http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김위현 고구려발해학회 2007 고구려발해연구 Vol.29 No.-
Foundation of Chin(金), and PalhaeKIM Wee-hoyunRanke said history should be recorded objective and scientifically. Current Chinese scholars usetoo much errotic arguments like these.Following are problems of Chinese scholars’concepts about [Chin foundation and Palhaepeople]1. Are Jurchen and Palhae are same race? Wan-yen Jurchen who founded Chin are emigrationsafter the ruins of Silla so there are no any relationships. During that time period there were bunchof tribes that called Jurchen by themselves. Consequently, Wan-yen Jurchen used Palhae peoplepolitically.2. Could the logic that China’s political power was from accepted ancient China culture beformed?This is not correct. Becaues Palhae kept using Yeon Ho(年號), and they used the word ‘Emperor’instead of ‘King’. If they insist Palhae is local politic because of the truth that modelingsystem and bringing tribute, all of the other countries that interchanged with T ang are also T ang’s local politics. 3. I cannot agree to the assertion that Koryo is accession of Koguryo. ①On the publication ofSamguksagi(三國史記), they considered Silla, Baek Jae, and Koguryo as a One country, it isKoguryo is One of the category of Koryo’s ancestor, and ②Gung Ye(弓裔) used Koryo as his firstname of the country this means they succeed to Koguryo. After that Koryo Wang Gun also usedKoryo as the name of his country. Beside these, in the China’s Xinwudaishi(新五代史) and Jiuwudaishi(舊五代史) that are calledJung Sa(正史) refers the connection of Koguryo and Koryo.금(金)건국과 발해유민 (김위현) 4574. When the Palhae had been founded, Jurchen helped them, Koryo wasn’t even care about it.Because they did not considered as the same race.5. We cannot agree to the assertion that Go Young-Chang’s naming Dayuan(大元) of TheEmperor of Great Palhae(大渤海皇帝) is for founding Political power of rivalry of powerfulLeaders(割據政權). If their main purpose was Political power of rivalry of powerful Leaders, why