광복 70년, 국어학 외연의 확대와 발전

홍종선(Hong Jongseon) 한국언어문학회 2015 한국언어문학 Vol.95 No.-

Over 70 years since Independence, the outer edge of the Korean Linguistics has been expanded in various ways with the development of the Korean Linguistics. When we roughly divide the study which is included in the external areas of the Korean Linguistics into interdisciplinary research and applied research, there are philosophy of language, sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, neurolinguistics, rhetorics, Korean stylistics, glottochronology, mathematical linguistics, computational Korean lingustics, Korean corpus lingustics and Korean language culture studies in interdisciplinary research. In applied research, there are Korean educational linguistics, Korean educational linguistics as a foreign language, Korean lexicography, Computational Korean Linguistics, Korean lalopathology, Korean language policy, Korean medium lingustics, Korean advertising lingustics, interpretation studies and translation studies. These external studies of Korean Linguistics and pure Korean Linguistics help each other to expand their views and research methodology, adding various viewpoints in many ways, and achieving mutual rising development by providing new facts and materials in the aspect of information. It can also contribute to the development of Korean language culture by adding practicality that can be used in real life through external studies. Among interdisciplinary researches and applied researches, there are a lot of fields where the researches are already activated but there are still quite a few areas which are about to be studied. In the future, Korean linguistics research should foster user-oriented grammar with researcher-oriented grammar and greatly develop the study of spoken language and discourse. Therefore, we should enlarge the cooperating researches providing more information to external areas of Korean linguistics.

북한 조선어학의 특징에 대하여 -<조선어학전서>(2005)와 <언어학연구론문색인사전>(2006)을 대상으로-

이상혁 ( Sang Hyeok Lee ) 민족어문학회 2011 어문논집 Vol.- No.64

The purpose of this paper is to analyze ``Joseoneohak(Korean Linguistics in North Korea)`` in the text of ``The Series on Korean Linguistics in North Korea(Jeonseo, 2005)`` and ``Index dictionary on Linguistics in North Korea(Saegin, 2006), to study the difference of two text(Jeonseo(2005) and Saegin(2006)) by the inductive method each other. One of the weaknesses on Korean Linguistics is to have neglected the North Korean Linguistics problem until now. Therefore, this article is based on this issue and explains ultimately the nature and system of the North Korean Linguistics for integration of the Korean Linguistics, focusing on Jeonseo(2005) and Saegin(2006). In this paper we pointed out that the system of Jeonseo(2005) is limited to Korean Linguistics in North Korea. But Saegin(2006) is consist of the content of the general linguistics including South-Korean Linguistics, Notrh- Korean Linguistics, and other Linguistics in North Korea academic field. Specifically, we have classified the tendency of main stream in the txet of Jeonseo(2005) and Saegin(2006), based on the theory, practical aspect, and prescription on North-Korean Linguistics in North Korea. Also, we emphasized the similarities and differences between North-Korean Linguistics and South-Korean Linguistics. The system of North-Korean Linguistics is wider than South-Korean Linguistics in terms of the categories of Korean Linguistics. Finally, we suggested the several ways of plans must been performed for integration on Korean Linguistics. This paper is related to the analysis of Jeonseo(2005) and Saegin(2006) as the system of North-Korean Linguistics, but this first attempt will be able to lead to discussion for the ultimate reunification of the Korean Linguistics for our people and overseas Koreans in South Korea.

국어학에서의 융합의 개념과 유형

한재영(Han, Jae young) 국어국문학회 2015 국어국문학 Vol.- No.170

The objective of this manuscript is to consider the meaning of academic convergence in Korean linguistics and examine the direction to which a study of Korean linguistics should be oriented by exploring the type of convergence. In order to understand convergence legitimately, the manuscript examines the relationship among academic fields related to Korean linguistics, the relationship between sub-academic fields constituting Korean linguistics, and specific contents of work. This manuscript first explores Korean linguistics and stylistics in literature, Korean linguistics and Korean lexicography, Korean linguistics and Korean informatics in computer science, and Korean linguistics and Korean language education in education theory, which can be considered as the convergence of Korean linguistics and the academic study of other linguistics-related fields. Next, it examines previous discussions on morphosyntax, morphophonology, syntactic semantics, and syntax-phonology, which can be described as the convergence of various academic fields of Korean linguistics, and the aspect of convergence in Korean linguistics. In order to better explore the need for convergence in Korean linguistics, it is confirmed that the grammatical phenomenon of passivity is a subject that needs to be considered, not only from a morphological perspective, which claims that passivity is derivation, but also from syntactic and semantic perspectives. Additionally, the manuscript confirms that phonology is closely related to issues of tonology and dialectology. Through this process, the manuscript examines the value of convergent thinking and approach in Korean linguistics and points out that the results of individual studies become the premise for increasing the effectiveness of convergence.

