산업안전보건분야에서 인간공학 전문가의 역할에 관한 연구

한강진(Kang-Jin Han),박동현(Dong-Hyun Park),최서연(Seo-Yeon Choi) 한국컴퓨터정보학회 2021 韓國컴퓨터情報學會論文誌 Vol.26 No.8

본 논문은 인간공학 전문가를 활용하여 보다 나은 안전보건 환경을 조성하여 산업재해예방을 하고자 한다. 본 논문에서 사용한 데이터는, 산업안전보건연구원에서 조사한 산업안전보건동향조사를 사용하였으며 분석 데이터 수는 2,084개이다. 결론은 다음과 같다. 1. 설문조사 중 22.9%만이 인간공학 전문가를 활용하고 있었다. 다른 사업장의 경우 인간공학에 대한 이해도와 접근이 부족하여 활용하지 않는 것으로 사료된다. 2. 산업현장에서 인간공학 전문가는 작업절차서(94.8%), 모니터링 지침(85.5%), 위험요소 근로자에 정보제공(95.8%), 위험요소 교육실시(96.6%), 기타 예방조치(94.1%)를 체계적으로 관리하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 3. 인간공학 전문가를 활용하는 기업은 활용하지 않는 기업에 비해 안전보건 의사소통은 2.391배(1.949-2.932) 잘 이루어지고 있으며, 안전보건문화는 2.128배(1.786-2.537) 안정적으로 정착되어 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과, 산업현장의 안전보건 분야에서 인간공학 전문가의 활용이 유의미함을 증명해 낼 수 있었다. In this paper, effects on industrial accident prevention based on better safety and health environment by utilizing ergonomics expert were studied. This study was mainly based on the data from ‘the survey for occupational safety and health trend’ conducted by Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. The number of industries participated in the survey was 2,084. Main results of the study were as follows; 1) Only 22.9% of the industries participated in the survey utilized ergonomics expert. The rest of the industries have never had an ergonomics expert due to the reasons such as lack of knowledge for the field of ergonomics, etc. 2) Specific activities done by the industries with ergonomics expert in order to have better safety & health were ‘providing work orders’(94.8%), ‘providing monitoring guidelines’(85.5%), ‘providing information for dangerous work’(95.8%), ‘providing safety education’(96.6%), and ‘other safety management’(94.1%). 3) When the odds ratio for the levels of communication and the levels of environmental stability regarding safety & health for the different groups(with experts and without experts), it was found that the group with ergonomics experts had a significant higher ORs(2.391, 95% confidence interval(1.949-2.932) and 2.128, 95% confidence interval(1.786-2.537)) respectively than those of the industries without ergonomics expert. The results suggested that ergonomics expert has been unique in most of time in terms of his/her contributions in the field of industrial safety and health.

일반 논문 : 인터넷 언어의 국어교육 내용 연구 -전문가 델파이 조사를 중심으로-

윤여탁 ( Yeo Taek Yoon ),송여주 ( Yeo Ju Song ),정지민 ( Ji Min Jung ),김진진 ( Jin Jin Kim ) 한국어교육학회(구-한국국어교육연구학회) 2010 국어교육 Vol.0 No.133

