국가재건최고회의 시기 박정희 정권의 사회단체 규제와 정치적 입지 확보 모색 : 한국아세아반공연맹 강화를 중심으로

서상현(Suh, SangHyun) 한국외국어대학교 역사문화연구소 2022 역사문화연구 Vol.81 No.-

본 연구는 국가재건최고회의 시기 박정희 군부가 정치적 입지 확보를 시도해 가는 과정을 검토했다. 국가재건최고회의가 남긴 기록물과 당시 신문 기사 등을 토대로 박정희 군부가 정치적 입지 확보를 모색하였던 것을 검토했다. 박정희 군부 내 개별 인물이 아닌 국가재건최고회의의 활동을 중심으로 살펴보았다. 구체적인 내용은 다음과 같다. 군부는 국가재건최고회의 활동의 유리한 여론을 조성하기 위해 기존의 정당·사회단체를 해체시켰다. 국가재건최고회의는 5월 23일 포고령을 통해 기존의 정당·사회단체를 해체했다. 이후 6월에 새로운 사회단체 등록 관련 법률을 만들어 사회단체를 통제하고 정치적인 입장을 내세우지 못하게 조치했다. 국가재건최고회의는 장면 정권 시기의 사회단체 등록제를 폐지했다. 국가재건최고회의는 사회단체 등록에 있어 허가제를 사용하였는데 이는 이승만 정권 시기에 사용하였던 군정법령 제55호와 유사했다. 군부는 과거의 사회단체 난립과 부패일소를 이유로 내세웠지만 강력한 여론 통제와 사회단체들의 정치적인 행동과 발언을 막기 위한 의도가 더 강했다. 군부는 민정이양 이전까지 기존의 정치적 영향력이 강하였던 정당·정치인·사회단체들의 활동을 규제하면서 자신들의 정치적 입지를 확대해 갈 수 있는 시간적 여유를 얻고자 했다. 군부는 정치적 입지 확보를 위한 시도로 한국아세아반공연맹을 강화하고자 했다. 한국아세아반공연맹 강화의 일환으로 이사진을 개편하면서 구 정계 인사들을 참여시켰다. 군부는 이사진 개편 등을 통해 구 정계 정치 인사들을 반공 활동 내에서 포섭하고자 했다. 국가재건최고회의의 반공 활동을 강조하고자 하였으며 인지도가 있는 정치 인사도 국가재건최고회의 사업에 지지를 보내고 있다는 것을 동시에 보여주고자 했다. 이는 국가재건최고회의가 구 정계 인사들을 사회악으로 규정했던 것과 상반되는 모습이었다. 군부는 국가재건최고회의 기간 동안 한국아세아반공연맹을 통해 반공 공보 활동을 강조했다. 1962년 자유센터 유치를 대대적으로 선전하고 구 정계 인사들을 주비위원회 등에 임명하면서 반공 활동 강조와 정치 인사 포섭을 시도했다. 1963년 대선 당시 붉어진 사상논쟁에서도 군부는 반공을 강화하는 목적으로 한국아세아반공연맹을 한국반공연맹으로 개칭했다. 박정희 정권은 민간단체인 한국반공연맹이 합법적으로 국가의 재정적 지원을 받을 수 있는 법적 근거를 마련하고자 『한국반공연맹법』을 제정했다. 『한국반공연맹법』은 국가가 민간단체를 법적으로 관변단체화 시킨 최초의 사례였다. 법적근거를 통해 한국반공연맹은 1970년대까지 박정희 정권의 여러 반공 활동을 대행하고 정치적인 입장을 대변하는 활동을 하게 된다. This study reviewed the process of Park Chung-hee s military regime attempt to secure a political position during the Supreme Council for National Reconstruction. Based on the records left by the Supreme Council for National Reconstruction and newspaper articles at the time, it was reviewed that the Park Chung-hee military sought to secure a political position. The study focused on the activities of the Supreme Council for National Reconstruction, not individual figures in the Park Chung-hee military regime. The details are as follows. The military regime dismantled existing political parties and social organizations to create favorable public opinion on the activities of the Supreme Council for National Reconstruction. The Supreme Council for National Reconstruction disbanded existing political parties and social organizations through a decree on May 23. After that, in June, a new social organization registration law was created to control social organizations and prevent political positions from being put forward. The Supreme Council for National Reconstruction abolished the registration system for social organizations during the Jang Myun government. The Supreme Council for National Reconstruction used the