항행 및 항법 : A-SMGCS 기능 위험 평가 사례 연구

이홍석 ( Hongseok Lee ),조상훈 ( Sanghoon Jo ),최형석 ( Hyungseok Choi ) 한국항행학회 2016 韓國航行學會論文誌 Vol.20 No.2

안전과 관련된 CNS/ATM 시스템의 개발은 안전 평가 활동을 필요로 한다. 안전 평가에는 기능 위험 평가를 포함하며, 이는 시스템의 위험한 상황을 감소시키기 위한 시스템 안전 요구사항을 도출하는데 영향을 끼친다. 본 논문은 A-SMGCS에 대한 기능 위험 평가에 대한 사례 연구를 수행하였다. 이를 위해 관련연구인 Eurocontrol과 EMMA에서 수행한 연구를 분석하였으며 Eurocontrol 및 EMMA의 기능 위험 평가 체계를 통합하였다. FHA(functional hazard assessment) 범위뿐만 아니라 FHA를 위한 여러 가정 사항들을 인천국제공항에 대해서 정의하였다. 29개의 위험원이 식별되었고, 각각에 대해 심각도가 평가되었다. 그리고 위험원에 대한 노출빈도와 안전 목적이 이벤트 트리 분석 방법을 사용하여 분석되었다. 본 연구 결과와 EMMA의 결과에 대한 차이를 분석하였으며 또한 본 연구에서의 평가 결과에 대해서도 검토 하였다. Safety assessment is necessary to develop safety related CNS/ATM system. It includes functional hazard assessment (FHA), effects eliciting system safety requirement that mitigates system`s hazardous event. This paper performs a case study for functional hazard assessment of A-SMGCS. To do this, related A-SMGCS studies from Eurocontrol and EMMA are surveyed, and assessment schemes of functional hazard from Eurocontrol and EMMA are combined. Not only FHA scope but also several assumptions for FHA are defined for Incheon airport. 29 hazards are identified and their severities are assessed. And exposures and safety objectives from hazards are analyzed using event tree analysis method. Differences between result of this study and result of EMMA are analysed, and assessment results in this study are also reviewed.

항행 및 항법 : A-SMGCS 구현을 위한 위험요소 식별에 대한 연구

홍승범 ( Seung Beom Hong ),최승훈 ( Seung Hoon Choi ),최연철 ( Youn Chul Choi ) 한국항행학회 2015 韓國航行學會論文誌 Vol.19 No.1

최근 국내에서 A-SMGCS (advance surface movement ground control systems) 레벨 Ⅳ 단계를 구현하기 위한 연구가 활발히 진행중에 있다. 전체 A-SMGCS 시스템의 안전을 확보하기 위하여 안전성 평가가 필요하며, 유로컨트롤에서는 A-SMGCS의 안전성 평가를 위하여 기능별 위험요소 평가, 예비시스템 안전성 평가, 그리고 시스템 안전성 평가를 수행하도록 권고하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 기능별 위험요소 평가 방법을 통하여 전체 A-SGMCS의 위험요소를 식별한다. 따라서 A-SMGCS레벨 Ⅳ 시스템에 대하여 29가지 위험 요소를 식별하고 각 위험요소의 심각도를 평가하는 자료로 활용할 것이다. Recently, it is actively under study for the implementation of advance surface movement ground control systems (A-SMGCS) level Ⅳ in Korea. To ensure the safety of the A-SMGCS system needs the safety assessment, and Eurocontrol is encouraged to perform the functional hazard assessment, preliminary system safety assessment, and system safety assessment to the safety assessment of A-SMGCS. In this paper, we identify the hazard of A-SMGCS through a functional hazard assessment. Therefore, we will identify 29 types of hazard for the A-SMGCS level Ⅳ and serve as important data to evaluate the severity of each hazard.

