부동산의 이중양도와 원상회복

윤진수 한국민사법학회 1986 民事法學 Vol.6 No.-

유치권 및 저당권설정청구권에 관한 민법개정안

윤진수 한국민사법학회 2013 民事法學 Vol.63 No.1

The Korean Civil Code grants the possessory lien to certain types ofcreditors. According to the Code, the creditor has a right to remain inpossession of the property under the lien until the debtor has satisfied hisor her debt. The possessory lien on an immovable, however, has beencriticized for its adverse aspects. Critics’ arguments are twofold. To begin with, the possessory lien on animmovable is not registered in the register. Hence, other creditors such asregistered mortgagees have difficulty recognizing the existence of thepossessory lien. This is detrimental to certainty of transaction. Further, therequirement of the possession of an immovable by the possessory liencreditor leads to inefficient result, since no one is entitled to use theimmovable in an efficient manner once the possession is taken. Against this backdrop, the Civil Code Revision Committee of theDepartment of Justice has prepared the Korean Civil Code revision draft toaddress this issue. The outline of the draft is as follows. Firstly, the possessory lien on an immovable is no longer allowed exceptwhen an unregistered immovable is at issue. Even in this exceptional case,the creditor must demand the registration of mortgage within 6 monthsafter an immovable is registered. Once registered, the mortgage is deemedto have existed from the time when the debt is due. Secondly, the creditor who had made certain expenditure on anregistered immovable can demand the registration of the mortgage without the consent of the debtor or the owner of the immovable. This registeredmortgage has the same effect as other registered mortgages. This meansthat the mortgagee cannot assert his or her mortgage over other priormortgages. The above draft is now under its way to final legislation.

UI-IWG 회의 보고

윤진수 한국컴퓨터통신연구회 1993 OSIA Standards & Technology Review Vol.7 No.1

법정지상권 성립후 건물을 취득한 자의 지위(상) - 대법원 85.4.9 선고 84다카 1131 1132 판결 -

윤진수 한국사법행정학회 1986 사법행정 Vol.27 No.5

법정지상권 성립후 건물을 취득한 자의 지위(중) - 대법원 85.4.9 선고 84다카 1131 1132 판결 -

윤진수 한국사법행정학회 1986 사법행정 Vol.27 No.6

박근혜 정부의 중간점검 및 향후 정책과제 : 제1회 ; 제7분과 <공공기관정책특별기획2: 공공기관 지배구조와 이사회> : 기업지배구조의 현황과 평가