permit system in the registration of social organizations, which was similar to the Military regime Decree No. 55 used during the Lee Syngman governmet. The military regime put forward the reasons for the turmoil of social groups and the elimination of corruption in the past, but the intention to control public opinion and prevent political actions and remarks by social groups was stronger. The military regime sought to gain time to expand their political position by regulating the activities of political parties, politicians, and social organizations that had strong political influence before the transfer of civil affairs. The military regime tried to strengthen the Korea Asian People’s Anti-Communist Federation in an attempt to secure a political position. As part of the strengthening of the Korea Asian People’s Anti-Communist Federation, the board of directors was reorganized and political figures were involved. The military regime tried to include political figures from the former political circles within anti-communist activities through reorganization of the board of directors. It was intended to emphasize the anti-communist activities of the Supreme Council for National Reconstruction, and to simultaneously show that recognized political figures are also supporting the projects of the Supreme Council for National Reconstruction. This was contrary to the Supreme Council for National Reconstruction s defining former political figures as social evils. During the Supreme Council for National Reconstruction, the military regime emphasized anti-communist activities through the Korea Asian People’s Anti-Communist Federation. In 1962, he promoted the attraction of the Freedom Center and appointed former political figures to the main committee, emphasizing anti-communist activities and attempting to embrace political figures. Even in the ideological debate that turned red during the 1963 presidential election, the military regime renamed the Korea Asian People’s Anti-Communist Federation to the Korean Anti-Communist Federation with the aim of strengthening anti-Communist. The Park Chung-hee regime enacted the Korea Anti-Communist Federation Act to provide a legal basis for the private organization, the Korea Anti-Communist Federation, to legally receive financial support from the state. The Korea Anti-Communist Federation Act』 was the first case in which the state legally organized private organizations. Through legal grounds, the Korea Anti-Communist Federation acted on behalf of various anti-Communist activities of the Park Chung-hee administration until the 1970s and represented a political position.

