子宮平滑筋線維肉腫의 1例

金炯九,崔虎容,李顯式 최신의학사 1968 最新醫學 Vol.11 No.12

Leiomyosarcoma of the uterus is far less common lesion. The diagnosis of, this lesion is rarely made preoperatively, because the symptoms and physical findings are attributed to the myomata. A case of Leiomyosarco ma combined with bilateral ovarian cysts found postoperatively is presented with a brief review of literature available.

기하학적. 재료적 비선형성을 갖는 중첩된 판 스프링의 특성해석에 관한 연구

김형구,임정식,김일곤,손동성 대한기계학회 1990 대한기계학회논문집 Vol.14 No.1

본 연구에서는 일반적인 셸 요소에 대해 von Mises의 항복조건에 입각한 탄소 성 구성방정식과 total Lagrangian식을 바탕으로한 비선형 해석이론에 Lagrange Mult- iplier식을 이용한 구속조건(constraints)을 도입하여, 중첩된 비선형 구조물이 갖고 있는 제반 비선형성을 고려할 수 있도록 수식화하였으며, 이를 엄밀해를 구할 수 있는 두개의 외팔보가 중첩된 경우에 적용하여 엄밀해와 비교하였으며, 또한 실제적으로 국 산 핵연료 집합체에 사용되는 각 홀드다운 스프링 집합체에 대한 특성 해석을 수행하 여 그 결과를 실험치와 비교하여 그 비교치가 근사함을 보임으로써 본 방법의 신뢰성 과 효용성을 보였다. A general analysis method is proposed for analysis of the superposed structures with geometric and material nonlinearities. It is presumed that no friction occurs between structures. It utilizes a shell element for the geometric and material nonlinearities and imposes various deformation constraints for the contact and interaction between structures. To show the reliability and effectiveness of this method, superposed cantilevers for which exact solutions can be obtained and holddown spring assemblies which are now used in PWR reactors are chosen as analysis models. The results of analyses were compared with exact solution in the case of cantilevers and with test results in the case of holddown spring assemblies. The analysis results obtained by this method showed good agreement with the reference values.

고등학교 체육수업에서 모험교육을 통한 자아개념의 변화

김형구,이안수,이경희 한국스포츠교육학회 2010 한국스포츠교육학회 학술발표논문집 Vol.2010 No.12

Legal Issues on Witness Protection in the International Criminal Court

김형구 한양법학회 2007 漢陽法學 Vol.21 No.-

This article mainly deals with the legal issues surrounding witness (and victims) protection at the International Criminal Court, by referring the provisions in the ICC Statute and the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. Clearly (victim) witness can play a crucial role to find the substantial justice in a courtroom, and it is necessary to let them testify without fear or unjustified coercion from the accused side. However, such protection should be done by the way not to harm or breach the notion of a fair trial, and the right of the accused. In this context, this article particularly deals with ‘using anonymous witness’, ‘using audio-video technology’ and ‘disclosure of evidence or personnel information of witness’in the ICC proceedings. At the same time such three issues are closely related to the rules of evidence. Therefore, this article considered two main issues with referring the principle of a fair trial and rules of evidence of the ICC.

Jurisprudence of the UN Ad Hoc Tribunals on Mens Rea for Genocide

김형구 한양법학회 2007 漢陽法學 Vol.20 No.-

This article studies the jurisprudence of the UN Ad HocTribunals on Mens Reafor the crime ofgenocide, one of jurisdictional crimes of the Tribunals. Concerning genocide, Article 4 (2) of the ICTYStatute, and Article 2 (2) of the ICTR Statute define any of the enumerated acts in Article 4 of theICTY Statute (Article 2 of the ICTR Statute)committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, anational, ethnical, racial or religious groups, as such. However, it is not clear the meaning of each sub-element by only reading the expression inprovisions of the ICTY Statute, and the ICTR Statute. For example, what kind intent is necessary toconstitute genocide?, Is it enough for a perpetrator has douls eventualisto constitute crime ofgenocide?", "What the expression destroy means?, Only physical destroy or not?, Howcharacterize a certain group as national, racial, ethnical, or religious? To give the answer to suchquestions, it seems inevitable to scrutinize case law of the ICTY and the ICTR. Considering the expression in Article 4(2) of the ICTY Statute and the ICTR Statute, it is possible to analysis sub-elements of Men Rea for genocide as (1) intent (to) (2) destroy, (3) in whole or in part, (4) a national, ethnical, racial, or religious groups, (5) as such. Therefore, this article deals with each sub-element one by one with analysis of the case law of the UN Ad Hoc Tribunals.

