http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이홍복,이성규,변종훈,전인석,김웅봉,두창준,김정례 대한내분비학회 1988 Endocrinology and metabolism Vol.3 No.2
Adrenal myelolipoma is uncommon, nonfunctioning benign tumor, is composed of hemato-poietic cells and fat cells, which simulates the bone marrow. In most cases, this tumor is found incidnetally at autopsy. The advent of cross-sectional abdominal imaging technique has increased the incidence of this tumor, and the importance of the tumor has emphasized among the adrenal diseases. This tumor can be diagnosed by ultrasound and CT which show avasculr, highly fatty mass chatacterestically, and can be confirmed by fine-needle aspiration. Myelolipoma, in most, does not need any treatment, especially surgical removal. So, clinician do his or her best to avoid useless operation on facing such nonfunctioning adrenal tumor.
日ㆍ韓両国語における「スル」形と「hanta」形 ー「概念構成」の形式としての把握ー
이홍복 한국일본학회 2008 日本學報 Vol.74 No.-
日ㆍ韓両言語において、もっとも基本的と考えられる述語形式は、「スル」形と「hanta」形であろう。しか し、両形式は、時間的な意味に注目すると、「未来」対「現在」と大きな食い違いが生じる。 本稿では、最も基本的な述語形式は、述語的意味が最も消極的であり、単に事態を構成するだけの形式、 概念構成形式であるという考えに立ち、「スル」形を事態の「概念構成」形式と把握する尾上圭介氏の理論を 參考に、「hanta」形の意味ㆍ用法との対照を通じて、「hanta」形も「スル」形と同様、「概念構成」形式と 主張する。 「スル」形と「hanta」形を消極的な述語形式であると把握することで、①「未来」あるいは「現在」以外の 意味、用法を実は多様に持ちうることを説明することができる。②「スル」形と「hanta」形がおびる時間性のず れについては、形式の消極性ゆえに、それが表す意味は、他の助動詞との張り合いの結果によって決まるもので あるからだという解釈を与えることができる。
홍복기(Hong Bok-Ki) 한국법학원 2006 저스티스 Vol.- No.94
법무부 회사법 개정특별위원회가 2005년 7월에 구성되어 그동안 여러 차례의 논의 끝에 개정시안을 마련하였다. 회사법 개정시안은 크게 기업 지배구조의 개선, 기업경영의 IT화, 재무관리의 자율성 도모 및 새로운 회사형태의 도입 등으로 요약될 수 있다. 특히 지배구조의 개선과 관련하여 사외이사의 개념규정의 신설, 집행임원제도의 도입, 이중대표소송제도의 도입, 이사의 자기거래 승인대상의 확대, 이사의 책임감경제도의 도입 등을 들 수 있다. 이에 대한 개정시안을 마련하는 과정에서 격론이 있었으나 현재의 골격을 유지하기로 하였으며, 따라서 지배구조개선에 관한 기본 입법방향에 대하여는 큰 변화가 없으며, 1999년 이후에 이루어진 상법개정사항을 보완하는 차원에서 이루어졌다. 오랜 관행으로 남아있던 기업의 지배구조의 문제점이 불과 몇 년 동안의 법개정만으로는 시정될 수 없으며, 이를 기업운영과정에서 연착륙할 수 있도록 관련 법제도를 개선?보완하는 노력이 꾸준히 전개되어야 할 것이다.
홍복기 한국상사법학회 2014 商事法硏究 Vol.33 No.2
Over fifty years have passed since the Korean Commercial Act came into force in 1963. The Korean Commercial Act has been amended about twenty times so far, and the recent amendments made in 2011 represent the most large-scale revisions to the Act since its inception. The 2011 amendments have mainly amended the part of corporate law under the Korean Commercial Act in order to strengthen the competitiveness of Korean companies in international markets by establishing effective forms of corporate governance and market-oriented discipline. For instance, not only the regulatory scope of self-dealing restrictions is extended, but also the prohibition from usurping corporate opportunities, which is suitable for calling a revolutionary change in the business world, is newly introduced. At the beginning of new government in 2013, a new amendment proposal of the Korean Commercial Act was published. This is politically a fulfillment of the president’s public promise and legally a complementary measures for the 2011 amendments. The contents of the 2013 proposal include: the separate election of director who will be a member of audit committee in the listed corporation and a voting right limitation to any shareholder who holds more than 3/100 of the total issued and outstanding shares; introduction of the cumulative voting system and a mandatory electronic voting system in the listed corporation; introduction of double derivative suits; and prohibition of concurrently assuming the status of both officer and a chairman of the board of directors in the corporation which established a audit committee, including a enforcement of a officer system. The distinctive feature of the 2013 proposal is that most rules are mandatory ones applicable to the listed corporation or the corporation which is determined by Presidential Decree in consideration of the size of assets, etc. It is a very strong legislative approach compared with the 2011 amendments, which admits corporate self autonomy. The 2013 draft bill is ineffective at present due to the business group’s strong resistance, but there are rooms still left for the reargument in future. Nevertheless, Korean corporate law will be continually developed, globalized, and settled down through the efforts of resolving difficult conflicts around the corporation. How can we develop effectively our corporate law? It is a task of us all. This paper as a whole examined the recent amendment progress of corporate law, globalization of the corporate law, and some core legal issues related to Korean corporate law, which includes as follows: problems of severely unbalanced use of corporate forms, making a independent code of corporate law, difficulties in corporate governance, revitalization of the electronic shareholder’s meetings, fiduciary duty of the controlling shareholders, reorganization of the corporation. Finally, the author of this paper emphasized the appropriate role and the mission of corporate law to advance the aggregate national welfare by quoting the statements of other prominent scholars.