정치교육의 과제와 이념

이규호 한국국민윤리학회 1976 倫理硏究 Vol.5 No.1

국제지적재산소송원칙의 개요와 활용방안에 대한 연구

이규호 한국지식재산연구원 2014 지식재산연구 Vol.9 No.1

Hague Conference on Private International Law drafted a DraftConvention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil andCommercial Matters in 1999. This Draft failed to attract wide supportfrom the Member countries. Especially, the Draft did not succeed inharmonizing the interests of the Member countries in terms ofintellectual property rights. As soon as this Hague project appeared tobe unsuccessful, the legal scholars in America, Europe, and Asia (i.e.,Korea and Japan) had engaged in new projects in order to proposeprinciples applicable to transnational intellectual property disputes in anenforceable way. Globalization and complexity of international IPdisputes and the development of the Internet have naturally resulted inthe birth of these projects. These projects has yielded the Principles theIntellectual Property: Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law,and Judgments in Transnational Disputes(hereinafter ‘ALI Principles’)drafted by the American Law Institute on May 14th, 2007, thePrinciples for Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property drafted by theEuropean Max Planx Group on December 1st, 2011(hereinafter ‘CLIPPrinciples’), the Principles of Private International Law on IntellectualProperty Rights finalized jointly by private international law scholars inKorea and Japan on October 14th, 2010(hereinafter ‘The JointJapanese-Korean Proposal(Waseda Principles)’ or “Waseda-KoreanPrinciples”) and the Principles on International Intellectual Property Litigation approved by Korea Private International LawAssociation(‘KOPILA Principles’) on March 26th, 2010. This Article aims at delving into the overview of the KOPILAPrinciples and its application to legal practices. This Article concludesthat the KOPILA Principles can be applied to legal practices related toIP contracts and negotiation for bilateral IP-related treaty between twocountries, and play a key role as Asian model law, legislative materials,basic materials for creating case law, and international norms. 한국국제사법학회가 2010년 3월 26일 승인한 우리나라의‘국제지적재산소송원칙’은 헤이그 국제사법회의에서 1999년“국제재판관할과 외국재판의 승인및 집행에 관한 조약안(이하‘헤이그예비초안’이라 한다)”, 2007년 5월 14일제정된 미국법률협회(The American Law Institute)의“지적재산: 섭외적 분쟁에서 재판관할, 준거법 및 재판을 규율하는 원칙[Intellectual Property:Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, and Judgmentsin Transnational Disputes(이하‘ALI원칙’이라고 한다)]”, 2011년 12월 1일 제정된“유럽 막스 프랑크 그룹(The European Max Plank Group, 이하‘EMPG’라고 한다)”의“지적재산에 관한 저촉법원칙[Principles for Conflictof Laws in Intellectual Property(이하‘CLIP원칙’이라고 한다)]”등을 참고로 하여 탄생한 원칙이다. 국제지적재산소송원칙은 국제적 지적재산분쟁의 국제재판관할, 준거법, 외국재판의 승인 및 집행뿐만 아니라 중재에 관한 원칙을 정함을 그 목적으로 한다. 국제지적재산소송원칙은 지적재산에 관한 민·상사분쟁(지적재산권의 성립·유효성 분쟁을 포함한다)에 적용한다. 본고는 이 국제지적재산소송원칙의 주요내용(국제재판관할, 준거법, 외국재판의 승인 및 집행, 중재 등)을 고찰한 다음, 이 원칙의 활용방안을 집중적으로 살펴본다. 본고는 그 활용방안으로서 (i) 지적재산권 거래 관련 계약실무에의 활용방안, (ii) 양자간 협정에서의 활용방안, (iii) 아시아 모델로서의 활용방안, (iv) 입법자료로서의 활용방안, (v) 판례 형성의 기초자료로서의 활용방안 및 (vi) 국제적규범 모델로서의 활용방안 등을 제시하고 있다.