평화의 회복을 위한 국제형사재판의 현황과 한계: 국제형사재판소의 Al-Bashir사건을 중심으로

김형구 사단법인 한국평화연구학회 2011 평화학연구 Vol.12 No.4

On 14 July 2008 the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (hereinafter “the ICC”) applied a warrant of arrest against Ormar Hassan Ahamd Al Bashir, the President of the Republic of Congo, and on 4 March 2009 the Pre-Trial Chamber of the ICC issued the first arrest warrant against him. And the revised arrest warrant was issued on 12 July 2010. The current case may be the first successful international criminal trial against the current head of State. And that is one of the reasons why international mass media and scholars pay attention to this case. Regarding the necessities of preventing the impunity on international criminals and restoring international peace and security of mankind, the accusation against Mr. Al-Bashir by the ICC is absolutely legitimate. Nevertheless, there have been many views on whether the ICC’s prosecution against Mr. Al-Bashir may be an useful mean to restore the peace in the Sudanese territory or not. Regarding the surrounding discourses on the ICC prosecution against Mr. Al-Bashir, this article deals with old and controversial theme whether international criminal prosecution may be helpful or useful to restore the peace or not. More specifically “Is the ICC the best choice to restore the peace in the region of conflict?”, “Was the prosecutorial strategy successful in Al-Bashir case?”, “Did the Prosecutor of the ICC exercise his prosecutorial discretion in a proper moment to restore the peace?”, “What are the limits of the ICC in current international politics?”, “What is the sound relations between the ICC and other organizations? And what should the ICC has done such a relations before its prosecution?”, and “What are the critics against the ICC and what are the reasons?”. 제 2차 세계대전 이후 국제공동체에는 전쟁범죄, 인도에 반하는 죄, 제노사이드범죄 그리고 침략범죄와 같은 국제법의 중대한 위반으로서의 국제범죄를 자행한 국제범죄자를 처벌하기 위한 국제형사재판이 출현하였으며 21세기에 들어서는 상설적인 국제형사재판소(International Criminal Court)가 설립되기에 이르렀다. 그러나 평등한 주권을 향유하는 분권화된 국제공동체에서 국제형사재판기구가 실효적으로 활동할 수 있는가 하는 의문은 국제형사재판의 출현부터 다양한 형태의 담론으로 꾸준히 제기되어 왔다고 할 수 있다. 이는 특히 다자조약을 근거로 설립된 국제형사재판소의 활동에 있어 직면할 수밖에 없는 현실적인 문제일 것이다. 이러한 맥락에서 이 글은 수단 다푸르 사태와 관련한 국제형사재판소의 실행을 비판적으로 고찰함으로써 분권화된 국제공동체에 있어 국제형사재판이 현실적으로 가지는 한계는 무엇이고, 이를 극복하기 위한 바람직한 소추전략은 어떻게 마련되어야 하는지를 다루고 있다.

토론 : 수입차 업체의 마케팅전략 - 토요타 사례

김형구 한국자동차산업학회 2001 한국자동차산업학회 학술대회 자료집 Vol.- No.-

영남문집해제 : 팔오헌집

김형구 영남대학교 민족문화연구소 1988 민족문화연구소 자료총서 Vol.4 No.-

경제환경 변화에 따른 경남의 대응방안

김형구 경남연구원 2011 경남발전 Vol.- No.113

사립학교법 개정에서 살펴 본 사학의 자주성과 공공성의 관계

김형구 한국교육개발원 2005 한국교육 Vol.32 No.1

Adverse criticism is not ceasing the law of private schools being the independence the revision every time we being the public. This research lays on analyzing the call of provisions about social background. I distinguish a restoration of independence this present time to the back of a four period- the formative period of a foundation, a growth period of quantity, a promoting period of environment, a growth period of quality. I concerned the politics social background of a private establishment school law department each period which is revised by an each period and analyzed. I have been accessed to the relation which the relation of public concern is wrong around the private schools with the independence. The relation of public concern have been accessed around the law of private schools with the independence to an inverse proportion relation, confronting relation. An independence and public concern rather desirable relation is to make public concern to a mutual relation, a comparison relation. The problem of the private schools can be solved only if it makes the relation setting up from the departure of the problem recognition desirable. 사립학교법은 개정 때마다 자주성이냐 공공성이냐는 논란이 끊이지 않고 있다. 본 연구는 사립학교법의 개정에 따른 자주성과 공공성 관련조문을 사회적 배경과 관련지어 분석함으로써 그 관계를 구체적으로 밝히는 데 있다. 이에 광복이후 현재까지를 네 시기 즉, 기반형성기, 양적성장기, 환경조성기, 질적성장기로 구분하여, 각 시기별로 개정된 사립학교법과 그 시기의 정치사회적 배경을 관련지어 자주성과 공공성의 관계를 분석하였다.사립학교법을 중심으로 한 자주성과 공공성의 관계는 잘못된 관계 즉, 반비례적 관계, 대립적인 것으로 접근되어 왔다. 보다 바람직한 관계는 자주성과 공공성이 상생적 관계, 비례적 관계로 공공성을 높이면서 동시에 자주성을 보장하는 것이다. 문제인식의 출발에서부터 관계설정을 바람직하게 해야 사립학교에 관련된 문제는 해결의 실마리를 찾을 수 있을 것이다.