http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
권태진(Tae-Jin Kwon),남민지(Min-Jee Nam),김완배(Wan-Bae Kim),오세익 한국농촌경제연구원 2010 한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서 Vol.- No.-
This is one of the second year reports of the three-year research entitled "Overseas Agricultural Development for Food Security", which is led by the Korea Rural Economic Institute. The purpose of the study is to seek an integration strategy between overseas agricultural development and international agricultural cooperation. In addition, this study provides the information on the possibilities of the development for Primorsky, Russia. Regarding the conceptive scope of the international agricultural development, it might include physical and economical access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food as well as establishment for the food security system. In the meantime, it is not recommending policies that plans only to bring in the agricultural resources exploited in overseas. In the early days, the international agricultural development had failed, since there was no appropriate information on the target countries. In the 1990s, however, private and public organizations with various purposes started actively entering into overseas such as Maritime province, Russia, America, and China. Most of them had engaged in the production of agricultural commodities. The legal foundation of the international agricultural development has been "The Overseas Resource Development Act.". However, agriculture has been excluded in the financial support of the Act. Moreover, it has been regulated by the WTO and other international regulations as the resources were brought into Korea, because there has not been a way to provide any type of preferential advantage for the resources. When it comes to emergency situation in foreign countries, there are high possibilities of banning exports the commodities produced in the country. Even though foreign agricultural developments are non-governmental, when it comes to food security, no one will invest if all the responsibilities go to the people. To solve this problem, not only the government"s diplomatic support is needed, but also indirect supports are needed. One of the alternatives is to connect international agricultural development cooperation and foreign agricultural development. International agricultural development cooperation is a government supported agricultural development in developing countries. And when foreign agricultural development areas match, businesses that invest in foreign agricultural development can receive indirect benefits. Therefore, the international agricultural development has to aim at various purposes such as establishment of globalization, new development motivations, and the procurement of overseas agricultural resources. Constructing private and public cooperation systems should be the first priority for the development. Detailed objectives are suggested in the study. Merits of Maritime province in Russia are the geographical proximity to Korea and the experiences that many Korean have invested in the area since 1990"s. Also, it is not difficult to lease sizable land in the area. However, the agricultural facilities and infrastructures in the area have fallen behind, and the agricultural population has been decreasing continuously. Law and institutional obstacles make it difficult for foreign agricultural investors. Therefore, joint ventures between public sectors and private sectors might reduce the initial investment risks.
김정호 ( Jung Ho Kim ),권태진 ( Tae Jin Kwon ),김하은 ( Ha Eun Kim ),박진영 ( Jin Young Park ) 한국농업기계학회 2018 한국농업기계학회 학술발표논문집 Vol.23 No.2