This study is applicable to the phase 2 of `A Study on Status of Internet Language Use in School Education and Improvement Plan` as implemented from November 2008 ~ October 2010. As being undertaken in a total of 3 phases, this study has the first phase in finding out the status through survey of Internet language use and the second phase in contemplation of education contents through the survey on experts. The third phase of the study is planned to implement for verification of the improvement plan through the on-site studies. On this article, the expert Delphi survey was implemented for the study of education contents of the Internet language. The expert Delphi survey is to extract the opinion and determination of expert group on the research issue to clarify with the group determination as a way of research and this is a useful method to plan several fields of programs including education. The categories surveyed through the expert Delphi survey were defining concept of Internet language, direction of education, content elements in Korean language education, and evaluation and current tasks on the present Internet language education. The Internet language was defined as `language and signs in integrated form as communicated on Internet and became a medium of implicated action`, and as the direction for the Internet language education, the focus was on appropriate language education to fit into the context, rather than the education on grammatical norms. In the meantime, the trend was shown to value the understanding of education rather than the expression of education in the Internet language, but there is an opinion that the education has to advance from understanding to expression along the hierarchy of learner. In addition, for the contents factors of the Internet language education, importance has been presented in the sequence of critical reading on the text, knowledge on the Internet communication structure, knowledge on the Internet language, participatory writing for social communication and sequence of communication ethics of the Internet language. With respect to the currently implementing Internet language education, a number of experts evaluated that the systematic education contents and method have lacked with the general insufficiency in Korean language education theories, education process, contents of teaching material, evaluation criteria and the like. For the current issues of the Internet language education, there are characteristics of the Internet communication method shown after Web 2.0, characteristics of language culture, characteristics of the Internet communities and issue of establishing the identity, study on production of Internet language and production and acceptance.

의약품 광고심의 기준 및 절차 개선을 위한 전문가 의견 조사

김지현(Jihyun Kim), 조우연(Wooyeon Cho), 신성환(Seonghwan Shin), 박지우(Jeewoo Park), 김주경(Ju Kyoung Kim), 정재훈(Jae-Hoon Cheong), 전하림(Ha-Lim Jeon) 한국보건사회약료경영학회 2023 한국보건사회약료경영학회지 Vol.11 No.1

BACKGROUNDS Since the number of drug advertisements is increasing due to the expansion of advertising markets and the emergence of a new type of advertisement, it is important to review drug advertisements accurately and efficiently. OBJECTIVE We aim to gather and analyze the expert’s opinions regarding the criteria and procedures of drug advertisement review. METHODS Survey questionnaire was sent to 42 members of the drug advertisement review committee. The questionnaire included the key principle of drug advertisement review, the importance of prohibition by type of advertisement, the necessity of permitting by type of advertisement, and questions about current procedures of drug advertisement review. RESULTS In total, 23 of 42 members participated (54.7% response rate). Survey results showed that the ‘Proper expression of efficacy and effectiveness’ and ‘Fair competition among drugs’ were important principles. Prohibition of ‘False advertisements’ and ‘Advertisements that distort facts’ were considered important. The degree of agreement in the need for permission was relatively low, but it was considered relatively necessary to allow ‘Advertisements that present drugs which have been recognized for safe use, such as vitamins.’ All respondents agreed that the number of drug advertisement reviews was high. Approximately 70% of respondents answered that current review fees are not adequate. CONCLUSION This study shows the degree of consensus of experts and provides evidence for further amendment on criteria and procedures of drug advertisement review.

의약품 급여기준 외 사용에 대한 본인부담 경감방안 도입 타당성에 대한 전문가 의견 조사 결과

김동숙 ( Kim Dong Sook ),전하림 ( Jeon Ha Rim ),김병수 ( Kim Seong-ok ),김성옥 한국보건경제정책학회 2017 보건경제와 정책연구 Vol.23 No.2

Background and Objective: The selective benefit, introduced in June 2013, is a new copayment system to cover 50~80% of expenditures of pharmaceuticals which are not essential but with social demand. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of introducing a selective benefit by conducting an expert opinion survey. Method: Expert opinion surveys were conducted from May 4, 2015 to May 17, 2015. We distributed questionnaire to members of the Health and Medical Technology Evaluation Society, members of the Health, Social and Pharmacy Management Association, citizen group and member of patient group. As a result, 30 responded(response rate 23.1%). The questionnaire was based on the assumption that the four types of severe disease drug selective benefit introduction, and the opinions on the measures to reduce the burden on the user based on the criteria, application method. Results: Of the 30 respondents, 56.7% of the total respondents represented neutral opinion on introduction of drug selective benefits, 30% agreed with the introduction of selective benefits, and 13.3% disagreed. The evaluation items should be related to clinical utility, cost of medication, social needs. As for alternative plan to reduce patients` financial burden, 38.9% of respondents answered it is needed to strengthen upper limit for copayment, another 38.9% of respondents answered it is needed patient-based special fund, and 19.4% of respondents answered it is not necessary to introduce another support. Conclusion: To increase the coverage rate of the health insurance, it is more adequate to expand financial support on the basis of patients` level rather than introducing drug selective benefit scheme.

