http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 한인섭 ( In Sup Han ) (검색결과 115 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
다변량통계분석을 이용한 수질오염총량관리 단위유역별 오염물질 배출특성 분석 -한강수계를 중심으로-
최옥연 ( Ok Youn Choi ),김기훈 ( Ki Hoon Kim ),한인섭 ( Ihn Sup Han ) 한국물환경학회 2015 한국물환경학회지 Vol.31 No.6
The characteristic of the water quality and pollutant discharge was analyzed at the units watershed of the total amount management in Han-river basin, and after classified in a similar area by multivariate statistical analysis, the main trend such as the water quality trend and pollutant discharge characteristic were analyzed. As a result of this study, the density of the pollutant at the unit watershed is not necessarily identified as discharge density, and the primary management watershed and targeted substances were analyzed depending on the operating status of the environmental infrastructure in watershed and the main pollution factor and discharge path per pollutants. As a result of cluster analysis, watersheds were classified into four groups according to discharge characteristics. It will be used when selecting target area of primary management that is appropriate to the characteristics of each river and establishing efficient water quality improvement plans.
-
-
한강수계 내 Melamine 농도검출과 GAC처리에서의 파과모델링
이상중(Sang Jung Lee),이재엽(Jai Yeop Lee),한인섭(Ihn Sup Han) 大韓環境工學會 2011 대한환경공학회지 Vol.33 No.10
현재, melamine은 레진, 내화제, 접착제, 라미네이트 등 우리 생활에 다양하게 사용되고 있다. 그로 인해 melamine이 포함된 폐수의 수계 유입 또한 증가하고 있다. EU안전지침서의 GHS에는 melamine을 암 유발 가능성이 있는 물질로 구분하고 있다. 하지만 아직까지 melamine에 대한 독성연구는 진행 중이며 어떤 영향을 주는지 아직까지 밝혀진 사실이 적다. 본 연구에서는 한강과 주변하천의 melamine 오염 정도를 HPLC/UV를 이용하여 오염 정도를 파악하였다. 그리고 활성탄을 이용한 흡착실험 및 모델링에 관한 연구를 하였다. 우선 한강수계 중 상대적으로 상류에 있는 팔당댐 근교와 그보다 하류지역인 뚝섬유원지에서 동일한 시료를 3개씩 채수하였고 한강에 유입되는 하천 중 홍릉천, 왕숙천, 청계천에서 동일하게 시료를 채수하여 정제 후 melamine 농도를 측정하였다. 그 결과 팔당댐 근교의 시료에서는 melamine이 검출되지 않았으며 그보다 상대적으로 하류인 뚝섬유원지에서는 0.312 μg/L농도가 검출되었다. 왕숙천에는 0.578 μg/L로 가장 높았으며 청계천과 홍릉천은각 0.197 μg/L, 0.325 μg/L로 검출되었다. 전체적으로 낮은 농도지만 대부분의 지점에서 melamine의 검출을 확인할 수 있었다. 1970년대에는 melamine 생산량이 200,000 ton에서 최근에는 1,400,000 ton으로 계속적인 사용의 증가로 수계오염은 심화될것으로 보인다. 활성탄을 이용한 흡착 실험에서는 활성탄 크기에 따라 melamine흡착에 약간의 차이를 보였으나 파과모델과 어느 정도 일치함을 보였다. Currently, melamine is being used variously in our lives such as resins, flame retardants, adhesive, laminate etc. And understandably sewer of stream of wastewater containing Melamine has also increased. GHS (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals) of EU safety guidelines says that it can cause cancer. Still, study on toxicity of Melamine is going on. In this research, melamine contamination level of the Han River and River Basin was analyzed by HPLC/UV. And the experiments of GAC adsorption were conducted and the model was studied. We collected the 3 same samples at the suburbs of Paldang Dam located in the relative upstream in Han River and Ttukseom amusement park, the downstream region and collected samples equally at the Hongreung stream, Wangsuk stream, Cheonggye stream among streams flowing into Han River and then measured Melamine concentration after purification. As a result, melamine was not detected at the suburbs of Paldang Dam and it was detected at Ttukseom amusement park, the downstream of it, in the concentration of 0.312 μg/L. The Wangsuk stream with 0.578 μg/L highest Cheonggye stream and Hongreung stream was detected with each 0.197 μg/L and 0.325 μg/L. Although the concentration was low in general, melamine detection could be checked at most point. In 1970, the world capacity of Melamine was estimated at 200,000 ton, with current production estimated to be 1,400,000 ton. Melamine of Han River and rivers flowing into Han River is present at low concentration but pollution will increase in the future due to increase of use. Depending on the size of activated carbon in the experiment were slightly different. But the breakthrough model is almost identical.