사회도덕에 관한 범죄의 구성요건

이규호 한국사법행정학회 2017 사법행정 Vol.58 No.7

남성의 화장품 구매 실태에 관한 연구

이규호,곽승준,이나겸,김병관 국제보건미용학회 2017 국제보건미용학회지 Vol.11 No.1

As the social culture that takes the appearance of male and female as their abilities spreads and ideal male image changes in the intensive competition society such as nowadays, this study was willing to investigate the status of purchasing cosmetics by male. It analyzed the male knowledge of cosmetics, purchasing status, 3 factors of satisfaction, age and academic career, difference analysis along occupation and how the knowledge of cosmetics influences on purchasing status using factor analysis, analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis. As the results of analysis, it appeared that the factor of cosmetics-using satisfaction shows the significant difference in age and academic career and the factor of cosmetics-knowledge does so in academic career. It also appeared that the factor of cosmetics-knowledge influences on status of purchasing cosmetics and using-satisfaction with very high positive (+) strength at the level of p<.001 and showed the results that using-satisfaction gets lowered as cosmetics-knowledge gets higher.

생물교사 양성기관의 전공 교과목에 관한 연구

이규호,김성하 韓國生物敎育學會 1997 생물교육 Vol.25 No.2

Our study attempted to provide with helpful suggestions to set up the common curricula of the biology teacher training institutes. In particular, the emphasis was given to explore the major courses of the curricula. The analysis of six high school biology textbooks shows that they consist of the subjects such as $quot;Physiology,$quot; $quot;Genetics,$quot; $quot;Taxonomy,$quot; $quot;Cell Biology,$quot; $quot;Biochemistry,$quot; $quot;Embryology,$quot; $quot;Histology,$quot; $quot;Behavioral Science$quot; in the order of quantity and importance, We also asked biology teachers to select ten required and elective courses they thought to be important. Then, the courses were statistically analyzed in terms of frequency and importance. Although the teachers agreed with each other about the major university curricula and courses, but the priority numbers of their choice were different. The most mentioned are $quot;Cell Biology,$quot; $quot;Genetics,$quot; $quot;Animal Physiology,$quot; $quot;Plant Physiology,$quot; and $quot;General Biology.$quot; Thus, we recommend that these courses be included in the major courses of the biology teacher training institutes

증인의 권리와 의무

이규호 한국사법행정학회 2016 사법행정 Vol.57 No.7

불기소처분의 불복제도와 고발인의 형법상 재정신청 대상범죄

이규호 한국사법행정학회 2020 사법행정 Vol.61 No.6

구성요건적 고의와 착오

이규호 한국사법행정학회 2017 사법행정 Vol.58 No.10

한시비평의 비교문학적 고찰

이규호 우리말글학회 1983 우리말 글 Vol.1 No.-

기자의 취재원 보호와 증언거부권

이규호 한국민사소송법학회 2012 민사소송 Vol.16 No.2

According to Article 315 of Korean Civil Procedure Act, a witness may refuse to testify when he or she is examined on matters falling under his or her technical or professional secrets. In this regard, one of the key issues is whether a reporter's privilege falls under the scope of professional secrets. The reporter's privilege raises different questions than other professional secrets. The professional secrets claimed by attorneys, medical doctors,psychotherapists, and clergy members are designed to protect the client's or patient's private statements from disclosure. With the reporter's privilege,however, it is the reporter who is seeking protection for the right to publish or broadcast the source's information while keeping the source's identity secret. Although confidentiality may also protect the source, the privilege's primary goal is to protect the reporter's freedom of speech to publish the news without government interference. There are divided approaches in Korea as to whether the reporter's privilege is absolute. I think the reporter's privilege is not absolute. Hence, a court should take into account several factors by a balancing test in order for it to allow the reporter's privilege. Those factors include public interest in keeping the news sources' identity secret, the existence of alternative evidence, burden of proof, and the importance of secrecy of the news sources'identity. The balancing test will support constitutional value of the freedom of speech. At the outset, this Article will explore the overview, history and legal sources of the reporter's privilege. Second, the Article will discuss whom the reporter's privilege protects and what the privilege protects. Third, the Article will explain how to apply the privilege in America and Japan. Finally, the Article will propose whom the reporter's privilege protects,what the privilege protects, and how to apply the privilege in Korea.