전통의학 정보포털 활성화를 위한 한의전문가 의견분석에 관한 연구

예상준(Sangjun Yea),장현철(Hyunchul Jang),김상균(Sangkyun Kim),김진현(Jinhyun Kim),김철(Chul Kim),김익태(Iktae Kim),장윤지(Yunji Jang),김창석(Changseok Kim),송미영(Miyoung Song) 한국한의학연구원 2011 한국한의학연구원논문집 Vol.17 No.1

We surveyed attendee at TKM Information Common Application Committee who are the chairman of TKM journals, the dean of oriental medicine colleges and the head of oriental medicine institutes. We analyzed the survey results to activate OASIS and to more utilize OASIS in TKM research. From the analysis, the experts predict that TKM literature information and combined search connected to internal/external TM database are most applicable to OASIS. If the contents and functions are provided in OASIS, experts said that they will use more 2.2 times than now. We drew the future plan of OASIS from the 2 survey analysis which are conducted by OASIS users and TKM experts. It is made up 6 kinds of strategies such as core business model, data, meta-data and etc. Because this study has surveyed the TKM authoritative experts for the future plan of OASIS, it is significant study to get objective indices.

기업의 IFRS 적용 주석공시 사례에 대한 재무전문가의 반응

고완석 ( Wan Suk Ko ) 한국회계학회 2017 회계저널 Vol.26 No.1

IFRS`s (International Financial Reporting Standards) requirements for extensive note disclosure have been recognized as possibly posing a significant challenge for the auditors and users, as welll as the preparers, of the financial statements prepared according to IFRS. Concerns have been raised as to whether the costs to fulfill these requirements pay off, including their possibly producing disclosure overload. This paper investigates the views of financial experts (users, preparers and auditors of financial statements) on whether firms properly identify and understand voluminous note disclosure contents and provide information in the relevant form and substance. It examines note disclosure practices as reported in the K-IFRS financial statements (prepared in accordance with IFRS adopted in Korea) and conducts a survey of financial experts` opinions about the adequacy focusing on the sufficiency and usefulness of the note disclosure in the K-IFRS financial statements. The survey results revealed that the concerns about overload of the IFRS disclosure requirements seem to be exaggerated and anecdotal, but that there is a need to improve some disclosure requirements related to the case disclosures. A majority of the respondents preferred clear and condensed presentation of necessary information without a simple collection of too many detailed items and wanted proper separation of figures and assumptions based on their function for better understanding or analyses.

Questionnaire Survey on the Risk Perception in the Istanbul Strait

Volkan Aydogdu,Cemil Yurtoren,Serdar Kum,박진수 한국항해항만학회 2010 한국항해항만학회지 Vol.34 No.7

There are enormous challenges in the Istanbul Strait- one of the most important, congested and narrow waterways in the world – from the view point of risk determination and risk mitigation for the local traffic. Previously several traffic parameters such as; traffic volume for local vessels, traffic flow and potential encounters of local traffic, in addition to the possibility of collision, were investigated in order to determine the degree of dangers in the southern entrance of the Istanbul Strait. Furthermore, risky zones were also determined in this waterway. On the basis of the results of those, a group of expert was surveyed. These experts were pilots, Vessel Traffic Services Operators (VTS-O), Local Traffic Vessel Captains and Master Mariners who had several experience of navigation through the Istanbul Strait. In order to assess experts perceptions of danger and to propose further studies based on this survey. The questionnaire was analyzed by using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) program version 13.0. Finally, some differences and/or shares on risk perceptions of expert in the Istanbul Strait are considered

