http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : Ancient Official Document and Philosophers (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
楊兆貴 ( Yang¸ Zhao Gui ),趙殷尙 ( Cho¸ Eun Sang ) 한국중국학회 2021 중국학보 Vol.97 No.-
錢穆對秦漢史、漢代經學研究飮譽學林, 影響很大。他這兩方面的論著大多已逾半世紀, 在出土文獻日益增多、研究方法多元化等學風下, 他的論著有哪些價值?對當代相關研究有什麼影響?筆者結合他這兩方面的研究, 聚焦他的漢代『春秋』學, 以見他治學、見解之一斑。 要探討他對漢代『春秋』學的看法, 則先簡介他對『春秋』及三傳的看法。他與傳統主張孔子作『春秋』的看法相同, 並從史學肯定『春秋』、『左傳』的史學價值。他認為漢代經學今古文之別是王官學與百家言之殊, 而非文字古今之異。這是他論漢代經今古文最具特色的部分。他撰『孔子與春秋』一文, 著重闡釋『公羊』學的精神, 強調孔子『春秋』以百家言而成為新的王官學。他在不同時期對『公羊』學與董仲舒的評價不同。他認為漢儒多通古今, 因此治『春秋』者多能兼採三傳或兩傳之義、說。他又指出, 『春秋』學與漢代思想尤其是災異說、禪讓說、禮制說有密切的關係。 Prof. Qian Mu has a great influence on the honorary scholars of Qin and Han history and Han dynasty studies. Most of his works in these two areas have been over half a century. With the increasing number of unearthed documents and diversified research methods, what is the value of his works? And what is the impact on contemporary related research? This essay combines his research in these two areas and focuses on his study of Chun Qiu in the Han Dynasty, so as to see his academic research methods and insights. To explore his views on the study of Chun Qiu in the Han Dynasty, the first part of the essay introduces his views on Chun Qiu and the three ‘Zhuan’. He is the same as the traditional view that Confucius wrote Chun Qiu, and affirmed the historical value of Chun Qiu and Zuo Zhuan from his historiography. He believes that the difference between modern and ancient literatures in Han dynasty is the difference between Ancient Official Document and Philosophers, rather than the difference between ancient and modern writing. He wrote the article Confucius and Chun Qiu, focusing on explaining the spirit of school of Gong Yang, emphasizing that Confucius' Chun Qiu became a new official ideology with the philosophical thought in Han China. He had different evaluations of Gong Yang and Dong Zhongshu in different periods. He believes that the Han scholars are mostly integrated with the ancient and modern literatures, so most of them who studied Chun Qiu can adopt the meaning and theories of the three or two ‘Zhuan’ at the same time. He also pointed out that the study of Chun Qiu has a close relationship with the thoughts of the Han Dynasty, especially the theory of catastrophe, concession, and etiquette.
-
이향배(Lee, Hyang-bae) 충남대학교 충청문화연구소 2018 충청문화연구 Vol.21 No.-
충암 김정은기묘제현 중 도학 뿐만 아니라 문학 방면에도 뛰어난 작가이다. 문학에 대한 관심이 높은 그는 당시를 추구하고 진한고문을 익혔다. 그는 육경의 도학을 기본으로 하여 양웅과 한유의 박학을 추구하고 사마천과 반고의 기이한 문장을 본받았다. 뿐만 아니라 노장사상까지 섭렵하여 고상하고 포용하며 심원하고 정미한 문장을 추구하였다. 그의 산문은 크게 세 가지 특질이 있었다. 첫째는 풍격이 전아엄중하며 의고적 글쓰기이다. 글은 문체가 엄중하고 사리가 분명하였다. 경전을 비롯하여 史書에서 전고를 인용하여 자신의 논리 전개를 보완하여 전아한 문체를 형성했다. 서경의 문체를 본받아 의고적 글쓰기도 시도하였다. 이는 그가 진한고문가적 특질을 잘 보여준다 둘째는 도학적 논리를 웅건한 필치로 서술한 점이다. 김정은 호방한 상상력을 통해 태초의 모습을 논리적으로 서술했으며, 형기론에 입각하여 조화의 세계를 웅건하게 서술하였다. 이러한 도학적 글쓰기는 김정의 학문적 관심이 얼마나 깊고 넓었는지를 잘 보여준다. 셋째 김정의 산문에는 의론과 직서가 다양한 방식으로 구성된 점이다. 의론과 직서, 직서와 의론, 한 문단 내 직서와 의론의 교차, 한 문장 내 직서와 의문형 의론 등의 방식이 구성되어 있다. 이는 그가 의론과 직서의 묘합을 통해 다양한 방식으로 산문을 창작한 사실을 말해준다. 이상과 같은 김정의 산문에는 서경 및 진한고문의 문체적 특징과 호방한 도학가 상상력이 결부되어 자신만의 산문세계를 이루고 있었다. 그의 산문은 조선 전기 성리학적 사고에 기반한 일반적 산문 글쓰기에서 진한 산문을 전범으로 삼아 고문적 글쓰기로 문풍이 전환되는데 있어서 과도기적 면모를 보여주고 있다. Chung-am Kim Jeong is a distinguished writer in the fields of moral philosophy and literature also in a scholar group in the year of Gimyo. He who was highly interested in literature pursued poems of Dang Dynasty and learned ancient literary works inChineseJinandHandynastie s.He not only sought profound knowledge of Yang-wung and Han-yoo but followed extraordinary sentences of Samacheon and Ban-go based on the moral philosophy written in Yukgyeong also. He, in addition, searched for noble, comprehensive, profound and specific sentence by widely reading theories of Lao-tzu and Chuang-tzu. There were generally three features in his prose. Firstly, his style of writing is archaistic with elegance and strictness. His proses had sternness and clearly made sense. He formed a refined style while complementing in developing his theory by quoting authentic precedent from Chinese Confucian text as well as scripture. He, also, tried archaistic writing following the style of Seogyeong. This shows his characteristic of ancientliteraturein Chinese Jin and Han dynasties. Secondly, he developed his theory of moral philosophy in vigorous style. Kim Jeong logically described beginning state of the world through his broad imagination and vigorously wrote the world of harmony. He sturdily described harmonious world based on Hyunggiron. This ethical writing proves the profoundness and wideness of Kim Jeong"s academic interest. Thirdly, his proses are consisted of argument and direct description in various ways. They are constructed with discussion and direct statement, and vice versa. Also, there are intersection between direct description and argument in one paragraph, and method of mixing direct statement and argument as questions in one sentence. This proves the fact that he wrote proses by tactfully mixing argument and direct statement in various ways. Therefore, Kim Jeong created his own world of literature where his writing style of Seogyeong and ancient literary works in Chinese Jin and Han dynasties was linked to his broad moralistic imagination. His proses show a transitional aspect from general prose style based on Neo-Confuciastic thought in early period of Joseon dynasty into archaistic one following proses in Chinese Jin and Han dynasties.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