목적: 최근 급부상하고 있는 동남아 농기계 시장에서 한국 농기계의 수출 확대를 위해서는 동남아 시장에서 한국 농기계가 어느 정도의 경쟁력을 갖고 있는지, 기존 브랜드 농기계와는 경쟁력 면에서 어느 정도 차이가 있는지를 가늠할 필요가 있음. 본 연구는 동남아 시장이라는 특수한 환경에서 한국 농기계의 수출 경쟁력을 객관적이고 체계적으로 비교 평가하기 위한 「수출 농기계 경쟁력 평가 지표」의 개발과 이를 통해 국내 농기계 업계가 효과적이고 용이하게 자사(自社) 제품의 수출경쟁력을 높이는데 기여하기 위함임. 자료 및 방법: 동남아 국가 4개국(미얀마, 캄보디아, 인도네시아, 베트남)의 농작업별 기계화 상황, 농기계 시장 여건, 농가의 농기계 구매 특성 등을 현지조사와 관계자 인터뷰 그리고 선행연구 등을 통해 분석함(그 결과를 토대로 농기계 구매 결정시 농가가 가장 고민하는 경쟁요소(Competitive facts)를 경쟁력 평가지표(evaluation indicator)로 설정함). 이들 평가지표는 농기계 수출 경쟁력에 영향을 미치는 ‘농기계의 수익성(profitability)’과 ‘마켓팅 파워(marketing power)’분야에서 영향력 순위(priority)에 따라 각각 3개의 지표를 선정하고 각 지표별로 지수(index)화 함으로써 상대적 경쟁력을 평가함. 결론 및 고찰: 동남아 지역의 취약한 농업기계화 여건 때문에 농기계 구매 농가가 가장 우선적으로 고려하는 요소는 ‘수익성’분야에서는 1)고장 빈도, 2) 내용연수, 3) 작업능력이며 ‘마켓팅 파워’면에서는 1) 파이낸싱, 2) 보증기간(warranty), 3) A/S시스템으로 파악됨. 평가 지표별로 동남아에 수출되고 있는 한국농기계(트랙터, 콤바인)와 동일 마력(hp)의 경쟁브랜드의 계량화된 지수를 비교하면 한국 농기계의 경쟁력 수준과 경쟁 취약부문을 구체적으로 알 수 있고 나아가 이의 보강방안도 강구할 수 있게 됨(지금까지는 추상적으로 평가 -예, (“한국 농기계는 가격과 품질 면에서 중국산과 일본산 농기계의 중간 수준”). 기종별/브랜드 업체별로 평가요소에 대한 구체적 정보를 수집 중에 있어 한국 농기계의 종합적인 경쟁력 수준을 측정하기 어려우나, 지금까지 파악된 정보로는 한국 트랙터(50마력)는 내용연수, 작업능력, 파이낸싱 등에 있어서는 경쟁력이 있음. 고장빈도와 A/S 시스템에 있어서는 경쟁업체에 비해 경쟁력이 낮은 것으로 나타나고 있으며, 콤바인(60마력)의 경우는 고장빈도와 작업능력, A/S 시스템 모두 경쟁력이 매우 낮은 상황임. 동남아 수출 확대를 위해서는 현지 영농여건에 적합한 개량모델 개발이 요구되며 마켓팅 파워 면에서는 A/S 시스템의 확충이 시급한 상황임.
Microwave Plasma Process에 의한 N-Hexane으로부터 다이아몬드 박막제작 및 특성
한상보(Sang-Bo Han),권태진(Tae-Jin Kwon),박상현(Sang-Hyun Park),박재윤(Jae-Youn Park),이승지(Seung-Ji Lee) 한국조명·전기설비학회 2011 조명·전기설비학회논문지 Vol.25 No.4
In this paper, the best conditions for the deposition of the high quality diamond thin-film from N-hexane as a carbon source in the microwave plasma process was carried out. Major parameters are the deposition time, flow rates of oxygen and hexane. The deposition time for the steady state thin-film was required more than 4[h], and the suitable flow rates of hexane and oxygen for the high-quality thin-film are 0.4[sccm] and 0.1~0.2[sccm], respectively. In addition, amorphous carbons such as DLC and graphite were grown by increasing the flow rate of hexane, and it decreased by increasing the flow rate of oxygen. Specifically, the growth rate is about 1.5[㎛h-1] under no addition of oxygen and it decreased about 60[%] as ca. 1.0[㎛h-1] with oxygen.
식량안보체계 구축을 위한 해외농업개발과 자원 확보 방안(2/3차 연도)
김용택(Yong-taek Kim),권태진(Tae-jin Kwon),김병률(Byeong-Ryul Kim),전익수(Ik-su Jun),윤종열(Jong-Yeol Yoon),남민지(Minji Nam),조우림(Urim Cho) 한국농촌경제연구원 2010 한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서 Vol.- No.-
After the global food crisis that took place in 2007 and 2008, food importing countries around the world actively took part in discussion on food security, and the competition to secure food resources is becoming more intense around the world. Since 2008, China, Japan and GCC(Gulf Cooperation Council) countries have been competing against one another to secure overseas farmlands. Those countries are, in particular, looking to farmlands in Africa and Southeast Asia and are in the process of securing numerous overseas farmlands, with the combined number of overseas farmlands that were secured by those countries standing at more than 100 in 2008 alone. Korea, for its part, is coming up with ways to increase food self-sufficiency rate for food security, and introducing and implementing overseas agricultural development polices. As part of overseas agricultural development policy, Korea established 10-year-plan for overseas agricultural development in June 2008 and has been carrying out overseas agricultural development projects since 2009. Although Korea came to establish the system in place to support overseas agricultural development at a policy level, but we need to establish an effective operating system for overseas agricultural development projects given that Korea’s entry into this field is relatively new and competition over overseas agricultural development is getting intense around the world. Among others, it is necessary to review and evaluate the implementation of overseas agricultural development carried out after 10-year-plan for overseas agricultural development, establish the necessary complementary measures, and improve the relevant institutions. Amid increasing discussion over food security among food importing countries after 2007 and 2008 global food shortage crisis and rapid in crease in international agricultural investment through securing of overseas farmlands, there exist two opposite views on securing of overseas farmlands: negative view that securing overseas farmlands equals Neo-Imperialism or Land Grab, and positive view that it is a new opportunity for agricultural development or the win-win strategy for countries. In order to facilitate a responsible overseas agricultural development investment, an appropriate international principle should be established that can allow for win-win situation where both investing country and recipient country benefit.