http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Impact of Afterload on the Assessment of Severity of Aortic Stenosis
장성아,김형관,손대원 한국심초음파학회 2012 Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging (J Cardiovasc Im Vol.20 No.2
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is increasingly diagnosed in current aging society. Echocardiography is the most important tool in the assessment of AS and its severity. However, load-dependency of Doppler measurement could affect the accuracy of AS severity assessment. We tried to evaluate the impact of afterload on the assessment of AS severity by modification of afterload using pneumatic compression (Pcom). Methods: Forty patients diagnosed as moderate or severe AS [effective orifice area of aortic valve (EOAAV) by continuity equation of < 1.5 cm2] were consecutively enrolled. Patients with severely uncontrolled hypertension, severe left ventricular (LV)dysfunction, and other significant valve disease were excluded. Comprehensive echocardiography was performed at baseline to assess AS severity. Then, pneumatic compression of the lower extremities by 100 mmHg was applied to increase LV afterload. After 3 minutes, echocardiography was repeated to assess AS severity. Results: Mean blood pressure was significantly increased under Pcom (p < 0.001), while heart rate remained unchanged. Peak aortic valve velocity (Vmax) was slightly, but significantly decreased under Pcom (p = 0.03). However, Doppler velocity index and EOAAV by continuity equation were not affected by Pcom. Conclusion: AS severity assessment by echocardiography was not dependent on the change of LV afterload imposed by Pcom. AV Vmax was slightly decreased with LV afterload increment, but these changes were too small to alter treatment plan of AS patients. EOAAV and Doppler velocity index are more stable parameters for AS severity assessment.
장성아,Raymond J. Kim 한국심초음파학회 2016 Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging (J Cardiovasc Im Vol.24 No.2
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a useful diagnostic imaging modality in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). It provides unique information not available from other modalities, however, it is complex. CMR is not a single technique. Instead, it consists of multiple distinct techniques and a lack of understanding of which techniques to perform and how to interpret the findings in combination limits its efficacy and widespread use. Conversely, its multiparametric nature can provide a comprehensive assessment with the potential for higher accuracy than is achievable by other modalities. Moreover, its ability to directly assess myopathic processes often contributes insights that change patient management. In this article we provide a brief technical overview and focus on specific clinical scenarios in patients with known or suspected CAD. We highlight the multiparametric nature of CMR and discuss cases which illustrate the unique information that CMR can contribute.