http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Development of Mental Health Indicators in Korea
Hyeree Han,안동현,송진희,Tae Yeon Hwang,노성원 대한신경정신의학회 2012 PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION Vol.9 No.4
Objective Promoting mental health and preventing mental health problems are important tasks for international organizations and nations. Such goals entail the establishment of active information networks and effective systems and indicators to assess the mental health of populations. This being said, there is a need in Korea develop ways to measure the state of mental health in Korea. Methods This paper reviews the mental health indicator development policies and practices of seven organizations, countries, and regions:WHO, OECD, EU, United States, Australia, UK, and Scotland. Using Delphi method, we conducted two surveys of mental health indicators for experts in the field of mental health. The survey questionnaire included 5 domains: mental health status, mental health factor, mental health system, mental health service, and quality of mental health services. We considered 124 potential mental health indicators out of more than 600 from indicators of international organizations and foreign countries. ResultsaaWe obtained the top 30 mental health indicators from the surveys. Among them, 10 indicators belong to the mental health system. The most important five mental health indicators are suicide rate, rate of increase in mental disorder treatment, burden caused by mental disorders, adequacy of identifying problems of mental health projects and deriving solutions, and annual prevalence of mental disorders. Conclusion Our study provides information about the process for indicator development and the use of survey results to measure the mental health status of the Korean population. The aim of mental health indicator development is to improve the mental health system by better grasping the current situation. We suggest these mental health indicators can monitor progress in efforts to implement reform policies, provide community services, and involve users, families and other stakeholders in mental health promotion, prevention, care and rehabilitation.
발성 사고법을 이용한 예비 화학 교사의 지필평가 문항 제작 과정의 특징 분석
노태희 ( Taehee Noh ),김혜리 ( Hyeree Kim ),한재영 ( Jaeyoung Han ),강훈식 ( Hunsik Kang ) 한국과학교육학회 2017 한국과학교육학회지 Vol.37 No.2
이 연구에서는 예비 화학 교사가 개별적으로 지필평가 문항을 제작하는 과정의 특징을 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 8명의 예비 화학 교사가 기체 법칙에 대한 6개의 지필평가 문항을 제작하는 발성 사고 과정과 개별 심층 면담 전사본을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 예비교사들은 지필평가 문항 제작 과정에서 문항 제작 계획 단계의 체계성 부족, 수업과 평가의 상호관련성에 대한 인식 및 고려 부족, 문항 유형 결정 기준의 다양성, 문항의 행동 영역과 난이도 판별 곤란, 교사용 지도서 활용의 제한성과 교사용 지도서에 대한 오해, 검토 관점과 내용의 제한성 및 검토시기에 따른 차이점 등의 6가지 특징을 보였다. 이는 예비교사의 지필평가 문항 제작 능력을 향상시키는 방안을 모색하는 데 의미 있는 시사점을 제공할 수 있다. In this study, we investigated the characteristics of the individual processes of pre-service chemistry teachers in making written test items. For this, we analyzed the think-aloud processes of eight pre-service chemistry teachers while making six written test items about gas laws and their in-depth interview scripts. The characteristics of the processes were found to be divided into six categories; the lack of systemicity in planning stage for making written test items, the lack of awareness and consideration for the interrelationship between instruction and assessment, the diverse criteria in determining test item types, the difficulties in judging behavioral domains and difficulties of items in the table of specification, the limitation in using teacher`s guides and misunderstanding of teacher`s guides, and the limitation in point and/or content of review and differences depending on the time of review. These can provide some significant guidelines and implications in finding ways to improve pre-service chemistry teachers` ability to make written test items.
Eun Sol Lee,Vin Ryu,Jungwon Choi,Yunhye Oh,Jin Woong Yoon,Hyeree Han,Hyeon Hong,Hye Jung Son,Ji Hyun Lee,Subin Park 대한신경정신의학회 2022 PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION Vol.19 No.11
Objective Disruptive behavior disorder (DBD) adversely impacts children and adolescents. However, a comprehensive and cost-effective scale to assess DBD is lacking in Korea. Therefore, this study translated the Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale (DBDRS) into Korean and analyzed its psychometric properties.Methods Parents and primary caregivers of non-clinical (n=429) and clinical (n=28) children and adolescents aged 6–15 years were included in the analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted; further, concurrent validity and internal consistency were investigated using correlation analysis and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. Furthermore, discriminative capacity was estimated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.Results The four-factor model of K-DBDRS showed good model fit indices and factor loadings, which supported the construct validity of the scale. Strong correlations between K-DBDRS and related measurements were observed, and a robust level of Cronbach’s alpha was confirmed (0.891–0.933). The discriminative capacity of the scale was good, based on the area under the curve values (0.933–0.953).Conclusion This study indicated that the K-DBDRS is an appropriate screening tool for Korean children and adolescents. Thus, this scale can be applied in clinical and community settings to identify children and adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders.