http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
신고전학파 경제학의 변화와 한국학계의 수용 (1960~2006년)
홍훈 한국사회경제학회 2007 사회경제평론 Vol.- No.29-1
이 논문은 신고전학파의 최근 변화를 살펴보고, 이에 대한 한국학계의 수용 정도를 진단하는데 목표를 두고 있다. 일반균형에 의존하는 신고전학파의 특징은 이론에서 합리적 개인과 시장기구로, 방법론에서 개체주의와 반증주의로, 사회철학에서 자연 상태와 최소한의 정부로 규정된다. 최근 신고전학파는 선호나 기술 등 외생변수들을 내생화하고, 여타 학문의 대상들을 자신의 영역으로 흡수하고 있다. 무엇보다 행동경제학 등이 새로 생겨나 인간의 합리성과 이에 근거한 기대효용이론에 강한 의문을 제기하고 있다. 일반균형분석과 게임이론을 관통하는 기대효용이론과 달리 행동경제학은 인간의 행위에 있어 무의식적인 과정과 감성을 강조하고, 판단이나 의사결정이 준거점이나 문맥에 의존한다고 주장한다. 한국의 학계는 이런 변동을 별로 수용하지 못하고 있다. This paper purports to review recent breakthroughs in neoclassical economics and to examine whether they are properly accommodated into the Korean academia. General equilibrium system which, up to the seventies, had been the hardcore of neoclassical economics is characterized by: agents' rationality and price mechanism; methodological individualism and critical rationalism; doctrines of the state of nature and the minimal state. In recent decades, neoclassical economics turned around to endeavor to endogenize parameters such as preference or technology which used to be taken as exogenous. Moreover, expanding its domain, it has invaded into other disciplines. Most strikingly, behavioral economics which was born nearby the neoclassical tradition casts serious doubts on the expected utility model. This model which is based on the postulate of perfect rationality runs through general equilibrium analysis and game theory. Contrary to the claims of this model, behavioral economists put emphasis on the roles of automatic processes and affections in decision-making. More to the point, they argue that choices are sensitively dependent upon references and contexts. It is regrettable that Korean neoclassical economics lags so behind its American counterpart that almost none of the forementioned changes has been transmitted into the academia.
Common Sense and Economic Knowledge: Marx versus Keynes
홍훈 경상대학교 사회과학연구원 2009 마르크스주의 연구 Vol.6 No.2
This paper attempts to assign proper places to common sense and scientific knowledge in Marx’ and Keynes’systems. Marx conceives common sense both as the starting‐point and as the end‐point of knowledge. For him, scientific investigation starts from common sense, constructs basic categories, and ends up with forging links between the categories and common sense notions. As a result, common sense is reconstructed and subsumed as part of either knowledge or ideology. In Keynes’works, common sense is not entirely subsumed as part of theory or ideology. On his view, common sense, due to its autonomy, serves as checks on economic theory as regards its questions and its implications. Despite these differences, Marx and Keynes share the view that economic theory is neither disembedded from, nor conflated with, common sense and that cognition on the part of theorists and consciousness of agents are interlinked but layered, as illustrated in their concepts of value forms and convention. By these commonalities, Marx’ and Keynes’positions are distinguished from analytic philosophy and from Friedman’ ‘s if’methodology in particular.
RETHINKING THE NOTION OF THE NATURAL IN CLASSICAL POLITICAL ECONOMY
홍훈 한국경제학회 2006 The Korean Economic Review Vol.22 No.2
This paper intends to clarify and evaluate the notion of the natural which constitutes the basis for explanation and justification of a market-based society in classical political economy. This notion is primarily detected in such concepts as natural price, natural wage and differential rent. The notion of the natural which is implicated in these concepts is characterized by the following features: the role of self-interest and instincts on the level of agency, the working of processes of competition and procreation under the constraint of diminishing fertility of land, the inevitability and beneficence of social outcome of these processes. The basic contention of this paper is that the classical notion of the natural is based on what may be dubbed the universally natural and the capitalistically natural which are not easily integrable.