http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Word Recognition by Neural Networks Using Adaptive Mel-Cepstral Analysis
Hoya, Tetsuya,Ihara, Hitoshi,Asano, Takamitsu,Ishida, Yoshihisa 대한전자공학회 1994 ISPACS:Intelligent Signal Processing and Communica Vol.1 No.1
Neural networks have played an important role in many fields of signal processing. One of the fruitful application using neural networks is the development of speech recognition system. In this paper, a practical word recognition system using the technique of adaptive mel-cepstral analysis is presented. The experimental results show the proposed method is suitable for the practical word recognition system.
Endocuff-Assisted versus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Performed by Trainees: A Retrospective Study
Yutaka Okagawa,Tetsuya Sumiyoshi,Yusuke Tomita,Shutaro Oiwa,Fumihiro Ogata,Takashi Jin,Masahiro Yoshida,Ryoji Fujii,Takeyoshi Minagawa,Kohtaro Morita,Hideyuki Ihara,Michiaki Hirayama,Hitoshi Kondo 대한소화기내시경학회 2020 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.53 No.3
Background/Aims: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) of screening colonoscopies performed by trainees is often lower than thatof colonoscopies performed by experts. The effcacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) in adenoma detection is well documented,especially that of CACs performed by trainees. Endocuff, a new endoscopic cap, is reportedly useful for adenoma detection; however,no trials have compared the effcacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and CAC conducted by trainees. Therefore, the presentstudy retrospectively compared the effcacy between EAC and CAC in trainees. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study involving 305 patients who underwent either EAC or CAC performed by threetrainees between January and December 2018. We evaluated the ADR, mean number of adenomas detected per patient (MAP), cecalintubation rate, cecal intubation time, and occurrence of complications between the EAC and CAC groups. Results: The ADR was significantly higher in the EAC group than in the CAC group (54.3% vs. 37.3%, p=0.019), as was the MAP (1.36vs. 0.74, p=0.003). No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to the cecal intubation rate or cecal intubationtime. No major complications occurred in either group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that EAC exhibits increased ADR and MAP compared to CAC when performed by trainees.