http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
오늘 본 자료
-
교육복지 대상학생이 인식한 교육복지사업의 도움정도가 학교행복감에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 = The Influence of Perceived Helpfulness of Education Welfare Program on School Happiness of Students from Low-Income Families
-
[이연성의 16th rest] 이올란타와 알레코
-
(2012) 중국의 재발견
-
북한이탈주민정책에 대한 신제도주의적 분석
-
Slab-induced waveform effects as revealed by the TAIGER seismic array: Evidence of slab beneath central Taiwan
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 강승호 (검색결과 308 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
강승호 한국사회과학연구회 2004 동향과 전망 Vol.- No.60
A comparison of the hollowing out of industries in Korea, Japan and Taiwan 한국ㆍ일본ㆍ대만의 산업공동화 비교
-
-
-
-
동등성 시험을 신뢰구간을 사용하여 검정하는 경우 왜 신뢰도 90%인 신뢰구간을 사용하는가?
강승호,Kang, Seung-Ho 한국통계학회 2008 응용통계연구 Vol.21 No.5
임상시험의 자료에 대하여 통계적 검정을 실시하는 경우 유의수준 5%를 사용하는 것이 관례이다. 하지만 동등성 시험을 신뢰구간을 사용하여 검정하는 경우, 신뢰도 90%인 신뢰구간이 사용되고 있다. 흔히 신뢰도 $1-{\alpha}$인 신뢰구간을 검정에 사용하는 경우, 그 검정법의 유의수준은 ${\alpha}$이다. 이 때문에 동등성 검정에서 신뢰도 90%인 신뢰구간을 사용하게 되면, 유의수준은 10%가 되는 것이 아닌가 하는 혼란을 일으켰다. 본 논문에서는 이와 관련된 이슈들을 관련 문헌의 검토와 시뮬레이션을 통하여 명확하게 하여, 제약회사, CRO, 대학병원 등에 종사하는 통계전문가들에게 도움을 주고자 한다. It is a convention to use 5% significance level when a statistical test is employed for clinical data. But when a confidence interval is used for testing equivalence, 90% confidence interval has often been used. When $1-{\alpha}$ confidence interval is used for hypothesis testing, its significance level is often ${\alpha}$. So it makes a confusion that the significance level is 10% if 90% confidence interval is employed for testing equivalence. In this paper I will clarify this issue by reviewing relevant papers and conducting simulation studies. I hope that it will be beneficial to statisticians in pharmaceutical companies, CROs, university hospitals.
-
강승호,김병채,남태승,김준태,최성민,이승한,박만석,김명규,조기현 대한신경과학회 2011 대한신경과학회지 Vol.29 No.3
Background: Recurrent seizures result in brain damage, but it is usually gradual, minimal, and difficult to observe by visual inspection of magnetic resonance images (MRIs). It is well known that hippocampal structure is vulnerable to seizure-associated brain damage. We measured the hippocampal volume in patients with epilepsy to evaluate the degree of damage to the hippocampus. Methods: We recruited 33 patients with epilepsy and 21 healthy subjects from January 2007 to December 2008. We subclassified the patients into two groups: (1) 14 patients with intractable epilepsy and (2) 19 patients with drug-responsive epilepsy. In each group, the volumes of the left and right hippocampus were measured by manual drawing on brain MRIs. We compared the hippocampal volume in intractable epilepsy, drug-responsive epilepsy, and healthy subjects. The compounding effect of hippocampal sclerosis was ruled out by excluding eight patients with hippocampal sclerosis; we then compared the hippocampal volume in the two groups with epilepsy. Results: The volume of the bilateral hippocampus on brain MRIs was smaller in patients with intractable epilepsy than in those with drug-responsive epilepsy and healthy subjects (left, p<0.004; right, p<0.03). After excluding the patients with hippocampal sclerosis by visual inspection, the hippocampal volumes were also found to be smaller in patients with intractable epilepsy than in those with drug-responsive epilepsy (left, p<0.04; right, p<0.05). Conclusions: While there is no definitive abnormality of the hippocampus on visual inspection of brain MRIs, we determined the degree of hippocampal atrophy and volume loss in patients with intractable epilepsy. Hippocampal volumetry will be helpful for the assessment of brain damage in patients with intractable epilepsy. Background: Recurrent seizures result in brain damage, but it is usually gradual, minimal, and difficult to observe by visual inspection of magnetic resonance images (MRIs). It is well known that hippocampal structure is vulnerable to seizure-associated brain damage. We measured the hippocampal volume in patients with epilepsy to evaluate the degree of damage to the hippocampus. Methods: We recruited 33 patients with epilepsy and 21 healthy subjects from January 2007 to December 2008. We subclassified the patients into two groups: (1) 14 patients with intractable epilepsy and (2) 19 patients with drug-responsive epilepsy. In each group, the volumes of the left and right hippocampus were measured by manual drawing on brain MRIs. We compared the hippocampal volume in intractable epilepsy, drug-responsive epilepsy, and healthy subjects. The compounding effect of hippocampal sclerosis was ruled out by excluding eight patients with hippocampal sclerosis; we then compared the hippocampal volume in the two groups with epilepsy. Results: The volume of the bilateral hippocampus on brain MRIs was smaller in patients with intractable epilepsy than in those with drug-responsive epilepsy and healthy subjects (left, p<0.004; right, p<0.03). After excluding the patients with hippocampal sclerosis by visual inspection, the hippocampal volumes were also found to be smaller in patients with intractable epilepsy than in those with drug-responsive epilepsy (left, p<0.04; right, p<0.05). Conclusions: While there is no definitive abnormality of the hippocampus on visual inspection of brain MRIs, we determined the degree of hippocampal atrophy and volume loss in patients with intractable epilepsy. Hippocampal volumetry will be helpful for the assessment of brain damage in patients with intractable epilepsy.
-
-
-
-
DBpia연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
