http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Infectious peritonitis after endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage in a patient with ascites
Nozomi Okuno,Kazuo Hara,Nobumasa Mizuno,Takamichi Kuwahara,Hiromichi Iwaya,Masahiro Tajika,Tsutomu Tanaka,Makoto Ishihara,Yutaka Hirayama,Sachiyo Onishi,Kazuhiro Toriyama,Ayako Ito,Naosuke Kuraoka,Shi 소화기인터벤션의학회 2018 Gastrointestinal Intervention Vol.7 No.1
Summary of Event Bacterial, mycotic peritonitis and Candida fungemia developed in a patient with moderate ascites who had undergone endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). Antibiotics and antifungal agent were administered and ascites drainage was performed. Although the infection improved, the patient’s general condition gradually deteriorated due to aggravation of the primary cancer and he died. Teaching Point This is the first report to describe infectious peritonitis after EUS-BD. Ascites carries the potential risk of severe complications. As such, in patients with ascites, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is typically preferred over EUS-BD or percutaneous drainage to prevent bile leakage. However, ERCP may not be possible in some patients with tumor invasion of the duodenum or with surgically altered anatomy. Thus, in patients with ascites who require EUS-BD, we recommend inserting the drainage tube percutaneously and draining the ascites before and after the intervention in order to prevent severe infection.
Endocuff-Assisted versus Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Performed by Trainees: A Retrospective Study
Yutaka Okagawa,Tetsuya Sumiyoshi,Yusuke Tomita,Shutaro Oiwa,Fumihiro Ogata,Takashi Jin,Masahiro Yoshida,Ryoji Fujii,Takeyoshi Minagawa,Kohtaro Morita,Hideyuki Ihara,Michiaki Hirayama,Hitoshi Kondo 대한소화기내시경학회 2020 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.53 No.3
Background/Aims: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) of screening colonoscopies performed by trainees is often lower than thatof colonoscopies performed by experts. The effcacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) in adenoma detection is well documented,especially that of CACs performed by trainees. Endocuff, a new endoscopic cap, is reportedly useful for adenoma detection; however,no trials have compared the effcacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and CAC conducted by trainees. Therefore, the presentstudy retrospectively compared the effcacy between EAC and CAC in trainees. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study involving 305 patients who underwent either EAC or CAC performed by threetrainees between January and December 2018. We evaluated the ADR, mean number of adenomas detected per patient (MAP), cecalintubation rate, cecal intubation time, and occurrence of complications between the EAC and CAC groups. Results: The ADR was significantly higher in the EAC group than in the CAC group (54.3% vs. 37.3%, p=0.019), as was the MAP (1.36vs. 0.74, p=0.003). No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to the cecal intubation rate or cecal intubationtime. No major complications occurred in either group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that EAC exhibits increased ADR and MAP compared to CAC when performed by trainees.
Infectious peritonitis after endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage in a patient with ascites
Nozomi Okuno,Kazuo Hara,Nobumasa Mizuno,Takamichi Kuwahara,Hiromichi Iwaya,Masahiro Tajika,Tsutomu Tanaka,Makoto Ishihara,Yutaka Hirayama,Sachiyo Onishi,Kazuhiro Toriyama,Ayako Ito,Naosuke Kuraoka,Shi 소화기인터벤션의학회 2018 International journal of gastrointestinal interven Vol.7 No.1
Summary of Event Bacterial, mycotic peritonitis and Candida fungemia developed in a patient with moderate ascites who had undergone endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). Antibiotics and antifungal agent were administered and ascites drainage was performed. Although the infection improved, the patient’s general condition gradually deteriorated due to aggravation of the primary cancer and he died. Teaching Point This is the first report to describe infectious peritonitis after EUS-BD. Ascites carries the potential risk of severe complications. As such, in patients with ascites, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is typically preferred over EUS-BD or percutaneous drainage to prevent bile leakage. However, ERCP may not be possible in some patients with tumor invasion of the duodenum or with surgically altered anatomy. Thus, in patients with ascites who require EUS-BD, we recommend inserting the drainage tube percutaneously and draining the ascites before and after the intervention in order to prevent severe infection. Summary of Event Bacterial, mycotic peritonitis and Candida fungemia developed in a patient with moderate ascites who had undergone endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). Antibiotics and antifungal agent were administered and ascites drainage was performed. Although the infection improved, the patient’s general condition gradually deteriorated due to aggravation of the primary cancer and he died. Teaching Point This is the first report to describe infectious peritonitis after EUS-BD. Ascites carries the potential risk of severe complications. As such, in patients with ascites, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is typically preferred over EUS-BD or percutaneous drainage to prevent bile leakage. However, ERCP may not be possible in some patients with tumor invasion of the duodenum or with surgically altered anatomy. Thus, in patients with ascites who require EUS-BD, we recommend inserting the drainage tube percutaneously and draining the ascites before and after the intervention in order to prevent severe infection.
Al Hawi Yasmeen,Nagao Mizuho,Furuya Kanae,Sato Yasunori,Ito Setsuko,Hori Hiroki,Hirayama Masahiro,Fujisawa Takao 대한천식알레르기학회 2021 Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research Vol.13 No.1
Purpose: ImmunoCAP® (ImmunoCAP) and IMMULITE® 2000 3gAllergy™ (3gAllergy) systems are major quantitative allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) assay methods. Due to the heterogeneous nature of allergenic extracts and differences in the assay format, quantitation of allergen-sIgEs is not expected to correlate well between different methods. However, we have recently reported good agreement between the methods in the diagnosis of egg allergy. This study aimed to determine and correlate the predictive values of sIgE by the two systems in the diagnosis of milk and wheat allergies. Methods: Children who had undergone oral food challenge (OFC) for the diagnosis of milk and wheat allergies were enrolled. The OFCs were performed to diagnose either true allergy in the 1-year-old group (A) or tolerance in the 2- to 6-year-old group (B). Milk, casein and β-lactoglobulin, and wheat and ω-5 gliadin sIgE values were measured using the 2 systems. The predictive accuracy of each sIgE for the OFC outcome was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The probability of a positive OFC outcome was estimated by logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 395 patients were recruited from 7 primary care clinics and 19 hospitals in Japan. Milk and wheat OFCs were performed for 87 and 102 group A patients, and 124 and 82 group B patients, respectively. ROC analysis yielded similar areas under the curve for the 2 assays (0.7–0.9). The log-transformed sIgE data showed a strong linear correlation with the estimated probabilities (R > 0.9). Conclusions: The 2 systems may be interchangeable for diagnosis of milk and wheat allergies in young children.