-
-
-
한인섭 ( In Sup Han ) 한국형사정책학회 2006 刑事政策 Vol.18 No.2
Korea has maintained the professional-career judge system without any kind of lay participation in the trial. Since 2004, the Special Committee on the Judicial Reform discussed the introduction of a jury system-albeit as a form of weak participation. Now, the draft on the criminal jury system is awaiting a legislative review at the National Assembly. My question here is what kind of changes will be enforced if Korea introduce the criminal jury system. Police witness will often appear to the criminal trial. Police will stand in front of jury panel, and witness what he has experienced. Police is concerned with how to secure the reliability of his witness. His attitude or even his fashion would work as an influencing factor on the reliability. More important factor would be whether a witnessing police should maintain a distance from the prosecutor If a jury consider that a police witness was instructed/controlled by his supervising prosecutor, his testimony would be far from convincing. Such a new situation will require the new structure of police which will be more responsible for their investigation, and more independent from the prosecutor. Public prosecutor will much more concentrate on the trial than deeply involve in a direct investigation. Public prosecutor will focus their authority on the supervision of due process, and rather than the direct investigation. Police will gain the authority to commit an primary investigation under his own responsibility, and will be put under stronger pressure to the due process of law. The possible changes in the police work and criminal justice system in general would be more desirable because they will seek more justice and more human rights.
-
반민족행위자의 처벌과 김병로 -반민특위 특별재판부장의 역할을 중심으로-
한인섭 ( In Sup Han ) 서울대학교 법학연구소 2016 서울대학교 法學 Vol.57 No.2
제헌헌법 제101조는 “악질적인 반민족행위를 처벌하는 특별법을 제정할 수 있다” 고 규정하였고, 그에 따라 반민족행위처벌법이 제정되었다. 이 법에 따르면 국회 내에 특별조사위원회(반민특위)를 만들고, 동법 위반자는 특별재판부에 의해 재판받도록 되어 있었다. 초대 대법원장 김병로는 반민특위 특별재판부 재판부장으로 선임되어, 재판을 총괄하는 책무를 졌다. 김병로는 항일변호사로서의 탁월한 경력과 함께 일제말기 변절하지 않고 지조를 지켜냈기에 반민특위의 재판을 책임질 재판부장으로 최적임자였다. 그는 친일파 처벌은 민족정기를 살리기 위한 불가피한 과업으로 인식하였다. 국회에서 반민특위 위 원들은 잦은 변동을 보였는데, 반민특위작업과 관련하여 시종일관 한 자리를 고수하였던 인사는 김병로 재판부장뿐이었다. 이승만 대통령은 처음에는 법률제정 자체를 반대하였고, 법률이 제정된 후에는 3권분립에 위배되어 위헌이란 입장을 시종 고수하였다. 그러나 김병로는 위헌시비를 일축하고, 현행법에 따른 처벌의 필요성을 강조하였다. 이승만 정권이 반민특위 사 무실 습격 등 노골적인 방해책동에 나서자 김병로는 이를 “직무를 초월한 과오로서 불법”이라 맹공하였다. 반민특위 활동을 전체적으로 평가하면 용두사미로 보이지만, 정치가가 아닌 법률 가로서 김병로는 특별재판부장으로서 할 수 있는 최대치의 역할을 다하였다. 특히 반민자 처벌을 가능하게 하기 위한 소신 있는 발언을 선명하게 구사하였고 사법의 방패 역할을 하였다. 이를 통해 김병로 대법원장/반민특위 재판부장은, 민족적 과제 와 헌법적 쟁점에 대하여 이승만 대통령과 대립각을 뚜렷이 한 계기가 되었다. The 1st Constitution of Korea included an article that a special Act may be made for punishing those who betrayed her country and collaborated Imperial Japan maliciously. The Special Act against Pro-Japanese Traitors (hereafter “the Special Act”) passed on September 22, 1948. According to the Special Act, the Special Investigation Committee was established in the National Assembly. When the Committee found some criminal cases, it reported them to the Special Prosecutor’s Office with its opinion. The Special Prosecutor’s Office mandated to indict those traitors/collaborators, and the Special Tribunal under the Supreme Court tried those cases. Kim Pyoung Ro, the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Korea, was also chosen as the Chief Justice of the Special Tribunal. His positioning was regarded as the best choice because he had advocated Korean patriots at the Colonial Court, and defeated Japanese pressure to conversion. The Special Investigation Committee faced a variety of challenges despite huge popular support. High-ranking policemen gathered challenging power, and resisted the Committee’s investigating activities. Especially, the President Syngman Rhee opposed the Act, and encouraged the resisting police faction’s activities. On the other hand, Kim Pyong Ro criticized irrational legal reasoning by the President and strongly attacked the President’s abuse of power. The historical task for purifying Pro-Japanese traitors was rarely satisfied. However, Kim Pyong Ro did his best for implementation of the Special Act. Kim Pyong Ro as the Chief Justice of the judiciary maintained the conflicting relationship with Syngman Rhee as the President - the Chief of the Executive Branch. During his term as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, he maintained the judicial independence from political pressure.
-
-
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