5·4운동 시기 문명 전환론과 사회주의

차태근 한국중국현대문학학회 2010 中國現代文學 Vol.0 No.53

In China, Socialism was on the rise in the May Fourth Movement. This period is before and after the end of the world warⅠ, Many people were concerned about problem of postwar reconstruction of world. They severely criticized modern civilization that was regarded as cause of the tragic War and maintained that transition of civilization was needed various fields of political, economic, social and cultural condition. There was a hot dispute between the Eastern Miscellany and the New Youth about the way and method of china reconstruction. Some people like Li Dazhao, Chen Duxiu held that Socialism was an alternative to modern civilization regarded capitalism as her core. The Russian Revolution was the most effective model of new civilization. In 1920 Bertrand Russell, an advanced thinker called for social reconstruction, visited to china, based in Beijing and giving lectures across the country. although he had the belief of guild socialism, but he suggested that china adopted policy of Russia Bolshevist. Because guild socialism was not appropriate for an undeveloped country like china. His thought not a little effected on the chinese view of Russian Revolution and socialism.

1920년대 개조론의 확산과 기독교사회주의의 수용·정착

장규식 ( Chang Kyu Sik ) 역사문제연구소 2009 역사문제연구 Vol.13 No.1

In Korea, it was the `Christianity and Socialism` discourse, which was supported by Christian students who responded the anti-religion movement in 1923 and 1924, that laid the ideological foundation for Koreans` embracement of Christian Socialism. With this discourse, the speakers interpreted the Social reconstruction argument`s narratives in terms of Christian concept kingdom of God, and they searched for an alternative for a people`s society, while also attempting dialogue with Socialism. It was around 1925, when writings of the famous Japanese Christian Socialist Kagawa Toyohiko were translated and introduced to Korea, that the Christian Socialist ideology was introduced to the Korean Christian community as a Christian discourse of action. The `Socialism of Love` argued by Kagawa, which was based upon historical conception of Materialistic morality and the movement for the kingdom of God, one of theory and one of action, was an instant hit to the Korean students in their youth. So people who armed themselves with Kagawa`s idea, trying to model their actions after those of his, started to appear. They got interested in the rural society where a lot of the poor people were living. And they also turned their eyes to the cooperative unions which could function as social facilities of love that could overcome the nature of Capitalism which was destined to pursue only interest. The Christian Socialism of Korea encountered the opportunity to set firmly its feet on Korean soil, with the organization of the Christian Rural Research Association in 1929. This group embarked upon Christian-based rural reconstruction work, equipped itself with Christian Socialism, and spreaded its roots in the Korean society. They suggested the so-called Christianism(The ideology of the Cross), a theory designed to invite an ideal society which was also different from the one envisioned in Marxism. And they also initiated the movement for the Jesus Village as an utopian model village(`Spiritual movement of materials`), based upon the rural churches and cooperative unions. Yet the anti-Materialism, non- Materialism, and the Socialist inclination against selfishness clashed with each other in real life situations as well, and that was sort of a passage rite that all those theories and actions that were searching for a `third way` between Bourgeois Nationalism and Socialism had to go through.

러셀 사상의 수용과 『개벽』의 사회개조론 형성

허수 ( Hur Soo ) 역사문제연구소 2009 역사문제연구 Vol.13 No.1

The editors of the journal 『Gaebyeok(World`s Creation)』 wanted to show the people that their Cheondo-gyo school`s doctrine could cover the contemporary intellectual discourses, and that attempt was part of their efforts of practicing their own social influence. Such efforts began with their making an introduction of Russell`s Argument of Social reconstruction to the Korean readers, and proceeded by assimilating the dominant discourses of the time, and finally resulted in forming `『Gaebyeok』`s own Argument of Social reconstruction`. First of all, Kim Gi Jeon took interest in Bertrand Russell`s Argument of Social reconstruction, and introduced the Korean people to it through the pages of 『Gaebyeok』. The reason he got particularly interested in the task of introducing Russell`s argument was because he considered it to be sharing a lot of philosophical similarities with the `In-nae-Cheon` philosophy`(“People are heaven”, of the Cheondo-gyo school), and also because he figured that it had a quality of `social philosophy`, which could be usually absent in ordinary religions. Via this Russell`s Argument of Social reconstruction, Lee Don Hwa critically accepted the so-called `Culturalism`, Nationalism and Marxism which were popular at the time, and formed 『Gaebyeok』`s own unique stance of `Human Naturism`, `Pan-humanistic Nationalism`, and `Capitalism with a Human face`. Such efforts continued, and in the 『New Human Philosophy(新人哲學)』 published in 1931, Lee Don Hwa, in discussion of the social reconstruction narrative within the Suwun`s teachings(`水雲主義`), displayed an opinion which embraced the arguments of both Russell and Marx. The lead editors of 『Gaebyeok』 accepted Russell`s Argument of Social reconstruction, and as a result they came to display a non-Marxist criticism of Capitalism. This was a clearly different attitude from that of the Donga Ilbo newspaper, which merely introduced Russell`s Argument of Social reconstruction to the public. Such difference also had very much to do with the difference between 『Gaebyeok』 and 『Donga Ilbo』 in terms of their positions they displayed regarding `criticism of the Capitalist civilization`. It is a matter that should be further discussed in the future.

