미래 한반도에서의 안정화작전 수행방안 - 6.25전쟁 시 사례분석을 중심으로 -

장보선 ( Jang Bo Seon ) 미래군사학회 2017 한국군사학논총 Vol.6 No.1

US-led coalition forces successfully destroyed Iraqi forces during the Iraqi War in March, 2003. However, the military victory of US-led coalition forces did not result in a political victory. US has made an effort to improve the stabilization measures both national and military level since 2004. Recently ROK forces have also started to recognize the significance of stability operation and studied. Relating to the locations, targets, and aims of war, ROK forces` measures are different from those of the US forces`. For instance, whereas the American purpose of stability operation is aimed at building a new nation outside the mainland, ROK forces` operation is intended for a unified Korea. In this regard, It is necessary to establish a revised concept of stability operation especially for the Korean Peninsula. This study analyzed some of the historical cases that resulted in the successful stabilization, including the unification process of German, James Dobbins` successful condition of nation-building, the Iraq war, and Mao Zedong`s role during the Chinese Civil War. This study identified that the common key elements of driving a stabilization process effectively are ① a complete preparation, ② a legal task enforcement, ③ a comprehensive efforts, and ④ a conflict management. The results of this study are suggested as follows. First, effectiveness of a stabilization enforcement unit should be guaranteed. To do this, the government needs to clarify each role of a combat unit, a stability division, and a civil unit in each stage of operation. A professional joint stability division consisting of civil, governmental, and military units should be also organized. The stability division must be immediately deployed in recovered areas so that it can carry out successfully stability operations as early as possible. Second, public order and administrative system should be settled in early stage. For this, a temporary committee in relation to public order and local administration in each administrative district should be operated. Local representatives, a stability division, government agencies, and police officers are to be included in the committee. Thrid, military integration and WMD control process should be supported. For this, it is necessary to disarm the mobilized enemy and to treat hostile persons and military servants. POW and a deserted soldiers from nK forces should be well managed. WMD facilities should be safely controlled to avoid security risk. Fourth, the government should provide a humanitarian support and secure chances for autonomous economic activities. Finally, the government should minimize conflicts of the people in order to recover homogeneity.

비살상 무기와 작전수행 개념 연구

장보선 ( Jang Bo-seon ) 한국군사학회 2018 군사논단 Vol.94 No.-

Military powers require new tools(weapons) to minimize application of direct military forces but to control warfield effectively, as weapons of mass destructions in the era of Cold War have been recognized as not efficient for new state of affairs of wars due to changes in war environments such as remarkable development of military science and technology, international blame against civilian mass destruction, and increase in war cost required for recovery from mass destructions and damages. Like this, recognition on war has been changing, the most interested sector for the recent some years could be Non-Lethal Weapons. In future war, non-lethal weapons would be applied usefully in the entire process of war. Non-lethal weapons suppress deaths or injuries of human lives or mass destructions and enable to minimize political burden against human killing. It also destroys enemies by minimizing destruction against core facilities and functions, and so it could be useful tool to secure time for diplomatic resolution in the internationally sensitive circumstances. Despite of non-lethal weapons' effects, it could be converted to lethal one in the perspective of goal, and there are problems including anxiety on environmental destruction. However, in future, the application of concept of non-lethal warfare should be more extended. Its operation in strategic level is to paralyze an enemy's intention and will of war and to incapacitate the enemy's system of war map and core foundational facilities. By neutralizing war system before the actual battles, it should be operated to minimize damages in the battles of forces. It should be also operated to maximize its effects by integrating it with existing systems of weapons. During battles, by incapacitating an enemy's battle force system and neutralizing functions of missiles, long-range guns, and mechanized infantries, it should be operated to contribute to lead to definite victory. During an operation of stabilization, it should be operated by focusing on minimizing civilian damages and losses, making friendly environments, and recovering national functions and social orders earlier. In future wars, by integrating the concept of non-lethal warfare, after neutralizing enemies and increasing multiple effects by appropriate physical attacks, the complete victory should be made in the war.