韓國語學의 發展을 위한 提言

최명옥 한국어문교육연구회 2010 어문연구 Vol.38 No.1

This paper proposed four tasks as a way of developing Korean linguistics. Firstly, to be a good Korean linguist, he/she should remember as much information as possible, including general linguistic theories, existing linguistic studies on Korean language, and linguistic data about synchronic and diachronic Korean language. And the information should be considered all together when they read other studies or examine linguistic materials. Secondly, the object of Korean linguistics should be not ‘standard Korean' but ‘Korean as a natural language of Korea'. Thirdly, existing studies of Korean linguistics, which have made in the frame of several different linguistic theories, should be reviewed critically and we should correct them if any problem is found. Fourthly, lecturers of Korean linguistics in university should train their students to have language analyse ability and guide them to study Korean linguistics through Korean language as natural language. 筆者는 이 글에서 韓國語學의 발전을 위한 4가지 課題를 提示했다. 첫째, 좋은 硏究者가 되기 위해서는, 一般言語學 理論, 現代와 現代 以前의 韓國語에 대한 旣存의 硏究 情報와 資料 情報를 가능한 한 많이 기억해야 하며 韓國語에 대한 旣存 硏究를 읽거나 韓國語 資料를 檢討할 때에, 그러한 情報를 同時에 適用할 수 있어야 한다. 둘째, 韓國語學의 硏究對象인 ‘韓國語’는 ‘標準 韓國語’가 아니라 ‘自然語로서의 韓國語’가 主가 되어야 한다. 셋째, 서로 다른 言語 理論을 바탕으로 이루어진 旣存의 韓國語 硏究를 批判的으로 檢討하여 問題點을 발견하고 그것을 바로 잡아야 한다. 넷째, 大學과 大學院 過程의 韓國語學 講義 擔當者는 ‘自然語로서의 韓國語’ 資料를 많이 活用하여 學生들이 言語 分析 能力을 가지게 하고 自然語로서의 韓國語 硏究를 하도록 指導해야 한다.