러셀 사상의 수용과 『개벽』의 사회개조론 형성

역사문제연구소 2009 역사문제연구 Vol.2009 No.21

<P>The editors of the journal 『Gaebyeok(World’s Creation)』 wanted to show the people that their Cheondo-gyo school’s doctrine could cover the contemporary intellectual discourses, and that attempt was part of their efforts of practicing their own social influence. Such efforts began with their making an introduction of Russell’s Argument of Social reconstruction to the Korean readers, and proceeded by assimilating the dominant discourses of the time, and finally resulted in forming ‘『 Gaebyeok』’s own Argument of Social reconstruction’.</P><P> First of all, Kim Gi Jeon took interest in Bertrand Russell’s Argument of Social reconstruction, and introduced the Korean people to it through the pages of 『Gaebyeok』. The reason he got particularly interested in the task of introducing Russell’s argument was because he considered it to be sharing a lot of philosophical similarities with the ‘In-nae-Cheon’ philosophy’(“People are heaven”, of the Cheondo-gyo school), and also because he figured that it had a quality of ‘social philosophy’, which could be usually absent in ordinary religions.</P><P> Via this Russell’s Argument of Social reconstruction, Lee Don Hwa critically accepted the so-called ‘Culturalism’, Nationalism and Marxism which were popular at the time, and formed 『Gaebyeok』’s own unique stance of ‘Human Naturism’, ‘Pan-humanistic Nationalism’, and ‘Capitalism with a Human face’. Such efforts continued, and in the 『New Human Philosophy(新人哲學)』 published in 1931, Lee Don Hwa, in discussion of the social reconstruction narrative within the Suwun’s teachings(‘水雲主義’), displayed an opinion which embraced the arguments of both Russell and Marx.</P><P> The lead editors of 『Gaebyeok』 accepted Russell’s Argument of Social reconstruction, and as a result they came to display a non-Marxist criticism of Capitalism. This was a clearly different attitude from that of the Donga Ilbo newspaper, which merely introduced Russell’s Argument of Social reconstruction to the public. Such difference also had very much to do with the difference between 『Gaebyeok』 and 『Donga Ilbo』 in terms of their positions they displayed regarding ‘criticism of the Capitalist civilization’. It is a matter that should be further discussed in the future.</P>

두 교사의 교육과정 재구성 이미지에 의한 2007 개정초등사회과교육과정 실행양상 해석

한광웅 한국사회교과교육학회 2010 사회과교육연구 Vol.17 No.4

Researcher is described in detail two teacher’s 3, 4 grade social studies instruction applied 2007’s revision primary social studies curriculum and is discovered instruction pattern action revision curriculum by analyzed that content. If Pak teacher is tried soundly representation of revision curriculum at instruction, Choi teacher is seen instruction pattern transform revision curriculum. Pak teacher is constructed three activity by the way of correspondense with a textbook structure. This is closely linked with Pak teacher is tried soundly representation of revision curriculum at instruction. But Choi teacher is acted dual decisionmaking instruction strategy use episode by the way of revision, supplement, and replacement with a textbook content. Researcher is interpreted their instruction pattern by two teacher’s curriculum reconstruction image. Pak teacher’s curriculum reconstruction image, ‘curriculum faithfully perform’ and ‘aim at education content standard’ concur in Pak teacher’s instruction pattern. Choi teacher’s curriculum reconstruction image, ‘spacious reconstruction of curriculum’and ‘numberous change at a textbook content’ discord Pak teacher’s instruction pattern. Choi teacher’s curriculum reconstruction image is vague and blurred so this gap. Teacher’s curriculum reconstruction image is result of teacher’s curriculum understanding. This is constantly base for reasoning Choi teacher’s curriculum reconstruction action. Two teacher’s curriculum reconstruction image is closely met autonomy dilemma hold that understand and action curriculum text. This is the source regularly cut out one’s eyes see curriculum reconstruction. 연구자는 2007 개정 초등사회과교육과정을 올해부터 적용한 두 교사의 3, 4학년 사회과수업을 상세히 기술하고, 이렇게 기술한 내용을 분석하여 개정 교육과정을 실행하는 수업패턴을 발견하였다. 박교사가 수업에서 개정 교육과정의 온전한 재현을 도모하였다면, 최교사는 개정 교육과정을 변용하는 수업패턴을 보였다. 박교사는 교과서 구조와 상호조응하는 방식으로 세 가지 활동을 구성하였다. 이것은 박교사가 개정 교육과정의 온전한 재현을 도모하였다는 점과 밀접히 연동한다. 반면, 최교사는 교과서 내용을 수정, 보완, 대체하는 방식으로 에피소드를 활용한 이중적 의사결정 수업전략을 구안하여 실행하였다. 연구자는 이런 수업패턴을 두 교사의 교육과정 재구성 이미지에 의해 해석하였다. ‘교육과정 충실히 수행하기’와 ‘교육내용의 표준 지향’이라는 박교사의 교육과정 재구성 이미지는 개정 교육과정의 온전한 재현을 도모하는 박교사의 수업패턴과 일치하였다. ‘교육과정의 너른 재구성’과 ‘교과서 내용에 많은 변화주기’라는 최교사의 교육과정 재구성 이미지는 개정 교육과정을 변용하는 최교사의 수업패턴과 불일치하였다. 이런 간극만큼 최교사의 교육과정 재구성 이미지는 모호하고 흐릿하였다. 이런 간극은 최교사가 교육과정 재구성에 의한 실행을 끊임없이 사유하는 기반이었다. 두 교사의 교육과정 재구성 이미지는 교육과정텍스트를 이해하고 실행하면서 갖게 된 자율성 딜레마와 밀접히 맞닿아 있었다. 이것은 두 교사가 교육과정 재구성을 바라보는 시선을 일정하게 재단하는 근원이었다.