안정화사단 편성방안 연구

장보선 ( Jang Bo-seon ) 한국군사학회 2019 군사논단 Vol.98 No.-

The importance of Stability Operations has been stressed since participation in the U.S.'s wars with Afghanistan and Iraq. The U.S. has pursued the development of stability methods and doctrines since 2003 and the Korean Army has studied and developed the concept of Stability Operations since 2006. However, the Korean Army should still develop the detailed execution plans and use of resources for the Stability Operations. In particular, Korea should organize an army corp that takes charge of the Stability Operations. The Stability Operations need organic combination, or convergence, of the military and non-military sectors under a single command system, but the current stability division has been created to augment the number of corps and military forces in the process of national defense deformation. For that reason, it has been a major issue that the combat-style organization and equipment similar to those of the homeland division are not suitable for the Stability Operations. It has been necessary to resolve this issue and determined that ‘the stability division should be organized with a single command system for the civil, government, and military sectors.’ The organization of new stability division should satisfy the following conditions: first, the organization should be for administrative, security, urgent relief, restoration, and humanitarian support. It is focused on the civil services and the reconstruction of society. Second, there should be an organization within the military staff division to plan and control the Stability Operations and the military administration (siege) services. Third, the fundamental organization should consist of three branches for the operations of each unit of administrative districts and include 3-5 battalions flexibly considering the local needs of each district. Fourth, the reconstruction team should be included in the brigade that executes the operations. Fifth, the support division should be able to maintain its functions and provide minimal humanitarian support. Sixth, the training team should be able to train transferred and local staff. Seventh, each unit of the organization should consist of civil, government, and military staff. Major positions should be occupied by the military and government staff and the working positions by the military, government and local staff. Altogether, a new form of organization is created with the military, government, and local members. Based on the organization of Stability Division, the division was organized with the headquarters, headquarters troops, integrated military staff division, stability brigade, military police battalion, support team, and training battalion. The battalion for the Stability Operations consisted of three branches with three to five security teams and reconstruction teams considering the local needs. The existing civil services unit became a part of the division.

기관지확장제 반응 검사에서 속효성 기관지확장제 투여 용량의 차이가 소기도 반응도에 영향을 줄까?

백지현 ( Ji Hyeon Baek ),장호민 ( Homin Jang ),전유훈 ( You Hoon Jeon ),서보선 ( Bo Seon Seo ),이승진 ( Seung Jin Lee ),지혜미 ( Hye Mi Jee ),이경석 ( Kyung Suk Lee ),정영호 ( Young-ho Jung ),신윤호 ( Youn Ho Sheen ),한만용 ( Man 대한천식알레르기학회 2016 Allergy Asthma & Respiratory Disease Vol.4 No.4

Purpose: It is recommended to use 200 (2 puffs) or 400 (4 puffs) μg of salbutamol in the bronchodilator response (BDR) test. We aimed to compare the difference between these 2 doses with regard to small airway dysfunction.Methods: One hundred sixteen subjects who visited the hospital for diagnosis or follow-up of asthma were consecutively enrolled between June 1 and November 31, 2013. The subjects were randomly assigned to the BDR test at the 2 doses (200 or 400 μg of salbutamol), with physicians blinded to the group each subject was assigned to and undertook the BDR test using the spirometry and impulse oscillometry system (IOS).Results: A total of 116 subjects participated in this study; the mean age was 7.8±3.6 years. The number of participants who were assigned to 2 and 4 puffs groups was 59 and 57, respectively. The mean age was older in the 4 puffs group than in the 2 puffs group (P=0.008). There were no significant difference in spirometric and oscillometric parameters between the 2 and 4 puffs groups. However, in subgroup analysis of asthmatic patients on maintenance therapy (n=21), there was a significant difference in relative changes in Rrs5 between the 2 and 4 puffs groups (16.4%±9.6% vs. 28.7%±8.8%, P=0.035). The forced expiratory volume of 1 second showed a significant correlation with resistance in the 2 puffs group and with reactance in the 4 puffs group.Conclusion: There was a significant relationship between the amounts of bronchodilators administered and the small airway dysfunction in children with asthma on maintenance therapy. Further research is warranted to delineate changes in spirometric and IOS measures in accordance with the different amounts of bronchodilators administered. (Allergy Asthma Respir Dis 2016:4:284-289)