한국어학에서 ‘과학적 연구’ 개념의 기원과 전개

서민정 우리말학회 2025 우리말연구 Vol.81 No.-

이 연구는 20세기 초 전후 한국어학에서 ‘과학적 연구’라는 개념 이 어떻게 도입되고 형성되었는지를 고찰하고, 그 배경과 한계를 비판적 으로 평가하는 데 목적이 있다. 언어학에서 말하는 ‘과학적 연구’란 언어 를 감정적‧직관적‧전통적 방식이 아닌, 체계적이고 논리적이며 경험적(실 증적)인 방법으로 탐구하는 것을 의미한다. 이러한 방법론은 언어를 객관 적이고 보편적인 대상으로 다루며, 분석과 설명이 가능한 학문적 대상으 로 설정함으로써 학문적 발전과 사회적·기술적 응용에 기여했다. 한국어 학은 이 흐름에서 벗어나지 않았으며 오히려 과학적 연구를 더욱 강조해 왔다. 이러한 흐름 속에서 ‘과학적 연구’는 학문적 당위로 기능하며 특정 연구 태도를 정당화하거나 비판하는 근거로도 작용하였다. 이는 국어학 의 학문적 위상을 높이고 언어의 체계화, 교육, 기술 응용 등에 중요한 전 환점을 마련했으나, 동시에 한국어의 의미, 문화적 맥락, 역사성이 소외 되는 한계를 낳았다. 본 연구는 20세기 초 전후의 한국어학자들의 저작을 중심으로 ‘과학(적)’이라는 용어가 어떤 맥락에서 사용되었는지를 분석하고, 그것이 한국어학 내부에서 어떠한 의미 변화를 겪으며 정통성의 기반이 되었는지를 밝히고자 한다. 이 연구는 20세기 초 한국어학에서 과학적 연구가 단순한 방법론의 문제가 아니라 근대 학문으로서 국어학의 정체성과 방향성을 규정하는 핵심 적 장치였음을 밝히고, 그 기원이 일본 국어학과 독일 소장문법학파 등 유 럽 언어학의 영향 속에서 형성되었음을 규명한다. 이러한 고찰은 한국어학 의 발전에 기여한 과학적 연구의 긍정적 측면뿐 아니라, 그 과정에서 간과 되었던 한국어 고유의 언어적·사회적·역사적 맥락을 이해하는 데도 중요한 토대를 제공한다. This study aims to examine how the concept of “scientific research” was introduced and developed in Korean linguistics around the early 20th century, and to critically evaluate its background and limitations. In linguistic studies, “scientific research” refers to the systematic, logical, and empirical (positivist) investigation of language, distinct from emotional, intuitive, or traditional approaches. Such a methodology treats language as an objective and universal subject of analysis, establishing it as an explainable and researchable academic phenomenon, and contributing not only to scholarly advancement but also to social and technological applications. Korean linguistics did not deviate from this global trend; in fact, it emphasized scientific research even more strongly. Within this context, “scientific research” functioned as an academic imperative, serving as both a justification for certain research attitudes and a basis for criticizing others. While this strengthened the academic status of Korean linguistics and promoted the systematization of language, education, and technological applications, it also led to the marginalization of meaning, cultural context, and historical dimensions unique to Korean. Focusing on the writings of Korean linguists from the early 20th century, this study analyzes the contexts in which the term “scientific” was used and examines how it underwent shifts in meaning to become a foundational basis of legitimacy within Korean linguistics. It argues that the pursuit of scientific research in early Korean linguistics was not merely a methodological choice but a key mechanism for defining the identity and direction of Korean linguistics as a modern academic discipline. Furthermore, it clarifies that this orientation was not an indigenous development but was shaped under the influence of external traditions, notably Japanese linguistics and, more distantly, the German Neogrammarian school and European linguistic theories. This examination offers not only insights into the positive contributions of scientific research to the development of Korean linguistics but also provides an essential foundation for understanding the linguistic, social, and historical contexts that were overlooked in the process.

인문언어학의 한국어교육에의 적용 - 중국인 학습자를 대상으로 한 한국어교육에서 -

김성란 ( Jin Chenglan ) 연세대학교 언어정보연구원 2018 언어사실과 관점 Vol.44 No.-

The application of Humanistic linguistics to Korean language education is to focus on convergence education between the Korean humanities and Korean linguistic knowledge. It enables the Korean humanities to penetrate into the course of Korean language department and its required courses in Chinese school curriculums so that students can learn Korean linguistic knowledge in the Korean humanities while learning the Korean humanities in Korean linguistic knowledge. The Korean humanities and Korean linguistics can not be separated. Learning Korean for Korean language department students is about learning the Korean humanities. Students majoring in Korean language should not only proficiently use Korean but also know basic knowledge of the Korean humanities. Learning Korean language, as a foreign language, with the Korean humanities helps students to expand understanding of Korea and to communicate well with Koreans. The Korean language proficiency of students comes from a grasp of linguistic contents in a linguistic form as well as a linguistic form itself and knowledge about the humanities that learners have accumulated. This study discusses ways to nurture competent students by applying humanistic linguistics to Korean language education as a primary response to the era of the 4th industrial revolution and new silk-road in China. This study is to apply humanistic linguistics to Korean language education and to deal with the current problems of undergraduate curriculums at Korean language department in Chinese universities such as Korean language department of Minzu University of China and Yanbian University, which have focused on transferring of language knowledge. Furthermore, the study suggests how to design curriculums that apply a teaching method to enable a humanistic linguistics approach to Korean language education in China and also, explores ways to revise Korean textbooks that encompass all areas of the humanities including Korean literature, history, philosophy, etc. and Korean linguistic knowledge.