반려동물 상실 애도와 심리적 성장의 관계: 의미재구성과 긍정적 사회적 반응의 조절된 매개효과

한성아,유성경 한국상담심리학회 2022 한국심리학회지 상담 및 심리치료 Vol.34 No.2

This study investigated the moderated mediating effect of meaning reconstruction and positive social reactions on the relationship between companion animal loss grief and psychological growth or posttraumatic growth. A total of 369 adults, who had lost their companion animals at least six months ago, participated in this study. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire on Prolonged Grief Disorder, Grief and Meaning Reconstruction Inventory, Social Reactions Questionnaire, and Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. SPSS 23.0 and SPSS PROCESS Macro were used to analyze the results. The level of positive social reactions had a different effect on the relationship between prolonged grief and posttraumatic growth as mediated by meaning reconstruction. The results of this study suggest that therapeutic interventions that provide sufficient positive social reactions can be helpful in helping people who are suffering from psychological pain as a result of the loss of companion animal in reconstructing the meaning of loss and achieving psychological growth. 본 연구는 반려동물을 상실한 사람들의 애도와 심리적 성장의 관계에서 애도에 대한 의미재구성의 매개효과가 나타나는지 확인하고, 의미재구성의 매개효과를 긍정적 사회적 반응이 조절하는지 알아보았다. 이를 위해 국내 일반 성인남녀 중 반려동물을 죽음으로 상실한 지 6개월 이상 경과한 369명에게 지속애도, 애도에 대한 의미재구성, 긍정적 사회적 반응, 외상 후 성장에 대한 설문을 실시하고, 수집된 자료로 빈도분석, 의미재구성의 매개효과 검증, 긍정적 사회적 반응의 조절된 매개효과 검증을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 각 변인들 간에 유의한 상관이 있었고, 반려동물 상실로 인한 애도가 의미재구성을 통하여 심리적 성장에 미치는 영향이 긍정적 사회적 반응의 수준에 따라 달라지는 조절된 매개효과가 유의하게 나타났다. 본 연구결과는 반려동물 상실로 인해 심리적 고통을 겪는 사람들로 하여금 상실의 의미를 재구성하고 심리적 성장에 이르도록 조력하기 위해 긍정적 사회적 반응을 충분히 제공하는 치료적 개입이 도움 될 수 있음을 시사한다.