건물의 화재위험성 평가 프로그램(KESA-I)개발

이수경,이상준,김종훈 한국화재소방학회 2002 한국화재소방학회논문지 Vol.16 No.1

건축물의 화재로 인한 인적, 물적 피해를 방지하기 위해서는 먼저 이들 시설, 설비에 존재하는 잠재위험요인을 찾아내고 위험이 얼마나 큰가를 분석하는 위험성 평가가 수행되어야 한다. 본 연구에서는 건물의 화재위험성을 822개의 checklist에 의해 평가하도록 하였으며, 정량적 평가를 위하여 주요 구성요소를 10여개의 대분류로 나누고, 가중치를 부여하여 100점 만점의 점수를 산철하도록 하였다. 건물의 실제평가를 통하여 평가 모델의 적정성을 검토한 결과, 본 모델은 일반 모든 건물에 대하여 평가 적용이 가능하도록 되었다. 또한, checklist에 의한 세투적인 질문기범으로 작성되어 건물의 화재 위험성 평가를 수월하게 수행할 수 있도록 하였다. 따라서 본 평가모델의 제시는 이제까지 국내에서 소방진단을 위한 뚜렷한 평가모델이 마련되지 못한 현 시점에서 방화관리자 등 소방관련자에게 매우 유익한 평가모델이 될 것이다. The hazard assessment in which the potential hazard factors in the buildings are investigated and the scale of the hazard is analysed should be performed first in order to prevent personal and material damages due to building fire. In this study, the building fire hazard are assessed using 822-item checklist, for the qualitative evaluation of which the main factors are classified into 10 items, yielding 100 scale points with some weighting. It is shown that present model is applicable for the assessment model by actual assessment of existing building. Also the checklist is prepared in itemized questionnaire from easy assessment of building fire hazard. Therefore, the present model will be helpful for those working in fire prevention, who are suffering from the lack of manifest evaluation model for the fire prevention assessment so far in Korea.

항행 안전 시스템을 위한 안전 목표 수준 기반 위험 평가 방법론

이홍석 ( Hongseok Lee ),조상훈 ( Sanghoon Jo ) 한국항행학회 2016 韓國航行學會論文誌 Vol.20 No.4

CNS/ATM 분야에서 안전 평가는 시스템을 개발하는데 반드시 필요한 개발 활동이다. 현재까지, 안전 평가와 관련된 많은 참고할 만한 자료들이 있으나 CNS/ATM분야에서 무엇을 어떻게 적용해야 할지 명확하게 명시된 자료는 없다. 또 다른 문제는 DO-278A기반으로 소프트웨어를 개발하기 위해서는 개발하고자 하는 소프트웨어에 대한 소프트웨어 보증 수준이 결정되어 있어야 한다. 하지만 개발 보증 수준을 결정하는 체계도 또한 정의되어 있지 않다. 이와 같은 문제를 해결하기 위해 본 논문에서는 ICAO Doc 9689에 정의된 안전 목표 수준을 기반으로 한 위험 평가를 수행하기 위한 방법을 제시한다. 항행 안전 시스템에서 일반적으로 적용 가능하도록 하기 위해 위험 평가 수행 절차를 수학적으로 표현하였으며 위험 평가를 위해 필요한 위험원의 심각도 분류, 발생 확률, 시스템 안전 목표 수준 등을 정의하고 위험 평가를 수행하기 위해 이벤트 트리 분석 절차를 적용하는 방법을 설명하였다. Safety assessment is an essential activity for developing a system in the CNS/ATM domain. Up to now, there are many reference materials, but there is nothing that definitely specifies what to do and how to apply in the CNS/ATM. Another problem is that software assurance level has to be determined for a software under development. But there is nothing that defines a determination scheme of software assurance level. To solve these problems, this paper proposes a method to conduct a hazard assessment based on target level of safety defined in ICAO Doc 9689. To be applied generally in CNS/ATM domain, it mathematically defines procedures of hazard assessment. And it defines severity classification, probability, and safety objective of a system, which are necessary for hazard assessment, and it describes a method to apply event tree analysis process in order to conduct a hazard assessment.

A new approach to temporal modelling for landslide hazard assessment using an extreme rainfall induced-landslide index

Nedumpallile Vasu, N.,Lee, S.R.,Pradhan, A.M.S.,Kim, Y.T.,Kang, S.H.,Lee, D.H. Elsevier Pub. Co 2016 Engineering geology Vol.215 No.-

An ever-increasing trend of extreme rainfall events in South Korea due to climate change is causing shallow landslides and shallow landslide induced debris flows in the mountains that cover 70% of the total land area of the nation. These catastrophic, gravity-driven processes cost the government several billion won in losses, and attendant fatalities, every year. The most common type of landslide observed is the shallow landslide occurring at 1-3m depth, which may mobilize into a catastrophic debris flow. A landslide early warning system encompassing different scale-based stages is used to predict potential areas for both the landslide types. Current study focusing on the first stage landslide hazard assessment at regional or medium scale requires the development of spatially evolving landslide hazard maps for both types of landslides based on the real-time rainfall. However, lack of complete landslide inventory data motivates the development of temporal and spatial models as independent components of the landslide hazard. Most of the existing temporal assessment schemes traditionally rooted in recurrence-based concepts does not consider soil factors and are not suitable to be incorporated in to the landslide early warning system since real-time rainfall cannot be considered. This motivated the development of a new probabilistic temporal model termed the extreme rainfall-induced landslide index. The probabilistic index was developed in Gangwon Province through a logistic regression using four factors; namely, continuous rainfall, 20-days antecedent rainfall, saturated hydraulic conductivity, and storage capacity. The developed model exhibited high area under the curve (AUC) values of 82% and 91% obtained for the training and validation curves, exhibiting good performance of the statistical index. Also, a high performance susceptibility model (training and validation AUC values of 96% and 94%, respectively) was developed using a logistic regression analysis, for Deokjeok-ri Creek, located in Gangwon province. Assuming the independence of the hazard components, a dynamic hazard index (DHI) was established through a joint probability of both the well validated models. The DHI was used to study the evolution of landslide hazard for the July 2006 extreme rainfall-induced landslide events in Deokjeok-ri Creek.

