http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김구년(Gu-Nyeon Kim) 한국비교사법학회 2007 比較私法 Vol.14 No.1
Korean Antitrust law has been issued 26 years ago. Korean Fair Trade Commission has made an effort for control of anti-competitive practices and establishment of competition on market. However, according to the number of cases handled by KFTC, we can assume that anti-competitive practices don"t decrease. Recently many Scholars think the problem lies in enforcement of the antitrust law rather than the law itself. The remarkable characteristic of Korean antitrust law is that antitrust law enforcement largely depends on administrative regulations by KFTC. Nowadays, the studies on enforcement of anti-trust law are active. In Korea, compensation for damages is sole method of private enforcement. But, this has not been used actively. To file a suit, the injuries had to go thru regulations of KTFC and it is not easy for the injuries to prove accurate damages. Those have been discussed as the reasons. Thru revision of Korean antitrust law in 2004, the process to file a suit becomes more easy. The purpose of this study is to analysis system of compensation for damages of present Korean antitrust law.<BR> But, private sue for compensation for damages is an ex post method, so to prevent damages, we need injunction. Because damages caused by illegal practices sometimes are small accounts, introduce of class action and punitive damages are also needed.
주택시장 소비심리지수의 주택 하위시장 및 경매시장과의 영향관계에 관한 실증연구
김구회(Gu-Hoi Kim),김기홍(Ki-Hong Kim),이주형(Joo-Hyung Lee) 경기연구원 2016 GRI 연구논총 Vol.18 No.1
The purpose of this study is to explore causal and preceding relationship between house sub-market and the consumer sentiment survey of housing market. This study attempted to investigate and analyse among the consumer sentiment survey of housing market, an apartment deal price index by size and apartment auction bidding price rate by a new extent of research related to the consumer sentiment survey. For that reason, they have surveyed about Seoul and Seoul Metropolitan Area. In order to analyze them, We conducted unit root test, cointegration test, granger causality test and cross correlation test. The results of the study are as follows. First, it was confirmed that causality, correlation and precedence relations are existence between the consumer sentiment survey of housing market and an apartment deal price index by size and auction bidding price rate. Second, it was confirmed that influence is existence between the consumer sentiment survey of housing market and an apartment deal price index by size and apartment auction bidding price rate. The significance of this study is the new attempt about the apartment market by size, apartment auction market and a new extent of research related the consumer sentiment survey.
독점규제법상(獨占規制法上) 손해배상청구소송(損害賠償請求訴訟)의 제문제(諸問題)
김구년 ( Gu-nyeon Kim ) 한국경제법학회 2006 경제법연구 Vol.5 No.2
독점규제법이 시행된 지 벌써 26년이 지났다. 그간 공정거래위원회는 경쟁제한적인 행위를 규제하고 시장에서의 경쟁질서를 확립하기 위하여 큰 노력을 기울여 왔고, 그 결과 상당한 규제성과를 이루기도 하였다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 공정거래위원회의 연간 규제건수가 좀처럼 줄어들지 않고 있다는 점을 보면, 여전히 경쟁제한적인 거래관행이 팽배해 있음을 알 수 있다. 종래에는 실체법적 측면에서 그 원인을 찾고자 하는 연구가 많았으나, 최근에는 집행의 관점에서 그 원인을 규명하려는 노력이 활발하다. 우리 독점규제법 집행상의 가장 큰 특징은 공정거래위원회에 의한 행정적 규제가 집행체제의 중심을 이루고 있다는 점이다. 그런데, 최근에는 사적 집행의 활성화에 관한 논의가 활발하다. 독점규제법상 사적 집행 제도는 손해배상제도가 유일한 실정이다. 그러나, 손해배상제도는 거의 이용되지 않았다. 대부분의 견해는 그 원인을 시정조치 선확정제도와 손해액 입증의 어려움에서 찾고 있었다. 2004년 독점규제법 개정을 통하여 시정조치 선확정제도가 폐지되었고, 입증책임의 경감을 위해 손해액 인정제도가 도입되었는데, 이는 긍정적으로 평가할 수 있다. 본 연구는 개정법에 대한 해석방향을 시론적으로 제시함에 있다. 그런데, 손해배상제도는 그 자체가 사후보상적이어서 사전예방적 차원에서는 여전히 불완전한 제도이다. 따라서, 금지청구제도가 도입될 필요성이 있다. 한편, 독점규제법 위반 행위로 인한 손해는 손해액이 소액이어서 일반 소비자의 경우 소송을 제기할 유인을 가지기 힘들다. 따라서, 징벌적 손해배상제도와 집단소송제도의 도입도 고려될 필요가 있을 것이다. Korean Antitrust law has been issued 26 years ago. Korean fair Trade Commission has made an effort for control of anti-competitive practices and establishment of competition on market. However, according to the number of cases handled by KFTC, we can assume that anti-competitive practices don't decrease. Recently many Scholars think the problem lies in enforcement of the antitrust law rather than the law itself. The remarkable characteristic of Korean antitrust law is that antitrust law enforcement largely depends on administrative regulations by KFTC. Nowadays, the studies on anti-competitive practices are active. In Korea, compensation for damages is sole method of anti-competitive practices. But, this has not been used actively. To file a suit, the injuries had to go thru regulations of KFTC and it is not easy for the injuries to prove accurate damages. Those have been discussed as the reasons. Thru revision of Korean antitrust law in 2004,the process to file a suit becomes more easy. The purpose of this study is to analysis system of compensation for damages of present Korean antitrust law. But, private sue for compensation for damages is an ex post method, so to prevent damages, we need injunction. Because damages caused by illegal practices sometimes are small accounts, introduce of class action and punitive damages are needed.
김구수(Kim Gu Su),엄영익(Eom Young Ik) 한국정보처리학회 1997 정보처리학회논문지 Vol.4 No.8
In this paper, we propose a load sharing scheme in distributed systems. In the proposed scheme, the state of each host is classified as a server or a source by its current load and, to prevent excessive state changes of each host, we used three threshold values for identifying the current state of each host. Based on the threshold values, some hosts, called brokers, manage the servers registered to them. The brokers, whose number is determined by the system utilization factor and the total number of hosts, support task migration processes from overloaded sources to lightly loaded servers. Also they can hand over the broker's role to another host when it is overloaded. Simulation studies were performed for examining the sensitivity of each system parameters such as threshold values, utilization factor, the number of hosts, and the number of brokers to the system performance indices including mean response time, mean queue length.