정전 이후 북한 〈조선어학사〉의 서술과 그 지향

이상혁(Lee, Sanghyeok) 돈암어문학회 2013 돈암어문학 Vol.26 No.-

이 논문에서는 북한의 조선어학사의 서술과 그 지향이라는 주제 설정을 통해 북쪽의 〈조선어학사〉 서술의 경향은 지난 과거에서 현재에 이르기까지 어떻게 전개되고 있는지에 대하여 북쪽 조선어학사 저작물인 김병제(1984), 김영황(1996), 안경상(2005)의 연구 경향을 중심으로 그 변화와 흐름을 살펴보았다. 또한 북쪽 사회의 특성상 특정 주제에 대한 다양한 연구 성과가 양산되지는 않는다는 점을 전제하면서 세 텍스트와 함께 사회과학원 〈전서〉(2005) 및 〈색인〉(2006)에 드러난 북쪽의 ‘조선어학’ 체계안에서 ‘조선어학사’의 위상도 아울러 검토하였다. 이 두 문헌도 모두 북한의 ‘조선어학사’의 흐름을 전면적으로 파악해 볼 수 있는 공시적 연구 성과이자 통시적 자료의 성격을 함께 띠고 있다는 점에서 그 의의가 크다. 해방 이후 북한에서는 조선어학사에 대한 전면적인 서술이 존재하지 않았다. 1980년 이후 저술된 ‘조선어학사’ 3종의 연구서에서 북한은 민족주의적 어학사 서술이 이루어져 소위 ‘주체 언어학’의 기조 위에서 좀 더 체계적인 ‘조선어학사’ 서술의 경향을 확인할 수 있었다. 그것은 조선어학사 서술 시기의 확장과 함께 단군 조선에서 현대 항일무장투쟁 시기에 이르기까지 일관된 민족주의적 시각의 구축과 공고화였다. 그것은 어학사 서술에서 남한과의 차이를 보이는 특별하면서도 논쟁적인 지점이다. 또한 남한과 달리 ‘조선어학사’와 ‘조선어사’를 보다 큰 분류인 ‘언어(발전)력사’ 의 범주 속에 묶어서 보려는 경향도 남한과 차이를 보였으며〈전서〉와〈색인〉을 통해서 그 일면을 확인할 수 있었다. 결국 북한의 조선어학사는 조선어학의 체계 안에서 민족주의적 관점을 견지한 학설사의 서술 지향의 양상을 보여준 것과 동시에 그들의 이데올로기에 따른 서술의 관점이 반영된 것이었다. 또한 다른 한편으로는 언어정책사적 차원에서 실용적 영역도 조선어학사 범주에 한데 아우르는 체제로 발전해 온 측면도 간과할 수 없는 사실이다. The aim of this article is to examine diverse research conducted on the description and aim about the history of Korean linguistics in North Korea. It points out the historicity revealed in the textbooks of three kinds and the Series on Korean Linguistics(Jeonseo, 2005)" and Index dictionary on Linguistics(Saegin, 2006) in North Korea, and discusses the issues that may be raised in regard to producing that textbooks and its description depended on the viewpoints of the history of Korean linguistics after concluding a ceasefire agreement Korea War(1953). With this background information, we first demonstrate the distribution of the researchers the late 1940s in North Korea and analyze their academic trends at that time. We then explain the history of Korean linguistics in North Korea, due to the construction and its consolidation of the description for nationalism. We note that there are differences in perception between the textbooks of three kinds, Kim Byeongje(1984), Kim Yeonghwang(1996) and An Gyeongsang(2005) in identifying the starting point of the history of Korean linguistics each other. We also note that there are differences in perception of the history of Korean linguistics between Series on Korean Linguistics(Jeonseo, 2005)" and Index dictionary on Linguistics(Saegin, 2006) in North Korea. Nevertheless, we point out that the priority should be given to the similarity of the history of Korean linguistics of the two countries in additions, due to its unification. We believe that our claim is a desirable consideration, particularly because our focus is on issues that can be achieved essentially based on the viewpoints of the history of unified Korean linguistics.