Risk assessment to human health: Consumer exposure to ingredients in air fresheners

Kim, Joo-Hyon,Lee, Daeyeop,Lim, Hyunwoo,Kim, Taksoo,Suk, Kwangsul,Seo, Jungkwan Elsevier 2018 Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology Vol.98 No.-

<P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>Ingredient chemicals like fragrances may cause adverse health effects. Frequent health risk assessments and stringent management of consumer products are of paramount importance to reduce these serious occurrences. In this study, the respiratory and dermal health effects were assessed in relation to air fresheners. Twenty six fragrance ingredients, thirty four biocidal ingredients, and sixteen hazardous ingredients were analyzed and assessed according to their risk to human health on five groups by application type in eighty two air fresheners. For hazard characterization of ingredients, toxicological information on the intrinsic properties of the ingredients was collected, and reference values were determined as chronic NOAEL. Exposure assessment was performed in two steps. The 95th exposure factor values were used to estimate exposure to assume the worst-case scenario and the maximum concentration determined by the product purpose and application type was used type in tiered 1 assessment. The values input into the exposure algorithms were developed via the exposure route. In the tiered 2 assessment, the 75th exposure factor values were used to estimate the assumed reasonable exposure to ingredients. Six ingredients for the inhalation and twelve ingredients for the dermal route were conducted for tiered 2 assessment. This study showed that the assessed ingredients have no health risks at their maximum concentrations in air fresheners. The approach should be used to establish improved guidelines for specific ingredients that may pose inhalation and dermal hazard.</P> <P><B>Highlights</B></P> <P> <UL> <LI> Twenty six fragrances, thirty four biocides and sixteen hazardous ingredients were identified in eighty two air fresheners. </LI> <LI> Health risk assessments for inhalation and dermal exposure were conducted in two steps, tiered 1and 2. </LI> <LI> Tiered 2 risk assessments were conducted for six ingredients for the inhalation route, and twelve ingredients for the dermal route. </LI> </UL> </P> <P><B>Graphical abstract</B></P> <P>[DISPLAY OMISSION]</P>

A Proposal of Hazard/Risk Assessment Criteria and an Asbestos Management Method for Asbestos-containing Building Materials

Park, Wha-Me,Kim, Yoon-Shin Korean Society of Environmental Health 2012 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.38 No.1

Objectives: The AHERA method by the US EPA, ASTM E2356-04, and HSG264 by the UK HSE, all of which are hazard/risk assessment methods for asbestos-containing building materials, were reviewed and compared based on 231 homogeneous areas. In addition, the current Act on Asbestos Safety Management (enforcement: April 29, 2012) was reviewed and analyzed. This trial provided fundamental data for improving the current asbestos hazard/risk assessment method. Methods: For the hazard/risk assessment of 77 asbestos-containing public buildings including schools, 231 homogeneous areas were selected, each of which was assessed using AHERA, ASTM E2356-04, and HSG264. Results: The matching rate of the hazard/risk assessment stood at 20.4 percent between AHERA and ASTM, at 71.4 percent between AHERA and HSG264 and at 17.8 percent between ASTM and HSG264. The AHERA method includes a seven-category rating scale. There were three categories, two of which have three subcategories. ASTM provides two decision-making charts consisting of ten rating scales for current condition estimation and for potential for disturbance estimation. In addition, the HSG264 method has a total of 20 scores with four items, and then provides four grades. This HSG264 method cannot clearly separate current condition and potential for disturbance. Conclusions: In the Korean Act on Asbestos Safety Management, the hazard/risk assessment method for asbestos-containing building materials should consider balance between current condition estimation and the potential for disturbance estimation.

