RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      지식재산권 강화가 기술혁신과 경영성과에 미치는 영향의 산업별 비교연구 : 한국의 제약, 반도체, 조선 산업

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13407568

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      다수의 이론적, 실증적 연구에도 불구하고 지식재산권 제도와 기업 기술혁신 및 경영성과 간의 일반적 인과관계는 명확하지 않다. 본 연구는 산업별로 기업 경영성과의 핵심요인이 상이하다는 점에 주목한다. 지식재산권 강화→연구개발의 투입/산출 증가→매출증가로 이어지는 기본 성과창출경로가 작용하는 제약 산업, 지식재산권 강화와 연구개발 투입/산출간 관계가 약한 반도체산업, 연구개발과 매출 간 관계가 약한 조선 산업의 대기업과 중소기업을 대상으로 지식재산권 제도가 기업의 기술혁신과 경영성과에 영향을 미치는 경로를 분석했다. 한국의 특허제도가 선진국 수준에 도달한 TRIPs 이후 15년간의 패널 데이터를 사용했으며, 차분 GMM으로 추정하는 동태적 회귀모형과 고정효과모형을 적용했다. 결과적으로, 지식재산권 강화가 제약 대기업에서 연구개발의 투입/산출 및 경영성과 모두를 증가시켰지만, 반도체-조선 대기업에서는 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 제약과 반도체 중소기업에서는 연구개발의 투입경로를 통해 경영성과를 감소시키며 연구개발의 산출경로 를 통한 영향은 미미한 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 지식재산권 강화를 위한 제도 구축과 정책은 산업별로 맞춤화될 필요가 있으며, 일반적인 강화/약화는 특정 산업의 경영성과 제고에 유의미한 영향을 미치지 못한다.
      번역하기

      다수의 이론적, 실증적 연구에도 불구하고 지식재산권 제도와 기업 기술혁신 및 경영성과 간의 일반적 인과관계는 명확하지 않다. 본 연구는 산업별로 기업 경영성과의 핵심요인이 상이하...

      다수의 이론적, 실증적 연구에도 불구하고 지식재산권 제도와 기업 기술혁신 및 경영성과 간의 일반적 인과관계는 명확하지 않다. 본 연구는 산업별로 기업 경영성과의 핵심요인이 상이하다는 점에 주목한다. 지식재산권 강화→연구개발의 투입/산출 증가→매출증가로 이어지는 기본 성과창출경로가 작용하는 제약 산업, 지식재산권 강화와 연구개발 투입/산출간 관계가 약한 반도체산업, 연구개발과 매출 간 관계가 약한 조선 산업의 대기업과 중소기업을 대상으로 지식재산권 제도가 기업의 기술혁신과 경영성과에 영향을 미치는 경로를 분석했다. 한국의 특허제도가 선진국 수준에 도달한 TRIPs 이후 15년간의 패널 데이터를 사용했으며, 차분 GMM으로 추정하는 동태적 회귀모형과 고정효과모형을 적용했다. 결과적으로, 지식재산권 강화가 제약 대기업에서 연구개발의 투입/산출 및 경영성과 모두를 증가시켰지만, 반도체-조선 대기업에서는 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 제약과 반도체 중소기업에서는 연구개발의 투입경로를 통해 경영성과를 감소시키며 연구개발의 산출경로 를 통한 영향은 미미한 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 지식재산권 강화를 위한 제도 구축과 정책은 산업별로 맞춤화될 필요가 있으며, 일반적인 강화/약화는 특정 산업의 경영성과 제고에 유의미한 영향을 미치지 못한다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Despite many theoretical and empirical studies, general causality between IPRs system, firm technological innovation, and financial performance is not clear. This study notices that the core factor to create financial performance is different by each industry. The study analyzed the effect of IPRs system on innovation and economic growth targeting 3 industries; pharmaceutical industry to which the basic track of creating performance is applied (strengthening IPRs → increasing R&D input/output → increasing sales); semiconductor industry where the relationship between stronger IPRs and R&D input/output is weak; and shipbuilding industry which has weak correlation between R&D and sales. It used panel data for 15 years since TRIPs when the patent institution in Korea reached up to the level of advanced countries, and applied the dynamic regression model which estimates the fixed effect model with difference-GMM.
      As a result, stronger IPRs increases R&D input/output and financial performance in the large pharmaceutical firms, but has no influence on large semiconductor and shipbuilding firms. In the small and medium-sized pharmaceutical and semiconductor firms, stronger IPRs leads to reduction of financial performance and part of the performance creating route is weak or cut. That is, it is necessary to customize the construction of system and policy for strengthening IPRs by each industry, and unitary strengthening or weakening may have no significant impact on financial performance improvement in specific sectors.
      번역하기

