http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : feizhi非指 (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
철학부(哲學部) : 선진(先秦)시기 유지(有指)와 무지(無指)의 논전 - 공손룡자(公孫龍子) 지물론(指物論)을 중심으로 -
염정삼 ( Jungsam Yum ) 한국중국학회 2015 中國學報 Vol.71 No.-
The objective of this research is to investigate ancient china’s language theory, ‘Mingxue名學, study on Names’, based on the interpretation of Gongsunlongzi公孫龍子``s linguistic theory. Among relevant studies of Mingxue, Gongsunlongzi is the document that has been most frequently cited in explaining western conceptual theory. Although this idea, that the western logical structure has a certain universality that transcends west and east, is highly debatable, the basic stance of this research is that in order to accurately comprehend Gongsunlongzi, a representative figure among the Mingjias名家of the Xianqin先秦 era, it needs to be done through own understanding of the linguistic structure and expressions of ancient Chinese, as well as the context of Gongsunlongzi. Based on documents of the Xianqin era, the figure that established the theory of zhengming正名can be easily concluded to have been Kongzi孔子. This paper focuses on the influence this zhengming theory would have had on Gongsunlongzi. Therefore this research accommodates in accordance with Hanshu漢書 Yiwenzhi藝文志’s perspective regarding Gonsunlongzi. In other words, it does not exclude the possibility of Mingjias, including Gongsunlongzi, of having been members of the bureaucracy that specialized in Li禮. Particularly in Gongsunlongzi’s Mingshilun名實論(Theory of Names and Things), there are evidences to have theoretically succeeded Kongzi in terms of Li. Therefore we may assume that Gongsunlongzi has never denied the relations of Ming名(name) and Wei位(status). In particular, regarding Gonsunlongzi has refused liangming兩明(disorder) between king and officer君臣, we rather see a close resemblance with Kongzi’s Mingfen名分theory (theory of moral obligations on names). However, the two also show a clear difference: while Kongzi’s Theory of Zhengming is an affirmative approach requiring the father to behave ‘like a father’, Gongsunlongzi’s Mingshilun is a negative approach stating the father, fu父can only be revealed by clarifying the process of establishing feifu非父, ‘what is not father-like’. According to Mingshilun, zhengwei正位(rectification of status) and the strict differentiation of bi彼and feibi非彼can be the bases to mark the beginning of zhengming. Therefore Gongsunlongzi’s Zhiwulun指物論, ‘Theory of pointing things’ was a work that further developed the theory of Mingshilun.
-
先秦시기 有指와 無指의 논전 - 公孫龍子 指物論을 중심으로 -
염정삼 한국중국학회 2015 中國學報 Vol.71 No.-
The objective of this research is to investigate ancient china’s language theory, ‘Mingxue名學, study on Names’, based on the interpretation of Gongsunlongzi公孫龍子's linguistic theory. Among relevant studies of Mingxue, Gongsunlongzi is the document that has been most frequently cited in explaining western conceptual theory. Although this idea, that the western logical structure has a certain universality that transcends west and east, is highly debatable, the basic stance of this research is that in order to accurately comprehend Gongsunlongzi, a representative figure among the Mingjias名家 of the Xianqin先秦 era, it needs to be done through own understanding of the linguistic structure and expressions of ancient Chinese, as well as the context of Gongsunlongzi. Based on documents of the Xianqin era, the figure that established the theory of zhengming正名 can be easily concluded to have been Kongzi孔子. This paper focuses on the influence this zhengming theory would have had on Gongsunlongzi. Therefore this research accommodates in accordance with Hanshu漢書 Yiwenzhi藝文志’s perspective regarding Gonsunlongzi. In other words, it does not exclude the possibility of Mingjias, including Gongsunlongzi, of having been members of the bureaucracy that specialized in Li禮. Particularly in Gongsunlongzi’s Mingshilun名實論(Theory of Names and Things), there are evidences to have theoretically succeeded Kongzi in terms of Li. Therefore we may assume that Gongsunlongzi has never denied the relations of Ming名(name) and Wei位(status). In particular, regarding Gonsunlongzi has refused liangming兩明(disorder) between king and officer君臣, we rather see a close resemblance with Kongzi’s Mingfen名分 theory (theory of moral obligations on names). However, the two also show a clear difference: while Kongzi’s Theory of Zhengming is an affirmative approach requiring the father to behave ‘like a father’, Gongsunlongzi’s Mingshilun is a negative approach stating the father, fu父 can only be revealed by clarifying the process of establishing feifu非父, ‘what is not father-like’. According to Mingshilun, zhengwei正位(rectification of status) and the strict differentiation of bi彼 and feibi非彼 can be the bases to mark the beginning of zhengming. Therefore Gongsunlongzi’s Zhiwulun指物論, ‘Theory of pointing things’ was a work that further developed the theory of Mingshilun.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