A Proposal of Hazard/Risk Assessment Criteria and an Asbestos Management Method for Asbestos-containing Building Materials

박화미,김윤신 한국환경보건학회 2012 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.38 No.1

Objectives: The AHERA method by the US EPA, ASTM E2356-04, and HSG264 by the UK HSE, all of which are hazard/risk assessment methods for asbestos-containing building materials, were reviewed and compared based on 231 homogeneous areas. In addition, the current Act on Asbestos Safety Management (enforcement:April 29, 2012) was reviewed and analyzed. This trial provided fundamental data for improving the current asbestos hazard/risk assessment method. Methods: For the hazard/risk assessment of 77 asbestos-containing public buildings including schools, 231homogeneous areas were selected, each of which was assessed using AHERA, ASTM E2356-04, and HSG264. Results: The matching rate of the hazard/risk assessment stood at 20.4 percent between AHERA and ASTM, at 71.4 percent between AHERA and HSG264 and at 17.8 percent between ASTM and HSG264. The AHERA method includes a seven-category rating scale. There were three categories, two of which have three subcategories. ASTM provides two decision-making charts consisting of ten rating scales for current condition estimation and for potential for disturbance estimation. In addition, the HSG264 method has a total of 20 scores with four items, and then provides four grades. This HSG264 method cannot clearly separate current condition and potential for disturbance. Conclusions: In the Korean Act on Asbestos Safety Management, the hazard/risk assessment method for asbestos-containing building materials should consider balance between current condition estimation and the potential for disturbance estimation.

A Proposal of Hazard/Risk Assessment Criteria and an Asbestos Management Method for Asbestos-containing Building Materials

Whame Park,Yoonshin Kim 한국환경보건학회 2012 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.38 No.1

Objectives: The AHERA method by the US EPA, ASTM E2356-04, and HSG264 by the UK HSE, all of which are hazard/risk assessment methods for asbestos-containing building materials, were reviewed and compared based on 231 homogeneous areas. In addition, the current Act on Asbestos Safety Management (enforcement: April 29, 2012) was reviewed and analyzed. This trial provided fundamental data for improving the current asbestos hazard/risk assessment method. Methods: For the hazard/risk assessment of 77 asbestos-containing public buildings including schools, 231 homogeneous areas were selected, each of which was assessed using AHERA, ASTM E2356-04, and HSG264. Results: The matching rate of the hazard/risk assessment stood at 20.4 percent between AHERA and ASTM, at 71.4 percent between AHERA and HSG264 and at 17.8 percent between ASTM and HSG264. The AHERA method includes a seven-category rating scale. There were three categories, two of which have three subcategories. ASTM provides two decision-making charts consisting of ten rating scales for current condition estimation and for potential for disturbance estimation. In addition, the HSG264 method has a total of 20 scores with four items, and then provides four grades. This HSG264 method cannot clearly separate current condition and potential for disturbance. Conclusions: In the Korean Act on Asbestos Safety Management, the hazard/risk assessment method for asbestos-containing building materials should consider balance between current condition estimation and the potential for disturbance estimation.

Monte-Carlo 모의실험을 통한 부분 인구집단별 벤젠 및 PM 10 의노출 및 위해성 평가

박진현(Jinhyeon Park),양소영(So Young Yang):박윤경(Yunkyung Park),류현수(Hyeonsu Ryu),김은채(Eunchae Kim),최영태(Youngtae Choe),허 정(Jung Heo),조만수(Mansu Cho),양원호(Wonho Yang) 한국환경보건학회 2019 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.45 No.3

Objectives: The Korea Ministry of Environment regulates concentrations of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) through Atmosphere Environmental Standards to protect public health from HAPs. However, simply determining the exceedance of HAP concentrations has several limitations and more comprehensive assessment is required. In addition, integrated risk assessment is needed considering exposure in all microenvironments, including outdoor as well as indoor environments. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in risk by sub-population groups according to time-activity patterns and reported concentrations, as well as the lifetime risk for Koreans. Methods: In this study, we calculated time-weighted average exposure concentrations for benzene and PM 10 among preschool-age children, students, housewifes, workers, and the elderly using residential time and concentrations for indoor (house, school or workplace, other), outdoor, and transport by the meta-analysis method. The risk assessments were conducted by excess cancer risk and disease death risk using 1,000,000 Monte-Carlo simulations for probabilistic analysis. Results: Preschool-age children, students, housewifes, workers, and the elderly spent 91.9, 86.0, 79.8, 82.2, and 77.3% of their day in their house, workplace, or school, respectively. The more than 99% excess cancer risk for benzene exceed 1.0E-06 in all sub-populations and lifetime. The acute disease death risk for PM 10 for housewifes and workers for lifetime were 3.35E-04 and 3.18E-04, and chronic disease death risks were 2.84E-03 and 2.70E-03, respectively. Conclusions: The risk of benzene and PM 10 by sub-population group and for the lifetime of housewifes and workers were assessed. Benzene showed risky results for this study. All disease death risks of PM 10 were higher than 1.0E-04 and showed different risks by sub-population. This study can be used as a basis for lifetime exposure and risk assessment to benzene and PM 10 .