      Despite many theoretical and empirical studies, general causality between IPRs system, firm technological innovation, and financial performance is not clear. This study notices that the core factor to create financial performance is different by each ...

      Despite many theoretical and empirical studies, general causality between IPRs system, firm technological innovation, and financial performance is not clear. This study notices that the core factor to create financial performance is different by each industry. The study analyzed the effect of IPRs system on innovation and economic growth targeting 3 industries; pharmaceutical industry to which the basic track of creating performance is applied (strengthening IPRs → increasing R&D input/output → increasing sales); semiconductor industry where the relationship between stronger IPRs and R&D input/output is weak; and shipbuilding industry which has weak correlation between R&D and sales. It used panel data for 15 years since TRIPs when the patent institution in Korea reached up to the level of advanced countries, and applied the dynamic regression model which estimates the fixed effect model with difference-GMM.
      As a result, stronger IPRs increases R&D input/output and financial performance in the large pharmaceutical firms, but has no influence on large semiconductor and shipbuilding firms. In the small and medium-sized pharmaceutical and semiconductor firms, stronger IPRs leads to reduction of financial performance and part of the performance creating route is weak or cut. That is, it is necessary to customize the construction of system and policy for strengthening IPRs by each industry, and unitary strengthening or weakening may have no significant impact on financial performance improvement in specific sectors.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제1장 서론
      • 제2장 선행연구 검토
      • 2.1 지식재산권강화와 기술혁신 및 경제성장의 상관관계
      • 2.2 지식재산권강화 효과의 생태계
      • 제3장 실증분석 방법론
      • 제1장 서론
      • 제2장 선행연구 검토
      • 2.1 지식재산권강화와 기술혁신 및 경제성장의 상관관계
      • 2.2 지식재산권강화 효과의 생태계
      • 제3장 실증분석 방법론
      • 3.1 분석모델 및 가설설정
      • 3.2 이론모형과 추정방법
      • 3.3 분석대상 산업의 선정
      • 3.4 분석변수 및 자료
      • 3.4.1 한국의 특허보호 강화지수
      • 3.4.2 국제특허분류(IPC)와 한국산업분류(KSIC)의 일치
      • 3.4.3 기업특성변수 등
      • 제4장 실증분석 결과
      • 4.1 기초 통계량 분석
      • 4.2 연구가설 검증
      • 제5장 결론 및 시사점
      • 참고자료
      • 부록 (한국의 특허권보호지수, 사용자비용)
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference) 논문관계도

