Poster Ⅱ : Part D : Prokaryotic Gene Expression ; Isolation of Korean Hepatitis C virus : Sequence and expression of the structural protein

김귀화,홍소희,김민재,유종현,문홍모,김완기 한국생화학분자생물학회 (구 한국생화학회) 1991 추계학술대회집 Vol.- No.-

[중학생작문] 우리 말로는 맛내기라고 해요

김귀화 길림성민족사무위원회 1985 중국조선어문 Vol.- No.1985-1

海深密經의 二諦說과 心識說에 관한 硏究

김귀화 동국대학교 대학원 1996 東院論集 Vol.9 No.-

중국 대학생의 한국어 3분 스피치에 쓰인  담화표지에 관한 연구

김귀화 중앙어문학회 2017 語文論集 Vol.72 No.-

This study investigates the use of discourse markers by Chinese college students in advanced Korean courses and classifies them systematically according to their types. It aims to observe students’ use of discourse markers in three-minute speeches and explore the causes of the situation. The results show that the students rarely use discourse markers, and when they do, they only use some specific discourse markers. The phenomena of "centralization" and "fossilization" occur in the students. It can be concluded that Chinese college students in Korean advanced courses cannot use discourse markers strategically to engage in effective dialogue. This phenomenon can be attributed to three reasons: insufficient teaching (input) of pragmatic knowledge, insufficient use (output) of pragmatic knowledge, and the negative influence of their mother tongue. 이 연구는 중국 대학교 한국어학과 고급 과정의 학생들이 한국어로 발표할 때 어떤 담화표지들이 출현하는지 고찰하고, 그 담화표지들을 유형별로 체계 화하여 3분 스피치 담화표지의 사용 양상을 파악하고 그러한 양상이 나타난 원 인을 탐색하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 연구 결과 학생들이 담화표지를 아예 안 사용하거나 사용하더라도 제한적으 로 특정한 담화표지만 사용하고 있는 일명 ‘집중화’, ‘화석화’의 현상이 드러났 다. 즉 담화표지를 전략적으로 사용하지 못하고 있어 효과적으로 담화를 하지 못함을 알 수 있었다. 따라서 이러한 원인을 화용 지식의 입력 부족과 화용 지 식의 출력 부족 및 모어의 마이너스 전이의 세 가지 측면에서 조명하였다.

남해방언의 언어분화

김귀화 신라대학교 교육과학연구소 2001 교육과학연구 Vol.- No.6

Real study of Modern Korean language is the study of regional dialect which is connected to living Korean language. And many people have studied about intuition that the local people have on their dialect and tried to figure out the system of the rules which controls the linguistic phenomenon. Therefore dialect has been studied in order to describe the linguistic system of certain region and dialectology has contributed to setting up the goal and accumulation of the work of Korean language study. For that reason dialectology has been studied and developed focused on the study of the phonemic and morphologic structure. Futhermore it has been synthetically studied such as combination of morpheme or sentence structure. Consequently dialect research papers which is based on "Do", administrative district and nation wide dialect research papers were published. Those papers, however, were focused on describing regional dialect and neglected divergency of dialect, which is more important. Basically the study of dialect is on the basis of the divergency of dialect. Therefore we can talk about the dialectology after we understand the overall divergency of a language. Now that the overall picture of the divergency of a language can be found on the linguistic atlas, making a linguistic atlas is essential. But we don't have one yet. My purpose of this research is to take a look at the trend of Korean dialectology and to find out the divergency of the dialect on the aspect of linguistic geography especially in southern part of Korea where many interesting phenomenon is expected due to its topographical and social conditions. First of all 39 maps were made to find out the aspect of the dialectal divergency of the region. These maps were made on the basis of the 10 "Eup"s and "Myun"s in Namhae-kun. These places shows the clear divergency of dialects and linguistic maps contain all the differences among phonemics, morphemics and lexicology. Through analyzing individual linguistic maps, I explained relations between form of words and regional distribution. Besides I could explain general features of divergency of dialects by synthesizing divergency on each linguistic maps. And I proved these characteristics are highly connected with the topographical and administrative conditions. I conclude my thesis by summarizing as follows: I divided Namhe-Kun into 3 parts ; Changsun-Myun, Sulchun-Myun and the other area according to different linguistic specialization. It is different from other reserches that an isogloss between the east and west or between the south and the north is used. Because I focused on "Kun" which is smaller administrative district than "Do" used in other researches. I found that the dialects in southern area are divided by the geographical and administrative conditions. Linguistic traits of these isoglosses are 1. a simple vowel 2. omission and weakening of vocal consonant 3. simplification of consonant at the end of the syllable 4. voluntary change of consonant 5. addition of suffix and so on. 1. The specialization of the dialect which has single consonant system is depend on distinction between front vowel [e] and [ε]. In Sulchun area [e] and [ε] are pronounced distinctively, but in other areas [e] and [ε] are sounded [E] or sometimes [e] is sounded like [i] 2. the omission of the vocal consonant [g] and weakening of [b] - [b]> [w] -were found except Changsun area where these consonant are still preserved. While [j] is preserved all over the south, it is omitted in Sulchun. For example " camcari>camari" 3. When it comes to simplification of consonant group at the end of syllable, there is a great difference compared to central dialect. /r/ become silent in a consonant group and sounds /k/ or /p/. And I focused on how simplification of consonant group at the end of syllable differentiated. According to my research, there was a great difference between central dialect and southern dialect. but in Namhae-Gun divergency is distinctive except the final consonants which end with "ㄺ". For example 흙 and 닭 is � and �� in Sulchun and 흑 and 닥 in other areas. 4. Consonants which is similar in terms of intonation are specialized by swapping in the same region. And in southern part of Korea dialects like k~p, m~p are specialized. 5. Dialects from same origin differentiate according to derivation condition. I focused on especially how addition of suffix caused divergency. And I found out that the suffix -i is mostly concerned. Besides -ag, -chi, form a combination of suffix with -i. 6. Compared to a phonemic or lexical difference, grammatical specialization is slight. But there was a considerable difference in specialization of southern dialect except Changsun. 7. I made linguistic map using the vocabularies to show the specialization in this area. I also used several items which are nothing to do with phonemic or morphological variation. By looking into maps of individual words, I found out the lexical specialization. And By analyzing each linguistic maps, I could explain the connection between form of vocabulary and geographical distribution. I must accept that my linguistic geographical research on local area is somehow limited since there is not a nation wide linguistic atlas that I refer to. I couldn't consider connection of linguistic specifications with in other area. And I couldn't analyze maps systemically either. But partial study of dialect is inevitable until nation wide linguistic maps come out. And I'm pretty sure that these patial study will make our dialectology more desirable one. <부록> 1. 제보자 조사표 2. 방언조사 질문지

