiperidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (AMPip-TFSI), can advoid undesired side reactions. The controlled passivation film, comprising with high amount of organic species from the cation of RTILs, covered LiCoO<sub>2</sub> homogeneously with the layer > 25 nm and worked as a crucial role to suppress unfavorable thermal reaction as well as electrochemical side reactions.
사형 판결 없는 살옥죄인의 처리와 징벌: 19세기 살옥사건 심리ㆍ처결의 경향과 특징
문준영 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원 2022 한국문화 Vol.- No.98
The 19th century shows distinct features in the history of the judicial system of the Joseon Dynasty, forming a sharp contrast with the preceding period. In the realm of criminal justice that penalizes felony crimes with sentences such as the death penalty, the 19th century can be called the era of simni (審理), or special reexamination. In the late Joseon Dynasty, the simni reexamination were frequently conducted as a special reexamination procedure for finding prisoners who had dubious or extenuating circumstances, so as to mitigate the death sentence. In the 19th century, the simni reexamination became the general way of disposing death penalty cases instead of the sambok (三覆啓) or gyebok (啓覆), the regular and final review process for confirm the king's will before the execution of the death penalty. In order to study the criminal justice administration of the 19th century, it is necessary to recognize and understand trends and features of the era of simni, in which criminals charged with murder and manslaughter were treated and punished without death sentence. The era of simni opened by King Jeongjo continued into the 19th century. However, the features of that era are difficult to examine. They can be reconstructed only when fragments are collected and connected one by one from the vast criminal case records in Ilseongnok (日省錄), or Records of Daily Reflections, Chujogyeolokrok (秋曹決獄錄), which are the records of the decisions and dispositions of criminal cases by the Ministry of Justice. Combining these records provides a series of case records for 2,679 prisoners of ordinary murder cases. In this article, we explored aspects of this era using these records.
문준영 경북대학교 법학연구원 2012 법학논고 Vol.0 No.39
Hirobumi Ito, the resident-general of Korea, regarded the judicial reform as a priority for reforming and controling the administration of Korean government. As a first step and tentative measure towards realizing his end, Ito made Korean government hire Japanese legal assistants(法務補佐官) to aid in the proper administration of justice. This article is about the activities of legal assistants appointed in January 1907 and their influence to the legal practice in courts. Using the original copies of court decision in civil case, I investigated the assistant's seal of approval to the court decision, the form and statement of legal documents such as a written judgement, and the case treatment in appeal trials at the court of local governor. In general, gradual but significant changes was found. However, the speed and scale differed according to the locality in several points. This seems to be due to lack of uniform and detailed rules about the legal document, the individual capacity or the way of working of a legal assistant as well as the different situation of each court. When we read the judgement, we must consider carefully the complexity of the text and the difference among local courts. 이토 히로부미 통감은 한국 재판사무의 개량을 한국의 내정개량 및 일본의 한국 장악을 위한 우선적 과제로 인식하였다. 이 과제 수행을 위한 첫 단계로서 이토 히로부미는 일단 종래의 사법제도를 유지하면서 각 재판소에 일본인 법무보좌관을 배치하여 재판사무를 지도․감독하도록 하였다. 이에 따라 1907년 1월에 전현직 판검사인 법무보좌관 12명과 재판소서기인 법무보좌관보 12명이 임용되었다. 이 글은 법무보좌관들이 어떤 방식으로 직무를 수행하였고 재판실무가 어떻게 변화되었는지를 살펴보았다. 선행연구에서는 당초 빙용된 27명의 보좌관들만 언급하고 있으나, 보좌관을 조력할 인원을 보강하거나 1907년 12월의 신 재판소구성법 공포 이후의 인사이동으로 인해 보좌관 진용에 일부 변화가 있었다. 1907년 6월의 보좌관 회의에서 보좌관의 권한을 강화하고 재판사무를 개선하기 위해 결정된 방안들 중 일부는 비록 입법화되지는 않았으나 일련의 법부 훈령을 통해 실현되었다. 이 글에서는 당시의 민사판결서철을 활용하여 판결서 등에 대한 보좌관의 ‘인인’(認印)의 실태, 판결서 및 소송서류의 형식 및 기재방식에서의 변화, 지방재판소에서의 민사재판의 실례를 조사하였다. 대체로 장래 신 재판소구성법 체제에서 실현되는 것과 유사한 변화가 나타나고 있는데, 몇 가지 점에서는 지역별로 차이가 나타났다. 소송서류나 판결서의 서식에 관한 통일적인 규칙이 충분히 마련되지 않은 가운데, 보좌관 개인의 역량이나 태도 그리고 각 지역의 재판소의 여건이 그러한 차이를 만들어냈을 것이다. 이 시기의 판결서의 텍스트 분석을 시도할 때에도 신구의 조합에서 비롯되는 복합성과 함께 지역적 차이를 충분히 고려해야 할 것이다.