http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김정필(Kim Jeong Pil)(金正必) 대한중국학회 2017 중국학 Vol.61 No.-
본문은 중국어에서 존재여부를 놓고 논란이 되고 있는 ‘개사현공’이 과연 영어의 전치사 좌초(Preposition stranding)’와는 다른 중국어 특유의 어법이론으로써 가치를 지닐 수 없는가, 또 비록 이론적 가치가 없더라도 다른 어법연구나 교학에 어떻게 활용될 수 있을까에 대해 고찰해 보고자 하였다. 사실 중국어에서 개사현공’이 일어난다는 주장은 본래 개사의 목적어가 선행 정보에 있거나 혹은 유추가 가능할 경우에 목적어 없이 개사 단독으로 출현할 수 있다는 것이 주된 초점이다. 하지만 반대파의 견해는 중국어의 주요 특징은 목적어가 생략이나 탈락을 하는 것이 아니라, 오히려 ‘개사구조의 삭제’나 ‘개사구조의 보류’를 통해 ‘개사현공’을 피하려 한다는 것이 주요 초점이다. 그런데 중국어 ‘개사현공’의 어법화 과정은 우선 ‘현공’된 성분이 본래 개사인지에 대한 의문에서 출발하여, 다시 어법화 과정, 그리고 이후에 나타난 어휘화까지 모두를 ‘개사현공’의 범주에 넣고 연구가 진행되어야 할 것으로 보인다. 그래서 본문은 ‘개사현공’의 존재여부에 대한 논쟁보다는 이러한 이론의 도입이 중국어 연구에 얼마나 효용적인 활용될 수 있을까에 초점을 두고 연구해야 함을 주장하고자 한다. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of examines the arguments of each scholar about the occurrence of the ‘hanging in the air’ phenomenon of the Chinese ‘preposition’ studied against the ‘preposition stranding’ of the English language. In addition, we conducted a comparative analysis of the causes and methods of the various appearance patterns of ‘preposition stranding’. Although it can be said that the expression of preposition stranding in English and preposition stranding in Chinese may be similar or different from each other depending on the viewpoint. In other words, the predicate object is left in front of sentence and the preposition remains alone in the ‘wh-’ phrase of English. The Chinese preposition stranding is the same as the point where the object which was after the proposition is omitted and only the preposition remains. But, it is different in that it formed a direct relationship with the verb predicate and did another syntactic function or lexicalization. Currently, two opinions are still conflicting about the presence or absence of the ‘preposition stranding‘ in Chinese linguistics, but in the academic community the opinion that there is no preposition stranding within China is dominant. The reasons why it is difficult to explain the dropout of the Chinese preposition are as follows. First of all, because it was from the company there is a possibility to be lexicalized. Secondly, it is difficult to explain the phenomenon omission phenomenon caused by functional features in simple syntax.
중국어 개사(介词)의 도식화(图式化) 분석 - 이동도식과 관계도식을 중심으로 -
김정필(Kim, Jeong-Pil) 동북아시아문화학회 2019 동북아 문화연구 Vol.1 No.59
The text was carried out by observing the structure of the relationship between each component of the syntax in the framework of the spatial structure and scheming the process of movement that appeared between the components through mathematical diagrams or diagrams, thus altering the various boundaries that appeared in the spatial structure. First, the space and time in which the event occurs were consistent with the spatial structure framework, and the process of movement in the process of the event occurring and ending was understood through the narrative. In addition, two systems were formed by analyzing the objects that appeared in the event, the subject, the object, and the role of the observer, into the relationship structure, dividing them into spatial and mobile and relative structures and mobile diagrams. First, in the ‘movemental schematic of spatial structure’, we looked at the prepositions associated with the three viscosities of the starting point, process, and end point that constitute the movement. The first focused on ‘the starting point’ or compared differences in the moving process of the existing prepositions ‘朝’, ‘从’ and ‘离’. The differences in the starting points they display can be plotted as follows. The second example is the preposition ‘往’, ‘过’ and ‘当’, which focuses on process or progress. First, ‘往’ and ‘过’ are separated horizontally and vertically by their reference lines. Again, ‘过’ and ‘當’ are the reference points or stop at the reference line and then continue to the next or the difference is whether it is passed through a tube or through a tube. The third looked at ‘向’ and ‘到’-the prepositions focusing on the end points. While ‘到’ comes into contact with the arrival point as seen in its semantic structure, ‘向’ does not show whether it has made direct contact with the end point. The following are prepositions from ‘relationship structure and movemental schematic. ‘跟’ and ‘和’ of ‘bilateral action’ were compared with written style ‘與’ and ‘同’, looked at the ‘对’ and ‘给’ as well as ‘为’ and ‘替’ of one side. Below are eight prepositions divided by two. As we have seen in ‘relationship structure and movemental schematic‘ did not use Korean translation as in ’movemental schematic of spatial structure’. But for Korean Chinese learners, teaching classes separately from Korean translations is one way.
김정필(Kim, Jeong-Pil) 동북아시아문화학회 2015 동북아 문화연구 Vol.1 No.45
In Korean, there are a number of Chinese character languages of similar type which have a same shape like Chinese vocabulary by using Chinese character from ancient times. However, because it is used in different circumstance for a long time, the meaning categories do not correspond each other among similar type words or Chinese character languages of reverse word order structure are often used as synonym. This diachronic meaning change of Chinese character language can be misunderstood or wrong expression in mutual education and learning process of Korean and Chinese. Moreover, it can compare wrongly the mutual synonymous relation or it can be used as wrong translation word in the comparison research of Korean-Chinese vocabulary. For example, Chinese ‘回答’ is translated into Korean ‘대답하다(Answer:对答)’ and Korean similar type word ‘Reply(회답:回答)’ is translated into Chinese ‘回信’. In additional, various reverse-order translation words are used like ‘介绍’ : ‘Introduction(소개:紹介)’, ‘盗窃’ : ‘Theft(절도:竊盗)’, ‘达到’ : ‘Reaching(도달:到達)’, ‘缩短’ : ‘Shortening(단축:短縮)’, ‘替代’ : ‘Replacement대체:代替) in translation process of Chinese-Korean.