Questionnaire Survey on the Risk Perception in the Istanbul Strait

Aydogdu, Y. Volkan,Yurtoren, Cemil,Kum, Serdar,Park, Jin-Soo Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research 2010 한국항해항만학회지 Vol.34 No.7

There are enormous challenges in the Istanbul Strait- one of the most important, congested and narrow waterways in the world - from the view point of risk determination and risk mitigation for the local traffic. Previously several traffic parameters such as; traffic volume for local vessels, traffic flow and potential encounters of local traffic, in addition to the possibility of collision, were investigated in order to determine the degree of dangers in the southern entrance of the Istanbul Strait. Furthermore, risky zones were also determined in this waterway. On the basis of the results of those, a group of expert was surveyed. These experts were pilots, Vessel Traffic Services Operators (VTS-O), Local Traffic Vessel Captains and Master Mariners who had several experience of navigation through the Istanbul Strait. In order to assess experts perceptions of danger and to propose further studies based on this survey. The questionnaire was analyzed by using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) program version 13.0. Finally, some differences and/or shares on risk perceptions of expert in the Istanbul Strait are considered.

큰산개구리(Rana uenoi ) 종분포모형을 활용한 시민과학 및 전문가 기반 조사자료의 비교연구

이원철,유정우,노백호 한국환경과학회 2023 한국환경과학회지 Vol.32 No.6

Quantitative habitat model is established with species occurrence and spatial abundance data, which were usually acquired by professional field ecologists and citizen scientists. The importance of citizen science data is increasing, but the quality of these data needs to be evaluated. This study aims to identify and compare both expert-based data and citizen science data based on the performance power of quantitative models derived from both data sets. A Maximum Entropy (MaxENT) model was developed using eight environmental variables, including climate, topography, landcover and distance to forest edge. The AUC values derived from the MaxENT model were 0.842 and 0.809, respectively, indicating a high level of explanatory power. All environmental variables has similar values for both data sets, except for the distance to forest edge and rice paddy, which was relatively higher for expert-based survey data than that of the citizen science data as the distances increased. This result suggests that habitat model derived from expert-based survey data shows more ecological niche including wider ranges from forest edges and isolated habitat patches of rice paddy. This is presumably because citizen scientists focuses on direct observation methods, whereas professional field surveys investigate a wider variety of methods.

Residents’ and experts’ perspectives for evaluation of importance of Health Performance Indicators in social housings

Kang, Na Na,Lee, Tae Kyung,Kim, Jeong Tai,Kim, Chi Gyo SAGE Publications 2014 Indoor and Built Environment Vol.23 No.1

<P>This study evaluates the health performance of high-density, high-rise public housing in Korea to seek ways to improve their performance for the health and wellbeing of occupants. To do this, the existing ‘Health Performance Indicator for the Public Housing’ developed by a previous study in 2010 was utilized to compare and analyse the characteristic differences as evaluated by experts and the residents. The survey tool was developed to allow evaluation by the experts using pairwise comparison between components; while the residents were asked to evaluate the relative importance of the components in the survey tool. Furthermore, Analytic Hierarchy Process was applied to the evaluation given by experts and PASW statistical package was used to analyse the survey results given by the residents. The results showed that the residents do have a high awareness of the impacts of the various components in their apartments that could be seen visually, revealing a partial difference in their awareness in comparison to that given by the experts. It is therefore necessary to utilize this understanding of the experts and residents in order to meet the actual demands of the residents in accordance with their awareness. It is expected that the evaluation results of this study would be used in the construction plan of new apartments to promote healthy housing and to incorporate not just the experts’ view but also the demand of the residents.</P>