시를 통한 한국어교육의 실제

이영조(Lee Young-jo) 한국비평문학회 2008 批評文學 Vol.- No.28

The most salient character of literature is that is composed with linguistics. The language from the literature is a Korean asset which is carried out in actual and detailed situation. Especially, Korean literature is the cultural assets if Korean which originates from the concrete situations and the actual state of the culture which delicately refined. The meantime, practical methods of the literature have been discussed constantly in Korean education. If we assume that the most recent goal of linguistic education is improvement of ability in communication, literature education is one of the most suitable methods of education. The reason is learners prefer speaking languages fluently in everyday life to using linguistics in standardised teaching materials. In addition, the final goal to be achieved of teaching Koreans as a foreign language is about understanding Korean linguistics culture. Followed this, goal of Korean linguistics' education also has to be adjusted from basic communication to high level of communication ability, ability of building linguistic culture. Again, goal of Korean education through the literature is not to teach huge Korean literature, but to teach efficiently with linguistics. This is a way of being mature human being at same time. This paper will preferentially look into connection between literature and Korean education, but we also consider how to apply Korean education to writing education. The next step, we extend Korean class area from focusing in reading materials to improvement of reading skills through practical use in Korean education, understanding of Korean culture etc. As we provide the actual education plan, which can improve the learners' esthetical experience, we can achieve the integrated education curriculum. Therefore, this paper will show the class method in actual use to discover effective value over importance of Korean education though the literature. One the other hand, this paper is also carrying a meaning to check present position of Korean education.

인문학의 한류를 위한 세계적 시야의 한국어문확 연구와 교육; 인문학의 한류를 위한 한국어 학: 무엇을, 어떻게? -언어 연구 및 언어 교육을 위한 문화교육을 중심으로-

김남길 ( Nam Kil Kim ) 겨레어문학회 2013 겨레어문학 Vol.51 No.-

The Korean cultural wave is currently attempting to spread throughout the world after transforming from popular culture to ‘the K-culture’. The aim of this paper is to show that the nucleus of Korean culture (K-culture) comes from the humanities and that study of the Korean language can do ‘what’ and ‘how’ for the study of the Korean cultural wave of the humanities. In order to demonstrate the fulfillment of this aim, the core content of this paper consists of three sections. The first section investigates what the Korean cultural wave means and how it has evolved and will transform in the future; and at the same time, this section reveals that the Korean cultural wave of the humanities forms the foundation for K-culture. The second section concentrates on the treatment of differences between general linguistics and applied linguistics involving the teaching of language, which constitute the two central figures for the study of the Korean language. This section also presents the recent trends and claims that the 21stcentury is the age in which neo-empiricism leads applied linguistics based on practicality and application and that powerful descriptive linguistics such as corpus linguistics become resources for the formulation of important linguistic theories and provide support for the development of applied linguistics. The third section attempts to find the way that the study of culture is effectively linked to the teaching and the learning of language for people who are interested in learning Korean. For the purpose of achieving this goal, the general analysis of culture is presented on the basis of Moran (2001), and culture and its study are integrated through the cycle of cultural experience, cultural knowledge, and experiential learning. This section also emphasizes that in order for language learners to enhance their cultural experience, they must put their utmost effort not only to collecting cultural information, encouraging cultural activities, and finding good cultural interpretation but also to participating in experiential learning cycles that promote self-consciousness. Language-culture in which language and culture are mingled reflects two sides of a coin where two sides are in relation where one cannot separate itself from the other. Finally, by utilizing my Korean textbook in preparation, it is shown how Korean teaching through cultural experience is conducted in classrooms. Although various ways to teach and learn both language and culture may exist, Moran`s (2001) cultural experiential learning model is used to demonstrate the effective teaching of Korean culture in the Korean language classroom because his model contains rich contents and appears to be easy to understand, as well as effective in teaching.

국어학회 60년과 한국어 문법사

이지영 ( Lee Ji-young ) 국어학회 2020 국어학 Vol.0 No.93

The Korean Language Society, which began in 1959, has played a pivotal role in the development of Korean language research. This society has published the Journal of Korean Linguistics regularly and introduced precise studies which dealt with key issues of Korean linguistics and explored new topics and new research methodologies on Korean linguistics. This paper examined the major papers on historical studies on Korean Grammar published in the Journal of Korean Linguistics. This allowed us to grasp the achievements and major issues of historical studies on Korean grammar so far, as well as newly raised issues and methodologies of this field. So this is expected to contribute to the further development of historical studies on Korean grammar.