http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
오늘 본 자료
민사소송상 과학기술 전문가의 증언 활용에 관한 연구 - 미국 판례의 분석과 우리 법에의 수용을 중심으로 -
유승훈 충북대학교 법학연구소 2022 法學硏究 Vol.33 No.2
Science and law make a big difference in the ultimate goals they pursue. While scientific knowledge seeks a more sophisticated understanding of nature, legal frameworks exist to defend justice, protect the socially disadvantaged, and create a fairer society. These fundamental differences in goals force science and law to have different ethical standards and methodologies. As science and law exist on different levels, scientific evidence must go through a certain process of ‘acceptance’ in order to use it in court. What does the expert's testimony mean in a lawsuit in the specialized field of science and technology? This requires standards for legal acceptance because the decision of a judge who is a layman in the field of science and technology is likely to easily determine the opinions of experts, which can have a decisive impact on the winning or losing of the lawsuit. In the United States, in relation to the standard of acceptance of expert testimony in court, the ‘Frye’(1923), the ‘Dauber’ ruling (1993), the ‘Joiner’ ruling(1997) and the ‘Keumho Tire Ltd' ruling (1999). The Federal Rule of Evidence also sets out the criteria. If the court establishes a standard for the recognition of expert testimony related to scientific evidence in the field of science and technology, it will greatly help the court determine the facts. In this regard, in the absence of research, the previous standards presented in this study could be a major yardstick for the acceptance of expert testimony on scientific evidence in future civil proceedings. Based on this need, this study aims to present criteria for acceptance in civil litigation through analysis of relevant laws and precedents, focusing on acceptance of expert testimony in the field of science and technology and to what extent its legal limitations are.
중국의 해외직접투자 유치가 개발도상국 해외직접투자에 미치는 구축효과
유승훈,김석수 한국무역통상학회 2016 무역통상학회지 Vol.16 No.4
Since the 1990s and especially after China's accession to the WTO in 2001, China has become one of the most favored destinations for FDI. There are increasing concerns that China's FDI success has been excessive, thereby crowding out FDI inflows into other developing countries. This study is designed to investigate and answer three key questions. What are the location determinants of FDI inflows into developing countries? How China's emergence as a destination for FDI is affecting the ability of other countries to attract FDI? To answer this question we proposed and tested empirically a modified gravitiy model that includes host country locational determinants, gravity link variable and home country control variable. This paper has offered answers to this question by testing the hypothesis based on the location advantages of the OLI framework explaining FDI. In introducing the problems that author address, I assert the usefulness of modified gravity model. The basic idea underlying the gravity model is that interaction between two area is a function of the concentration of relavant variables in the two areas, and of the distance between them. The biggest advantage of our modified gravity model is to use remoteness instead of the absolute distance as the distance factor. Remoteness takes account of a country's geographic position relative to the rest of the world. In this study, in presenting the specified determinants of the country distribution of FDI inflows from all source countries into developing host countries, we shall therefore classify the determinants as source country variables, host country variables and linkage variables. The empirical study of the distribution of FDI inflows into developing countries by focusing on the host country location factors has demonstrated that, given the ownership the ownership advantages and the internalization advantages of the source countries, the location advantages of host countries are very important in determining the distribution of the magnitude of FDI inflows among developing countries. The main findings are: countries with a larger market size, faster economic growth, higher per capita income, higher quality of human capital, higher level of foreign stock and more liberalized economic regime attracted relatively more FDI inflows. Finally based upon our empirical model, FDI inflows into China are positive and statistically sigmificant to FDI inflows into other developing countries.. Relatively investment creating effect of China FDI inflow on the other asian countries implies that host country should enhance environmental location advantages such as investment incentives and competitive market instead of looking for inward FDI enhancement factor outside host country.
유승훈 에스케이텔레콤 (주) 2003 Telecommunications Review Vol.13 No.3
경제성장에 따라 정보통신산업에 대한 수요가 증가하고 있으며 정보통신산업이 국가경제에서 차지하는 비중도 크게 증가하는 등 국내외적인 경제환경의 변화로 인해 정보통신산업의 역할이 보다 중요해지고 있다. 따라서 정보통신산업의 산업파급효과 분석을 통해 정보통신산업이 국민경제에서 차지하는 역할을 진단하고 이에 기반하여 정보통신산업정책을 수립해야 할 필요성이 높아지고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 투입산출분석을 이용하여 정보통신산업의 국민경제적산업파급효과를 분석하고자 한다. 수요유도형 모형, 산업간 연쇄효과와 같은 통상적인 분석뿐만 아니라 유용하지만상대적인 복잡성 때문에 널리 사용되지 않았던 공급유도형 모형, 레온티에프 가격모형도 함께 논의한다. 특히 정보통신산업을 중심에 놓고 이를 외생화하여 분석 및 해석하는 접근방법을 취함으로써 정보통신산업에 대해 논의를 집중시킨다. 보다 구체적으로는 정보통신산업의 생산유발효과, 공급지장의 파급효과, 물가파급효과, 산업간 연쇄효과 등의분석결과를 제시한다. 아울러 주요 SOC 산업을 각각 외생화하여 분석한 결과와의 비교도 한다.