http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Takuya Misugi,Takashi Juri,Koichi Suehiro,Kohei Kitada,Yasushi Kurihara,Mie Tahara,Akihiro Hamuro,Akemi Nakano,Masayasu Koyama,Takasi Mori,Daisuke Tachibana 대한산부인과학회 2022 Obstetrics & Gynecology Science Vol.65 No.4
ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the accuracy and precision of continuous, non-invasive blood pressure obtained usingthe ClearSight system by comparing it with invasive arterial blood pressure, and to assess the hemodynamic changesusing invasive methods and the ClearSight system in patients undergoing cesarean section. MethodsArterial pressure was measured invasively with an intra-arterial catheter and non-invasively using the ClearSightsystem during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa or placenta accreta. Blood pressure measurementsobtained using these two means were then compared. ResultsTotal 1,277 blood pressure measurement pairs were collected from 21 patients. Under Bland-Altman analysis, theClearSight system demonstrated an acceptable accuracy with a bias and standard deviation of 8.8±13.4 mmHg forsystolic blood pressure, -6.3±7.1 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and -2.7±8.0 mmHg for median blood pressure. Cardiac index levels were significantly elevated during fetal delivery and 5 minutes after placental removal, andsystemic vascular resistance index levels were significantly decreased during fetal delivery and 40 minutes afterplacental removal. ConclusionIn patients undergoing cesarean section, the ClearSight system showed excellent accuracy and precision compared tothat of the currently used invasive monitoring system. 영어