http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이주한(Joohan Lee) 한국철학회 2019 철학 Vol.- No.138
인식적 의무는 전통적으로 믿음에 귀속되는 의무로 이해되어 왔다. 그리고 인식적 의무의 이 특징은 인식적 의무를 다른 종류의 의무들과 구분되게 하는, 그리고 더 나아가 다른 종류의 의무들과 통약 불가능하게 하는 주된 요인의 하나로 간주되어 왔다. 그러나 인식적 의무의 믿음 귀속에 대한 최근의 비판적 논의는 인식적 의무의 독특한 지위에 대해 근본적인 물음을 던지게 한다. 이러한 맥락에서 본 논문은 인식적 의무가 고유한 종류의 의무인지 아니면 다른 종류의 의무들과 통약 가능한 의무인지 논의를 진행한다. 이를 위해 우선, 인식적 의무의 행위 귀속성을 주장하는 이주한의 견해를 간략히 살펴보고, 그러한 견해 하에서 인식적 의무의 고유성이 어떻게 옹호될 수 있는지 주요 논증을 구체적으로 검토한다. 이 논의를 통해, 실천적 이유 구분 가능성에 기대는 고유성 논증과 인식적 이유 내재성에 기대는 고유성 논증 각각의 중심 생각과 그 문제점들이 드러날 것이다. 그리고 무엇보다, 인식적 의무는 단순히 고유한 종류의 의무가 아닐뿐더러, 도덕적, 타산적, 미학적 의무 등 다양한 종류의 실천적 의무들과 통약 가능하다는 점이 적극적으로 논의될 것이다. Epistemic duty is traditionally understood as pertaining to belief. And this feature is taken as one of main reasons to think that epistemic duty is distinct from and also incommensurable with other kinds of duties. A recent criticism against the thought that epistemic duty pertains to belief, however, prompts one to question the unique status of epistemic duty. In this context, this article discusses whether epistemic duty is of its own kind or commensurable with other kinds of duties. To begin, it reviews the recent discussion of Joohan Lee’s, which argues that epistemic duty pertains to act. And then, in light of this, it addresses mains arguments for the view that epistemic duty is of its own kind. From the discussion it will be revealed that the argument relying on intrinsicality of epistemic reason as well as the one relying on distinguishability of practical reasons will not stand the objections against them. And, more positively, it will be shown that not only is epistemic duty not of its own but commensurable with various kinds of duties such as moral, prudential, aesthetic, etc. ones.
트위터 이용자 특성에 관한 연구: 싸이월드, 페이스북을 비교 대상으로 : SNS 이용 정도와 대인관계관련, 사회적이슈관련, 매체관련 변인과의 관계 분석
이기석(Giseok Lee),이은혜(Eunhey Lee),곽경란(Kyeongran Kwak),박지윤(Jiyoon Park),제래미(Rai Mee Je),김주환(Joohan Kim) 한국HCI학회 2011 한국HCI학회 학술대회 Vol.2011 No.1
본 연구에서는 싸이월드를 비롯한 타 SNS와 비교를 통해, 트위터 이용자 특성을 분석하는 데 목표를 두었다. 타 SNS 이용자 집단에 비해 트위터 이용자 집단과 매체 관련, 대인관계 관련, 사회적 이슈 관련 변인들간의 관계가 다르게 나타날 것을 가정하고, 설문조사를 통해 변인들의 통계적인 차이를 알아보고자 했다. 김주환의 커뮤니케이션 능력 척도, Caprara의 정치효능감 분석 척도, Katz의 리더십 척도 문항을 기초로 설문을 실행, 이용정도와의 상관관계분석과 희귀분석을 통해 검증했다. 연구 결과, 각 SNS 별로 이용행태와 변인간의 상이한 상관관계가 발견되었으며, 싸이월드 사용자들이 대인관계 관련 변인에 많은 영향을 받는 데에 비해 트위터 사용자들은 정치관련 변인과 매체관련 변인의 영향을 많이 받고 있음이 나타났다. The purpose of this study is to analyse twitter users' characteristic by comparing them of other SNS users such as cyworld, facebook. Compared to other SNS user group, we assumed that twitter user group is categorized differently by media-related variables, relationship-related variables, social issue-related variables. Survey is conducted to prove statistical differences. Survey is made based on Kim Joohan's communication competence scale, Caprara's political efficacy scale and Katz's leadership scale. Correlation and regression analysis is conducted to prove statistical significance. As a result of analysis, there is a significant difference in correlational analysis between each SNS user group, and twitter users are affected by social issue-related and media-related variables, while cyworld users by relationship-related variables.
Sooah Jang,In-Young Kim,Sun-Woo Choi,Anna Lee,Ju-Yeal Lee,Hyunkyung Shin,Junwoo Lee,Mikyeong Lee,Kyoung-Ryul Lee,Saeeun Jung,Jin Sun Ryu,Jihee Oh,Manjae Kwon,Joohan Kim,Ryunsup Ahn,Young-Chul Jung,Jeo 대한신경정신의학회 2024 PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION Vol.21 No.3
Objective This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of Minds.NAVI, a depression screening kit combining psychometric measures and stress hormone biomarkers, in a prospective clinical trial. The objective was to assess its potential as a depression screening tool and investigate the associations between psychological assessments, salivary hormone staging, and depression severity.Methods Thirty-five participants with major depressive disorder and 12 healthy controls (HCs) were included. The Minds.NAVI software, utilizing the PROtective and Vulnerable factors battEry Test (PROVE) and salivary cortisol/dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) analysis, was employed. The PROVE test is a comprehensive self-report questionnaire that assesses depressive symptoms, suicide risk, attachment style, adverse childhood experiences, mentalization capacity, and resilience. In addition, salivary cortisol and DHEA levels were measured to evaluate the functional stage of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis.Results Minds.NAVI exhibited 100% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity, and 97.9% accuracy in distinguishing depression from HCs within an exploratory small group. Salivary stress hormone phases showed changes with depression stage (p=0.030), and the proportion of patients with “adrenal exhaustion stage” was higher in the moderate/severe depression group (p=0.038). Protective/vulnerable factors differed significantly between controls and depressed groups (p<0.001). Cortisol awakening response inversely correlated with depressive symptom severity (r=-0.31, p=0.034).Conclusion This study suggested possible clinical effectiveness of Minds.NAVI, a depression screening tool that integrates psychometric measures and stress hormone biomarkers. The findings support the potential association between depression, chronic stress, and HPA axis hyporesponsiveness.
Simulation of a tidewater glacier evolution in Marian Cove, King George Island, Antarctica
Joohan Lee,진영근,Jong Kuk Hong,유현재,Howoong Shon 한국지질과학협의회 2008 Geosciences Journal Vol.12 No.1
Glacier changes in Marian Cove, King GeorgeIsland (KGI) were investigated on the basis of observed and mod-eled data. Air temperature observations for the past 51 yearsrecorded at the Russian Bellingshausen Station (BS) and aerialphotographs provided adequate proofs of glacier retreat andyearly variant mas balance were performed to evaluate the gla-cier advance and retreat history. Then the models were validatedby observed data. The results indicate that the mas balance of 0.6m a-1 is a threshold point determining glacier advance or retreat inMarian Cove. The glacier changes are mainly affected by the icethickness at the terminus and the local mass balance. The massbalance also affects glacier displacement in subsequent years.present warming trend.