      1 S.Wagh, Park, "Index of Patent Rights", 2002

      2 Burk, Mark A.Lemley, "Policy Levers in Patent Law", 2003

      3 산업연구원, "혁신역량과 산업발전", 2001

      4 Barzel, "Optimal Timing of Innovations", 1968

      5 Koga, "Firm size and R&D tax incentives", 2003

      6 KHIDI, "2012 Korea Health Industry Report", 2012

      7 Gilbert, Shapiro, "Optimal patent length and breadth", 1990

      8 Pakes, Z.Griliches, "Patents and R&D at the Firm Level", 1984

      9 Jorgenson, Hall, "Tax policy and investment behavior", 1967

      10 OECD, "The Shipbuilding Industry in China", 2008

      1 S.Wagh, Park, "Index of Patent Rights", 2002

      2 Burk, Mark A.Lemley, "Policy Levers in Patent Law", 2003

      3 산업연구원, "혁신역량과 산업발전", 2001

      4 Barzel, "Optimal Timing of Innovations", 1968

      5 Koga, "Firm size and R&D tax incentives", 2003

      6 KHIDI, "2012 Korea Health Industry Report", 2012

      7 Gilbert, Shapiro, "Optimal patent length and breadth", 1990

      8 Pakes, Z.Griliches, "Patents and R&D at the Firm Level", 1984

      9 Jorgenson, Hall, "Tax policy and investment behavior", 1967

      10 OECD, "The Shipbuilding Industry in China", 2008

      11 King, Fullerton, "The Taxation of Income from Capital", 1984

      12 김종권, "제약산업 R&D 투자효과 분석", 제약산업 R&D 투자 효과분석, 2003

      13 Acs, Audretsch, "Innovation and size at the firm level", 1991

      14 조동성, "조선산업의 글로벌 경쟁전략", 2006

      15 Lemley, "Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office", 2001

      16 Slabbers, Moergastel, Verspagen, "MERIT Concordance Table: IPC-ISIC(rev.2)", 1994

      17 Lucas, "On the Mechanisms of Economic Development", 1988

      18 B.Lev, Aboody, "R&D Productivity in the Chemical Industry", 2001

      19 Park, "International Patent Protection: 1960-2005", 2008

      20 Mansfield, "Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study", 1986

      21 Nickell, "Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects", 1981

      22 Stein, Jeremy C, "Agency, information and corporate investment", National Bureau of Economic Research, "Agency, 2001

      23 Levin, S.G.Winter, "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D", 1987

      24 Romer, "In cr easin g Return s an d Lon g - Run Growth", Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, 1986

      25 Lerner, "Patent Protection and Innovation Over 150 Years", 2002

      26 Park, J.C.Ginarte, "?Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth", 1997

      27 Romer, "Idea Gaps and Object Gaps in Economic Development", 1993

      28 Lai, Grossman, "International Protection of Intellectual Property", 2004

      29 Pakes, Griliches, "Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Report", 1980

      30 Maskus, "Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy", 2000

      31 Klemperer, "How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be?", How broad should the scope of patent protection be?, 1990

      32 Tubbs, "The Relationship between R&D and CompanyPerformance", The Relationship Between R&D and Company Performance, 2007

      33 Scherer, F. M, "Industrial market structure and economic performance", Houghton Mifflin, 1970

      34 F.M.Scherer, Cormanor, "Patents Statistics as a Measure of Technology Change", 1969

      35 Gilbert, Newbery, "Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly", 1982

      36 Ginarte, "Determinants of Patent Rights: A Cross National Study", 1997

      37 Galende, "InternalFactors Determining aFirm'sInnovativeBehavior", Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behavior, 2003

      38 Helpman.E, "Inovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights", "Inovation, 1993

      39 Hall, "R&D tax policy during the eighties: success or failure", 1992

      40 이근, 임채성, 박동현, "지적재산권 체제와 한국 기업의 기술혁신", 2002

      41 Keith Maskus, 김태기(Taegi Kim), 오근엽(Keun-Yeob Oh), "한국 특허보호가 특허생산에 미치는 영향", 한국경제연구학회, "「한국경제연구」, 2003

      42 E.Noma, R.Perry, Narin, "Patents as Indicators of Corporate Technological Strength", 1987

      43 Acs, D.B.Audretsch, "Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis", 1988

      44 David, M.A.Hitt, J.Gimeno, "The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D", The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D, 2001

      45 W.C.Gruben, G ou ld, "?The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth", 1996

      46 Aghion, Vickers, Howitt, "Competition, Imitation, and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation", "Competition, 2001

      47 Barrett, O'Connell, "Does training generally work? Thereturns to in-company training", Does Training Generally Work? The Returns to In-Company Training, 2001

      48 Kanwar, "Does intellectual property protection spur technological change?", 2003

      49 Gallini, "The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform", 2002

      50 Reenen, Hall, "How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D A review of the evidence", 2000

      51 김혁준, 송종국, "R&D 투자 촉진을 위한 재정정책지원효과의 효과분석", 2009

      52 Foster, "Corporate Performance and Technological Change throughInvestor's eyes", Corporate Performance and Technological Change through Investor's Eyes, 2003

