RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        성과관리체계의 부정적 효과에 관한 실증연구

        금재덕(Keum Jae duk),이성도(Lee Sungdo) 서울행정학회 2009 한국사회와 행정연구 Vol.20 No.2

        After reviewing of some previous researches about the dysfunctional effects of the performance management system (PMS), the researchers intend to know whether those effects also appear in the national government of South Korea by the implementation of performance management system. Also, they tried to figure out if the public officials' perception on negative effects differs by the rank, the nature of works that public officials do in a daily life, and the type of agency that they belong to. To attain these research purposes, the researchers utilize the survey method. The result shows that public officials in the central government perceive the negative effects of the performance management system occur apparently. Also the result indicates that, as expected, the public officials' perception differs by the rank, the nature of work, and the type of agency.

      • KCI등재

        한국과 미국의 성과주의 예산의 제도화 비교분석

        금재덕 ( Keum Jae Duk ),임소영 ( Im So Young ) 한국행정연구원 2016 韓國行政硏究 Vol.25 No.3

        이 논문은 제도화과정, 성과와 예산의 연계를 위한 예산구조 변화과정, 국회와 행정부의 협력 과정을 분석기준으로 활용하여 우리나라와 미국의 성과주의 예산제도의 도입과정에 대해 비교· 분석하였다. 분석결과, 우리나라와 미국은 동일한 구성요소를 포함하여 성과와 예산을 연계시키기 위해 많은 노력을 해 왔음을 알 수 있었다. 그러나 제도의 도입 후 상당한 기간이 지난 지금 여러가지 면에서 다른 모습을 띄고 있음을 발견하였다. 먼저, 미국은 성과목표관리체계와 프로그램 예산체계에 더하여 부시행정부에서 PART를 구성 요소로 포함시켰다가 오바마 행정부에서 다시 삭제한 반면, 우리나라는 세 가지 요소를 지금까지 유지하고 있다. 또한 미국은 예산서 상의 사업 활동을 전략 및 성과목표별로 분리·병합·통합을 가능하게 하는 등 성과와 예산의 연계를 위해 예산구조를 변경시킬 수 있도록 하였으며, 결국 부시 행정부에서 성과계획서와 예산서를 하나로 통합하였다. 그러나, 우리나라는 성과계획과 예산서의 연계를 위해 지속적으로 노력하였으나, 예산구조의 변경을 엄격히 제한하였기 때문에 성과계획서와 예산서를 통합하는 일은 일어나지 않았다. 우리나라는 주로 재정사업자율평가제도를 변경하여 성과와 예산의 연계를 강화하고자 노력하였다. 마지막으로 의회와의 협력과 관련하여, 미국은 법에 행정부와 의회간 자문을 명시적으로 요구하고 있으나, 우리나라는 그러한 규정은 없다. 이와 같은 분석결과를 토대로 다음과 같은 정책적 함의를 도출하였다, 성과계획서와 예산서의 형식적이고 기계적인 통합을 위해 노력하기보다 성과와 예산의 실질적 연계를 위해 재정사업자율 평가와 심층평가 뿐만아니라 여러 다양한 평가체계(예컨대 보조금사업 평가와 기금평가 등)를 성과중심의 예산제도에 포함시킬 필요가 있다. 또한 국회로부터의 지지를 잃지 않도록 노력해야 할 필요가 있다. 미국의 부시행정부에서 민주당 사업의 예산을 삭감하기 위해 PART제도를 이용했다가 의회로부터 지지를 잃어버렸음을 타산지석으로 삼아야 할 것이다. This paper conducted comparative analysis of the adoption process of performance based budgeting(PBB) between South Korea and the U.S. To do this, this study employs the processes of the institutionalization, the change of budgetary structure for linking performance and budget, and cooperation between the legislature and the executive, as analytical criteria. Results found that there were different experiences between the two. First, the components of PBB including strategic and annual plan, program budget, K-PART has not been changed in South Korea. However, PART was included in Bush administration and eliminated in Obama administration. Second, the U.S. federal government integrated annual performance plan and program budget but South Korea did not do. Third, GPRA has required the cooperation between the legislature and the executive. But there is no such a law in South Korea. This study suggested some policy recommendations: it should be noted that technical and formal integration of performance plan and budgetary structure is not critical in terms of linking performance to budget; more performance review or evaluations should be included into the system of PBB; Centrral Budget office tries to seek the support from the legislature in order to link performance and budget.

      • KCI등재

        서울시 자치구간 재정력 격차에 미치는 영향요인 분석

        박종철 ( Park Jong Cheol ),금재덕 ( Keum Jae Duk ),하현상 ( Ha Hyun Sang ) 한국지방행정연구원 2016 地方行政硏究 Vol.30 No.3

        This study seeks to identifies factors affecting the disparity of fiscal capacity among 25 districts in Seoul City and find out basic solutions for such disparity. To do this task, this study analyzes empirically the relationship between influencing factors and fiscal capacity gap utilizing the panel data from 2002 to 2012. This study analyzes systematically factors that influence on fiscal gap among 25 districts, divides such factors into the socio-economic factors, population factors, and physical factors. In addition, this study uses index of disparity be called direct one instead of the coefficient of variation, the Gini index be called indirect outcome. The results are as follows: most factors in current system of fiscal adjustment grants, including the number of old-aged population, basic livelihood security recipients, workers ratios by industry, and extension road facility have significant impacts on fiscal disparities. However, some factors such as apartment ratio, library ratio, and park area significantly affect fiscal disparity. These factors do not belong to the current measurement items of fiscal adjustment grants. Based on this result, we suggest that these factors should be included in that system in order to alleviate the fiscal disparity among 25 districts in Seoul.

      • KCI등재

        Factors Affecting the Internal Use of Performance Information

        Tulsi Ram Bhusal, Ph.D(툴시 람 부살),Jae Duk Keum, Ph.D(금재덕) 한국공공관리학회 2017 한국공공관리학보 Vol.31 No.1

        This paper examines empirically what factors affect the internal use of Performance Information (PI) in South Korean public agencies. In order to do this, this paper has identified dimensions of the internal use of PI and examined the role of institutional, individual, data quality, and external factors to be correlated with the internal use of PI. Data from 333 public managers from four different South Korean public agencies participating in the survey were used to test the relationship. The results show that public officials’ use of PI for managerial and organizational decision making is affected by several factors. Particularly, individual perception about Performance Management(PM) have significant relationships with the internal use of PI (both managerial and organizational use), suggesting that the individual-level factors may results in differences in the uses of PI. However, this study highlights that different factors have affect the different use of PI. On the one hand, institutional factors (the quality of PMS and gatekeeping), group and development culture, and role of stakeholder have significant relationship with managerial use. On the other hand, data quality, rational culture, and grade is significantly and positively related to organizational use of PI. This result implies that PMS should be carefully constructed and implemented, in order to enlarge the use of PI for the internal decision making. It is needless to say that purposes of PI use should be considered.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