학교부적응 고등학생을 위한 긍정심리중심 집단미술치료가 자아탄력성과 학교생활적응에 미치는 효과

김귀화,윤효운 대구대학교 특수교육재활과학연구소 2015 특수교육재활과학연구 Vol.54 No.3

본 연구의 목적은 학교부적응 청소년을 대상으로 긍정심리중심 집단미술치료 프로그램이 고등학생의 자아탄력성과 학교생활적응력 향상에 미치는 효과를 알아보는 데 있다. 연구의 대상은 학교부적응 청소년들로 실험, 통제집단에 각 8명씩 무선배치 하였다. 실험집단은 2014년 9월 17일부터 2014년 12월 4일까지 주 1회 60분씩 사전ㆍ사후검사를 제외한 총 10회기 긍정심리중심 집단미술치료를 실시하였고 통제집단은 아무런 처치를 하지 않았다. 연구 도구는 자아탄력성과 학교생활적응척도이며, 프로그램 효과를 검증하기 위해 집단(실험집단, 통제집단)과 검사시기(사전ㆍ사후ㆍ추후검사)에 따른 반복측정변량분석을 실시하였다. 그리고 상호작용 효과가 나타난 경우에 단순 주 효과를 검증하고 집단과 검사시기 별 효과를 비교하기 위해 Scheffe 다중비교를 실시하였다. 그림투사검사로 KSD를 사전ㆍ사후 비교하였다. 연구 결과는 자아탄력성척도 하위영역인 외적보호와 학교생활적응척도 하위영역인 학교규칙이 유의미하게 향상되었으며, 추후검사에서도 그 효과가 유지되고 있음을 확인 할 수 있었다. KSD는 전체적으로 온화하고 우호적인 분위기로 자기상, 교우상 모두 상호작용과 협동성이 긍정적으로 변화되었음을 확인할 수 있었다. 이러한 연구 결과를 통해서 긍정심리중심 집단미술치료 프로그램은 학교부적응 청소년의 자아탄력성과 학교생활적응력을 향상시켜 주는 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