      53 Bloom, Reenen, "Do R&D Tax Credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979~1997", 2002

      54 Bhagat, "Corporate research & development investments international comparisons", 1995

      55 S.Bond, Blundell, "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models", 1998

      56 Kortum, "Assigning Patents to Industries: Tests of the Yale Technology Concordance", 1997

      57 Horii, "Economic Growth with Imperfect Protection of Intellectual Property Rights", 2007

      58 Lefort, Esquivel, Caselli, "Reopening the convergence debate: a new look at cross-country growth empirics", 1996

      59 특허청·한국특허정보원, "특허분류와 한국표준산업분류의 연계표 작성에 관한 연구", 2008

      60 O.Bover, Arellano, "Another look at the instrumental variableestimation of error components models", Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models, 1995

      61 Scherer, "Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented invention", "Firm size, 1965

      62 Nordhaus, William D, "Invention, growth, and welfare : a theoretical treatment of technological change", M. I. T. Press, "Invention, 1969

      63 McCalman, "Reaping what you sow: an empirical analysis of international patent harmonization", 2001

      64 Jaffe, Jaffe, Adam B., "The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process", 2000

      65 Kabla, Arundel, "What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms", What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms, 1998

      66 이성수, "특허보호강화가 우리나라 제약산업의 기술혁신에 미치는 영향", 2011

      67 T.Sung, Lee, "Schumpeter's legacy: A new perspective on the relationship between firm size and R&D", 2005

      68 Hausman, Hall, Griliches, "Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the patents-R&D Relationship", 1984

      69 Nelson, Mazzoleni, "The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: A contribution to the current debate", 1998

      70 Yang, K.Maskus, "Intellectual Property Right, Licensing, and Innovation in an Endogenous Product-Cycle Model", "Intellectual Property Right, 2001

      71 Yang, "Protecting foreign inventors or a learning channel? Evidence from patents granted in Taiwan", 2003

      72 Johnson, "The OECD Technology Concordance (OTC): Patents by Industry of Manufacture and Sector of Use", 2002

      73 Cohen, S.Klepper, "Firm size and the nature of innovationwithin industries: the case of process and product R&D'", Firm Size and The Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D, 1996

      74 Sakakibara, Sakakibara, Mariko, "Do Stronger Patents Induce more Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms", Do stronger patents induce more innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms, 2001

      75 Arvanitis, "The Impact of Firm Size on Innovative Activity: An Empirical Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data", 1997

      76 박창수, 오준병, "특허권 강화와 민간기업의 연구개발 투자: 기업 자료를 이용한 실증분석", 2008

      77 Romijn J, H.Albaladejo, "Determinants of Innovation Capability in Small Electronics and Software Firms in Southeast England", Determinants of Innovation Capability in Small Electronics and Software Firms in Southeast England, 2002

      78 Kumar, "Intellectual property rights, technology, and economic development: experiences of Asian countries", "Intellectual property rights, 2002

      79 송종국, 서환주, 정동진, "특허권 강화는 기술혁신을 촉진하는가?: 한국의 특허법 개혁을 중심으로", 2004

      80 Eicher, "Endogenous Strength of Intellectual Property Rights: Implications for Economic Development and Growth", 2008

      81 Hadjimanolis, "An investigation of innovation antecedents in small firms in the context of a small developing country", An Investigation of Innovation Antecedents in Small Firms in The Context of a Small Developing Country, 2000

      82 Cohen, "Appropriability conditions and why firms patent and why they do not in the American Manufacturing sector", 1997

      83 S.R.Bond, Arellano, "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations", 1991

      84 Hall, Bronwyn H, "The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1975-1995", "The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 2001

      85 Lanjouw, "The Introduction of Pharmaceutical Product Patents in India: 'Heartless Exploitation of the Poor and Suffering?", 1997

      86 Kim Yee Kyoung, "Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of development", 2012

      87 Sherwood, "Intellectual property systems and investment stimulation: the rating of systems in eighteen developing countries", 1997

      88 Chen, Chien, Peng, "Manufacturing intelligence for semiconductor demand forecast based on technology diffusion and product life cycle", 2010

      89 Walsh, Nelson, Cohen, "Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not)", 2000

      90 Mansfield, "Intellectual Property Protection, Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer: Germany, Japan, and the United States", "Intellectual property protection, 1995

      91 Hirabayashi, "Revisiting the USPTO Concordance Between the U.S. Patent Classification and the Standard Industrial Classification Systems", 2003

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