윤진수 한국정책학회 2015 한국정책학회 학술대회 Vol.2015 No.-

미성년 자녀를 둔 성전환자의 성별정정

윤진수 서울대학교 법학연구소 2020 서울대학교 法學 Vol.61 No.3

The plenary decision of the Korean Supreme Court on September 2, 2011 declared that a transgender who has a minor child cannot request the change of his/her sex designation on the family register. This paper deals with this decision critically. This decision reasoned that the change of sex designation of the transgender parent would cause the minor child mental chaos and shock. Furthermore, when the submission of the family relation certificate is necessary, the child should submit the certificate which has the appearance of same-sex marriage. The literature on this topic in Korea is divided. There is no jurisdiction which requires the absence of the minor child for the change of sex designation of transgender parent except Japan. However, against the Japanese law there is strong criticism. In my opinion, not allowing the change of sex designation to prevent the mental shock of the minor child is unpersuasive, as the mental shock, if any, would result from the physical change of the transgender parent, not from the change of sex designation on the family register. So it does not fulfill the suitability of means, which is a subprinciple of the proportionality principle required to limit the human right. The real motive of the decision may be the concern that the child will suffer by the disclosure of the fact that her parent is transgender to other people. However, this argument is problematic, as it presupposes the discrimination and prejudice against transgenders. Lastly, the disadvantage to the transgender parent brought by the denial of the change of sex designation is far greater than the disadvantage to the minor child by the change of sex designation of his/her parent. So the presence of the minor child should not be regarded as a huddle to change of sex designation. 대법원ﾠ2011. 9. 2.ﾠ자ﾠ2009스117ﾠ전원합의체 결정은, 성전환자에게 미성년자인 자녀가 있는 경우에는 성별정정을 허가할 수 없다고 하였다. 이 글에서는 이 결정이 과연 타당한 것인지를 살펴본다. 위 결정은 그 이유로 성전환자에게 미성년자인 자녀가 있음에도 성별정정을 허용한다면 미성년자인 자녀는 정신적 혼란과 충격에 노출될 수 있고, 성별정정을 허용하게 되면 가족관계증명서상 동성혼의 외관이 현출될 수밖에 없으며, 미성년자인 자녀는 가족관계증명서가 요구될 때마다 동성혼의 외관이 현출된 가족관계증명서를 제출할 수밖에 없다는 점을 들었다. 국내의 문헌상으로는 이 문제가 많이 논의되고 있지는 않으나, 이 결정에 찬성하는 견해와 반대하는 견해가 발표된 바 있다. 성전환자의 성별정정을 허가함에 있어서 미성년 자녀가 존재하지 않을 것을 요구하는 나라는 일본을 제외하고는 거의 찾기 어렵다. 일본의 판례는 자녀가 존재하지 않을 것을 요구하는 것이 위헌이 아니라고 보았으나, 이에 대하여는 비판이 많다. 생각건대 자녀들이 충격을 받는다고 하더라도 이는 성별정정 허가 자체에 의한 것이 아니고, 그 전의 부 또는 모의 변화에 의한 것이므로, 자녀의 심리적 충격을 막기 위하여 성별정정을 불허하는 것은 타당하지 않다. 이는 기본권 제한에 관한 비례의 원칙 가운데 방법의 적정성이 결여된 것이라고 할 수 있다. 또한 대상결정의 진의는 가족관계증명서의 기재에 의하여 부나 모가 성전환을 하였다는 사실이 다른 사람에게 알려짐으로써 자녀가 고통을 받을 것임을 우려하는 것으로 이해할 수 있으나, 이는 성전환자에 대한 사회적 차별과 편견을 기정사실로 하여, 미성년 자녀가 이에 노출되어서는 안 된다는 것으로서, 문제가 있는 논증이다. 그리고 미성년 자녀를 둔 성전환자의 성별정정을 불허하는 것이 성전환자에게 주는 불이익이 성별정정 허가에 의하여 미성년 자녀가 입는 불이익보다 훨씬 크므로, 미성년 자녀가 있다는 것만으로 성별정정을 불허하여서는 안 될 것이다.

채권자취소권에 관한 민법 개정안 연구

윤진수,권영준 한국민사법학회 2014 民事法學 Vol.66 No.-

The Korean Civil Code (hereinafter “KCC”), which was first enacted back in 1960, is a fundamental norm governing legal relationships among private entities. Since the enactment of the KCC, Korean society has experienced drastic changes in various aspects. However, the KCC has never been comprehensively amended up to now. Against this backdrop, there has been a constant call for the comprehensive amendment of the KCC. In response, the Ministry of Justice has carried out an ambitious legal project of amending the KCC since 2009. As of January 2014, the final amendment draft is about to be completed. This article aims to address major changes envisaged in the draft specifically concerning a fraudulent transfer. The draft reflects detailed legal doctrines regarding a fraudulent transfer developed by the courts and the legal academia, and attempts to minimize legal uncertainty by presenting detailed rules on many issues, thereby increasing the number of provisions from two to ten. The draft intends to enhance coherence and consistency between bankruptcy law and civil law. In its efforts to synchronize both fields of law, the draft follows the rules set forth in the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act by presuming the intention of a transferee on fraudulency of the transfer only when the transferee is in special relationship with a debtor (Draft Article 406②), distinguishing between a transfer for value and a gratuitous transfer (Draft Article 406-2), and putting separate provisions regarding the legal position of a transferee and the second transferee (Draft Article 407-5, 6). The draft also aims to strike a proper balance between a creditor and a transferee as well as among creditors. For example, the draft places the burden of proof on the intention of a transferee on a creditor rather than on a transferee (Draft Article 406①), while shifting such burden on a transferee when he or she is in special relationship with a debtor (Draft Article 406②). The draft, in case of recovering money from a transferee, allows all creditors to raise their claims during the period of 3 months while allowing the avoiding creditor to satisfy his or her claim first when there is no competing claimant appearing during the above period (Draft Article 407-4, Draft Civil Execution Act Article 248-2). Although there may be pros and cons of the draft, it is indeed a sign of noteworthy achievement after lengthy efforts to incorporate proper solutions to numerous legal issues on the fraudulent transfer. It remains to be seen whether or not this draft will finally be enacted in the near future. Yet, the draft itself is certainly worthy of being reviewed from an academic point of view even before its enactment.

자율주행차량의 도로 기하구조를 고려한 에코드라이빙 주행 전략

윤진수,배상훈 한국ITS학회 2017 한국ITS학회 학술대회 Vol.2017 No.04

損害賠償의 方法으로서의 原狀回復: 民法改正案을 계기로 하여

윤진수 한국비교사법학회 2003 비교사법 Vol.10 No.1