사회적 맥락, 체면 위협 행위와 사과화행 간의 상관성에 관한 연구

김귀화,왕흔,이찬규 어문연구학회 2022 어문연구 Vol.114 No.-

The purpose of this study is to investigate the method of apology behavior between Korea and China and to examine how this apology behavior correlates with social context and facethreateningacts in China and Korea respectively. Korea and China are geographically close, historically belonging to the Confucian cultural sphere, and have many things in common, such as high-context culture, but it is expected that there will be differences in dialogue as they each step into communism and capitalism. Therefore, this study aims at examining how apology behavior, one of the relatively active conversation types, differs in the two cultures in social context or face threatening acts, and consequently to understand the difference in cultural background and the impact on conversation. The apology speech is closely related to the face-threateningbehavior of speakers and listeners, so it is an appropriate field to grasp these behaviors and there are many differences in the aspects of apology in each cultural circle. In this regard, this study was conducted to observe how the style of apology varies depending on the degree of burden on face threatening acts in various social contexts by means of questionnaires and deep interviews with a group of Korean-Chinese university students. The results of the study are as follows. First, Chinese students were more motivated to apologize if they felt that social decency was threatened than moral decency. However, according to the survey, decency related to morality such as violating the social order was not threatened. On the contrary, although Korean students value social decency, they actively make a sincere apology if moral decency is threatened. Second, Korean students' burden of the severity of the violation and the threat to decency were positively proportional, but Chinese students' burden of the threat to decency was not as great even though they felt the severity of the violation. Third, both groups found that situational factors had a greater impact on apology strategies than social conditions. Fourth, the degree of burden of decency threat was influenced by closeness. In the same situation, Korean and Chinese college students showed differences in the degree of burden of decency threat according to affinity in the case of what happened. Fifth, even if there was no mistake, Korean students would consider the relationship for apology. However, Chinese students do not apologize much for things they do not think they have done wrong.

커뮤니케이션의 상황 점검 및 관리에 표출된 설득전략에 관한 연구

김귀화(金?花) 길림성민족사무위원회 2013 중국조선어문 Vol.184 No.-

일상 커뮤니케이션에서 사람들은 상대방을 설득하는 상황에 자주 직면하게 된다. 이 연구에서는 커뮤니케이션의 관점에서 텍스트 생산자가 수용자에게 전달하려는 의도를 달성하기 위해 설득이라는 장치를 통하여 어떻게 상황점검과 상황관리를 하는지를 드라마 텍스트를 통하여 파악해보고 텍스트의 상황모델을 마련해보았다. 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻을 수가 있었다. ㄱ)모든 담화에 상황점검과 상황관리가 작용한다. ㄴ) 상황점검과 상황관리에서 설득전략을 적극적으로 수용한다. ㄷ) 일반대화에 반해 쟁론담화에서는 상황점검보다는 상황관리가 더 적극적으로 이루어진다. ㄹ) 발화자의 상황관리배렬과 발화자가 어떤 설득전략을 사용하느냐에 따라 상황모델이 다르게 나타난다. ㅁ) 상황관리와 상황점검 두 변인은 상호 작용하는것으로 의존적이다.

稱讚談話 狀況에서 反應語로 나타나는 談話標識에 관한 硏究

김귀화(Kim Gui-Hwa),이찬규(Lee Chan-Kyu) 중앙어문학회 2010 語文論集 Vol.44 No.-

This study aims to investigate the difference between the two groups - Korean and Korean Chinese in terms of the discourse marker as a reaction to the praising discourse. The way how they accept was as follows. Regarding the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for causality, both groups showed 'thank you' at a high rate of frequency which means they accept it willingly. In terms of the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for greeting, 'thank you' was at the higher frequency in Korean collage students but Korean-Chinese collage students reacted saying 'really' at the higher frequency which showed indirect way of accepting it. Koran college students accepted it willingly since they regards it as showing an interest to the counterpart. In case of Korean-Chinese often uses discourse marker for retaining social relationship with the counterpart and for reconfirming it. Regarding the discourse marker as the reaction to the praising discourse for flattery, Korean college students reacted like 'thank you', 'not really' with high frequencies which means they accept it with passive and heavily upon his mind. On the other hand, the Korean-Chinese illustrated 'not really', 'don't say that' with high frequencies. This because Korean college students are not willingly take the praising discourse not to make the counterpart displeased, they take it indirectly but Korean-chinese college students exposed refusal response and attitude. For making the communication better, the listener should respond with speech act that the culture of the speaker is expecting and it is important and needed an attitude learning and accepting the culture of the listener.

설득 커뮤니케이션에 나타난 담화표지에 관한 연구

김귀화 ( Kim Gui Hwa ) 한성대학교 한성어문학회 2012 漢城語文學 Vol.31 No.-

This study is to investigate how the discourse marker is exposed in the discourse situation of persuading in communication. In order to approach closer to the purpose of this study I took a look at the discourse marker which appears in the discourse situation of persuading in a serial drama text. The result has been proved by conducting a survey under three tentative hypothesis. The results are as follows. First, Discourse markers are used in apersuasive discourse as an strategy of persuading. In other words, A discourse marker can be used as an strategy of persuading. Second, A discourse which discourse markers are used is more effective than the one that a discourse markers are not used. Third, When people are in the persuasive discourse situation they use appropriate discourse markers. Fourth, The same discourse markers are used as each different strategy for persuading depending on the location and context of realization.