논쟁적 대화 : H.G 웰즈의 근대유토피아론과 조선 사회주의 문예운동

허혜정(Huh, Hye-jung) 한국비평문학회 2017 批評文學 Vol.- No.63

큰 비중으로 드러나지는 않지만, 박영희의 ‘고민기’의 비평이나 김기진의 클라르테 운동에 대한 비평, 조선지식인들의 단편적 언급들은 웰즈와 연관된 조선 사회주의 문예운동의 초기적 토대를 살펴보기 위한 중요한 통로이다. 비록 웰즈의 사회주의 이념에 대한 심도 있는 접근을 한 글은 없다 해도, 사회주의적 이상향을 위해 세계개조를 주장했던 웰즈의 사상은, 그의 과학소설이나 클라르테 운동에 대한 조선문인들의 관심을 매개로 적지 않은 주목을 받았다. 조선문인들은 20년대 소개된 웰즈의 근대유토피아론과 과학소설을 통해 타락한 브르조아 세계의 말로를 성찰하는 계기를 맞았던 것으로 보이는데, 특히 박영희에게 있어 웰즈의 이론은 그의 사회주의 문예이론의 설계에 중요하게 작용한다. 이는 웰즈의 사상적 핵심어들이 박영희의 20년대 평론 뿐 아니라 그의 후기평론 속에서도 줄곧 큰 비중으로 드러나고 있다는 사실에서 뒷받침된다. 박영희는 사회주의로의 사상적 전환을 겪던 ‘고민기’의 비평에서 웰즈가 가담했던 클라르테 운동을 조망했던 흔적들을 적지 않게 내보이고 있다. 아울러 클라르테 진영이 브르조아문학을 공격했던 논리와 유사하게 이광수에 대한 전면적 비판까지 감행했다는 점등을 본고는 주목했다. 김기진 또한 웰즈와 사회주의 노선을 같이 해온 앙리 바르뷔스에 대한 비판적 논평을 통해 클라르테 운동진영의 편협한 계급이해, 폐쇄적이고 과두적인 조직논리, 제국주의에 대한 문제의식이 결여된 혁명론, 목적을 정당화하기 위한 폭력을 비판함으로써 식민지의 현실과는 동떨어진 사회주의 이론을 수정, 보완하고자 했다. 조선의 사회주의자들의 주장과 웰즈의 사회주의의적 주장들이 어긋나는 지점을 명료하게 밝히는 일은 조선 사회주의의 이념적 기반을 밝히기 위해서도 중요한 작업이라 판단된다. 조선 사회주의 문예이론 형성기에 소개된 웰즈의 저작들이 조선 사회주의 문예운동과 관련하여 갖는 의의 또한 여기에 있다. In the big frame, the socialist ideology of Joseon during the Japanese colonial period was borrowed from the West. However, Chosun literary criticized the dangerous ideas that even socialism made as an ideology of imperialism and fascism, such as Park Young-hee and Kim Ki-jin are representative writers. From the data point of view, the traces left by H. G. Wells in the Joseon socialist literary movement are very limited. Although there is no clear discourse on Wells political discourse and science fiction, we can conclude that Wells’s writings had an important meaning in Joseon. For his specialty Park Younghee, Wells" theory plays an important role in the design of his socialist literary theory, and Kim Kijin also deeply worried about the direction of Chosun socialism through critical comments on the Clarte movement which Wells was involved. Skeptic gaze on socialism, which allegedly advocated gradual social transformations, like the Fabian socialists on the surface, but tolerated the radicality of violence and war, is not a socialist debate, but Kim Ki-rim"s keen criticism and so on. The intellectuals of Joseon refer to Wells as a problematic writer because They took a critical attitude toward violent revolutionism that can be tied with fascism or Soviet socialism that could be imperialism, but in reality his political ideology and science fiction I do not think that I have left a deep review on this. However, a critical decipherment of Wells" socialist ideology can be reconstructed through interest in Wells scattered like fragmentation. It is also important to clarify the point of deviation of the socialist claims of Joseon and the socialist claims of Wells that result in the world reconstruction is also an important work for revealing the ideological basis of Korean socialism. Here is also the significance of Wells" works presented in the formation of the Joseon socialist literary theory in relation to the Joseon socialist literary movement.

초등교사에게 사회 교과서란 무엇인가? -세 교사의 사회 교과서 이야기

백선영 한국사회과교육학회 2019 시민교육연구 Vol.51 No.4

This study is a narratives study on the meaning of elementary school social textbooks. The problems with textbook-centered lessons have long been pointed out by researchers. To improve this, the national curriculum has been gradually revised from the 7th curriculum so that teachers' expertise in the curriculum can be realized in the class, but the classes have not changed significantly even now when the 2015 revision was introduced. The local education office also require teachers through training to break away from textbook-centered lessons. Such efforts highlighted the negative aspects of the textbook-centered lessons and emphasized the need for curriculum reconstruction. There is not enough discussion about what textbooks are for teachers. Therefore, I tried to find out the meaning of social textbooks by telling the story of the experiences of elementary school teachers. As a result, three meanings were derived. The meaning of social textbooks was likened to ‘shameful inside clothes’, ‘menu boards rather than recipe books’ and ‘sound words’. There are limits to the generalization of the meaning based on personal experience, but it will help teachers better understand their experiences in social studies textbooks and classes. 본 연구는 초등학교 교사 3인의 내러티브를 통해 사회 교과서의 의미를 탐구하였다. 전통적인 교과서 중심 수업이 우리 교육에 끼치는 문제점들은 오래전부터 지적되어 왔다. 이를 개선하기 위해 제7차 교육과정부터 점차 교사의 교육과정 전문성이 수업에서 실현될 수 있도록 국가 교육과정이 개정되고 있으나, 학교 현장은 2015 개정이 도입된 지금도 크게 변화하지 않고 있다. 시·도 교육청에서도 연수를 통해 교사에게 교과서에 탈피한 수업을 적극적으로 요구하고 있다. 이러한 노력으로 교과서 중심 수업의 부정적인 측면이 부각되고 교육과정 전문성의 필요성이 강조되기는 하였으나, 정작 교사에게 교과서가 무엇인가에 대한 논의는 부족하다. 따라서 초등학교 교사의 이야기를 내러티브 탐구방법을 통해 분석하고, 사회 교과서가 교사들에게 어떤 의미가 있는지 알아보고자 하였다. 그 결과 세 가지 의미를 도출하였다. 초등교사에게 사회 교과서의 의미는 ‘내보이기 부끄러운 빨간 내복’, ‘레시피 북이라기보다는 메뉴판’, ‘교과서라는 동음이의어’로 비유되었다. 개인적인 경험에 근거를 두어 그 의미를 일반화하기 어렵다는 한계가 있으나, 사회 교과서와 수업에 대한 교사들의 생각을 좀 더 생생하게 이해하는 데 도움을 줄 것이다. 이를 바탕으로 향후 교과서 개발에 고려해야 할 점과 지역교육청의 사회 교과교육 지원 방안을 제안하였다.

사별을 경험한 성인의 사회적지지와 탈중심화가 의미재구성을 매개로 지속비애 증상에 미치는 영향: 사별 예측 여부를 중심으로

김영석 ( Youngseok Kim ) 사단법인 아시아문화학술원 2021 인문사회 21 Vol.12 No.1

본 연구에서는 사별을 경험한 성인을 대상으로 사회적지지와 탈중심화가 의미재구성을 매개로 지속비애 증상에 미치는 영향이 사별 예측 여부에 따라 차이가 있는지를 검증하고자 하였다. 301부의 설문을 분석에 활용하였고, 분석방법으로는 PLS 구조방정식 모형을 적용하였다. 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 예기하지 못한 사별 경험자 집단에서는 사회적지지와 지속비애 간의 관계를 의미재구성이 부분매개하고, 예기된 사별 경험자 집단에서는 의미재구성이 완전매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 예기하지 못한 사별 경험자 집단과 예기된 사별 경험자 집단 모두에서 탈중심화와 지속 비애 간의 관계를 의미재구성이 완전매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 사별 경험으로 인한 치료적 개입에서 사별 경험자의 사별 예측 여부에 따라 심리치료 개입 방안 마련에 다른 방략이 필요함을 제시하였다는데 그 의의가 있다. In this study, the purpose of this study was to verify whether the effects of social support and decentering of adults who experienced bereavement on persistent sadness symptoms through semantic reconstruction differ depending on whether bereavement was predicted. Questionnaire 301 was used for the analysis, and the PLS-SEM model was applied as an analysis method. The analysis results are as follows. First, in the unexpected bereavement experience group, meaning reconstruction partially mediated the relationship between social support and prolonged grief symptoms, and in the expected bereavement experience group, meaning reconstruction was completely mediated. Second, in both the unexpected bereavement group and the expected bereavement experience group, the relationship between decentering and prolonged grief symptoms was found to be completely mediated by meaning reconstruction. This study is meaningful in that it suggested that different therapeutic approaches are needed depending on whether or not bereavement is predicted.